Topic: Conviction overturned in MySpace suicide case | |
---|---|
Conviction overturned in MySpace suicide case Good news for net users By Dan Goodin in San Francisco Posted in Law, 3rd July 2009 00:11 GMT A federal judge on Thursday tentatively overturned convictions against a mother accused of using MySpace to bully a 13-year-old girl who went on to hang herself to death. US District Judge George Wu tentatively acquitted Lori Drew, 50, of three misdemeanor counts of accessing computers without authorization. To the dismay of many, she was originally charged with four felony counts stemming from her role in creating a fake MySpace profile, which is a violation of the site's terms of service. Prosecutors argued her skirting of the rules amounted violations of the US Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Although not final until filed in writing, the ruling is good news for anyone who uses the internet. Drew faced three years in prison and a $300,000 fine in the case. If allowed to stand, it could have made criminals out of anyone who has ever entered a false email address, age, or surname while registering for an online service. That point wasn't lost on Wu. "You could prosecute pretty much anyone who violated terms of service," he said during a Thursday court hearing, according to Wired.com. "It basically leaves it up to a web site owner to determine what is a crime...and therefore it criminalizes what would be a breach of contract," he added, according to the Associated Press. Drew was accused of participating in the MySpace hoax in an attempt to find out if a neighbor, 13-year-old Megan Meier, was spreading negative gossip about Drew's daughter. Using a picture of a sandy-haired boy with broad shoulders, she helped concoct a boy named Josh, who over a few months used MySpace messages to befriend Meier. Eventually, one of the other participants in the hoax caused Josh to send a message that said the world would be better without her. Meier hanged herself in her bedroom closet a few hours later. MySpace terms of service compel users to provide factual information about themselves and to refrain from using information obtained from the site to harass others. Prosecutors from the US Attorney's office in Los Angeles argued that violating those terms to gain access to MySpace services was tantamount to illegal computer hacking. It's fair to say the decision to charge Drew has been controversial, not because most approve of what Drew was accused of doing, only that she did nothing illegal. Last year, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the Center for Democracy and Technology and other groups filed a friend-of-the-court brief (PDF){http://www.eff.org/files/filenode/US_v_Drew/Drew_Amicus.pdf} in the case arguing it could set dangerous precedents. The prosecution was all the more startling, given federal attorneys in Missouri, where both Drew and Meier lived, had declined to bring a case. Prosecutors say they won't decide whether to appeal the acquittal until after they read the written ruling, which could be filed as soon as next week. ® http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/07/03/lori_drew_conviction_overturned/ |
|
|
|
I could NOT believe that idiot judge threw this out. Yes, the young girl made her OWN decision to take her life, BUT there is such a thing as contributory negligence and that Mom is Absolutely guilty of that!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() psst...there are cyber stalking and harassment laws here hon. but the original charge was NOT correct...you are right. that is why it was thrown out |
|
|
|
Chalk it up to the prosecution morons who didn't charge this woman with anything exception violating the term of myspace by using a false profile. All the charges filed against the woman were such a ugly mess that they would have had far reaching effects outside of this case for anyone who has ever used a false name on a profile.
|
|
|
|
I said when this first came out that they were idiots and charged her wrong.
|
|
|
|
I said when this first came out that they were idiots and charged her wrong. Too bad she wasn't tried in Texas. ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
I said when this first came out that they were idiots and charged her wrong. Too bad she wasn't tried in Texas. ![]() ![]() yeah yeah yeah....people whine about Texas...but other states let a guy get 70 something DUI's etc. in Texas that guy would have 3 strikes and he's out....and even the 1st strike is tough ![]() |
|
|
|
I could NOT believe that idiot judge threw this out. Yes, the young girl made her OWN decision to take her life, BUT there is such a thing as contributory negligence and that Mom is Absolutely guilty of that! I agree. That mother bullied and harassed that child. That happened right outside of my city, btw. |
|
|
|
I could NOT believe that idiot judge threw this out. Yes, the young girl made her OWN decision to take her life, BUT there is such a thing as contributory negligence and that Mom is Absolutely guilty of that! I agree. That mother bullied and harassed that child. That happened right outside of my city, btw. Yep! And contributory negligence IS part of the law. It happens in car accidents all of the time. I had a case on jury duty once where an older gentleman was hit and killed by a drunk, speeding, dumb *** who admitted to never hitting the brakes but the horn. Because of contributory negligence, i.e. the older man didn't get completely into the lane he needed to be in, we had to acquit the case. It made me ill. |
|
|
|
and contrary to what some idiots say, we don't live in a bubble, a vacuum. What we do effects other people. And this woman with malice purposely set out to harm this child. She is irresponsible at the Very least, and a Huge contributing factor at the most.
|
|
|
|
and contrary to what some idiots say, we don't live in a bubble, a vacuum. What we do effects other people. And this woman with malice purposely set out to harm this child. She is irresponsible at the Very least, and a Huge contributing factor at the most. I don't consider her to be irresponsible. I consider her to be an adult that bullied a child. |
|
|
|
This is another example of why u've got to pay close attention to what ur kids are doin online. Know they're sites, usernames an passwords. Check them regularly. It's disgustin that she got away with what she did. Hopefully the prosecutors will try her again usin the correct charges.
![]() |
|
|
|
I think an appeal or dropping it are the only choices. Would it be considered double jeopardy to try her again under different charges, but for the same incident?
|
|
|
|
DOUBLE JEOPARDY - Being tried twice for the same offense; prohibited by the 5th Amendmentto the U.S. Constitution. '[T]he Double Jeopardy Clause protects against three distinct abuses: [1] a second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal; [2] a second prosecution for the same offense after conviction; and [3] multiple punishments for the same offense.' U.S. v. Halper, 490 U.S. 435, 440 (1989).
so if they use different charges...I don't believe it's double jeopardy. it's like a "different" crime |
|
|
|
For better or for worse, I'd bet justice will find her even if it is not through the judicial system.
![]() |
|
|
|
For better or for worse, I'd bet justice will find her even if it is not through the judicial system. ![]() you just want to spank her ![]() |
|
|
|
For better or for worse, I'd bet justice will find her even if it is not through the judicial system. ![]() you just want to spank her ![]() No, but would you kindly volunteer? ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
The bottom line. You cannot charge someone for another persons suicide. Suicide = killing yourself. Murder = killing someone else. The girls parents should have paid more attention as to what was going on in their childs life. Most parents don't do that and when something happens they want to blame someone else. Better parenting could have prevented this. be seeing you.
|
|
|
|
I don't let my child on the puter unless I can keep an eye on him. When I'm not on it, I've got it locked an he doesn't know my password. Too bad more parents don't do this.
![]() |
|
|