Community > Politics, Current News & Events

Topic: Poll on who believes the official 9/11 account.
Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Sat 05/12/12 06:17 AM
(The truther movement is growing.) A monumental new scientific opinion poll has emerged which declares that only 16% of people in America now believe the official government explanation of the September 11th 2001 terror attacks. According to the new New York Times/CBS News poll, only 16% of Americans think the government is telling the truth about 9/11 and the intelligence prior to the attacks: "Do you think members of the Bush Administration are telling the truth, are mostly telling the truth but hiding something, or are they mostly lying? Telling the truth 16% Hiding something 53% Mostly lying 28% Not sure 3%" The 84% figure mirrors other recent polls on the same issue. A Canadian Poll put the figure at 85%. A CNN poll had the figure at 89%. Over 80% supported the stance of Charlie Sheen when he went public with his opinions on 9/11 as an inside job. A recent CNN poll found that the percentage of Americans who blame the Bush administration for the September 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington rose from almost a third to almost half over the past four years. This latest poll shows that that figure has again risen exponentially and now stands at well over three quarters of the population. what was the 'official' government explanation? I believe they were aware of the plan with the planes, I believe the planes hit as was broadcast on the day, I believe the buildings collapsed from the jet fuel and heat of the explosion as well as less than undestructable construction, I also believe one of the buildings had precautionary measures in it to blow manually in the event of a catastrophe, and that building was manually blown Doubt if anyone sane would pre-rig a Building with Explosives to be used in case of an Emergency! Too many things can go wrong when you have three-hundred-odd Tons of Explosives laying around! Besides that,a Structure needs to be considerably weakened throughout to be taken down with Explosives! Also,a dumb thing to do in case of Fire!

Peccy Joined Thu 06/28/07 Posts: 17181	Sat 05/12/12 06:18 AM
What demographic was used from which part of the country for the random sample? What was the margin of error? These are some things that make it a legitimate survey. Why don't you ask CNN and the new New York Times/CBS News poll people. Because I for one am not curious, I happen to believe in the laws of physics. Maybe one or two small parts of this are made up, but just because one part of the sundae is melted, doesn't mean the whole thing is bad. The parts where "truthers" try and deny the laws of physics is what gets me laughing.

metalwing Joined Fri 11/14/08 Posts: 26218	Sat 05/12/12 07:09 AM
Bill Clinton says 9/11 truthers are idiots.... http://youtu.be/Pk7-XfE7KcU Yes, but has he seen the photos of the ray guns turning the building to dust???

Leigh2154 Joined Sun 10/02/11 Posts: 16479	Sat 05/12/12 07:13 AM
Bill Clinton says 9/11 truthers are idiots.... http://youtu.be/Pk7-XfE7KcU Yes, but has he seen the photos of the ray guns turning the building to dust??? No, but I think Hillary has.....

metalwing Joined Fri 11/14/08 Posts: 26218	Sat 05/12/12 07:20 AM
Bill Clinton says 9/11 truthers are idiots.... http://youtu.be/Pk7-XfE7KcU Yes, but has he seen the photos of the ray guns turning the building to dust??? No, but I think Hillary has..... I bet Hillary was pulling the trigger!!

Leigh2154 Joined Sun 10/02/11 Posts: 16479	Sat 05/12/12 07:34 AM
Bill Clinton says 9/11 truthers are idiots.... http://youtu.be/Pk7-XfE7KcU Yes, but has he seen the photos of the ray guns turning the building to dust??? No, but I think Hillary has..... I bet Hillary was pulling the trigger!! With her "left" hand...

RKISIT Joined Tue 01/08/08 Posts: 16721	Sat 05/12/12 07:49 AM
Naw Godzilla punched Gamera into the buildings.

metalwing Joined Fri 11/14/08 Posts: 26218	Sat 05/12/12 08:42 AM
Naw Godzilla punched Gamera into the buildings. Ironically, the Godzilla reference actually applies to the 9/11 events and "truther" movement. Most people have never seen the original version of Godzilla. Gojira was an emotional movie about a three way love affair and the horrors of atomic warfare which was cut and had new scenes added with Raymond Burr to appeal to the American audience. So if someone took a "poll" and asked most Americans "What was the movie Godzilla about?", they would get mixed responses about a children's monster movie. The basic theme of the three way love triangle would be totally absent and few would "get" the war reference. The "truthers" put up MOSTLY the same film and data as everyone else but add their version of Raymond Burr... and the story comes out much differently.

InvictusV Joined Sun 11/23/08 Posts: 5282	Sat 05/12/12 08:45 AM
(The truther movement is growing.) A monumental new scientific opinion poll has emerged which declares that only 16% of people in America now believe the official government explanation of the September 11th 2001 terror attacks. According to the new New York Times/CBS News poll, only 16% of Americans think the government is telling the truth about 9/11 and the intelligence prior to the attacks: "Do you think members of the Bush Administration are telling the truth, are mostly telling the truth but hiding something, or are they mostly lying? Telling the truth 16% Hiding something 53% Mostly lying 28% Not sure 3%" The 84% figure mirrors other recent polls on the same issue. A Canadian Poll put the figure at 85%. A CNN poll had the figure at 89%. Over 80% supported the stance of Charlie Sheen when he went public with his opinions on 9/11 as an inside job. A recent CNN poll found that the percentage of Americans who blame the Bush administration for the September 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington rose from almost a third to almost half over the past four years. This latest poll shows that that figure has again risen exponentially and now stands at well over three quarters of the population. what was the 'official' government explanation? I believe they were aware of the plan with the planes, I believe the planes hit as was broadcast on the day, I believe the buildings collapsed from the jet fuel and heat of the explosion as well as less than undestructable construction, I also believe one of the buildings had precautionary measures in it to blow manually in the event of a catastrophe, and that building was manually blown Doubt if anyone sane would pre-rig a Building with Explosives to be used in case of an Emergency! Too many things can go wrong when you have three-hundred-odd Tons of Explosives laying around! Besides that,a Structure needs to be considerably weakened throughout to be taken down with Explosives! Also,a dumb thing to do in case of Fire! so you are saying that the emergency command post for NYC couldn't have had holes drilled into the structural columns and explosives planted just in case they needed to blow it up? good god, man....

InvictusV Joined Sun 11/23/08 Posts: 5282	Sat 05/12/12 08:50 AM
I have to add that modern architecture surly includes enough holes and explosives in every major new construction to insure that in case of emergency they can just push a button and blow it sky high.. It is actually putting quite a strain on the nano termite supply..

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Sat 05/12/12 08:53 AM Edited by Conrad_73 on Sat 05/12/12 08:57 AM
(The truther movement is growing.) A monumental new scientific opinion poll has emerged which declares that only 16% of people in America now believe the official government explanation of the September 11th 2001 terror attacks. According to the new New York Times/CBS News poll, only 16% of Americans think the government is telling the truth about 9/11 and the intelligence prior to the attacks: "Do you think members of the Bush Administration are telling the truth, are mostly telling the truth but hiding something, or are they mostly lying? Telling the truth 16% Hiding something 53% Mostly lying 28% Not sure 3%" The 84% figure mirrors other recent polls on the same issue. A Canadian Poll put the figure at 85%. A CNN poll had the figure at 89%. Over 80% supported the stance of Charlie Sheen when he went public with his opinions on 9/11 as an inside job. A recent CNN poll found that the percentage of Americans who blame the Bush administration for the September 11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington rose from almost a third to almost half over the past four years. This latest poll shows that that figure has again risen exponentially and now stands at well over three quarters of the population. what was the 'official' government explanation? I believe they were aware of the plan with the planes, I believe the planes hit as was broadcast on the day, I believe the buildings collapsed from the jet fuel and heat of the explosion as well as less than undestructable construction, I also believe one of the buildings had precautionary measures in it to blow manually in the event of a catastrophe, and that building was manually blown Doubt if anyone sane would pre-rig a Building with Explosives to be used in case of an Emergency! Too many things can go wrong when you have three-hundred-odd Tons of Explosives laying around! Besides that,a Structure needs to be considerably weakened throughout to be taken down with Explosives! Also,a dumb thing to do in case of Fire! so you are saying that the emergency command post for NYC couldn't have had holes drilled into the structural columns and explosives planted just in case they needed to blow it up? good god, man.... takes more than a few holes and a couple pounds of C4 to take down a Building like that,regardless of what the Truthers claim! Then set the Structure afire with an Airplane to make those Explosives work even better!

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Sat 05/12/12 08:55 AM
I have to add that modern architecture surly includes enough holes and explosives in every major new construction to insure that in case of emergency they can just push a button and blow it sky high.. It is actually putting quite a strain on the nano termite supply.. they had to appeal to North Korea to send them a couple hundred tons!

InvictusV Joined Sun 11/23/08 Posts: 5282	Sat 05/12/12 08:57 AM
I have to add that modern architecture surly includes enough holes and explosives in every major new construction to insure that in case of emergency they can just push a button and blow it sky high.. It is actually putting quite a strain on the nano termite supply.. they had to appeal to North Korea to send them a couple hundred tons! it is how the building owner evicts tenants.. you don't pay your rent on time they blow up your office..

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Sat 05/12/12 08:59 AM
I have to add that modern architecture surly includes enough holes and explosives in every major new construction to insure that in case of emergency they can just push a button and blow it sky high.. It is actually putting quite a strain on the nano termite supply.. they had to appeal to North Korea to send them a couple hundred tons! it is how the building owner evicts tenants.. you don't pay your rent on time they blow up your office.. a bit radical I would say!

InvictusV Joined Sun 11/23/08 Posts: 5282	Sat 05/12/12 09:01 AM
I have to add that modern architecture surly includes enough holes and explosives in every major new construction to insure that in case of emergency they can just push a button and blow it sky high.. It is actually putting quite a strain on the nano termite supply.. they had to appeal to North Korea to send them a couple hundred tons! it is how the building owner evicts tenants.. you don't pay your rent on time they blow up your office.. a bit radical I would say! they need to check and make sure all those explosives are operational in case there is an emergency and they need to take her down in a hurry..

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Sat 05/12/12 09:05 AM
I have to add that modern architecture surly includes enough holes and explosives in every major new construction to insure that in case of emergency they can just push a button and blow it sky high.. It is actually putting quite a strain on the nano termite supply.. they had to appeal to North Korea to send them a couple hundred tons! it is how the building owner evicts tenants.. you don't pay your rent on time they blow up your office.. a bit radical I would say! they need to check and make sure all those explosives are operational in case there is an emergency and they need to take her down in a hurry.. gets interesting when you have leaking electricity in the Building with thousands of electrical Blasting Caps around! Could get very interesting!

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Sat 05/12/12 10:06 AM
What demographic was used from which part of the country for the random sample? What was the margin of error? These are some things that make it a legitimate survey. Why don't you ask CNN and the new New York Times/CBS News poll people. Because I for one am not curious, I happen to believe in the laws of physics. Maybe one or two small parts of this are made up, but just because one part of the sundae is melted, doesn't mean the whole thing is bad. The parts where "truthers" try and deny the laws of physics is what gets me laughing. Peccy the truthers don't deny the laws of physics. Where do you get that idea? You will have to be more specific. What I don't buy is the computer simulations and the false information programmed into them in order to finally, after trial and error, get the calculations they needed to claim that it is possible for a giant high rise to be toppled by a normal fire or a plane. What I don't buy is how a parking lot full of cars were all rusted out with many that had their engine blocks melted and the parking lot was blocks away from the buildings. I watched the videos and I did not see that much fire. It was all dust. If there was that much heat and fire then why was there paper flying all over the place that was not even touched by fire?

mightymoe Joined Sun 11/19/06 Posts: 37362	Sat 05/12/12 10:19 AM Edited by mightymoe on Sat 05/12/12 10:20 AM
What demographic was used from which part of the country for the random sample? What was the margin of error? These are some things that make it a legitimate survey. Why don't you ask CNN and the new New York Times/CBS News poll people. Because I for one am not curious, I happen to believe in the laws of physics. Maybe one or two small parts of this are made up, but just because one part of the sundae is melted, doesn't mean the whole thing is bad. The parts where "truthers" try and deny the laws of physics is what gets me laughing. Peccy the truthers don't deny the laws of physics. Where do you get that idea? You will have to be more specific. What I don't buy is the computer simulations and the false information programmed into them in order to finally, after trial and error, get the calculations they needed to claim that it is possible for a giant high rise to be toppled by a normal fire or a plane. What I don't buy is how a parking lot full of cars were all rusted out with many that had their engine blocks melted and the parking lot was blocks away from the buildings. I watched the videos and I did not see that much fire. It was all dust. If there was that much heat and fire then why was there paper flying all over the place that was not even touched by fire? only about 4 floors were on fire.. that left about 100 other floors that did not burn... i think they might of had some paper on the other 100 floors... maybe.... and that would actually be about 200 floors, 100 per building

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Sat 05/12/12 10:30 AM
What demographic was used from which part of the country for the random sample? What was the margin of error? These are some things that make it a legitimate survey. Why don't you ask CNN and the new New York Times/CBS News poll people. Because I for one am not curious, I happen to believe in the laws of physics. Maybe one or two small parts of this are made up, but just because one part of the sundae is melted, doesn't mean the whole thing is bad. The parts where "truthers" try and deny the laws of physics is what gets me laughing. Peccy the truthers don't deny the laws of physics. Where do you get that idea? You will have to be more specific. What I don't buy is the computer simulations and the false information programmed into them in order to finally, after trial and error, get the calculations they needed to claim that it is possible for a giant high rise to be toppled by a normal fire or a plane. What I don't buy is how a parking lot full of cars were all rusted out with many that had their engine blocks melted and the parking lot was blocks away from the buildings. I watched the videos and I did not see that much fire. It was all dust. If there was that much heat and fire then why was there paper flying all over the place that was not even touched by fire? only about 4 floors were on fire.. that left about 100 other floors that did not burn... i think they might of had some paper on the other 100 floors... maybe.... and that would actually be about 200 floors, 100 per building Exactly, so how did all that fire reach a parking lot a few blocks away and virtually melt the engine blocks of cars? And what caused the cars to rust so quickly? ... Oxidation. So why would a building on fire collapsing cause all that oxidation, melt engine blocks, and rust out hundreds of cars?

mightymoe Joined Sun 11/19/06 Posts: 37362	Sat 05/12/12 10:46 AM
What demographic was used from which part of the country for the random sample? What was the margin of error? These are some things that make it a legitimate survey. Why don't you ask CNN and the new New York Times/CBS News poll people. Because I for one am not curious, I happen to believe in the laws of physics. Maybe one or two small parts of this are made up, but just because one part of the sundae is melted, doesn't mean the whole thing is bad. The parts where "truthers" try and deny the laws of physics is what gets me laughing. Peccy the truthers don't deny the laws of physics. Where do you get that idea? You will have to be more specific. What I don't buy is the computer simulations and the false information programmed into them in order to finally, after trial and error, get the calculations they needed to claim that it is possible for a giant high rise to be toppled by a normal fire or a plane. What I don't buy is how a parking lot full of cars were all rusted out with many that had their engine blocks melted and the parking lot was blocks away from the buildings. I watched the videos and I did not see that much fire. It was all dust. If there was that much heat and fire then why was there paper flying all over the place that was not even touched by fire? only about 4 floors were on fire.. that left about 100 other floors that did not burn... i think they might of had some paper on the other 100 floors... maybe.... and that would actually be about 200 floors, 100 per building Exactly, so how did all that fire reach a parking lot a few blocks away and virtually melt the engine blocks of cars? And what caused the cars to rust so quickly? ... Oxidation. So why would a building on fire collapsing cause all that oxidation, melt engine blocks, and rust out hundreds of cars? i don't know that it did that... i just hear about your fantasies... why don't you show me the melted engine blocks, please...