Do you write for Saturday Night Live?

for Homeland Security

What office you work in. I think I should pay it a visit.

oh jeez....watch Fox News for another craze gunman attack

YOU SUCK! I JUST WANT TO TEL YOU TO YOUR FACE YOU ARE WRONG! At least I got the balls to say those words to your face. You may be twice my size and capable of eating nails and spitting rust. I could care less. I ain't on this Earth to hurt anyone. That is not my job. If you are some Homeland Security agent maybe you should have me walk in so we can discuss your malfunction face to face. We may disagree and I am good with that. Have to get violent over a disagreement? Maybe you. I don't swing first. I know better. But if I am going to loose a fight you can bet I am going to make my opponent remember me for the rest of their life painfully. I don't need a gun and I don't need to go around shooting people. just becasue I dislike someone doesn't mean SQUAT to me in the bigger picture.

And you are the one who brought up Homeland Insecurity! Are you a Fed Agent? Please, I got to know. Because I want to tell you to your face what I think in front of a whole crowd of people so when you swing first you prove my point to the letter. We do have a reason to fear YOU!

So how do you like me now? You are fronting on a host of levels. Is that all you got? Big man on the outside? What's inside? I'm only 185 pounds and badly out of shape. Come now, a big strapping man who wears body armor and carries a gun for America, you shouldn't have to be scared of me or MY bad opinion should you? Unless you made up being associated with Homeland Insecurity.

OH NO! ANOTHER ASSUMPTION I AM GOING TO GO OVERBOARD JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE IS BEING A GRAN RICHARD! (French for a big DICK!)

jeez...and this guy has guns?...

it should no longer be a mystery as to why the NRA is willing to give funds to Mental Health Services ...

Yeah, and you just got owned on the other topic you are trolling after me on! No wonder people are so pissed off at each other. Look at how ignit you are coming off, but then again you so ignit you can't see it for yourself!

I think you are a LIAR here! I think you are LYING! Want to have a little cry and call me more bad names and make more hostile insinuations? Twisting words and making insinuations without basis IS LYING.


I am serious, if you are a FED spell it out. Tell me where I can look you up so I can look you right in your eye and tell you you are making crap up and lying right to your face. Lets see how adult you take it. I just busted you RED HANDED on the topic "SO WE FOCUS ON GUNS."

If you are a Fed you should be on the same team as the rest of us Americans even if we argue and disagree. Afraid your friends may laugh at you when a guy half your size tells you to your face you are not as smart as you think you are? Wanna argue the gun issue face to face? I am down for it! I assure you I am not going to swing first. I am not going to come armed with anything. if you are so civilized I should be able to tell you to your face what I feel without having to worry about violence from any end.

Do you know who Ghey it is for such a big man to pretend he isn't scared of me when chances are you think I am going to shoot at you or something. Fist of all I am not going to waste the ammo. Second of all I may be coarse but I extremely sure I am more civilized than TEN of you combined! Why? I attempt to validate my argument with reason. You just play this whole, "you ain't as smart as You think you are," game with me when really I am grappling with a person who lives in a fiction deeper than myself.

Let people have free unrestricted access to radioactive substances... How stupid does a person have to be to not see HOW OVER THE TOP DANGEROUS THAT IS? Using such an extreme to validate an argument is pretty poor form. And then to accuse me of being LIKE the Taliban...



Don't bust a blood vessel trying to respond!

funches is still hard at work I see.

ok so far you believe that the 2ND amendment gives you and your neighbors and any other "irresponsible" person the right to have Drones..

so what other fire power do you believe that you and your neighbors and other irresponsible people should have?...what about nukes?

So far there are no laws about creating your own drones. They are pretty easy to make. They are simply remote controlled air craft and anyone who flies model airplanes and has a little computer smarts and can play video games can probably make and operate one.

If and when the shadow government begins to assassinate citizens with drones, I hope there is an army of nerds who have fully developed drone capabilities to help us combat them.

it's in the Interest of National Security

they could assassinate you and the nerds using your cellphone or computers.....

it's in the Interest of National Security

No, they can't.

Nerds rule.

Case in point: On Friday, Anonymous took over the U.S. Sentencing Commission’s website in response to the recent suicide of Aaron Swartz, who had been facing the prospect of more than 30 years in prison for downloading academic articles without authorization. In an action the group calls “Operation Last Resort,” Anonymous announced on the Sentencing Commission’s website that it has compromised and extracted secret files from multiple U.S. government systems. It threatened to release excerpts from those files in the coming weeks to various media outlets. After being intermittently restored to service, the Sentencing Commission’s website was hacked again on Sunday, this time turning into a playable game of Asteroids.

The image of Anonymous running roughshod over a Department of Justice website doesn’t inspire confidence in the level of U.S. government cybersecurity. In the DOJ’s defense, it could be pointed out that the Sentencing Commission site is merely an outward facing portal, and that most of the government’s systems and networks are buried behind many more layers of protection. But in today’s world, all electronic systems are connected. Even those that are separated from the rest of the Internet by an “air gap”—so that they don’t talk directly to the outside world—can be compromised via software delivered (and later extracted) by a USB stick or CD drive by a malicious or unwitting insider.

Anonymous, of course, is not the only group that might have an interest in compromising American computer systems. State actors have long been suspected of conducting industrial espionage on American companies, and unlike hacktivists, they aren’t likely to announce their successes. But it doesn’t take a genius to look at what Anonymous can do and conclude that true cybersecurity is an illusion, and that anyone who claims otherwise is lying, delusional, incompetent, or some combination thereof.

Looks a bit passive aggressive.

How are ya funches?