100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Poll on who believes the official 9/11 account. | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
I could prove it to you but you are not willing to accept the facts. The fact is that the FBI has NO EVIDENCE connecting Osama Bin Laden to 9/11. And the so-called Muslims were not qualified to fly those planes, and they were not seen or photographed boarding those planes and they were not on the passenger lists. They were not on the planes. thats not evidence, that is called speculation. i didn't say anything about osama anyway, even though he took credit for it 2 or 3 times... and they were all filmed boarding the planes, but you didn't see that i guess... No, I did not ever see or hear of any of them being filmed boarding any planes. Got a link to that video? i'll see if i can find it for you... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No evidence that Muslims hijacked planes on 9/11
I did find this: http://newcrisispapers.com/noevidence.pdf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I could prove it to you but you are not willing to accept the facts. The fact is that the FBI has NO EVIDENCE connecting Osama Bin Laden to 9/11. And the so-called Muslims were not qualified to fly those planes, and they were not seen or photographed boarding those planes and they were not on the passenger lists. They were not on the planes. thats not evidence, that is called speculation. i didn't say anything about osama anyway, even though he took credit for it 2 or 3 times... and they were all filmed boarding the planes, but you didn't see that i guess... Only one from the Flight 77 terrorists. That footage shows no one that looks like the Terrorist supposedly on that plane. No, I did not ever see or hear of any of them being filmed boarding any planes. Got a link to that video? i'll see if i can find it for you... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video of hijackers shown not boarding but passing through security screeners at the Washington Dulles International Airport on 9/11......
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5485376/ns/us_news-security/t/sept-panelcriticizes-dullessecurity-screeners/#.T62Wau0qPJw |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(The truther movement is growing.) A monumental new scientific opinion poll has emerged which declares that only 16% of people in America now believe the official government explanation of the September 11th 2001 terror attacks. According to the new New York Times/CBS News poll, only 16% of Americans think the government is telling the truth about 9/11 and the intelligence prior to the attacks: "Do you think members of the Bush Administration are telling the truth, are mostly telling the truth but hiding something, or are they mostly lying? Telling the truth 16% Hiding something 53% Mostly lying 28% Not sure 3%" The 84% figure mirrors other recent polls on the same issue. A Canadian Poll put the figure at 85%. A CNN poll had the figure at 89%. Over 80% supported the stance of Charlie Sheen when he went public with his opinions on 9/11 as an inside job. A recent CNN poll found that the percentage of Americans who blame the Bush administration for the September 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington rose from almost a third to almost half over the past four years. This latest poll shows that that figure has again risen exponentially and now stands at well over three quarters of the population. what was the 'official' government explanation? I believe they were aware of the plan with the planes, I believe the planes hit as was broadcast on the day, I believe the buildings collapsed from the jet fuel and heat of the explosion as well as less than undestructable construction, I also believe one of the buildings had precautionary measures in it to blow manually in the event of a catastrophe, and that building was manually blown |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The short take...... The gov't ALWAYS has something to hide, and who can trust ANYONE that you know for a fact is concealing evidence, and claiming national security as it's reasoning. I have always thought that the more informed you were, the better you were able to protect yourself...who are they protecting? Whenever our gov't reps or media mouth pieces say "trust me!".....I worry! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(The truther movement is growing.) Hiding something 53% Mostly lying 28% I'm in these groups. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Fri 05/11/12 05:46 PM
|
|
Msharmony, Within 30 minutes after it happened they blamed Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda. That just seems unreal … and a little too….um ….”efficient” for a nation that (allegedly) allowed high jackers to board planes with boxcutters and fly them into their targets without any interference from Airport security or the Airforce after having learned of planes being highjacked.
But the official government account of what happened and our response to the attack has officially changed since the first official report. (It changed after the NORAD tapes were discovered.) As for the alleged video of high jackers slipping past security, I doubt that video is authentic. If it were, it would have been a major piece of evidence from the beginning. Instead, it turns up years later. The article said: “Elaine Teague, who is suing over the death of her 31-year-old daughter, Sandra, said she had previously been shown the footage by the FBI. But the terrorists’ faces had been digitally disguised.” “The video was obtained from the Motley Rice law firm, which is representing some victims’ families suing the airlines and security industry over their actions in the Sept. 11 attacks.” Some questions: Why was Elaine Teague shown the footage by the FBI? Digitally disguised? Why? Were the faces fuzzed out or changed? So now how do we know the video hasn’t been totally digitally altered? And can you even see who those people are in this video? What is the chain of evidence? Here is a good question: How did the Motly Rice Law firm have possession of the video? Did they get it from the FBI? Why would the FBI release it? And last but not least, do all Muslim terrorists wear Oxford shirts? (The writer felt it necessary to mention that twice.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Msharmony, Within 30 minutes after it happened they blamed Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda. That just seems unreal … and a little too….um ….”efficient” for a nation that (allegedly) allowed high jackers to board planes with boxcutters and fly them into their targets without any interference from Airport security or the Airforce after having learned of planes being highjacked. But the official government account of what happened and our response to the attack has officially changed since the first official report. (It changed after the NORAD tapes were discovered.) As for the alleged video of high jackers slipping past security, I doubt that video is authentic. If it were, it would have been a major piece of evidence from the beginning. Instead, it turns up years later. The article said: “Elaine Teague, who is suing over the death of her 31-year-old daughter, Sandra, said she had previously been shown the footage by the FBI. But the terrorists’ faces had been digitally disguised.” “The video was obtained from the Motley Rice law firm, which is representing some victims’ families suing the airlines and security industry over their actions in the Sept. 11 attacks.” Some questions: Why was Elaine Teague shown the footage by the FBI? Digitally disguised? Why? Were the faces fuzzed out or changed? So now how do we know the video hasn’t been totally digitally altered? And can you even see who those people are in this video? What is the chain of evidence? Here is a good question: How did the Motly Rice Law firm have possession of the video? Did they get it from the FBI? Why would the FBI release it? And last but not least, do all Muslim terrorists wear Oxford shirts? (The writer felt it necessary to mention that twice.) Im not sure what Oxford shirts have to do with the story. And I dont personally recall timing the lapse between the incident and mention of Osama, although I have read many claims of such knowledge seems like it was more time to me,, but either way, that would fall in line with them being aware the attack was being planned, BY AL QUEDA,, and deciding to call their bluff,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am having this feeling of deja vu!
Where have I heard all this before?  KYLE WHY ARE YOU SO AFRAID OF THE TRUTH!?! BUTTERS: WELL I HEARD THAT 911 WAS CAUSED BY PRESIDENT BUSH! BUTTERS: THE GOVT AND THE CORPORATIONS HEADED BY THE JEWS THAT CARRIED OUT 911! http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/155282/911-all-over-again |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(The truther movement is growing.) Hiding something 53% Mostly lying 28% I'm in these groups. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirty minutes after 9-11 attack the media was placing the blame on Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda. The only conceivable reason for jumping to that swift conclusion would be that they planned to blame Al Qaeda from the very beginning. ---It was part of the plan.
They later claimed that they had no idea that terrorists would attack us with planes and that they were totally taken by surprise. (They can't really have it both ways. Either they had advanced warning or they didn't.) Meanwhile they are performing a drill pretending that planes are attacking at the same time it is really happening. When the bombing in Oklahoma happened, they did not jump in there with a suspect in 30 minutes because they had no idea who might have done it. Yet within 30 minutes of 9/11 attacks, they were screaming "Al Qaeda did it." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Fri 05/11/12 07:30 PM
|
|
I am having this feeling of deja vu! Where have I heard all this before? KYLE WHY ARE YOU SO AFRAID OF THE TRUTH!?! BUTTERS: WELL I HEARD THAT 911 WAS CAUSED BY PRESIDENT BUSH! BUTTERS: THE GOVT AND THE CORPORATIONS HEADED BY THE JEWS THAT CARRIED OUT 911! http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/155282/911-all-over-again No, it was the govt and corporations headed by the aliens. Ultimately, the aliens are in charge. I know that's a tough pill to swallow.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video of hijackers shown not boarding but passing through security screeners at the Washington Dulles International Airport on 9/11...... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5485376/ns/us_news-security/t/sept-panelcriticizes-dullessecurity-screeners/#.T62Wau0qPJw Wait!! That can't be true!!!! Jenniebean Butters said no evidence of this type exists and she is a private investigator!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Fri 05/11/12 07:39 PM
|
|
Video of hijackers shown not boarding but passing through security screeners at the Washington Dulles International Airport on 9/11...... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5485376/ns/us_news-security/t/sept-panelcriticizes-dullessecurity-screeners/#.T62Wau0qPJw Wait!! That can't be true!!!! Jenniebean Butters said no evidence of this type exists and she is a private investigator!!! Those faces in the videos were digitally altered according to the woman who is filing a lawsuit against the Airport security, so they are hardly evidence of anything. Just some guys going through airport security. Could be ANYONE. Seriously they are worthless. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video of hijackers shown not boarding but passing through security screeners at the Washington Dulles International Airport on 9/11...... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5485376/ns/us_news-security/t/sept-panelcriticizes-dullessecurity-screeners/#.T62Wau0qPJw Wait!! That can't be true!!!! Jenniebean Butters said no evidence of this type exists and she is a private investigator!!! Those faces in the videos were digitally altered according to the woman who is filing a lawsuit against the Airport security, so they are hardly evidence of anything. Just some guys going through airport security. Could be ANYONE. Seriously they are worthless. another opinion... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We don't really know that anything is really real. President Bush
may have never really existed! The video and photos of him may well have just been digital creations started back in the 40s when HW and Barbara decided to fake having a real family. They used animation film, duct tape and popsicle sticks back then though....But they quickly progressed to the digital creations - which was the really first application of the new Eniac technology. In fact, I am not so sure that HW Bush, Barbara and Dick Cheney are really real. Maybe I am not even typing this. But I going to continue to pretend I am just because that is the way I fake roll.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We don't really know that anything is really real. President Bush may have never really existed! The video and photos of him may well have just been digital creations started back in the 40s when HW and Barbara decided to fake having a real family. They used animation film, duct tape and popsicle sticks back then though....But they quickly progressed to the digital creations - which was the really first application of the new Eniac technology. In fact, I am not so sure that HW Bush, Barbara and Dick Cheney are really real. Maybe I am not even typing this. But I going to continue to pretend I am just because that is the way I fake roll. Saw a Poll on it,so it must be true!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(The truther movement is growing.) Hiding something 53% Mostly lying 28% I'm in these groups. 
|
|
|
|
|
