Topic: Looking at the foundation of your core values | |
---|---|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Sat 12/03/11 04:52 PM
|
|
I watched him admit on television that his wife did not know about his "affair/friendship" or whatever you want to call it. If he is so "innocent" why would he keep a woman on the side, pay her expenses, and not tell his wife about it? Really. You actually believe that? Even if he never screwed her, he lied about it to his wife. But she claims it was a SEXUAL AFFAIR. I have no reason no to believe her. I don't watch TV, so I didn't see the press conference. I certainly don't approve of him keeping any relationship a secret from his wife, especially one in which he was offering financial assistance to another woman. Still, he hasn't admitted to a sexual affair, so what you posted isn't true. It does give me more to think about, but without more proof, I won't change my position. I'm sure if he continues to deny it, proof will be forthcoming. His own denial of an affair with the woman that lasted 13 years is another betrayal. One that disrespects her, and calls her a liar. I'm sure she has tons of proof. |
|
|
|
I watched him admit on television that his wife did not know about his "affair/friendship" or whatever you want to call it. If he is so "innocent" why would he keep a woman on the side, pay her expenses, and not tell his wife about it? Really. You actually believe that? Even if he never screwed her, he lied about it to his wife. But she claims it was a SEXUAL AFFAIR. I have no reason no to believe her. I don't watch TV, so I didn't see the press conference. I certainly don't approve of him keeping any relationship a secret from his wife, especially one in which he was offering financial assistance to another woman. Still, he hasn't admitted to a sexual affair, so what you posted isn't true. It does give me more to think about, but without more proof, I won't change my position. I'm sure if he continues to deny it, proof will be forthcoming. If it turns out to be true, I'll be very disappointed him . |
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Sat 12/03/11 04:55 PM
|
|
Wife's verdict awaits Herman Cain as he admits 'friend' was a secret
Read more: http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/world-news/wifes-verdict-awaits-herman-cain-as-he-admits-friend-was-a-secret-16086074.html |
|
|
|
In building a house, we all know that it must have a solid foundation. You can have a beautiful house, but if it is built on a foundation of sand, it will eventually crumble no matter how well it is built or how good it looks. Symbolically, our lives are the same If your life is built on a foundation of lies and broken promises, you can't build the rest of your life around that unless and until you come clean. In being true, I think you should begin by being true to yourself, then vow to be true and honest to those close to you. That would be your friends and family. I am referring to Herman Cain. A liar and cheater at home is a lair and cheater in life. If you spend your life building it on sand, know that eventually it will come falling down, just like Herman Cain's. Karma is a beeitch. Be as true as you can. Karma is a beeitch..however, fair and just. muche more than a punishing god. The karma concept keeps me checking myself far more than the threat of hell. I think right now in general, karma is kicking in quicker, for me and some I know anyway. I feel the same way about Herman's lie...if he were to go to his wife and end his marriage, I would have more respect. but a 13 year lie.... yeah, karma is a biotch indeed. |
|
|
|
Did you say the same about Clinton?
|
|
|
|
In building a house, we all know that it must have a solid foundation. You can have a beautiful house, but if it is built on a foundation of sand, it will eventually crumble no matter how well it is built or how good it looks. Symbolically, our lives are the same If your life is built on a foundation of lies and broken promises, you can't build the rest of your life around that unless and until you come clean. In being true, I think you should begin by being true to yourself, then vow to be true and honest to those close to you. That would be your friends and family. I am referring to Herman Cain. A liar and cheater at home is a lair and cheater in life. If you spend your life building it on sand, know that eventually it will come falling down, just like Herman Cain's. Karma is a beeitch. Be as true as you can. well, obama is a liar too, but i guess it is ok for him...or is it because he's not a cheater? EVERYONE has lied, where they lied is of no consequence and makes them no better than any other liar or no worse, it condemns them to no less opportunity for becoming something better or correcting their mistakes than it condemns any other liar the notion that what happens at home once someone is GROWN indicates how they will be in every area of life is fallacious,,, |
|
|
|
Did you say the same about Clinton? I know I didnt. Im one who doesnt feel general trustworthiness is an issue that can be determined by how capable a person is of monogamy. |
|
|
|
In building a house, we all know that it must have a solid foundation. You can have a beautiful house, but if it is built on a foundation of sand, it will eventually crumble no matter how well it is built or how good it looks. Symbolically, our lives are the same If your life is built on a foundation of lies and broken promises, you can't build the rest of your life around that unless and until you come clean. In being true, I think you should begin by being true to yourself, then vow to be true and honest to those close to you. That would be your friends and family. I am referring to Herman Cain. A liar and cheater at home is a lair and cheater in life. If you spend your life building it on sand, know that eventually it will come falling down, just like Herman Cain's. Karma is a beeitch. Be as true as you can. well, obama is a liar too, but i guess it is ok for him...or is it because he's not a cheater? EVERYONE has lied, where they lied is of no consequence and makes them no better than any other liar or no worse, it condemns them to no less opportunity for becoming something better or correcting their mistakes than it condemns any other liar the notion that what happens at home once someone is GROWN indicates how they will be in every area of life is fallacious,,, so it is ok for obama to lie, but not cain... you guys are hypocrites... |
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Sun 12/04/11 02:22 PM
|
|
This is not about Obama. It is not even about Cain.
It is about the betrayal of a (sacred) trust or breaking a promise to one who is "supposed" to be your closest partner, your spouse. It is about whether or not you can trust a man who breaks a promise to his wife and lies for 13 years. No, you can't |
|
|
|
In building a house, we all know that it must have a solid foundation. You can have a beautiful house, but if it is built on a foundation of sand, it will eventually crumble no matter how well it is built or how good it looks. Symbolically, our lives are the same If your life is built on a foundation of lies and broken promises, you can't build the rest of your life around that unless and until you come clean. In being true, I think you should begin by being true to yourself, then vow to be true and honest to those close to you. That would be your friends and family. I am referring to Herman Cain. A liar and cheater at home is a lair and cheater in life. If you spend your life building it on sand, know that eventually it will come falling down, just like Herman Cain's. Karma is a beeitch. Be as true as you can. well, obama is a liar too, but i guess it is ok for him...or is it because he's not a cheater? EVERYONE has lied, where they lied is of no consequence and makes them no better than any other liar or no worse, it condemns them to no less opportunity for becoming something better or correcting their mistakes than it condemns any other liar the notion that what happens at home once someone is GROWN indicates how they will be in every area of life is fallacious,,, so it is ok for obama to lie, but not cain... you guys are hypocrites... not 'you guys', I am actually supporting the 'he who is without sin' mentality,, that noone is perfect and no ONE detail or sin should be used to judge general character or trustworthiness,,,, |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sun 12/04/11 02:27 PM
|
|
This is not about Obama. It is not even about Cain. It is about the betrayal of a (sacred) trust or breaking a promise to one who is "supposed" to be your closest partner, your spouse. It is about whether or not you can trust a man who breaks a promise to his wife and lies for 13 years. No, you can't you cant if you insist on assuming a spouse is a persons closest partner some people get married to the best provider some get married for the social status not all get married because they have a 'closeness' to their spouse |
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Sun 12/04/11 02:35 PM
|
|
This is not about Obama. It is not even about Cain. It is about the betrayal of a (sacred) trust or breaking a promise to one who is "supposed" to be your closest partner, your spouse. It is about whether or not you can trust a man who breaks a promise to his wife and lies for 13 years. No, you can't you cant if you insist on assuming a spouse is a persons closest partner some people get married to the best provider some get married for the social status not all get married because they have a 'closeness' to their spouse Yes I feel justified assuming that your spouse is your closest partner. You are partners by law. You have a legal binding agreement, community property. If your spouse is NOT your trusted and closest partner you should not be married. Some people may have had arranged marriages. That may not apply. |
|
|
|
This is not about Obama. It is not even about Cain. It is about the betrayal of a (sacred) trust or breaking a promise to one who is "supposed" to be your closest partner, your spouse. It is about whether or not you can trust a man who breaks a promise to his wife and lies for 13 years. No, you can't you cant if you insist on assuming a spouse is a persons closest partner some people get married to the best provider some get married for the social status not all get married because they have a 'closeness' to their spouse Yes I feel justified assuming that your spouse is your closest partner. You are partners by law. You have a legal binding agreement, community property. If your spouse is NOT your trusted and closest partner you should not be married. I Agree. And I believe most people who are married today should not be because they marry for the wrong reasons. I dont believe all such people, however, are incapable of making sound and honest choices in other areas of their life though |
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Sun 12/04/11 02:39 PM
|
|
This is not about Obama. It is not even about Cain. It is about the betrayal of a (sacred) trust or breaking a promise to one who is "supposed" to be your closest partner, your spouse. It is about whether or not you can trust a man who breaks a promise to his wife and lies for 13 years. No, you can't you cant if you insist on assuming a spouse is a persons closest partner some people get married to the best provider some get married for the social status not all get married because they have a 'closeness' to their spouse Yes I feel justified assuming that your spouse is your closest partner. You are partners by law. You have a legal binding agreement, community property. If your spouse is NOT your trusted and closest partner you should not be married. I Agree. And I believe most people who are married today should not be because they marry for the wrong reasons. I dont believe all such people, however, are incapable of making sound and honest choices in other areas of their life though Never said they weren't. But they still can't be trusted (to keep their word.) |
|
|
|
This is not about Obama. It is not even about Cain. It is about the betrayal of a (sacred) trust or breaking a promise to one who is "supposed" to be your closest partner, your spouse. It is about whether or not you can trust a man who breaks a promise to his wife and lies for 13 years. No, you can't you cant if you insist on assuming a spouse is a persons closest partner some people get married to the best provider some get married for the social status not all get married because they have a 'closeness' to their spouse Yes I feel justified assuming that your spouse is your closest partner. You are partners by law. You have a legal binding agreement, community property. If your spouse is NOT your trusted and closest partner you should not be married. I Agree. And I believe most people who are married today should not be because they marry for the wrong reasons. I dont believe all such people, however, are incapable of making sound and honest choices in other areas of their life though Never said they weren't. But they still can't be trusted. noone can if we dont know them personally and arent positive they have never told a lie to their spouse,, apparently |
|
|
|
True, but lying to your wife for 13 years is a good sign.
![]() |
|
|
|
True, but lying to your wife for 13 years is a good sign. ![]() yes, of an incapacity to be a good spouse,,,or maintain monogamy, or face the risks that come with that inability do we not trust someone who has chosen to 'stay in the closet' with their family about their sexual preference? of perhaps we can consider the issue was not as simple as honesty but also was impacted by fear of consequence,,,,,? |
|
|
|
Clintonssss, both of them, have been hiding money in foreign investments for a long time. Bill is said to have a half black kid somewhere. He still got voted in.
Cain pulled out prematurely. He probably could have all that work to his favor with a little intelligence. Hell, all kinds of losers bought into Barry's BS. ![]() ![]() ![]() So, now, MSM is bouncing all around Ron Paul. He has the most experience and has been working for the people, not the lobbyists, for the same amount of years. |
|
|
|
and when we find the perfect candidate who has
disclosed all their finances NEVER associated or worked with anyone with questionable backgrounds NEVER done business with lobbyists NEVER lied to his wife and NEVER had or associated with anyone who had former mistakes of judgment or bad choices,,, I hope someone will share their name with me,,, ![]() ![]() ![]() in the meantime, lots of imperfect men have accomplished pretty incredible things and been incredible leaders |
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Sun 12/04/11 03:05 PM
|
|
True, but lying to your wife for 13 years is a good sign. ![]() yes, of an incapacity to be a good spouse,,,or maintain monogamy, or face the risks that come with that inability do we not trust someone who has chosen to 'stay in the closet' with their family about their sexual preference? of perhaps we can consider the issue was not as simple as honesty but also was impacted by fear of consequence,,,,,? Your core values are either built on honesty or they are not. Not many people have the courage to be honest. It is a rare trait I guess. But in answer to your question, no, we can't trust a person whose values are built and founded on a lie. But none of that matters unless that person has your future and your life in their hands. As president of the country, he does. Other than that, it matters not whether or not I can trust him. I don't care what a liar he is. |
|
|