No thanks, its a big web out here, and your a big boy. Stick to sites with .edu, and you will be fine.

*you're

Bushido is opinion?

You guys are pretty funny!

At least someone gets me...

http://www.cancer.umn.edu/cancerinfo/NCI/CDR539333.html

http://www.fccc.edu/cancer/pdq/English/Patients/LaetrileAmygdalin.html

Any discussion of cancer research and money leads to the American Cancer Society. They have one of the poorest records of any charity on spending their funds on actually helping cancer victims and research.

An interesting read.

http://www.preventcancer.com/losing/acs/wealthiest_links.htm

That's hilarious. Just goes to show when you try to be a pedant, you get what you dish out.

Parasites cause cancer.

Says Dr. Hulda Clark: All cancers are alike and all are caused by a single parasite (fasciolopsis buskii), the same parasite that also causes HIV and AIDS. If you kill the parasite, the cancer stops immediately and the tissues return to normal. You must have this parasite in order to get cancer or AIDS.

http://www.lightparty.com/Health/PARASITE.html


Also:
http://www.canceractive.com/cancer-active-page-link.aspx?n=214

It is very unlikely that a GP will ever tell you that the cause of your illness is a parasite.

And certainly none would ever be so trivial as to tell you a parasite was the cause of your cancer. But parasites do cause cancer - they drain you of nourishment abnd produce carcinic weaste products like aflatoxins. One of the most common parasites is yeast. You need some in your body, but an excess can cause a serious problem. Yeast infections like candida, fungal infections, microbes, amoeba, tapeworms and flukes are all parasites.

And the fact that GP´s never even test for these inhabitants is tantamount to negligence. New research from around the world links stomach cancers to a bacterium, and now colon cancers to microbes (Cancer Watch Spring 2006). Then, some arthritis sufferers have been aided by yeast killers like garlic, diabetics by cinnamon (known to kill yeasts in the blood stream). So it´s time to think again.

Skin cancer: Find a black walnut tree with walnuts. Use the green outer skin and rub it on the cancer. It also kills ringworms on the skin.

It is nice though that Peter has the integrity to draw attention to his own errors, by making a follow-up posts highlighting them. I wouldn't have used the '*', though, as that is more conventionally used to show the correction, rather than the original error.

I find its better to ignore simple errors in difference to the conclusions, and meanings held within. I find no problems in understanding meaning when given context. That makes all such corrections petty.

Just my .02

*deference

I believe that parasites can influence the development of cancer, and it seems plausible that certain parasites in certain circumstances can increase your risk of cancer.



(sigh)



Unless the cause of your illness is actually a parasite. It does happen, and GPs do tell people this.

I'm glad that most gps know better than to blame all cancers, hiv, and aids all on one parasite. It would be a horrible world if they did.




GPs do test for fungal infections and 'microbes', when they have cause to do so. Simply having cancer, alone, is not cause to do so.



Aw, good! Yes! Specific kinds of cancer can be aggravated or maybe caused by specific species of invasive agent. There is a useful line of thinking.

I have read a lot of Dr Hulda Clark's stuff and I think she is a bit germ-a-phobic. (Or parasite phobic).

I don't think that all cancers are caused by a single parasite though. That is the first time I read that in her stuff.

I do think that parasites are the single cause of cancer though.

What is a parasite? --Just about anything.-- Germs, bugs, viruses, worms, bacteria etc. In fact, our bodies are full of bacteria and parasites. Not all of them are deadly or harmful.

I think if a person has cancer, they should start eating things that kill parasites. Garlic is one of them.

I think if we knew how to protect our bodies from toxins and parasites we could life indefinitely.

Fountain of youth.

I have a bad habit of not paying attention at all while I type. I start the first few letters of a word its as if I let my fingers finish typing the word on their own accord, leading to frequent use of the wrong suffix (or absence of a necessary suffix), or just the wrong word altogether.

Sometimes I skip entire words, thinking that I typed them - which is awful when the word is 'not' or 'no', and pretty bad when its 'some' or 'all'.

These problems should be solved by rereading before posting, but I don't always take the time - and when I do, and edit, sometimes I try to move text or insert text in the wrong place, yielding incomprehensible gibberish. I don't recall anyone criticizing me for it, though I have to wonder if some people think I sometimes post while drunk.

I welcome corrections in the spirit of 'making sure we understand each other'.

That was actually helpful. I wasn't sure of (and didn't feel I need to know) precisely what he meant, though I should have known, since I'm prone to phonetic misspellings and semi-phonetic word substitution.

I just thought 'needed' and typed 'need' - that happens to me all the time unless I'm writing something for 'serious'.

I was just being a wise acre.

JB wrote:



It is hard to contrive a definite and simple counter example, since basically all of us have had some kind of the above organisms in our body. Has any human, anywhere, actually had a sterile life, both outside and within their bodies? I don't think a hardcore course in antibiotics followed by sterile isolation is sufficient.

Personally, this makes me more suspicious of the theory, not less so.


Spider wrote: