Community > Posts By > shovelheaddave

 
shovelheaddave's photo
Tue 08/07/18 04:10 PM




It was on a tv program yesterday discussing FB. And. They can give your personal information to Banks and other corporations for advertising purposes on FB.

Not sure if this is correct, but if so, it is not good.


Facebook wants access to big banks user accounts.

I value my privacy too much to give Facebook that much control.

They botched it on Cambridge Analytica. I don't see good things coming from this.

Facebook can't do squat on this front. That's why they're asking for banks to hand over the data, which in and of itself is shady. They may make it sound like they're "asking", but given how powerful they think they are, they think they can push big banks like Chase around.

OF COURSE they want access to that information!!!
they want acces to ALL the information the can get on EVERYBODY!!!

that's because there isn't enough regulation to protect people's privacy,and their personal information on these websites!

if the government gets involved in these sites,then the personal information that they are allowed to collect,and use,and what they are allowed to use it for will ALSO be heavily regulated,for the good of the people,unlike NOW,where the sites all hide their agendas in tiny fine print that nobody reads,and pretty much do what they please,so,government regulation on these sites will also ensure that people's privacy,and personal rights are protected,which would also be ANOTHER 'plus' for government control over these sites.


Government already HAS your information. Why would you give them more power to regulate your movement, free association, and who you do business with?

and,just HOW do you associate government FCC regulation of these websites with 'regulating your movements','free association',and 'who you do business with'??

cuz,i just don't see any connection in FCC regulation of a media source,and these things.
you are STILL free to move around the country at will,associate with the people you want to,and do business with whoever you want to.

please explain how you WOULDNT be??
[unless you are wanting to associate with the like of child predators,and anarchistsand associate with people who are harmful to society,in which case,somebody NEEDS to tell you not to do that,if you cant figure that out for yourself!!]

shovelheaddave's photo
Tue 08/07/18 04:05 PM


if the government gets involved in this,then these companies will have to fall under the rule of the Federal Communication Comission (FCC),which was started to regulate medias that the masses use to communicate with each,such as TV,and radio.

social media sites are really no different than those are,and should DEFINITELY be regulated in the same way,since they have the ability to cause great harm to the country,and its citizens if they are used incorrectly...

all you have to do is look at the way that facebook was misused during the last election cycle to realize that,since it almost brought our election system to its knees since there was no regulation to keep it from being hijacked by foreign countries to manipulate our elections,and all of the REAL 'fake news' that it gives to people who just assume that the 'news' stories they are reading are genuine,since they are so used to the FCC having oversight over all media to prevent the spread of false stories from happening on a large scale.

so,YES,due to the fact that there are now sites that have even more reach than TV,and radio does,i believe that LARGE social media sites like FB MUST be regulated,for the common good of the country,for which there is already a great precedent in existence,even if you DO happen to think of it as 'censorship',instead of 'public safety'.







Facebook is to blame for it, by allowing third party apps access to their user data once a user download such-and-such app that linked to Facebook.

In other words, users voluntarily gave up their information to third parties by simply installing an app.

Facebook for it's part, shut off that spigot (or so they claim).


that's why I don't use facebook,because I already KNOW what these sites are capable of doing!

and,if they are capable of doing it,then you can pretty much be guaranteed that,without regulations telling them that they CANT do it, they WILL do it!

but,MOST people don't take the time to read all of the fine print,and don't understand what it all means,so they are willing to trade off something that they don't see the value in,or think is as important as it actually is for the 'privilege' of using a site that is DESIGNED to harvest personal information that it can use against people while they are engaging in what they think are 'innocent social activities'
but,all you have to do is realize that if the things that you are freely giving away to them didn't have any value,then why would these huge companies be running these 'free' sites,and making BILLIONS of dollars of profits off of them.

shovelheaddave's photo
Tue 08/07/18 03:55 PM
Edited by shovelheaddave on Tue 08/07/18 03:57 PM


It was on a tv program yesterday discussing FB. And. They can give your personal information to Banks and other corporations for advertising purposes on FB.

Not sure if this is correct, but if so, it is not good.


Facebook wants access to big banks user accounts.

I value my privacy too much to give Facebook that much control.

They botched it on Cambridge Analytica. I don't see good things coming from this.

Facebook can't do squat on this front. That's why they're asking for banks to hand over the data, which in and of itself is shady. They may make it sound like they're "asking", but given how powerful they think they are, they think they can push big banks like Chase around.

OF COURSE they want access to that information!!!
they want acces to ALL the information the can get on EVERYBODY!!!

that's because there isn't enough regulation to protect people's privacy,and their personal information on these websites!

if the government gets involved in these sites,then the personal information that they are allowed to collect,and use,and what they are allowed to use it for will ALSO be heavily regulated,for the good of the people,unlike NOW,where the sites all hide their agendas in tiny fine print that nobody reads,and pretty much do what they please,so,government regulation on these sites will also ensure that people's privacy,and personal rights are protected,which would also be ANOTHER 'plus' for government control over these sites.

shovelheaddave's photo
Tue 08/07/18 03:50 PM
if the government gets involved in this,then these companies will have to fall under the rule of the Federal Communication Comission (FCC),which was started to regulate medias that the masses use to communicate with each,such as TV,and radio.

social media sites are really no different than those are,and should DEFINITELY be regulated in the same way,since they have the ability to cause great harm to the country,and its citizens if they are used incorrectly...

all you have to do is look at the way that facebook was misused during the last election cycle to realize that,since it almost brought our election system to its knees since there was no regulation to keep it from being hijacked by foreign countries to manipulate our elections,and all of the REAL 'fake news' that it gives to people who just assume that the 'news' stories they are reading are genuine,since they are so used to the FCC having oversight over all media to prevent the spread of false stories from happening on a large scale.

so,YES,due to the fact that there are now sites that have even more reach than TV,and radio does,i believe that LARGE social media sites like FB MUST be regulated,for the common good of the country,for which there is already a great precedent in existence,even if you DO happen to think of it as 'censorship',instead of 'public safety'.





shovelheaddave's photo
Tue 08/07/18 03:27 PM
didn't you just start a thread about this yesterday?

shovelheaddave's photo
Tue 08/07/18 10:54 AM


Best pickup line:

"Built FORD tough!"

["Like a rock" not nearly as good to use for a pickup,since rocks tend to sink when they go through a mud puddle,and they are VERY HARD to work on/'fix'!]

laugh


rofl I'm a jeep guy...

Bullet proof...


you are a JEEP guy??

dont worry...
i know where you can get ECMs wholesale!
rofl

shovelheaddave's photo
Tue 08/07/18 10:50 AM
If blondes and bimbos were the same thing, the prefix 'bim' could be used to create new words that describe them:

Bimbabble - noises coming from a group of blondes

Bimbaffled - constant mental state of blondes

Bimbait - short skirts, sheer blouses, string bikinis or other
clothing worn by blondes in an attempt to attract the attention of males

Bimbar - a bar where blondes hang out wearing bimbait

Bimbag - a blonde's purse

Bimbrushes - essential equipment in a bimbag

Bimbastic surgeon - specialist in breast enhancements for blondes

Bimbeeper - special instrument used as a homing device for lost blondes

Bimbellow - sound emanating from a blonde after she finally got the most recent blonde joke she heard

Bimbillion? - a blonde giving an estimate of anything

Bimblaze - the result of a blonde trying to cook

Bimblues - a blonde's state of mind after her latest boyfriend ditched her

Bimboette - a young blonde

Bimbonese - language spoken by blondes, largely unintelligible to anyone else

Bimbonique behavior - airhead behavior, unique to blondes

Bimboozle - to fool a blonde

Bimbore - a blonde who uses "like" more than 10 times in a sentence

Bimbozo - another name for a blonde

Bimboron - a blonde even less intelligent than most other blondes

Bimbrownie - a well-tanned blonde

Bimbrunette - a blonde who dyes her hair brunette, usually to appear smarter than she actually is

Bimburden - blonde carrying too many bags at the mall


shovelheaddave's photo
Tue 08/07/18 10:24 AM
Edited by shovelheaddave on Tue 08/07/18 10:27 AM

Why people on this site are so silent?Why do they not respond??And if they don't not want to talk to anyone then what do they do here to be online for so long??


who says that they are being silent??

maybe it is just like with a dog whistle..
they are really making noise,but you just cant hear it?

but,SOMETIMES,the noise of rejection CAN BE deafening,but not very pleasant,compared to the silence you are hearing.

so,I guess THAT is what you are looking for?

laugh

shovelheaddave's photo
Tue 08/07/18 10:14 AM

Is it possible?


not for EVERYONE!!!

there are LOTS of people out there who,for one reason,or another,go through their whole lives without having a serious relationship.

if you feel that you might be one of these people [and,from the sound of your post,it seems like you do.],then,maybe you need to examine yourself,and your life and try to figure out what changes you might make to make yourself more appealing to people,cuz,eventually,you just have to realize that,"maybe the problem isn't with everyone else"?

shovelheaddave's photo
Tue 08/07/18 09:38 AM
Best pickup line:

"Built FORD tough!"

["Like a rock" not nearly as good to use for a pickup,since rocks tend to sink when they go through a mud puddle,and they are VERY HARD to work on/'fix'!]

laugh

shovelheaddave's photo
Tue 08/07/18 09:32 AM




its only a 1/2 hour until I HAVE TO get up,so I might as well just go ahead and get up now,instead of trying to go back to sleep. '~'

No way....wait for the last 10second countdown then get up lol


I went to sleep a little early last night,so my circadian rhythm wouldn't let me go back to sleep.

stupid circadian rhythm!!!
sad

Well you don’t have to sleep just lay there until the last 10second countdown don’t give those bastards another free minute I say lol


lol
its not like I woke up early and WENT TO WORK!!!! noway

I spent the extra time contsructively....

watching an episode of WKRP in Cincinatti that I DVR'ed!
:thumbsup:

shovelheaddave's photo
Tue 08/07/18 09:30 AM

Nosey people have too much time on their hands. Perhaps if they had a full life, they wouldn't have to invade my privacy.


I agree!!!

they are DEFINITELY some people who need more going on in their lives to distract them from what OTHER people are doing in THEIR lives!!


shovelheaddave's photo
Tue 08/07/18 09:26 AM



Build the Wall!


No, not that one.



Build a wall around Chicago.
Allow no egress.



I saw those movies...

they were called 'escape from new york',and 'escape from L.A."

it didn't seem like they helped fix the government/the united states,cuz the same stuff was STILL going on.

I think the only thing it helped was kurt russel's career.

George Carlin also did a bit about something like that on one of his comedy specials..
I think that I liked HIS ideas better. lol
http://thedailybanter.com/issues/2013/09/09/11-profound-quotes-on-politics-by-george-carlin/


:thumbsup:

shovelheaddave's photo
Tue 08/07/18 09:22 AM
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/06/technology/infowars-alex-jones-apple-facebook-spotify.html

Top technology companies erased most of the posts and videos on their services from Alex Jones, the internet’s notorious conspiracy theorist, thrusting themselves into a fraught debate over their role in regulating what can be said online.

Apple, Google, Facebook and Spotify severely restricted the reach of Mr. Jones and Infowars, his right-wing site that has been a leading peddler of false information online. Mr. Jones and Infowars have used social media for years to spread dark and bizarre theories, such as that the Sandy Hook school shooting was a hoax and that Democrats run a global child-sex ring. Apple made its move on Sunday and the others followed on Monday.

Apple on Sunday removed five of the six Infowars podcasts on its popular Podcasts app. Commenting on the move, a spokeswoman said, “Apple does not tolerate hate speech.”
Facebook, Spotify and Google’s YouTube site, which removed some Infowars content last week, followed with stronger measures on Monday. Facebook removed four pages belonging to Mr. Jones, including one with nearly 1.7 million followers as of last month, for violating its policies by “glorifying violence” and “using dehumanizing language to describe people who are transgender, Muslims and immigrants.” Facebook said the violations did not relate to “false news.”

YouTube terminated Mr. Jones’s channel, which had more than 2.4 million subscribers and billions of views on its videos, for repeatedly violating its policies, including its prohibition on hate speech. Spotify cited its own prohibition on hate speech as the reason for removing a podcast by Mr. Jones.

“To many, Jones is a bad joke,” said the Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks hate groups. “But the sad reality is that he has millions of followers who listen to his radio show, watch his ‘documentaries’ and read his websites, and some of them, like Boston Marathon bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev, resort to deadly violence.”

Mr. Jones and Infowars did not respond to requests for comment.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

it is about time that some of these tech companies that alex jones has been using as a platform to spread his hate speech,and fear mongering took a stand and did the right thing,and took their platforms away from him!!

:thumbsup:

[ NOW,if we could only get 'twitter' to shut down donald trump's account??!!??!! ]





shovelheaddave's photo
Tue 08/07/18 09:08 AM
Edited by shovelheaddave on Tue 08/07/18 09:11 AM


publically admitted that there WAS collusion between his presidential election campaign and the Russian government during the June 2016 meeting with the Russians in Trump Tower.

Federal campaign finance law clearly states "it is illegal for a foreign national to "directly or indirectly, make a contribution or a donation of money or other thing of value to a campaign.",and it is ALSO illegal "to accept help from a foreign government,or a foreign national to influenece an election".

Trump made the admission

What part is hard to understand?

I'm not saying Clinton should be made president, I'm saying the whole election was illegal and should be redone...NOW and Trump should go to jail.

I'm curious how long we citizens have to endure this stuff from the people we elect to represent us? Where the hell do we draw the line?
why should Trump go to jail? What was the contribution the Russians gave Trump Jr.? What law was broken? Trump owns a multi national corporation, some doesn't meet with foreign Nationals?


if you are still asking those questions at this point,i don't believe that you really want to know the answer,so trying to explain it to you would be an exercise of futility,and I am not going to waste any of my time playing childish games that people use when they cant rationally defend their opinions.

all I can do is tell you that google is your friend,and you should learn how to do a little bit of research if you want anyone to consider your opinions are valid,because when you ask questions like THOSE,then all you are doing is inviting ridicule to both YOU,and your opinions!

shovelheaddave's photo
Tue 08/07/18 07:47 AM

Build the Wall!


No, not that one.



Build a wall around Chicago.
Allow no egress.



I saw those movies...

they were called 'escape from new york',and 'escape from L.A."

it didn't seem like they helped fix the government/the united states,cuz the same stuff was STILL going on.

I think the only thing it helped was kurt russel's career.

George Carlin also did a bit about something like that on one of his comedy specials..
I think that I liked HIS ideas better. lol

shovelheaddave's photo
Tue 08/07/18 07:37 AM


opposition research is fine if its not DIRECTLY from a foreign national as opposed to a RESEARCH agency based in the USA.


A foreign national shall not, directly or indirectly, make a contribution or a donation of money or other thing of value, or expressly or impliedly promise to make a contribution or a donation, in connection with any Federal, State, or local election.

The statute in question is 52 USC 30121, 36 USC 510


Let's not forget the p***gate dossier originated from Christopher Steele, an MI6 agent.



the difference between what happened at the 'trump tower' meeting,and the 'steele dossier' is that the steele dossier was handed over to AMERICAN INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES,by the BRITISH INTELLIGENCE AGENCY,about what they had discovered in their investigation into trump and his suspicious business deals with Russian oligarchs,and the OFFICIAL investigation by OUR GOVERNMENT INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES proceeded from there...,it wasn't a clandestine meeting between somebody who WASNT part of any government intelligence agency running for an elected office,and an agent of a foreign government.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%E2%80%93Russia_dossier

shovelheaddave's photo
Tue 08/07/18 07:19 AM

Residents could make a big difference in the problem. They could set up a charity for donation to offer rewards. Some people would turn in their own mom for some money.



It could be anonymous


I think that most cities already have something like that,,,

it is called 'crimestoppers'!

[at least down here it is...it might be called something else where you live.]

shovelheaddave's photo
Tue 08/07/18 07:07 AM


its only a 1/2 hour until I HAVE TO get up,so I might as well just go ahead and get up now,instead of trying to go back to sleep. '~'

No way....wait for the last 10second countdown then get up lol


I went to sleep a little early last night,so my circadian rhythm wouldn't let me go back to sleep.

stupid circadian rhythm!!!
sad

shovelheaddave's photo
Tue 08/07/18 07:04 AM

Not a whol e lot of chit or chat going on in here :joy::joy::joy:


no CHITTIN',
OR
CHATTIN'?

what is this site coming to???

tears

1 2 9 10 11 13 15 16 17 24 25