Previous 1
Topic: Libertarians
no photo
Sat 02/23/13 08:21 AM
Who here believes that the government should stay out of our lives unless you harm someone and protect our land? That what people do to themselves in the private of their own homes is no ones business. That is people personal responsibility to decide how they want to live. That the charities of individuals and private groups do far better a job then a government of red tape. That the American public is not heartless and will help those in need and not those that are lazy.

That a company should not have to go through 10 different agencies just to get the ok to open a business. After all if your business may effect the environment why does the EPA, Army Corp of Engineers and Fish & Wildlife all have to give approval. Shouldn’t one group handle all things environment related?

That the government should not steal your hard earn money and give it to those they say deserve it, normally their buddies or to buy vote with the offer of government programs. That the tax code should be simplified to where everyone is paying their fair share, the same percent regardless on the amount they make.

That all elected offices should have term limits. That the US congress should be part time and forced to have to go back to their states and get a real job and see just what the public deals with. Why should they make more money then the people they represent? Why should they give themselves a raise at the cost of our paycheck when we hired them by voting?

That laws should not be rushed through in the name of protecting someone but read and heavily debated to insure that the innocent are wrongfully punish. That a person doing honest work should not go to jail because a law was unclear. That people should not get rich by suing a person or company by make false accusations.

That we know better how to live our lives and run our community better then some rich politician that never had a real job off hundreds of miles away. This past election, I was one of the million people that vote for free people, free choice.

willing2's photo
Sat 02/23/13 08:58 AM
Yes to all the above.

no photo
Sat 02/23/13 09:02 AM
there are a lot of generalizations here metalshadow. Libertarians have the right idea I also think, but it is a matter of scale. The laws and bureaucracies that exist usually exist because there was a problem...often HUGE problem - like severe air & water pollution, species dying in piles because of DDT, or gripping poverty in the 1930s that was too large for private funding (and besides there is something to be said for not having to rely on private charity that may or may not be there tomorrow).

Anyway though, I agree in principle with the Libertarians on many things....like reducing income taxes .... and bueaucracy. And a plan to enforce existing laws to deal with large problems like illegals.

I think realistically what they need to work on is showing how their ideas will not allow a regression back to problems of the past.

And no, in my experience we cannot rely on the private sector....we don't want the robber barons back....industry simply will not regulate itself to behave responsibly. We are seeing that now with the Oil & Gas industries in the NE and Midwest.

Libertarians best bet in my opinion is too target clearly wasteful gov't spending, reducing foreign aid and reducing our military presence abroad.....afterall when Sharia law abuses someone, no one complains that the Canadians aren't "doing anything." So perhaps we should just as disintereted?

Dodo_David's photo
Sat 02/23/13 09:17 AM
The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution says the following:

"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

The Preamble spells out the purpose of the U.S. Constitution, which in turn defines the job of the U.S. Government. The U.S. government is fine as long as it is doing its job as defined by the U.S. Constitution.


no photo
Sat 02/23/13 09:23 AM

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution says the following:

"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

The Preamble spells out the purpose of the U.S. Constitution, which in turn defines the job of the U.S. Government. The U.S. government is fine as long as it is doing its job as defined by the U.S. Constitution.


:thumbsup: I agree

I think what becomes at issue is whether that job is being done FOR the people or TO the people

sometimes I honestly wake up and wonder what is the gov't going to do TO me today.....?......in a general (not paranoid) sense, that is

Oh and BTW willing2 would be a DDT victim lying dead in the desert if it were 1954

no photo
Sat 02/23/13 10:49 AM

there are a lot of generalizations here metalshadow. Libertarians have the right idea I also think, but it is a matter of scale. The laws and bureaucracies that exist usually exist because there was a problem...often HUGE problem - like severe air & water pollution, species dying in piles because of DDT, or gripping poverty in the 1930s that was too large for private funding (and besides there is something to be said for not having to rely on private charity that may or may not be there tomorrow).

Anyway though, I agree in principle with the Libertarians on many things....like reducing income taxes .... and bueaucracy. And a plan to enforce existing laws to deal with large problems like illegals.

I think realistically what they need to work on is showing how their ideas will not allow a regression back to problems of the past.

And no, in my experience we cannot rely on the private sector....we don't want the robber barons back....industry simply will not regulate itself to behave responsibly. We are seeing that now with the Oil & Gas industries in the NE and Midwest.

Libertarians best bet in my opinion is too target clearly wasteful gov't spending, reducing foreign aid and reducing our military presence abroad.....afterall when Sharia law abuses someone, no one complains that the Canadians aren't "doing anything." So perhaps we should just as disintereted?


The gripping poverty during the 1930 was extended because of the federal government getting involved. The depression that happen before the 1930s is never talked about because the government then got out the way and it quickly recovered. I remember coving it in history a little.

Yea we had water and air pollution and no one says we want to allow people to mess it up but now the EPA wants to regulate to have zero particulate matter in a work place. Not only impossible but also not even nature has zero particulate matter. And the areas that have the most harmful, humans don’t even live there.

Death Valley had a string of disasters form forest fires and flash floods that destroyed their water supply system. The Feds came in, saw a wheel barrel and said that is to mechanize, that they have to used a horse and shovel. And the claim they want to protect an owl, frog and butterfly at the cost of the town not having water. The thing is the owl, frog and butterfly left back during the fires and floods.

You say the charity may not be there tomorrow, the same can be said for government. Just because Government is there and says they have programs to help, does not mean you get it. Back during hurricane Katrina, Wal-Mart, churches and private business were already there to help the needy long before the federal government. The problem was the government got in the way telling Wal-mart that they could not bring truckload of bottle water to the people yet FEMA order ice and had it shipped to Maine and Arizona. Private Hotels were going to use their own busses to help people out of town but no; the government said they had to take them to the Super Dome.

Regression back to the past sounds bad when you think about slavery and oppression but that would be hard to do. But regression back to the past does not mean all that evil comes back but freedom. The government may be credit for many things because they past laws after private groups lead the charge.

Henry Ford was the first to start the assembly line and the forty-hour workweek. Other companies fallowed before the Government step in during the 1930s. Our first black speaker of the house was back in 1870 to 1879. Even back late 1700s individuals fought for the freedom of black but it was the government that oppressed them. Even during the civil rights movement, many private companies had already intergraded before the Government ever did anything. The Play Boy clubs where among the first.

The robbers barons don’t last long and in today would be brought down quickly do to fast information. John D Rockefeller was called a thief by the other oil producers because he found a way to get oil cheaper and sell it cheaper thus allowing the poor to afford it. By producing cheaper oil made it not as profitable to hunt whales for the oil to use for energy.

Again with the BP oil spill, the government used a 20 to 30 year old method to clean it up. Yet a private group set up a change to give a million dollars to who ever can come up with a better and faster way. The winning team was four times faster then what the government currently does. One guy came up with a gel that can be use to put out fires and local fire fighter have adopt but the federal has too many buddies that they refuse to use the guy’s better method.

Our medical prices keep rising do to both insurance and government, really rose this past January thanks to Obama care. Yet things like LASIK eye surgery, which has to be paid out of the pocket, has gone down in price. What use to be thousands of dollars is now as low as $500 per eye and the surgery has got better and safer.

I do agree that we don’t need to be over seas. Why is our army being the police in many countries, even European. We don’t need a base in Germany any more. We were not supposed to be nation build in Iraq.

no photo
Sat 02/23/13 10:50 AM

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution says the following:

"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

The Preamble spells out the purpose of the U.S. Constitution, which in turn defines the job of the U.S. Government. The U.S. government is fine as long as it is doing its job as defined by the U.S. Constitution.


The problem is, our modern federal government is trying to skirt around the US Constitution.

no photo
Sun 02/24/13 08:00 AM


there are a lot of generalizations here metalshadow. Libertarians have the right idea I also think, but it is a matter of scale. The laws and bureaucracies that exist usually exist because there was a problem...often HUGE problem - like severe air & water pollution, species dying in piles because of DDT, or gripping poverty in the 1930s that was too large for private funding (and besides there is something to be said for not having to rely on private charity that may or may not be there tomorrow).

Anyway though, I agree in principle with the Libertarians on many things....like reducing income taxes .... and bueaucracy. And a plan to enforce existing laws to deal with large problems like illegals.

I think realistically what they need to work on is showing how their ideas will not allow a regression back to problems of the past.

And no, in my experience we cannot rely on the private sector....we don't want the robber barons back....industry simply will not regulate itself to behave responsibly. We are seeing that now with the Oil & Gas industries in the NE and Midwest.

Libertarians best bet in my opinion is too target clearly wasteful gov't spending, reducing foreign aid and reducing our military presence abroad.....afterall when Sharia law abuses someone, no one complains that the Canadians aren't "doing anything." So perhaps we should just as disintereted?


The gripping poverty during the 1930 was extended because of the federal government getting involved. The depression that happen before the 1930s is never talked about because the government then got out the way and it quickly recovered. I remember coving it in history a little.

Yea we had water and air pollution and no one says we want to allow people to mess it up but now the EPA wants to regulate to have zero particulate matter in a work place. Not only impossible but also not even nature has zero particulate matter. And the areas that have the most harmful, humans don’t even live there.

Death Valley had a string of disasters form forest fires and flash floods that destroyed their water supply system. The Feds came in, saw a wheel barrel and said that is to mechanize, that they have to used a horse and shovel. And the claim they want to protect an owl, frog and butterfly at the cost of the town not having water. The thing is the owl, frog and butterfly left back during the fires and floods.

You say the charity may not be there tomorrow, the same can be said for government. Just because Government is there and says they have programs to help, does not mean you get it. Back during hurricane Katrina, Wal-Mart, churches and private business were already there to help the needy long before the federal government. The problem was the government got in the way telling Wal-mart that they could not bring truckload of bottle water to the people yet FEMA order ice and had it shipped to Maine and Arizona. Private Hotels were going to use their own busses to help people out of town but no; the government said they had to take them to the Super Dome.

Regression back to the past sounds bad when you think about slavery and oppression but that would be hard to do. But regression back to the past does not mean all that evil comes back but freedom. The government may be credit for many things because they past laws after private groups lead the charge.

Henry Ford was the first to start the assembly line and the forty-hour workweek. Other companies fallowed before the Government step in during the 1930s. Our first black speaker of the house was back in 1870 to 1879. Even back late 1700s individuals fought for the freedom of black but it was the government that oppressed them. Even during the civil rights movement, many private companies had already intergraded before the Government ever did anything. The Play Boy clubs where among the first.

The robbers barons don’t last long and in today would be brought down quickly do to fast information. John D Rockefeller was called a thief by the other oil producers because he found a way to get oil cheaper and sell it cheaper thus allowing the poor to afford it. By producing cheaper oil made it not as profitable to hunt whales for the oil to use for energy.

Again with the BP oil spill, the government used a 20 to 30 year old method to clean it up. Yet a private group set up a change to give a million dollars to who ever can come up with a better and faster way. The winning team was four times faster then what the government currently does. One guy came up with a gel that can be use to put out fires and local fire fighter have adopt but the federal has too many buddies that they refuse to use the guy’s better method.

Our medical prices keep rising do to both insurance and government, really rose this past January thanks to Obama care. Yet things like LASIK eye surgery, which has to be paid out of the pocket, has gone down in price. What use to be thousands of dollars is now as low as $500 per eye and the surgery has got better and safer.

I do agree that we don’t need to be over seas. Why is our army being the police in many countries, even European. We don’t need a base in Germany any more. We were not supposed to be nation build in Iraq.



Ima history teacher metalshadow. The depression ended with the FDIC and the WPA. It was caused by the private sector. After the first sentence I kinda felt I'd be wasting my time to go further (no offense intended) and maybe I am wrong. I may come back to read the rest of what you said later.

I am more interested in a logical and balanced approach. Things are seldom one sided. There are things about the gov't that do need to be improved and Libertarians have some good ideas. I've been on their website and almost joined. But I did not find a realistic agenda there that would insure problems of the past would not surface again. One of the reasons gov't became so large is because the of problems with industry's private sector. Can't remove the bad aid till the bleeding stops.....but we do not need triage for a splinter either. I'll be back later - I just woke up :)

no photo
Sun 02/24/13 09:07 AM
Edited by rambill79 on Sun 02/24/13 09:07 AM

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution says the following:

"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

The Preamble spells out the purpose of the U.S. Constitution, which in turn defines the job of the U.S. Government. The U.S. government is fine as long as it is doing its job as defined by the U.S. Constitution.


... which quit happening about 150 years ago i would say.




no photo
Sun 02/24/13 09:08 AM
Edited by rambill79 on Sun 02/24/13 09:09 AM

there are a lot of generalizations here metalshadow. Libertarians have the right idea I also think, but it is a matter of scale. The laws and bureaucracies that exist usually exist because there was a problem...often HUGE problem - like severe air & water pollution, species dying in piles because of DDT, or gripping poverty in the 1930s that was too large for private funding (and besides there is something to be said for not having to rely on private charity that may or may not be there tomorrow).

Anyway though, I agree in principle with the Libertarians on many things....like reducing income taxes .... and bueaucracy. And a plan to enforce existing laws to deal with large problems like illegals.

I think realistically what they need to work on is showing how their ideas will not allow a regression back to problems of the past.

And no, in my experience we cannot rely on the private sector....we don't want the robber barons back....industry simply will not regulate itself to behave responsibly. We are seeing that now with the Oil & Gas industries in the NE and Midwest.

Libertarians best bet in my opinion is too target clearly wasteful gov't spending, reducing foreign aid and reducing our military presence abroad.....afterall when Sharia law abuses someone, no one complains that the Canadians aren't "doing anything." So perhaps we should just as disintereted?


generally speaking, (pun intended), the thread baron here speaks Gospel.

Conrad_73's photo
Mon 02/25/13 10:47 AM


there are a lot of generalizations here metalshadow. Libertarians have the right idea I also think, but it is a matter of scale. The laws and bureaucracies that exist usually exist because there was a problem...often HUGE problem - like severe air & water pollution, species dying in piles because of DDT, or gripping poverty in the 1930s that was too large for private funding (and besides there is something to be said for not having to rely on private charity that may or may not be there tomorrow).

Anyway though, I agree in principle with the Libertarians on many things....like reducing income taxes .... and bueaucracy. And a plan to enforce existing laws to deal with large problems like illegals.

I think realistically what they need to work on is showing how their ideas will not allow a regression back to problems of the past.

And no, in my experience we cannot rely on the private sector....we don't want the robber barons back....industry simply will not regulate itself to behave responsibly. We are seeing that now with the Oil & Gas industries in the NE and Midwest.

Libertarians best bet in my opinion is too target clearly wasteful gov't spending, reducing foreign aid and reducing our military presence abroad.....afterall when Sharia law abuses someone, no one complains that the Canadians aren't "doing anything." So perhaps we should just as disintereted?


The gripping poverty during the 1930 was extended because of the federal government getting involved. The depression that happen before the 1930s is never talked about because the government then got out the way and it quickly recovered. I remember coving it in history a little.

Yea we had water and air pollution and no one says we want to allow people to mess it up but now the EPA wants to regulate to have zero particulate matter in a work place. Not only impossible but also not even nature has zero particulate matter. And the areas that have the most harmful, humans don’t even live there.

Death Valley had a string of disasters form forest fires and flash floods that destroyed their water supply system. The Feds came in, saw a wheel barrel and said that is to mechanize, that they have to used a horse and shovel. And the claim they want to protect an owl, frog and butterfly at the cost of the town not having water. The thing is the owl, frog and butterfly left back during the fires and floods.

You say the charity may not be there tomorrow, the same can be said for government. Just because Government is there and says they have programs to help, does not mean you get it. Back during hurricane Katrina, Wal-Mart, churches and private business were already there to help the needy long before the federal government. The problem was the government got in the way telling Wal-mart that they could not bring truckload of bottle water to the people yet FEMA order ice and had it shipped to Maine and Arizona. Private Hotels were going to use their own busses to help people out of town but no; the government said they had to take them to the Super Dome.

Regression back to the past sounds bad when you think about slavery and oppression but that would be hard to do. But regression back to the past does not mean all that evil comes back but freedom. The government may be credit for many things because they past laws after private groups lead the charge.

Henry Ford was the first to start the assembly line and the forty-hour workweek. Other companies fallowed before the Government step in during the 1930s. Our first black speaker of the house was back in 1870 to 1879. Even back late 1700s individuals fought for the freedom of black but it was the government that oppressed them. Even during the civil rights movement, many private companies had already intergraded before the Government ever did anything. The Play Boy clubs where among the first.

The robbers barons don’t last long and in today would be brought down quickly do to fast information. John D Rockefeller was called a thief by the other oil producers because he found a way to get oil cheaper and sell it cheaper thus allowing the poor to afford it. By producing cheaper oil made it not as profitable to hunt whales for the oil to use for energy.

Again with the BP oil spill, the government used a 20 to 30 year old method to clean it up. Yet a private group set up a change to give a million dollars to who ever can come up with a better and faster way. The winning team was four times faster then what the government currently does. One guy came up with a gel that can be use to put out fires and local fire fighter have adopt but the federal has too many buddies that they refuse to use the guy’s better method.

Our medical prices keep rising do to both insurance and government, really rose this past January thanks to Obama care. Yet things like LASIK eye surgery, which has to be paid out of the pocket, has gone down in price. What use to be thousands of dollars is now as low as $500 per eye and the surgery has got better and safer.

I do agree that we don’t need to be over seas. Why is our army being the police in many countries, even European. We don’t need a base in Germany any more. We were not supposed to be nation build in Iraq.

Hear,Hear!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:thumbsup:

Conrad_73's photo
Mon 02/25/13 10:51 AM


The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution says the following:

"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

The Preamble spells out the purpose of the U.S. Constitution, which in turn defines the job of the U.S. Government. The U.S. government is fine as long as it is doing its job as defined by the U.S. Constitution.


The problem is, our modern federal government is trying to skirt around the US Constitution.
exactly!


Constitution



Today, when a concerted effort is made to obliterate this point, it cannot be repeated too often that the Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals—that it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government—that it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizens’ protection against the government.


Ours was the first government based on and strictly limited by a written document—the Constitution—which specifically forbids it to violate individual rights or to act on whim. The history of the atrocities perpetrated by all the other kinds of governments—unrestricted governments acting on unprovable assumptions—demonstrates the value and validity of the original political theory on which this country was built.


http://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/constitution.html

mightymoe's photo
Mon 02/25/13 10:52 AM
i keep hearing people griping about taxes, but nobody griping about all the other increases in daily crap that we need... milk is 4 dollars a gallon, 2 dollars for eggs,3-4 dollars for bread... i just paid 3.79 for gas, 2 months ago i was paying 2.85... it is my understanding that the government needs the tax revenue to run, but the other crap keeps going up while our taxes do not...

no photo
Mon 02/25/13 11:16 AM
One of the reason prices keeps going up is they are printing more money. Germany tried that after WWI and it end up costing a wheelbarrow full of dollar bills to by a loaf of bread. Also the cost of operation keeps going up with new regulations. Companies like Perdue have to hire a person to sit there and look at the chick as it comes through for anything wrong with the chick because the government requires it while Perdue has a test area where they check for bacteria that can cause food poisoning.

Also some rules require some goods like food products cannot be bought below a certain price. This is called a Price Floor. Other rules require part of a certain good be diverted for something else. This is what has happen to corn. The government wants to put it in our gas tanks, which is more environmentally harmful. Since some much corn has to be used for fuel, it cuts into the amount of corn that is sold for use to eat, feed livestock or make corn syrup for other food products. This also drives up this price of those products.

As for gas, it cost money to make all the different types and ethanol. California is so strict that they require a different blend then some of the other states. Also forever dollar that is collected for gas, about 6 cents is profit for the gas company while on average, 42 cents is taxes colleted by the government. It very from state to state but government is in no hurry to let the price of gas go down. Don’t forget that the Federal government didn’t want to build that pipeline from Canada to the gulf and risking Canada to sell it to China. Also why it is so hard to try and get the Feds, not only to approve new drilling permits, but to accept Natural Gas as a cheaper, cleaner choice.

mightymoe's photo
Mon 02/25/13 11:23 AM

One of the reason prices keeps going up is they are printing more money. Germany tried that after WWI and it end up costing a wheelbarrow full of dollar bills to by a loaf of bread. Also the cost of operation keeps going up with new regulations. Companies like Perdue have to hire a person to sit there and look at the chick as it comes through for anything wrong with the chick because the government requires it while Perdue has a test area where they check for bacteria that can cause food poisoning.

Also some rules require some goods like food products cannot be bought below a certain price. This is called a Price Floor. Other rules require part of a certain good be diverted for something else. This is what has happen to corn. The government wants to put it in our gas tanks, which is more environmentally harmful. Since some much corn has to be used for fuel, it cuts into the amount of corn that is sold for use to eat, feed livestock or make corn syrup for other food products. This also drives up this price of those products.

As for gas, it cost money to make all the different types and ethanol. California is so strict that they require a different blend then some of the other states. Also forever dollar that is collected for gas, about 6 cents is profit for the gas company while on average, 42 cents is taxes colleted by the government. It very from state to state but government is in no hurry to let the price of gas go down. Don’t forget that the Federal government didn’t want to build that pipeline from Canada to the gulf and risking Canada to sell it to China. Also why it is so hard to try and get the Feds, not only to approve new drilling permits, but to accept Natural Gas as a cheaper, cleaner choice.



a buddy of mine works for chevron... he told me their proffits last year 246 billion... do you think it costs that much for development? reminding people, that was pure profit, after they paid for everything you mentioned...

no photo
Wed 02/27/13 04:33 PM
The Elite profit from high gas and oil prices and I don't think those are going to go down. A good alternative is to work close to home, or work at home. Live where you want to work.

The Elite want to have total control over food production, travel, education of your children, energy, the media, money and commerce.

The alternative is to be as self sufficient as possible and get out of debt. Start learning to trade and barter and cut the government out of getting a slice of your pie as much as possible.


boredinaz06's photo
Wed 02/27/13 06:20 PM


I fully agree %100 with the OPdrinker

no photo
Thu 02/28/13 12:32 PM


One of the reason prices keeps going up is they are printing more money. Germany tried that after WWI and it end up costing a wheelbarrow full of dollar bills to by a loaf of bread. Also the cost of operation keeps going up with new regulations. Companies like Perdue have to hire a person to sit there and look at the chick as it comes through for anything wrong with the chick because the government requires it while Perdue has a test area where they check for bacteria that can cause food poisoning.

Also some rules require some goods like food products cannot be bought below a certain price. This is called a Price Floor. Other rules require part of a certain good be diverted for something else. This is what has happen to corn. The government wants to put it in our gas tanks, which is more environmentally harmful. Since some much corn has to be used for fuel, it cuts into the amount of corn that is sold for use to eat, feed livestock or make corn syrup for other food products. This also drives up this price of those products.

As for gas, it cost money to make all the different types and ethanol. California is so strict that they require a different blend then some of the other states. Also forever dollar that is collected for gas, about 6 cents is profit for the gas company while on average, 42 cents is taxes colleted by the government. It very from state to state but government is in no hurry to let the price of gas go down. Don’t forget that the Federal government didn’t want to build that pipeline from Canada to the gulf and risking Canada to sell it to China. Also why it is so hard to try and get the Feds, not only to approve new drilling permits, but to accept Natural Gas as a cheaper, cleaner choice.



a buddy of mine works for chevron... he told me their proffits last year 246 billion... do you think it costs that much for development? reminding people, that was pure profit, after they paid for everything you mentioned...
Oh I have no doubt that their profit is in the billions but they do have a pretty big operation. But when you break it done to how much per dollar goes to profit, how much goes to cost of operation and how much is taxes collected, the Government makes the most off of high gas prices, where the companies have to pay employs, bills, fees, and more.

I have no problem with companies that make profit, but you got to take a look at the operation and cost. It is not like they stick a straw anywhere in the ground and gain lots of money. Just think about all the people the hire and pay.

Surveyors to go out and search for new supplies.
Construction workers that set up and build the equipment used.
Drillers to extract the oil.
Maintenance workers for repair.
Sectaries to handle paper work.
Transporters to deliver supplies both ways.
Insurance for workers and equipment.
Interest on stocks and loans to pay.
Basic utilities.
Processing and refinement of the product, plus the workers involved and their benefits.
Payroll Taxes.
Buying permits.

And I beat more then what I just named. Sure those companies make a lot of money, but look at all the people they employ only.

Still, the government profits the most for high gas prices. The government makes money from the taxes that are collected from the sell of gas, from paying the employees, from collecting fees for the permits.

no photo
Thu 02/28/13 12:35 PM

The Elite profit from high gas and oil prices and I don't think those are going to go down. A good alternative is to work close to home, or work at home. Live where you want to work.

The Elite want to have total control over food production, travel, education of your children, energy, the media, money and commerce.

The alternative is to be as self sufficient as possible and get out of debt. Start learning to trade and barter and cut the government out of getting a slice of your pie as much as possible.



I like the idea of being self-sustaining just because I don’t like being force to give someone else my hard earn money. The elite sit in government making all the rules to restrict our freedom and take our hard earn money.

Takes to the Internet, people’s voices can be heard. We can see different views about what just happen and not what the elite wants us to see. Information can be shared so we can learn to be self-sustaining.

mightymoe's photo
Thu 02/28/13 02:49 PM



One of the reason prices keeps going up is they are printing more money. Germany tried that after WWI and it end up costing a wheelbarrow full of dollar bills to by a loaf of bread. Also the cost of operation keeps going up with new regulations. Companies like Perdue have to hire a person to sit there and look at the chick as it comes through for anything wrong with the chick because the government requires it while Perdue has a test area where they check for bacteria that can cause food poisoning.

Also some rules require some goods like food products cannot be bought below a certain price. This is called a Price Floor. Other rules require part of a certain good be diverted for something else. This is what has happen to corn. The government wants to put it in our gas tanks, which is more environmentally harmful. Since some much corn has to be used for fuel, it cuts into the amount of corn that is sold for use to eat, feed livestock or make corn syrup for other food products. This also drives up this price of those products.

As for gas, it cost money to make all the different types and ethanol. California is so strict that they require a different blend then some of the other states. Also forever dollar that is collected for gas, about 6 cents is profit for the gas company while on average, 42 cents is taxes colleted by the government. It very from state to state but government is in no hurry to let the price of gas go down. Don’t forget that the Federal government didn’t want to build that pipeline from Canada to the gulf and risking Canada to sell it to China. Also why it is so hard to try and get the Feds, not only to approve new drilling permits, but to accept Natural Gas as a cheaper, cleaner choice.



a buddy of mine works for chevron... he told me their proffits last year 246 billion... do you think it costs that much for development? reminding people, that was pure profit, after they paid for everything you mentioned...
Oh I have no doubt that their profit is in the billions but they do have a pretty big operation. But when you break it done to how much per dollar goes to profit, how much goes to cost of operation and how much is taxes collected, the Government makes the most off of high gas prices, where the companies have to pay employs, bills, fees, and more.

I have no problem with companies that make profit, but you got to take a look at the operation and cost. It is not like they stick a straw anywhere in the ground and gain lots of money. Just think about all the people the hire and pay.

Surveyors to go out and search for new supplies.
Construction workers that set up and build the equipment used.
Drillers to extract the oil.
Maintenance workers for repair.
Sectaries to handle paper work.
Transporters to deliver supplies both ways.
Insurance for workers and equipment.
Interest on stocks and loans to pay.
Basic utilities.
Processing and refinement of the product, plus the workers involved and their benefits.
Payroll Taxes.
Buying permits.

And I beat more then what I just named. Sure those companies make a lot of money, but look at all the people they employ only.

Still, the government profits the most for high gas prices. The government makes money from the taxes that are collected from the sell of gas, from paying the employees, from collecting fees for the permits.


right now, our #1 import is crude oil... our #1 export is refined oil...

Previous 1