Naw dear, just more important things to do than go tit for tat with a liberal. I've had my daily dose of a liberal, thanks.

Naw dear, just more important things to do than go tit for tat with a liberal. I've had my daily dose of a liberal, thanks.

Awwww poor babies, can't understand that I'm not going tit for tat with a lib for now? Awwwww Look up socialist and liberal, simple as that.

Just admit you don't know and be done with it.

It is already obvious to us.

Awww you poor things. Okay the I word again.

Main Entry: so·cial·ist
Pronunciation: \ˈsō-sh(ə-)list\
Function: noun
Date: 1827
1 : one who advocates or practices socialism
2 capitalized : a member of a party or political group advocating socialism
— socialist adjective often capitalized
— so·cial·is·tic \ˌsō-shə-ˈlis-tik\ adjective
— so·cial·is·ti·cal·ly \-ti-k(ə-)lē\ adverb

Main Entry: so·cial·ism
Pronunciation: \ˈsō-shə-ˌli-zəm\
Function: noun
Date: 1837
1 : any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
3 : a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done

Main Entry: 1lib·er·al
Pronunciation: \ˈli-b(ə-)rəl\
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French, from Latin liberalis suitable for a freeman, generous, from liber free; perhaps akin to Old English lēodan to grow, Greek eleutheros free
Date: 14th century
1 a : of, relating to, or based on the liberal arts <liberal education> b archaic : of or befitting a man of free birth
2 a : marked by generosity : openhanded <a liberal giver> b : given or provided in a generous and openhanded way <a liberal meal> c : ample, full
3 obsolete : lacking moral restraint : licentious
4 : not literal or strict : loose <a liberal translation>
5 : broad-minded; especially : not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or traditional forms
6 a : of, favoring, or based upon the principles of liberalism b capitalized : of or constituting a political party advocating or associated with the principles of political liberalism; especially : of or constituting a political party in the United Kingdom associated with ideals of individual especially economic freedom, greater individual participation in government, and constitutional, political, and administrative reforms designed to secure these objectives
— lib·er·al·ly \-b(ə-)rə-lē\ adverb
— lib·er·al·ness noun
synonyms liberal, generous, bountiful, munificent mean giving or given freely and unstintingly. liberal suggests openhandedness in the giver and largeness in the thing or amount given <a teacher liberal with her praise>. generous stresses warmhearted readiness to give more than size or importance of the gift <a generous offer of help>. bountiful suggests lavish, unremitting giving or providing <children spoiled by bountiful presents>. munificent suggests a scale of giving appropriate to lords or princes <a munificent foundation grant>.

Wow, I feel pity now,

Did you read it?

Uh yes dear I did.

Well, I don't like talking to brick walls, so good bye

AAAAAAACHOOOOOOOOOOOO

Oh excuse me, I'm allergic to bullsh*t.

Bc, he did NOTHING to deserve it. What's so hard to understand?????

HA good one! well put!

The chairman of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, explaining the decision to honor Obama, told skeptical journalists this morning: "We hope this can contribute a little bit to enhance what he is trying to do." When former President Jimmy Carter was given the prize in 2002, the Nobel judges readily agreed that the award was intended to be a "kick in the leg" to the Bush administration, which was then gearing up for war in Iraq.

There is a tiny thingy problem here.

The deadline for nominations was February 1 -- just 10 days after Obama took office.

Whether he has done good or bad in the past months, that's a different topic, he was only in office for 10 days, when he was already nominated.


according to the Norwegian Nobel Comittee this is what they had to say:





http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2009/10/09/a_bluntly_political_act/

So basically view it as an encouragement? But then..the Nobel Peace Prize doesn't make sense to others who truly did a lot (decades of work) and then got the price.


Anyway...It's up to these Norwegians, not USA or anyone else so if they think they'll give their award, then let it be...Norway is still a kindgom, ruled by a king (FYI).

There is a tiny thingy problem here.

The deadline for nominations was February 1 -- just 10 days after Obama took office.

Whether he has done good or bad in the past months, that's a different topic, he was only in office for 10 days, when he was already nominated.


according to the Norwegian Nobel Comittee this is what they had to say:





http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2009/10/09/a_bluntly_political_act/

So basically view it as an encouragement? But then..the Nobel Peace Prize doesn't make sense to others who truly did a lot (decades of work) and then got the price.


Anyway...It's up to these Norwegians, not USA or anyone else so if they think they'll give their award, then let it be...Norway is still a kindgom, ruled by a king (FYI).

so he didn't win the prize because of anything he did or didn't do. It had nothing to do with being a good or bad president.

Nobody said that except you.