100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Poll on who believes the official 9/11 account. | |
|---|---|
|
Edited by
Chazster
on
Tue 05/15/12 08:47 AM
|
|
found something about the intentional demolition Here's another piece of information that contradicts the Official Story - the man who signed a 99-year lease for the WTC plaza, six weeks before 9/11, stated in a PBS documentary that WTC 7 was intentionally demolished: In the documentary Silverstein makes the following statement; "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse. This directly contradicts the official FEMA report that "fire" and "damage from debris from WTC 1 and 2" caused the building to collapse. This is huge. Here's the relevant sound clip from the PBS documentary "America Rebuilds": http://VestigialConscience.com/PullIt.mp3 This comes from http://www.prisonplanet.com/011704wtc7.html - yes, I realize Alex Jones is way out there for some people, but this clip is the real deal from the documentary that anyone can order. Now, to those who buy the Official Story - how do you explain THIS one? http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1033796 You think this is something new? It isn't. He meant pull the fire fighters out. The owner of a building nor a fire chief have the authority to call for a demolition. I challenge you to find anything pre 9/11/01 that says pull it is a demolition term. It has only been associated with that sense 9/11 conspiracy stories. When did they get explosives in there? How did a 7 hour fire not compromise them? Why would he say this to the fire chief? Why over the phone? If it was this obvious why did the insurance company pay him? Really I wish people thought before they made statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
found something about the intentional demolition Here's another piece of information that contradicts the Official Story - the man who signed a 99-year lease for the WTC plaza, six weeks before 9/11, stated in a PBS documentary that WTC 7 was intentionally demolished: In the documentary Silverstein makes the following statement; "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse. This directly contradicts the official FEMA report that "fire" and "damage from debris from WTC 1 and 2" caused the building to collapse. This is huge. Here's the relevant sound clip from the PBS documentary "America Rebuilds": http://VestigialConscience.com/PullIt.mp3 This comes from http://www.prisonplanet.com/011704wtc7.html - yes, I realize Alex Jones is way out there for some people, but this clip is the real deal from the documentary that anyone can order. Now, to those who buy the Official Story - how do you explain THIS one? http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1033796 You think this is something new? It isn't. He meant pull the fire fighters out. The owner of a building nor a fire chief have the authority to call for a demolition. I challenge you to find anything pre 9/11/01 that says pull it is a demolition term. It has only been associated with that sense 9/11 conspiracy stories. When did they get explosives in there? How did a 7 hour fire not compromise them? Why would he say this to the fire chief? Why over the phone? If it was this obvious why did the insurance company pay him? Really I wish people thought before they made statements. Silverstein was interviewed at great length later about these comments. He explained that he was talking about saving the lives of the firemen by getting them out of the building. Funny how the truthers keep repeating this trash. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
found something about the intentional demolition Here's another piece of information that contradicts the Official Story - the man who signed a 99-year lease for the WTC plaza, six weeks before 9/11, stated in a PBS documentary that WTC 7 was intentionally demolished: In the documentary Silverstein makes the following statement; "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse. This directly contradicts the official FEMA report that "fire" and "damage from debris from WTC 1 and 2" caused the building to collapse. This is huge. Here's the relevant sound clip from the PBS documentary "America Rebuilds": http://VestigialConscience.com/PullIt.mp3 This comes from http://www.prisonplanet.com/011704wtc7.html - yes, I realize Alex Jones is way out there for some people, but this clip is the real deal from the documentary that anyone can order. Now, to those who buy the Official Story - how do you explain THIS one? http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1033796 You think this is something new? It isn't. He meant pull the fire fighters out. The owner of a building nor a fire chief have the authority to call for a demolition. I challenge you to find anything pre 9/11/01 that says pull it is a demolition term. It has only been associated with that sense 9/11 conspiracy stories. When did they get explosives in there? How did a 7 hour fire not compromise them? Why would he say this to the fire chief? Why over the phone? If it was this obvious why did the insurance company pay him? Really I wish people thought before they made statements. Silverstein was interviewed at great length later about these comments. He explained that he was talking about saving the lives of the firemen by getting them out of the building. Funny how the truthers keep repeating this trash. I am not a truther. I probably care the least about it of anyone in the thread. I was just posting another 'theory' I had read. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
found something about the intentional demolition Here's another piece of information that contradicts the Official Story - the man who signed a 99-year lease for the WTC plaza, six weeks before 9/11, stated in a PBS documentary that WTC 7 was intentionally demolished: In the documentary Silverstein makes the following statement; "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse. This directly contradicts the official FEMA report that "fire" and "damage from debris from WTC 1 and 2" caused the building to collapse. This is huge. Here's the relevant sound clip from the PBS documentary "America Rebuilds": http://VestigialConscience.com/PullIt.mp3 This comes from http://www.prisonplanet.com/011704wtc7.html - yes, I realize Alex Jones is way out there for some people, but this clip is the real deal from the documentary that anyone can order. Now, to those who buy the Official Story - how do you explain THIS one? http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1033796 You think this is something new? It isn't. He meant pull the fire fighters out. The owner of a building nor a fire chief have the authority to call for a demolition. I challenge you to find anything pre 9/11/01 that says pull it is a demolition term. It has only been associated with that sense 9/11 conspiracy stories. When did they get explosives in there? How did a 7 hour fire not compromise them? Why would he say this to the fire chief? Why over the phone? If it was this obvious why did the insurance company pay him? Really I wish people thought before they made statements. Silverstein was interviewed at great length later about these comments. He explained that he was talking about saving the lives of the firemen by getting them out of the building. Funny how the truthers keep repeating this trash. what i don't get is even if they did tear down the building, what difference did it make? it was on fire for 7 hours, they couldn't save it anyway, so what would it matter if they tore it down then or weeks later? building seven should matter the least, but truthers keep going back to it like it matters in some way... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
found something about the intentional demolition Here's another piece of information that contradicts the Official Story - the man who signed a 99-year lease for the WTC plaza, six weeks before 9/11, stated in a PBS documentary that WTC 7 was intentionally demolished: In the documentary Silverstein makes the following statement; "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse. This directly contradicts the official FEMA report that "fire" and "damage from debris from WTC 1 and 2" caused the building to collapse. This is huge. Here's the relevant sound clip from the PBS documentary "America Rebuilds": http://VestigialConscience.com/PullIt.mp3 This comes from http://www.prisonplanet.com/011704wtc7.html - yes, I realize Alex Jones is way out there for some people, but this clip is the real deal from the documentary that anyone can order. Now, to those who buy the Official Story - how do you explain THIS one? http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1033796 You think this is something new? It isn't. He meant pull the fire fighters out. The owner of a building nor a fire chief have the authority to call for a demolition. I challenge you to find anything pre 9/11/01 that says pull it is a demolition term. It has only been associated with that sense 9/11 conspiracy stories. When did they get explosives in there? How did a 7 hour fire not compromise them? Why would he say this to the fire chief? Why over the phone? If it was this obvious why did the insurance company pay him? Really I wish people thought before they made statements. Silverstein was interviewed at great length later about these comments. He explained that he was talking about saving the lives of the firemen by getting them out of the building. Funny how the truthers keep repeating this trash. what i don't get is even if they did tear down the building, what difference did it make? it was on fire for 7 hours, they couldn't save it anyway, so what would it matter if they tore it down then or weeks later? building seven should matter the least, but truthers keep going back to it like it matters in some way... I agree. It makes absolutely no difference to me. They were buildings, insigificant and able to be rebuilt. The lost lives are significant. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
found something about the intentional demolition Here's another piece of information that contradicts the Official Story - the man who signed a 99-year lease for the WTC plaza, six weeks before 9/11, stated in a PBS documentary that WTC 7 was intentionally demolished: In the documentary Silverstein makes the following statement; "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse. This directly contradicts the official FEMA report that "fire" and "damage from debris from WTC 1 and 2" caused the building to collapse. This is huge. Here's the relevant sound clip from the PBS documentary "America Rebuilds": http://VestigialConscience.com/PullIt.mp3 This comes from http://www.prisonplanet.com/011704wtc7.html - yes, I realize Alex Jones is way out there for some people, but this clip is the real deal from the documentary that anyone can order. Now, to those who buy the Official Story - how do you explain THIS one? http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1033796 You think this is something new? It isn't. He meant pull the fire fighters out. The owner of a building nor a fire chief have the authority to call for a demolition. I challenge you to find anything pre 9/11/01 that says pull it is a demolition term. It has only been associated with that sense 9/11 conspiracy stories. When did they get explosives in there? How did a 7 hour fire not compromise them? Why would he say this to the fire chief? Why over the phone? If it was this obvious why did the insurance company pay him? Really I wish people thought before they made statements. Silverstein was interviewed at great length later about these comments. He explained that he was talking about saving the lives of the firemen by getting them out of the building. Funny how the truthers keep repeating this trash. what i don't get is even if they did tear down the building, what difference did it make? it was on fire for 7 hours, they couldn't save it anyway, so what would it matter if they tore it down then or weeks later? building seven should matter the least, but truthers keep going back to it like it matters in some way... Acording to which "truther" theory you want ... Bldg 7 held secret proof of crimes by the Bush Administration held the only copies of massive debt of friends of Bush held the only copies of CIA files that the public must not see. held various other crazy chit, blah, blah, blah. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
found something about the intentional demolition Here's another piece of information that contradicts the Official Story - the man who signed a 99-year lease for the WTC plaza, six weeks before 9/11, stated in a PBS documentary that WTC 7 was intentionally demolished: In the documentary Silverstein makes the following statement; "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse. This directly contradicts the official FEMA report that "fire" and "damage from debris from WTC 1 and 2" caused the building to collapse. This is huge. Here's the relevant sound clip from the PBS documentary "America Rebuilds": http://VestigialConscience.com/PullIt.mp3 This comes from http://www.prisonplanet.com/011704wtc7.html - yes, I realize Alex Jones is way out there for some people, but this clip is the real deal from the documentary that anyone can order. Now, to those who buy the Official Story - how do you explain THIS one? http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1033796 You think this is something new? It isn't. He meant pull the fire fighters out. The owner of a building nor a fire chief have the authority to call for a demolition. I challenge you to find anything pre 9/11/01 that says pull it is a demolition term. It has only been associated with that sense 9/11 conspiracy stories. When did they get explosives in there? How did a 7 hour fire not compromise them? Why would he say this to the fire chief? Why over the phone? If it was this obvious why did the insurance company pay him? Really I wish people thought before they made statements. Silverstein was interviewed at great length later about these comments. He explained that he was talking about saving the lives of the firemen by getting them out of the building. Funny how the truthers keep repeating this trash. what i don't get is even if they did tear down the building, what difference did it make? it was on fire for 7 hours, they couldn't save it anyway, so what would it matter if they tore it down then or weeks later? building seven should matter the least, but truthers keep going back to it like it matters in some way... Acording to which "truther" theory you want ... Bldg 7 held secret proof of crimes by the Bush Administration held the only copies of massive debt of friends of Bush held the only copies of CIA files that the public must not see. held various other crazy chit, blah, blah, blah. omg maybe it was a mass conspiracy... a building that held secret documents... i'm glad all the secret documents were all stored in that building, and the FIRE-CHIEF had enough sense to demolish the building before anyone could get in there in the 7 hours of fire and read any of them...man, if those super-secret documents ever got to the public, the world as we know it could have changed... And I'm glad the truthers knew about these super-secret documents, otherwise, someone might have missed that point and the government would have gotten away with it... curses, foiled again... darn metteling kids... maybe it was an invisible missile fired from a flaming plane that was setting bombs so the laser could turn the buildings to dust.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
found something about the intentional demolition Here's another piece of information that contradicts the Official Story - the man who signed a 99-year lease for the WTC plaza, six weeks before 9/11, stated in a PBS documentary that WTC 7 was intentionally demolished: In the documentary Silverstein makes the following statement; "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse. This directly contradicts the official FEMA report that "fire" and "damage from debris from WTC 1 and 2" caused the building to collapse. This is huge. Here's the relevant sound clip from the PBS documentary "America Rebuilds": http://VestigialConscience.com/PullIt.mp3 This comes from http://www.prisonplanet.com/011704wtc7.html - yes, I realize Alex Jones is way out there for some people, but this clip is the real deal from the documentary that anyone can order. Now, to those who buy the Official Story - how do you explain THIS one? http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1033796 You think this is something new? It isn't. He meant pull the fire fighters out. The owner of a building nor a fire chief have the authority to call for a demolition. I challenge you to find anything pre 9/11/01 that says pull it is a demolition term. It has only been associated with that sense 9/11 conspiracy stories. When did they get explosives in there? How did a 7 hour fire not compromise them? Why would he say this to the fire chief? Why over the phone? If it was this obvious why did the insurance company pay him? Really I wish people thought before they made statements. Silverstein was interviewed at great length later about these comments. He explained that he was talking about saving the lives of the firemen by getting them out of the building. Funny how the truthers keep repeating this trash. what i don't get is even if they did tear down the building, what difference did it make? it was on fire for 7 hours, they couldn't save it anyway, so what would it matter if they tore it down then or weeks later? building seven should matter the least, but truthers keep going back to it like it matters in some way... Acording to which "truther" theory you want ... Bldg 7 held secret proof of crimes by the Bush Administration held the only copies of massive debt of friends of Bush held the only copies of CIA files that the public must not see. held various other crazy chit, blah, blah, blah. omg maybe it was a mass conspiracy... a building that held secret documents... i'm glad all the secret documents were all stored in that building, and the FIRE-CHIEF had enough sense to demolish the building before anyone could get in there in the 7 hours of fire and read any of them...man, if those super-secret documents ever got to the public, the world as we know it could have changed... And I'm glad the truthers knew about these super-secret documents, otherwise, someone might have missed that point and the government would have gotten away with it... curses, foiled again... darn metteling kids... maybe it was an invisible missile fired from a flaming plane that was setting bombs so the laser could turn the buildings to dust....  no he didnt just quote scooby doo....lol my favorite kudos!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
found something about the intentional demolition Here's another piece of information that contradicts the Official Story - the man who signed a 99-year lease for the WTC plaza, six weeks before 9/11, stated in a PBS documentary that WTC 7 was intentionally demolished: In the documentary Silverstein makes the following statement; "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse. This directly contradicts the official FEMA report that "fire" and "damage from debris from WTC 1 and 2" caused the building to collapse. This is huge. Here's the relevant sound clip from the PBS documentary "America Rebuilds": http://VestigialConscience.com/PullIt.mp3 This comes from http://www.prisonplanet.com/011704wtc7.html - yes, I realize Alex Jones is way out there for some people, but this clip is the real deal from the documentary that anyone can order. Now, to those who buy the Official Story - how do you explain THIS one? http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1033796 You think this is something new? It isn't. He meant pull the fire fighters out. The owner of a building nor a fire chief have the authority to call for a demolition. I challenge you to find anything pre 9/11/01 that says pull it is a demolition term. It has only been associated with that sense 9/11 conspiracy stories. When did they get explosives in there? How did a 7 hour fire not compromise them? Why would he say this to the fire chief? Why over the phone? If it was this obvious why did the insurance company pay him? Really I wish people thought before they made statements. Silverstein was interviewed at great length later about these comments. He explained that he was talking about saving the lives of the firemen by getting them out of the building. Funny how the truthers keep repeating this trash. what i don't get is even if they did tear down the building, what difference did it make? it was on fire for 7 hours, they couldn't save it anyway, so what would it matter if they tore it down then or weeks later? building seven should matter the least, but truthers keep going back to it like it matters in some way... Acording to which "truther" theory you want ... Bldg 7 held secret proof of crimes by the Bush Administration held the only copies of massive debt of friends of Bush held the only copies of CIA files that the public must not see. held various other crazy chit, blah, blah, blah. omg maybe it was a mass conspiracy... a building that held secret documents... i'm glad all the secret documents were all stored in that building, and the FIRE-CHIEF had enough sense to demolish the building before anyone could get in there in the 7 hours of fire and read any of them...man, if those super-secret documents ever got to the public, the world as we know it could have changed... And I'm glad the truthers knew about these super-secret documents, otherwise, someone might have missed that point and the government would have gotten away with it... curses, foiled again... darn metteling kids... maybe it was an invisible missile fired from a flaming plane that was setting bombs so the laser could turn the buildings to dust....  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
found something about the intentional demolition Here's another piece of information that contradicts the Official Story - the man who signed a 99-year lease for the WTC plaza, six weeks before 9/11, stated in a PBS documentary that WTC 7 was intentionally demolished: In the documentary Silverstein makes the following statement; "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse. This directly contradicts the official FEMA report that "fire" and "damage from debris from WTC 1 and 2" caused the building to collapse. This is huge. Here's the relevant sound clip from the PBS documentary "America Rebuilds": http://VestigialConscience.com/PullIt.mp3 This comes from http://www.prisonplanet.com/011704wtc7.html - yes, I realize Alex Jones is way out there for some people, but this clip is the real deal from the documentary that anyone can order. Now, to those who buy the Official Story - how do you explain THIS one? http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1033796 You think this is something new? It isn't. He meant pull the fire fighters out. The owner of a building nor a fire chief have the authority to call for a demolition. I challenge you to find anything pre 9/11/01 that says pull it is a demolition term. It has only been associated with that sense 9/11 conspiracy stories. When did they get explosives in there? How did a 7 hour fire not compromise them? Why would he say this to the fire chief? Why over the phone? If it was this obvious why did the insurance company pay him? Really I wish people thought before they made statements. Silverstein was interviewed at great length later about these comments. He explained that he was talking about saving the lives of the firemen by getting them out of the building. Funny how the truthers keep repeating this trash. what i don't get is even if they did tear down the building, what difference did it make? it was on fire for 7 hours, they couldn't save it anyway, so what would it matter if they tore it down then or weeks later? building seven should matter the least, but truthers keep going back to it like it matters in some way... Acording to which "truther" theory you want ... Bldg 7 held secret proof of crimes by the Bush Administration held the only copies of massive debt of friends of Bush held the only copies of CIA files that the public must not see. held various other crazy chit, blah, blah, blah. omg maybe it was a mass conspiracy... a building that held secret documents... i'm glad all the secret documents were all stored in that building, and the FIRE-CHIEF had enough sense to demolish the building before anyone could get in there in the 7 hours of fire and read any of them...man, if those super-secret documents ever got to the public, the world as we know it could have changed... And I'm glad the truthers knew about these super-secret documents, otherwise, someone might have missed that point and the government would have gotten away with it... curses, foiled again... darn metteling kids... maybe it was an invisible missile fired from a flaming plane that was setting bombs so the laser could turn the buildings to dust.... no he didnt just quote scooby doo....lol my favorite kudos!! scooby snacks for everyone! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rooby Rooby Roooooooooo!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
found something about the intentional demolition Here's another piece of information that contradicts the Official Story - the man who signed a 99-year lease for the WTC plaza, six weeks before 9/11, stated in a PBS documentary that WTC 7 was intentionally demolished: In the documentary Silverstein makes the following statement; "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse. This directly contradicts the official FEMA report that "fire" and "damage from debris from WTC 1 and 2" caused the building to collapse. This is huge. Here's the relevant sound clip from the PBS documentary "America Rebuilds": http://VestigialConscience.com/PullIt.mp3 This comes from http://www.prisonplanet.com/011704wtc7.html - yes, I realize Alex Jones is way out there for some people, but this clip is the real deal from the documentary that anyone can order. Now, to those who buy the Official Story - how do you explain THIS one? http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1033796 You think this is something new? It isn't. He meant pull the fire fighters out. The owner of a building nor a fire chief have the authority to call for a demolition. I challenge you to find anything pre 9/11/01 that says pull it is a demolition term. It has only been associated with that sense 9/11 conspiracy stories. When did they get explosives in there? How did a 7 hour fire not compromise them? Why would he say this to the fire chief? Why over the phone? If it was this obvious why did the insurance company pay him? Really I wish people thought before they made statements. Silverstein was interviewed at great length later about these comments. He explained that he was talking about saving the lives of the firemen by getting them out of the building. Funny how the truthers keep repeating this trash. what i don't get is even if they did tear down the building, what difference did it make? it was on fire for 7 hours, they couldn't save it anyway, so what would it matter if they tore it down then or weeks later? building seven should matter the least, but truthers keep going back to it like it matters in some way... Acording to which "truther" theory you want ... Bldg 7 held secret proof of crimes by the Bush Administration held the only copies of massive debt of friends of Bush held the only copies of CIA files that the public must not see. held various other crazy chit, blah, blah, blah. omg maybe it was a mass conspiracy... a building that held secret documents... i'm glad all the secret documents were all stored in that building, and the FIRE-CHIEF had enough sense to demolish the building before anyone could get in there in the 7 hours of fire and read any of them...man, if those super-secret documents ever got to the public, the world as we know it could have changed... And I'm glad the truthers knew about these super-secret documents, otherwise, someone might have missed that point and the government would have gotten away with it... curses, foiled again... darn metteling kids... maybe it was an invisible missile fired from a flaming plane that was setting bombs so the laser could turn the buildings to dust.... Oh, and the secret service ... Building 7 was pulled in order to destroy the Secret Service's criminal files. All of them. All of the Secret Service files tracking an unknown number of criminals were lost in the collapse of Building 7. The Secret Service lost their entire data bank. The army lost a significant amount of budget data. "The Navy, which lost about 70 percent of its Pentagon office space in the attack, lost some data, but had its backup data stored off-site." What do we make of the 70 percent figure? |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
RKISIT
on
Tue 05/15/12 10:13 AM
|
|
Naw Ms.Piggy did some of her judo chops on the pillars of building 7 and it collapsed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Naw Ms.Piggy did some of her judo chops on the pillars of building 7 and it collapsed. she was acting under direct orders of the fire chief, so she is untouchable... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
found something about the intentional demolition Here's another piece of information that contradicts the Official Story - the man who signed a 99-year lease for the WTC plaza, six weeks before 9/11, stated in a PBS documentary that WTC 7 was intentionally demolished: In the documentary Silverstein makes the following statement; "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse. This directly contradicts the official FEMA report that "fire" and "damage from debris from WTC 1 and 2" caused the building to collapse. This is huge. Here's the relevant sound clip from the PBS documentary "America Rebuilds": http://VestigialConscience.com/PullIt.mp3 This comes from http://www.prisonplanet.com/011704wtc7.html - yes, I realize Alex Jones is way out there for some people, but this clip is the real deal from the documentary that anyone can order. Now, to those who buy the Official Story - how do you explain THIS one? http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1033796 You think this is something new? It isn't. He meant pull the fire fighters out. The owner of a building nor a fire chief have the authority to call for a demolition. I challenge you to find anything pre 9/11/01 that says pull it is a demolition term. It has only been associated with that sense 9/11 conspiracy stories. When did they get explosives in there? How did a 7 hour fire not compromise them? Why would he say this to the fire chief? Why over the phone? If it was this obvious why did the insurance company pay him? Really I wish people thought before they made statements. Silverstein was interviewed at great length later about these comments. He explained that he was talking about saving the lives of the firemen by getting them out of the building. Funny how the truthers keep repeating this trash. what i don't get is even if they did tear down the building, what difference did it make? it was on fire for 7 hours, they couldn't save it anyway, so what would it matter if they tore it down then or weeks later? building seven should matter the least, but truthers keep going back to it like it matters in some way... Acording to which "truther" theory you want ... Bldg 7 held secret proof of crimes by the Bush Administration held the only copies of massive debt of friends of Bush held the only copies of CIA files that the public must not see. held various other crazy chit, blah, blah, blah. omg maybe it was a mass conspiracy... a building that held secret documents... i'm glad all the secret documents were all stored in that building, and the FIRE-CHIEF had enough sense to demolish the building before anyone could get in there in the 7 hours of fire and read any of them...man, if those super-secret documents ever got to the public, the world as we know it could have changed... And I'm glad the truthers knew about these super-secret documents, otherwise, someone might have missed that point and the government would have gotten away with it... curses, foiled again... darn metteling kids... maybe it was an invisible missile fired from a flaming plane that was setting bombs so the laser could turn the buildings to dust.... Oh, and the secret service ... Building 7 was pulled in order to destroy the Secret Service's criminal files. All of them. All of the Secret Service files tracking an unknown number of criminals were lost in the collapse of Building 7. The Secret Service lost their entire data bank. The army lost a significant amount of budget data. "The Navy, which lost about 70 percent of its Pentagon office space in the attack, lost some data, but had its backup data stored off-site." What do we make of the 70 percent figure? maybe thats where they had the plans for the laser that turned metal into dust? or, maybe, thats where all the plans for 9-11 was stored? that makes sense, so it must be true... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Naw Ms.Piggy did some of her judo chops on the pillars of building 7 and it collapsed.
|
|
|
|
|
