100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Does no mean no? | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Dude. Watch science. Smurfs are asexual. I'm sad that my Mortal Kombat picture got taken down... I was being nice to everybody. So what the hell is Smurfette all about then? And I know there are members here who think she is hawt...  whatever turns them on!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dude. Watch science. Smurfs are asexual. I'm sad that my Mortal Kombat picture got taken down... I was being nice to everybody. So what the hell is Smurfette all about then? And I know there are members here who think she is hawt... whatever turns them on! Ok this is actually a little weirder then my my girl scout uniform comment ( and I like older women too... go figure)... shame on you!!! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sat 12/22/12 11:15 AM
|
|
Sometimes NO means YES....I'm kidding, of course no means no. not contractually, contractually the signature means yes, regardless of what the verbal response is,,,, similar in other life situations too,,we dont just communicate with our mouths,, How is a signature meaning more than what is said verbally similar to what happens in the bedroom? it shows how the law doesnt consider verbal communication the deciding factor IF accompanied by other communication,,,,except in rape, when its probably hardest to prove that it happened,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes NO means YES....I'm kidding, of course no means no. not contractually, contractually the signature means yes, regardless of what the verbal response is,,,, similar in other life situations too,,we dont just communicate with our mouths,, That's so True. Body language, stripping off clothes, lip locking...it goes on and on. Then you Yell...Stop..NO..   I'll try it out with Navygirl and see how it goes....  I will pay a million the day navy girl strips and locks lips and goes 'on and on' just to say no to someone LoL she'll break out her board game of battle ship ( the canadian version of course )... Hmm, if a guy pushes himself on me after I said no; the only thing that I will break is his arm.  Ill have to admit I am not perfectly familiar with the rules for Canadian battleship... I am not sure if youd have to break my arm thoguh.... I think one of the players has to dress up in their girlscout uniform and wear pig tails.. I think you would look good in a girlscout uniform and wearing pigtails. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes NO means YES....I'm kidding, of course no means no. not contractually, contractually the signature means yes, regardless of what the verbal response is,,,, similar in other life situations too,,we dont just communicate with our mouths,, How is a signature meaning more than what is said verbally similar to what happens in the bedroom? it shows how the law doesnt consider verbal communication the deciding factor IF accompanied by other communication,,,,except in rape, when its probably hardest to prove that it happened,,, I'm not sure what you're trying to compare, though, as there's no signature required for sex. So, obviously, what is said verbally stands. You're comparing very different things, which isn't making sense. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
everybody should carry forms with them at all times which
state that they agree to have sex and understand that any known risk factors for pregnancy, injury or infection have been disclosed and represented and that they are consenting to the following sexual activities(listed in the document) so signed party #1 and party #2...up to party #N that this is the entire agreement and legally binding worldwide. Sign and then f***. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
everybody should carry forms with them at all times which state that they agree to have sex and understand that any known risk factors for pregnancy, injury or infection have been disclosed and represented and that they are consenting to the following sexual activities(listed in the document) so signed party #1 and party #2...up to party #N that this is the entire agreement and legally binding worldwide. Sign and then f***. sad but true but even then, people would feel the right to change their mind with a verbal no,,, what then? when it comes to sex and consentual sex, often times the only two who know what was said or done are the two involved its very hard to prove that you spoke during a sexual/physical encounter, let alone that you said no, or that the partner HEARD you saying no thats why the no means no mantra is kind of as useful regarding rape as the just say no mantra was with the 'war on drugs' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
everybody should carry forms with them at all times which state that they agree to have sex and understand that any known risk factors for pregnancy, injury or infection have been disclosed and represented and that they are consenting to the following sexual activities(listed in the document) so signed party #1 and party #2...up to party #N that this is the entire agreement and legally binding worldwide. Sign and then f***. sad but true but even then, people would feel the right to change their mind with a verbal no,,, what then? when it comes to sex and consentual sex, often times the only two who know what was said or done are the two involved its very hard to prove that you spoke during a sexual/physical encounter, let alone that you said no, or that the partner HEARD you saying no thats why the no means no mantra is kind of as useful regarding rape as the just say no mantra was with the 'war on drugs' Is that why you've been going on and on about no not always meaning no? Because you believe it can't be proved and so the guy shouldn't have to listen to it if he believes her body isn't saying the same thing? I have been wondering why you've been pushing so hard against the word no actually meaning no. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sat 12/22/12 12:12 PM
|
|
everybody should carry forms with them at all times which state that they agree to have sex and understand that any known risk factors for pregnancy, injury or infection have been disclosed and represented and that they are consenting to the following sexual activities(listed in the document) so signed party #1 and party #2...up to party #N that this is the entire agreement and legally binding worldwide. Sign and then f***. sad but true but even then, people would feel the right to change their mind with a verbal no,,, what then? when it comes to sex and consentual sex, often times the only two who know what was said or done are the two involved its very hard to prove that you spoke during a sexual/physical encounter, let alone that you said no, or that the partner HEARD you saying no thats why the no means no mantra is kind of as useful regarding rape as the just say no mantra was with the 'war on drugs' Is that why you've been going on and on about no not always meaning no? Because you believe it can't be proved and so the guy shouldn't have to listen to it if he believes her body isn't saying the same thing? I have been wondering why you've been pushing so hard against the word no actually meaning no. Im not pushing against no meaning no. I think a lover (guy or girl) is sometimes in a heightened enough sensual state that the VERBAL is no longer being focused on nearly as much as the PHYSICAL so its easy to miss the VERBAL no, if the PHYSICAL activity suggests yes,,, as I said, people tune out for many reasons, heightened sexual arousal is one that just may cause a NATURAL tendency to become less aware of dialogue and other non physical factors,,, in that stage, a no can sound very much like a moan or an 'oh', if it is accompanied by no other action or words or form of expression |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Im not pushing against no meaning no. I think a lover (guy or girl) is sometimes in a heightened enough sensual state that the VERBAL is no longer being focused on nearly as much as the PHYSICAL so its easy to miss the VERBAL no, if the PHYSICAL activity suggests yes,,, as I said, people tune out for many reasons, heightened sexual arousal is one that just may cause a NATURAL tendency to become less aware of dialogue and other non physical factors,,, in that stage, a no can sound very much like a moan or an 'oh', if it is accompanied by no other action or words or form of expression To you, it's an acceptable excuse for a man not stopping when the woman says no because he may have tuned out what she's saying? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sat 12/22/12 12:16 PM
|
|
Im not pushing against no meaning no. I think a lover (guy or girl) is sometimes in a heightened enough sensual state that the VERBAL is no longer being focused on nearly as much as the PHYSICAL so its easy to miss the VERBAL no, if the PHYSICAL activity suggests yes,,, as I said, people tune out for many reasons, heightened sexual arousal is one that just may cause a NATURAL tendency to become less aware of dialogue and other non physical factors,,, in that stage, a no can sound very much like a moan or an 'oh', if it is accompanied by no other action or words or form of expression To you, it's an acceptable excuse for a man not stopping when the woman says no because he may have tuned out what she's saying? its acceptable if someone doesnt hear me say stop or no verbally, or give them some body language that implies dissatisfation that they keep going whatever the situation,,,,, yes although 'STOP' is less difficult to confuse with any other natural sound than 'no' is |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
chastity belt. it is the only sure way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Im not pushing against no meaning no. I think a lover (guy or girl) is sometimes in a heightened enough sensual state that the VERBAL is no longer being focused on nearly as much as the PHYSICAL so its easy to miss the VERBAL no, if the PHYSICAL activity suggests yes,,, as I said, people tune out for many reasons, heightened sexual arousal is one that just may cause a NATURAL tendency to become less aware of dialogue and other non physical factors,,, in that stage, a no can sound very much like a moan or an 'oh', if it is accompanied by no other action or words or form of expression To you, it's an acceptable excuse for a man not stopping when the woman says no because he may have tuned out what she's saying? its acceptable if someone doesnt hear me say stop verbally, or give them some body language that implies dissatisfation that they keep going whatever the situation,,,,, yes Really? It's acceptable to you for him to continue having sex with you even though you're telling him to stop? When women think this way, no wonder it confuses some men... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
chastity belt. it is the only sure way. she can STILL change her mind, even if she gives him the key to open the belt,,lol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Im not pushing against no meaning no. I think a lover (guy or girl) is sometimes in a heightened enough sensual state that the VERBAL is no longer being focused on nearly as much as the PHYSICAL so its easy to miss the VERBAL no, if the PHYSICAL activity suggests yes,,, as I said, people tune out for many reasons, heightened sexual arousal is one that just may cause a NATURAL tendency to become less aware of dialogue and other non physical factors,,, in that stage, a no can sound very much like a moan or an 'oh', if it is accompanied by no other action or words or form of expression To you, it's an acceptable excuse for a man not stopping when the woman says no because he may have tuned out what she's saying? its acceptable if someone doesnt hear me say stop verbally, or give them some body language that implies dissatisfation that they keep going whatever the situation,,,,, yes Really? It's acceptable to you for him to continue having sex with you even though you're telling him to stop? When women think this way, no wonder it confuses some men... this is what I Said it is acceptable if someone doesnt HEAR me say stop, that they continue although 'stop' is a harder verbal signal to mix up or miss than a 'no',, which is easily confused with other natural moans and groans during sex... there really isnt much more difficulty for me to say STOP, GET OFF ME, or some other indicator , as there is for me to simply say 'no' and expect them to understand while they are aroused,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
chastity belt. it is the only sure way. she can STILL change her mind, even if she gives him the key to open the belt,,lol that's why Dad holds the key!! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
chastity belt. it is the only sure way. she can STILL change her mind, even if she gives him the key to open the belt,,lol that's why Dad holds the key!! oh wow,, kinky,, slowhand I never knew,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 US Patent 995600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Patent 995600 I hope thats for the male... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Im not pushing against no meaning no. I think a lover (guy or girl) is sometimes in a heightened enough sensual state that the VERBAL is no longer being focused on nearly as much as the PHYSICAL so its easy to miss the VERBAL no, if the PHYSICAL activity suggests yes,,, as I said, people tune out for many reasons, heightened sexual arousal is one that just may cause a NATURAL tendency to become less aware of dialogue and other non physical factors,,, in that stage, a no can sound very much like a moan or an 'oh', if it is accompanied by no other action or words or form of expression To you, it's an acceptable excuse for a man not stopping when the woman says no because he may have tuned out what she's saying? its acceptable if someone doesnt hear me say stop verbally, or give them some body language that implies dissatisfation that they keep going whatever the situation,,,,, yes Really? It's acceptable to you for him to continue having sex with you even though you're telling him to stop? When women think this way, no wonder it confuses some men... this is what I Said it is acceptable if someone doesnt HEAR me say stop, that they continue although 'stop' is a harder verbal signal to mix up or miss than a 'no',, which is easily confused with other natural moans and groans during sex... there really isnt much more difficulty for me to say STOP, GET OFF ME, or some other indicator , as there is for me to simply say 'no' and expect them to understand while they are aroused,,, You make an awful lot of excuses for men who you say may not hear something. |
|
|
|
|
