make your mind up, stop being greedy

i personally had a somewhat bad experience a few years ago while visiting a friend.before i went to visit,she told me her roommate was gay and i say "fine,just keep him away from me" but i also told her i was bringing my 9mm with me (because she lived in a bad neighborhood).

well the 3rd (and final)day i was there,i got woken up by her gay roommate saying "drop your pants and let me see it".my first thought was "WTF???",he kept on and kept on,finally after 10-20 minutes of this sh1t,i told him "dude you better turn your ass around and walk out the door or i'm gonna splatter your brains all over this wall!" and at that point i already had my 9mm in my hand cocked and loaded.he finally took the hint and left.i came home about an hour later and i have not spoken to her since.

i want to add,to any gay males that read this.DO NOT flirt with guys that you don't know if they are gay or not cause it could get you killed!.i'll be friends online with a gay male but the second he starts flirting with me,the sh1t's going to hit the fan!

also gays/lesbians say "we can't help who we are,just accept us".well guess what?straight guys can't help who we are and you're not goig to turn us gay by flirting with us,it's just going to piss us off!

I don't get it. You were threatening to shoot somebody that never touched you?

I tend to agree with this. Being Bi is now the "in" thing to do. More and more people are wanting to try this out. Just another example of people being afraid to make a decision and stand by it....

and don't get me started on bi's
make your mind up, stop being greedy and i for one don't want somethin thats been dipped in diffrent pies!

Please educate yourself at least. Being Bi simply means you do not base how you feel about a person on their genitals. You can fall in love with a person no matter if they are male or female. I wish people would get over their fear of sexuality, their own and others.

Please educate yourself at least. Being Bi simply means you do not base how you feel about a person on their genitals. You can fall in love with a person no matter if they are male or female. I wish people would get over their fear of sexuality, their own and others.

i dated a bi girl

know what she told me?

half of my heart is for you and half of my heart is for her

wanna explain that one?

OKAY OKAY ONCE AND FOR ALL

I said it is TRENDY - like a Mullet or Tattoo not that it is dismissive like having either of them being Gay is much more life changing BUT SOME PEOPLE Are faking it trying to be TRENDY

i personally had a somewhat bad experience a few years ago while visiting a friend.before i went to visit,she told me her roommate was gay and i say "fine,just keep him away from me" but i also told her i was bringing my 9mm with me (because she lived in a bad neighborhood).

well the 3rd (and final)day i was there,i got woken up by her gay roommate saying "drop your pants and let me see it".my first thought was "WTF???",he kept on and kept on,finally after 10-20 minutes of this sh1t,i told him "dude you better turn your ass around and walk out the door or i'm gonna splatter your brains all over this wall!" and at that point i already had my 9mm in my hand cocked and loaded.he finally took the hint and left.i came home about an hour later and i have not spoken to her since.

i want to add,to any gay males that read this.DO NOT flirt with guys that you don't know if they are gay or not cause it could get you killed!.i'll be friends online with a gay male but the second he starts flirting with me,the sh1t's going to hit the fan!

also gays/lesbians say "we can't help who we are,just accept us".well guess what?straight guys can't help who we are and you're not goig to turn us gay by flirting with us,it's just going to piss us off!

I would think getting hostile with another man flirting with you; not touching you, flirting with you - especially if it is subtle - is a pretty good sign that one is homophobic.

i dated a bi girl

know what she told me?

half of my heart is for you and half of my heart is for her

wanna explain that one?

i'm not a homophobe.i've had gay/bi relatives (a few who have passed away and i do miss them)but they need to know their boundaries.

so oh now it has to be PHYSICAL before you can give off warnings like that?


i guess if someone breaks into your house,you better not call the cops until they shoot you or stab you,right?if they haven't touched you than there's no reason for you or your KIDS to worry,huh?

Homosexuality and DSM-IV
Q. Do you have any information on how homosexuality was eliminated from the DSM-IV vs DSM-III? Is there an established revision procedure whereby disorders are either included or excluded in new editions? If so, is there a way to determine whether that procedure was followed in the revision work that excluded homosexuality in the current fourth edition?

A. The issue of whether homosexuality is a disease has been one of the more controversial matters that has faced the framers of the various DSMs over the last few decades. The very first edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-I) classified homosexuality as a sexual deviation, as did DSM-II in 1968. However, in December of 1973, the DSM-II was modified by the Board of Trustees of the American Psychiatric Association (APA), who voted to eliminate the general category of homosexuality, and replace it with sexual orientation disturbance.

As Dr. Jon Meyer notes (see Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry, 4th ed., eds. Kaplan & Sadock), "...this change reflected the point of view that homosexuality was to be considered a mental disorder only if it was subjectively disturbing to the individual. The decision of the APA Board...took place in the context of new sociological data, biological inferences, and de-emphasis of psychoanalytic observations. It also took place in an atmosphere of confrontation. Beginning in 1970, various gay activist groups demonstrated....at APA meetings. At issue was the conceptualization of homosexuality as an illness..."

The DSM-III committee and subcommittee charged with drafting the new manual (1976-78) settled on the diagnosis of ego-dystonic homosexuality, which, according to Meyer, "...represented a compromise between those individuals whose clinical experience, interpretation of the data, and, perhaps, biases, led them to the conviction that homosexuality was a normal variant of sexual expression..." By the time DSM-III-R (revised version of DSM-III) came out in 1987, the tide had shifted again. The category of ego-dystonic homosexuality was eliminated. As DSM-III-R itself stated, "...the diagnosis...has rarely been used clinically, and there have been only a few articles in the scientific literature that use the concept..."

However, one could use the category of sexual disorder not otherwise specified to include cases that previously would have been called ego-dystonic homosexuality. Our present DSM-IV does not include homosexuality per se as a disorder, but still permits the diagnosis of "Sexual Disorder Not Otherwise Specified" for someone with "...persistent and marked distress about sexual orientation".

For details on how the DSM-IV committees made their decisions, I suggest you get hold of a copy of the actual manual, and read the detailed description on p. xx in the introduction. I think it's fair to say that DSM-IV was more reliant on empirical data, and less on political considerations, than were some earlier DSMs. You may also want to see the article by Bayer & Spitzer in which edited correspondence by the DSM-III framers is presented on the issue of homosexuality (J Hist Behav Sci 18:32, 1982).

The DSM ruled OUT homosexuality as a perversion or mental illness YEARS ago.

What I meant was, it is not okay to punch someone out or harm them simply for looking at you too long, smiling at you, or complimenting you in an appropriate manner.

If a male would accept certain flirtatious behavior from a female without physically harming the female, wouldn't it stand to reason that it might be the male's issue if they couldn't tolerate, accept, or even welcome it from a male?

what STRAIGHT male is going WELCOME sexual advances from another male?if he does than he's no longer straight.

hell a woman can punch a guy out for doing those things and it's ok but a straight guy can't do that to a gay guy for those same reasons without him being a "homophobe"?

what STRAIGHT male is going WELCOME sexual advances from another male?if he does than he's no longer straight.

hell a woman can punch a guy out for doing those things and it's ok but a straight guy can't do that to a gay guy for those same reasons without him being a "homophobe"?