Donate blood... that's how I found out

It's not illegal to enter the country to seek asylum. But you're right that we need immigration reform and that requires Congress. I'm sure the Biden Administration is working on this right now, because once they get that cleared up, then Biden can get funding for Israel & Ukraine aid. Harris' campaigning doesn't change that either way. Whatever she's done, it's more than V.P. Pence ever did for immigration reform.

'Well, we gotta do something,' Biden said, 'They ought to give me the money I need to protect the border'

Do you see how you're contradicting yourself? You say Trump is not guilty because it hasn't been proven, but Biden is guilty even though nobody's found any real evidence. Kindly point me to the "lots of evidence out there for everybody to see."

Did you notice that Trump refuses to testify, sues to block others' testimony or release of any evidence? In the New York fraud case, he provided so weak a case that the judge granted a default judgement, and the trial was just to decide the damages. In all Trump's other cases, he's not providing arguments to clear him, but is asserting "absolute presidential immunity" and not even pretending to be innocent. So again, what's been disproven?

Oh right. That must be why Republican Reps Comer & Jordan say Biden is guilty, obviously because Democrats made them to it, since they have no evidence to, you know, prove it.

Neat. I wasn't aware smoking crack was illegal. Possession, sale & making, sure. But I've never heard of anybody getting arrested for smoking it. Maybe smoking it and then immediately operating a motor vehicle. I just searched Google, and saw no laws against smoking crack. Good luck proving that case unless Hunter still has the stuff.

You should write to Rep. Comer and tell him to go after Hunter's crack!

Claims against Trump have been disproven? Please do elaborate!

It absolutely has not been disproven that Trump and his family took payments from foreign entities while in office. It has not been disproven that Jared & Ivanka made hundreds of $millions while in the Trump Administration. Trump is so clearly guilty that he's not even fighting the charges, but rather demanding that he has "absolute presidential immunity," even though he's no longer president, and "absolute presidential immunity" isn't a thing. Every one of the 91 felonies are being charged with careful indictments and plenty of evidence and witnesses, and all Trump can do is delay and appeal, because he has no real defense for them.

OK, so a coverup that's stymied financial experts and Congressional Republicans for years, but there's, for sure, a crime there somewhere. Ya right.

That a computer repair shop owner "discovered illegal activity" on a laptop, but nobody's shown the illegal activity. Sure, there are embarrassing photos, and some vague emails, but no crimes. If influence peddling were a crime, Ivanka & the Trump boys should get locked up first. Maybe you say bribery. Try and find an official action to match any payment. There are none. Not like how Jared Kushner getting money from Qatar (and I'm sure DJT got a piece of that action).

Lastly, Hunter's pistol wasn't illegal. Maybe the irresponsible placement in a public trash can and the ATF form he filled out to get it. But that's Hunter, and Joe had nothing to do with it. Biden wasn't even in office when that happened.

The "crime family" label is imbecilic. You guys crack me up, so thanks again for the laughs. Happy 20204!
[/quote
Smoking crack is illegal, soliciting prostitution is illegal, lying on a gun permit is illegal..not sure what your point is about Trumps daughter and son in law.I haven’t seen photos of them smoking crack with whores and I’ve never heard of them trying to get out of paying child support or cheating on taxes or lying on a federal gun application, or sleeping with their deceased brothers wife. and he refuses to answer to a federal subpoena..but his pop is squeaky clean.. the nut usally doesn’t fall far from the tree.. in the case of the Biden’s blame it on white trash..

LOL, so, yeah, they conduct easily traceable bank deposits (over $10,000) even with hand-written checks and let Hunter run around with a drug addiction, forgetting his laptop at a MAGA-aligned repair shop, and new pistol in a trash can, but still run a criminal enterprise so sharp that experts around the world unable to find any actual crime (except for Hunter's gun form and taxes).

I love it. Thanks again for the laughs!

Context matters. Kamala wasn't supporting riots. but protests against racism.

ALSO, Kamala on Stephen Colbert: “But they’re not going to stop. They’re not going to stop. They’re not. This is a movement. I’m telling you. They’re not going to stop, and everyone, beware. Because they’re not going to stop. They’re not going to stop before election day in November, and they are not going to stop after election day. And everyone should take note of that on both levels. That they’re not going to let up. And they should not, and we should not.”

"They should not, and WE should not"??!!!! Nope, no support there either, huh?

No, I'm my opinion is not being used in court as expert testimony, but there's also no credible evidence that the voices in those recordings aren't Trump, either. Of course Trump gets due process, so he's not in prison, yet. No need to deny everything as "your opinion" here, because this is the Internet and nothing is verified. I'm just saying that I'm sure Trump is guilty from what I've seen, and I haven't seen anything showing that Biden is guilty of anything but doing his job.

The court in Colorado was not a criminal court, but rather a civil court because the plaintiffs sued to have Trump disqualified.Trump couldn't be found "guilty" in the legal sense. He was only shown to have engaged in insurrection, and his lawyers failed to disprove that. Hence, I don't say "Trump is guilty of insurrection" but rather, Trump was found in court to have engaged in insurrection. Do you see the difference?

One main difference is that insurrection is not a Colorado state law, so insurrection would have to be tried at the federal level, while elections are not federal (even though offices are) so Trump getting disqualified can only happen at the state level. There are a dozen other states working through whether to disqualify Trump from their ballots, too, including Texas and South Carolina.

Trump was found by a court in Colorado to have engaged and/or supported insurrection. You can do a web search on it. Here's a link to CREW's statement.

The reason I say Trump is guilty and Biden isn't is because while both have been under investigation for years, we have actual indictments and evidence and witnesses, and I've actually heard the recordings of Trump breaking the law in a few cases. I guess you consider those recordings "fake news." Obviously, it's my opinion, but I follow those stories closely and see neither credible evidence against Biden, nor a credible defense proposed by Trump's attorneys.

Lastly, the Southern border is a mess, but US Immigration law isn't all on the President. Maybe because the USA is great is why they're coming, so yeah, guilty of that charge. But if Congress wants US immigration reform, they need to pass those laws. The President can't just arrest every brown person entering the country asking for asylum; that would be illegal.

I'll grant that a bribe can have "Loan Repayment" written in the memo line of the check, just like I used to write "for sensual massage" when I repaid a loan to my buddy when I was 20. Funny gag. But, despite what Comer says (he lies a lot) Joe Biden doesn't have so many bank accounts. Maybe James and Hunter have numerous shell companies and bank accounts, but those are not the President's. Also, financial transactions occurring when Joe wasn't in office aren't worthy of an impeachment inquiry. The suspicious activity reports from banks are not about Joe's account.

Also, doesn't this fishing expedition into Hunter & James Biden strike you as politically motivated when there's no criminal complaint or evidence of any crime? Republicans cry about Trump being politically persecuted by being charged for actual crimes with actual evidence and witnesses, but are simply pleased as punch that Congressional Republicans spend years and $millions subpoenaing anybody who crossed paths with President Biden's son for the past few decades? Double standards much?

So Hunter Biden is suspect, but he's never held public office, while Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump made hundreds of $millions while they were personally appointed to government positions by President Trump (nepo babies). Even Comer says they think Hunter got $40,000 from deals with China. That's it. Kushner got $billions from Saudi Arabia just days after leaving office, and made all sorts of shady deals while in office (for fun, check out his deal with Qatar). DJT pocketed hundreds of $millions from foreign contacts, but all we hear about now are his actual crimes, while we easily lose track of the mere lapses of ethics.

Wrong. President Biden got $trillions invested into the national infrastructure. Unemployment is near record lows and the stock market is hitting record highs. That's not destruction. Democrats aren't the ones trying to shut down the government to get what they want.

Morally, the Republicans are the ones running counter to their old "law and order" label. Trump is a criminal, found to have engaged or supported insurrection in a court, currently awaiting trial for 91 felonies, yet is still leading the field of Republican candidates. And the charges aren't even political; they're criminal charges with plenty of evidence and witnesses lining up to testify against DJT. It seems, Carlos, that you've got it backwards.

If Israel had not oppressed the Palestinians, confiscated their property, and left them without rights, the Palestinians would not have resorted to resisting the occupation through fighting. So Hamas and others appeared. But due to strong Zionist and Western propaganda, it was able to portray Palestinian fighters as terrorists.
The Geneva Convention of August 12, 1949 emphasizes the need to protect civilians in time of war
UN Resolution No. 3236, issued in 1974, gave the Palestinian people the right to use all means to achieve their freedom and independence, including armed struggle.

All I have to go on is news reports, since I don't personally know Trump or Biden or any other character involved. Publicly available reports show Biden's attorneys discovered his classified documents but did not explain the level of classification, which leads me to believe they were not super serious documents. Possibly classified to protect proprietary information or personal identities.

In the Army I got all sorts of classified documents given to me, and instead of turning them in when we finished using them, we were told to just shred those docs. If I was in a meeting using those docs and took notes, I had to shred my notes, too. I imagine that's the kind of documents Biden had. Some sheets with the words "SECRET/NOFORN" stamped across the top & bottom. No issuing facility would ask for that back, but an uninitiated attorney would dutifully report it.

National defense documents like war plans or those describing secret military systems, like Trump has been reported (not by the DOJ) to have improperly shared, are a much higher level than Secret/noforn. Maybe you don't see the difference but it's huge!

If Biden is seen as corrupt, it's only because Right Wing Media is repeating unfounded claims against Biden every day. Years of investigations and no evidence. They lie about businesses like Dominion and Smartmatic, they get a lawsuit and pay hundreds of $millions in penalties, but lie about Biden and get $billions in ad revenue. No surprises. NARA never had to beg for documents. Only arranged for pickup.

First, the $200K check was from 2018, when Biden wasn't in public office. 2nd, the check came from his brother and was written six weeks after Joe transferred a similar amount to James Biden. The 2nd check even says "Loan Repayment" right on it.

Money laundering is not money passing from one bank account to another. Once money is in the banking system, it's already "laundered". Money transfers across international borders could be a sign of crime, but transfers from one American to his brother is not. Especially by large checks, between private citizens. Where's the crime?
[/quote
Well shut down the investigation then, Since it says ‘ loan repayment’ .. case closed! Lol.. what services can I get from any of the 101 shill companies set up by the Biden’s and why does joe need all those alias names he use in those ‘ businesses’ . And how about the many ‘red flags’ joe Biden’s banks have raised about the curious deposits and other activity dealing with joes account…I know, you know nothing about that…I’m sure. Comer uncovered that little tid-bit.. Comer is going after the Biden’s banking history, he has uncovered many irregularities but until we have a unbiased DOJ these will only be allegations. As bad as Biden’s poll numbers are on every issue that affects everyone, the dems. can’t afford to take these serious allegations’ serious’ so they tell everybody don’t believe what you hear or naturally perceive as real..I know what money laundering is and it is exactly what Joes conspirers were doing wether joe was reaping his rewards than or later. Notes and records can be tampered with but the banking records speak for themselves.

With Trump, we have actual evidence. Maybe they don't play the recording on Fox News or NewsMax or wherever you get your info. We've heard recordings of Trump threatening Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. There several witnesses, and co-conspirators agreeing to testify for the prosecution. Did you miss the photos of Trump's classified documents shown on TV and online? (I reposted a couple) Audio recordings of him showing the national defense docs to a biographer.

Maybe most importantly, Trump isn't even claiming he's innocent. [ur=http://www.cnn.com/2023/12/23/politics/trump-election-subversion-criminal-case/index.htmll]Now he's begging appeals courts to declare him immune from prosecution. Trump knows he's guilty. What have you seen so think Trump isn't guilty?

Conversely, where's the evidence on Biden? The Republicans have been investigating him years, maybe decades, and have nothing to show for it. A while back, Rep. James Comer showed a canceled check to Joe Biden for $200,000 from 2018, when Biden wasn't even a candidate, that appears to be a loan repayment from his brother. Where's the crime? If you believe Joe Biden is a criminal, then what crime do you believe he's committed?

You're right. I don't know that Biden didn't intentionally take those documents and deliberately stashed them in his university office and garage hidden among various other documents and notes, hoping NARA never came asking for them, and then one of his bumbling attorneys came across his stash, and Biden had to play dumb and pretend he had no idea and directed his attorney to cover it up and notify NARA to arrange returning the docs.

The difference is that Biden didn't have to be asked for the documents. Biden didn't show off his documents to unauthorized people or foreigners and Biden didn't blow off the FBI or NARA and obstruct the investigation into the misplaced documents. Trump did all that. You can Google it.