Topic: Why do UFO's need lights?
suzany's photo
Sat 06/16/12 06:35 PM
Edited by suzany on Sat 06/16/12 06:40 PM
and well why they have light on their aircraft i dont know,but when i saw it in 2006 it had light all rounded..blue and orange light that alternatedly blue orange blue orange....in a round motion ove the sky it was near 22 at night..andthe sky in Brazil was so dark it didt have stars..or at least not soo much....the first who saw it was me after the 2 person with me in the street near my home...and welll the most strange is that i didnt saw any object....i cant tell its material look alike what....cause it was not visible...i just saw lights alter natedly turning into blue and orange in a round not to big circuference.....amplitude...well i can say it was a flying sauce...by my experience cause i am 33 years old...a more young then in 2006 but yet i saw airplanes helicopters,kite,balloon and i doing a reserch about metereologic baloon in net...and it only seesm to be a kinfd of et....aircraft...i know maybe people think i smoked a weed or maybe think i am crazy....OR maybe think i just want to show off but i feell i am blessed for seeeing it....and welll as i know have at least more 2 persons that saw what i saw..sooooooooooo if et really exsist i can call me LUCKYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

metalwing's photo
Sat 06/16/12 06:57 PM

and well why they have light on their aircraft i dont know,but when i saw it in 2006 it had light all rounded..blue and orange light that alternatedly blue orange blue orange....in a round motion ove the sky it was near 22 at night..andthe sky in Brazil was so dark it didt have stars..or at least not soo much....the first who saw it was me after the 2 person with me in the street near my home...and welll the most strange is that i didnt saw any object....i cant tell its material look alike what....cause it was not visible...i just saw lights alter natedly turning into blue and orange in a round not to big circuference.....amplitude...well i can say it was a flying sauce...by my experience cause i am 33 years old...a more young then in 2006 but yet i saw airplanes helicopters,kite,balloon and i doing a reserch about metereologic baloon in net...and it only seesm to be a kinfd of et....aircraft...i know maybe people think i smoked a weed or maybe think i am crazy....OR maybe think i just want to show off but i feell i am blessed for seeeing it....and welll as i know have at least more 2 persons that saw what i saw..sooooooooooo if et really exsist i can call me LUCKYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY


You are not alone!

Dodo_David's photo
Sat 06/16/12 11:01 PM


When a flying object defies the laws of physics and disappears through a worm hole, I think it is safe to say that it is probably an alien space craft. I've seen videos of that too.


huh You saw a video of a spacecraft going into a wormhole.

What is wrong with this picture?



Yep.

When they go through the worm hole, there is a flash of light and the ship disappears. It is basically like traveling in the dimension of time, but they do it by bending space with electromagnetic fields.


I remember seeing that video.
Hmm. Now which episode of Star Trek was that?

no photo
Sun 06/17/12 06:38 AM


This is a picture of a real flying saucer. I got it off youtube. It was filmed coming in and out of a cloud.






it must be real, it has no lights....


And it was on Youtube, everything on Youtube is real.

Ladywind7's photo
Sun 06/17/12 07:14 AM
Two of us saw an oval in daylight. It was like glass, it was completly flat, just like a window. It was above us for about one minute, twinkled and disappeared? Whatcha reckon that was? A portal maybe? Oh and there were no lights.

no photo
Sun 06/17/12 09:17 AM

Two of us saw an oval in daylight. It was like glass, it was completly flat, just like a window. It was above us for about one minute, twinkled and disappeared? Whatcha reckon that was? A portal maybe? Oh and there were no lights.


You say it was oval, then you say it was flat. How could you tell it was flat?

It could have been a prob.

no photo
Sun 06/17/12 09:22 AM



This is a picture of a real flying saucer. I got it off youtube. It was filmed coming in and out of a cloud.






it must be real, it has no lights....


And it was on Youtube, everything on Youtube is real.



I know you are being sarcastic. Everything on youtube is certainly NOT real. Youtube is authored by the entire world.

Some of the ufo videos are authentic, many are not. You have to judge for yourself.

If you had a real video of a real UFO what would YOU do with it? Personally I would put it on the Internet rather than turn it over to the government authorities who would just keep it with their other classified stuff.

That is what they did when ranchers would report their mutilated cows. They would collect the cow and you would never hear from them again. They would also intimidate local newspapers and threaten them if they published any stories about the incidents.

They were purposely covering up the mutilation activity. This was going on all over Colorado. This is where I live.

Ladywind7's photo
Sun 06/17/12 02:06 PM
Oval as in a mirror hanging on your wall. Flat as in zero width.waving

no photo
Sun 06/17/12 02:37 PM

Oval as in a mirror hanging on your wall. Flat as in zero width.waving


So then, apparently you saw it move so you could see that it was flat?

wux's photo
Sun 06/17/12 02:47 PM


Oval as in a mirror hanging on your wall. Flat as in zero width.waving


So then, apparently you saw it move so you could see that it was flat?


I am really going out on a limb, but I'd venture to say that the lady saw that the moving oval was flat because she looked at it with her eyes.

I am sure other, alternative explanations exist, but this would be my theory.

wux's photo
Sun 06/17/12 03:01 PM
1. When a flying object defies the laws of physics, all those physics should get together and beat the crap out of the object with cut-off drain pipes.
2. When man sees a flying object defy the laws of physics as man has so far put those laws together, then man should reexamine these laws and alter them so that the phenomenon will no longer defy the laws of physics. This, actually, is the wormhole of science.
3. Alien UFO riders are not demons, who told you that bobymeiser. They are, in fact, gnomes and peppercorn people, who colonized the Philippine islands before Vasco de Gama was able to take his seeds there.
4. A wormhole is exactly that: a wormhole. The expression fits. If the worm does not, then it's not his hole.

no photo
Sun 06/17/12 03:05 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Sun 06/17/12 03:08 PM



Oval as in a mirror hanging on your wall. Flat as in zero width.waving


So then, apparently you saw it move so you could see that it was flat?


I am really going out on a limb, but I'd venture to say that the lady saw that the moving oval was flat because she looked at it with her eyes.

I am sure other, alternative explanations exist, but this would be my theory.


Being an artist, I realize that a flat circle,(or a disk) seen at a specific angle looks like an oval.

An oval, looked at strait on, can be flat or it could have depth.

An orb will look round at any angle.


no photo
Sun 06/17/12 03:07 PM

1. When a flying object defies the laws of physics, all those physics should get together and beat the crap out of the object with cut-off drain pipes.
2. When man sees a flying object defy the laws of physics as man has so far put those laws together, then man should reexamine these laws and alter them so that the phenomenon will no longer defy the laws of physics. This, actually, is the wormhole of science.
3. Alien UFO riders are not demons, who told you that bobymeiser. They are, in fact, gnomes and peppercorn people, who colonized the Philippine islands before Vasco de Gama was able to take his seeds there.
4. A wormhole is exactly that: a wormhole. The expression fits. If the worm does not, then it's not his hole.


I can't respond to this seriously because it appears to be some kind of humor, (although I don't find it funny or I just don't get it.)

But carry on. waving tongue2


wux's photo
Sun 06/17/12 03:12 PM
Being an artist, I realize that a circle, seen at a specific angle looks like an oval.

An oval, looked at strait on, can be flat or it could have depth.

An orb will look round at any angle.





A circle can look like an ellypsis, but never like an oval.

Yes, an oval, when looked at, can be flat or have depth. Your asking this lady now, is not going to alter her perception then. Your question does not desribe the possibity of how her perception could have made her see a thing with depth flat or the other way around. You just asked, how do you know it was flat.

An orb would never look like an oval, so what's the point of bringing up the shape. Yes, it looks round, from any angle, but it has depth, and the surface often will give away the fact it has depth. And like I said, it will never be mistaken for an oval.

I am sorry to give you a hard time, JB. I will send you a private email about this.

wux's photo
Sun 06/17/12 03:16 PM


1. When a flying object defies the laws of physics, all those physics should get together and beat the crap out of the object with cut-off drain pipes.
2. When man sees a flying object defy the laws of physics as man has so far put those laws together, then man should reexamine these laws and alter them so that the phenomenon will no longer defy the laws of physics. This, actually, is the wormhole of science.
3. Alien UFO riders are not demons, who told you that bobymeiser. They are, in fact, gnomes and peppercorn people, who colonized the Philippine islands before Vasco de Gama was able to take his seeds there.
4. A wormhole is exactly that: a wormhole. The expression fits. If the worm does not, then it's not his hole.


I can't respond to this seriously because it appears to be some kind of humor, (although I don't find it funny or I just don't get it.)

But carry on. waving tongue2




Points 2 and 4 were serious replies, made sense.

Point 1 is sensible on the truest metaphysical level -- I don't know how you can you quaff at this, but not at people who describe wormholes.

Point three was a pure, applied joke, and yet it was the least funny of the four.

no photo
Sun 06/17/12 03:22 PM
Intergalatic Universe Farm Insurance requires them!!!

huh

no photo
Sun 06/17/12 03:24 PM

Being an artist, I realize that a circle, seen at a specific angle looks like an oval.

An oval, looked at strait on, can be flat or it could have depth.

An orb will look round at any angle.





A circle can look like an ellypsis, but never like an oval.


If I draw a perfect circle on a piece of paper then I look at it from an angle it will appear as an oval.

This is an oval shape:



What the lady said she saw was an oval looking thing that appeared to be a mirror. This shape, she said was "flat."

Unless she saw it from the side, she has no way of knowing if it was flat.


Yes, an oval, when looked at, can be flat or have depth. Your asking this lady now, is not going to alter her perception then. Your question does not desribe the possibity of how her perception could have made her see a thing with depth flat or the other way around. You just asked, how do you know it was flat.


That's right. I want to know how she knows it was flat.




no photo
Sun 06/17/12 03:26 PM



1. When a flying object defies the laws of physics, all those physics should get together and beat the crap out of the object with cut-off drain pipes.
2. When man sees a flying object defy the laws of physics as man has so far put those laws together, then man should reexamine these laws and alter them so that the phenomenon will no longer defy the laws of physics. This, actually, is the wormhole of science.
3. Alien UFO riders are not demons, who told you that bobymeiser. They are, in fact, gnomes and peppercorn people, who colonized the Philippine islands before Vasco de Gama was able to take his seeds there.
4. A wormhole is exactly that: a wormhole. The expression fits. If the worm does not, then it's not his hole.


I can't respond to this seriously because it appears to be some kind of humor, (although I don't find it funny or I just don't get it.)

But carry on. waving tongue2




Points 2 and 4 were serious replies, made sense.

Point 1 is sensible on the truest metaphysical level -- I don't know how you can you quaff at this, but not at people who describe wormholes.

Point three was a pure, applied joke, and yet it was the least funny of the four.


If you would like to discuss anything seriously with me, I would appreciate it if you would not mix it with jokes. When you do, I then can't take any of it seriously. It is confusing.


Dodo_David's photo
Sun 06/17/12 07:30 PM
If you would like to discuss anything seriously with me . . .


rofl

no photo
Sun 06/17/12 08:51 PM

If you would like to discuss anything seriously with me . . .


rofl


I can see by your picture you are incapable of discussing anything seriously. laugh laugh