totally agree about dawn of the dead..very good movie.
its in the favorites rack.

also remember watching dark shadows and i still have episodes on vcr tape too.

remakes-you didnt exactly specify they had to be horror,so ill toss in
BattleStar Galactica-the remake by ron moore.
went i think four seasons and the last season was just incredible.

ps,Lpdon..you didnt address my point about the Power the drug companies hold over the entire country compared to the few and scared supporters of marijuana.

WHOA!!

as far as bias goes,it works both ways,and lets just be honest here.

the pot smokers union versus the drup companies...Cmon!!
the drug companies create toxic addicting lethal side effect drugs,over and over and they pay people to push this **** thru the fda and all that and all they want is more money.
they have Billions!!
they have Political people Living in their pockets,that are bought and paid for.


the pot smokers money fund for advertising-AKA-so called bias,is like non-existent compared to them.

so,jmo,but lets keep it in perspective.
excellent points by Ms Seakolony too

final thought..
whens the last time you saw a pothead rob a bank??
never..why,because hed never get past the Lollipops

wow..mind if i borrow your answer,seeing as you said exactly what i was thinking?
cheers m8

me too..the movie was great too..esp the highway scene.

if they dont like you,then its time to move on and find some one who will....why waste your time?





being honest is where its at..
just tell her how you feel,and let the chips fall where they may.
g/l and just be yourself.


i dont normally start emailing women,altho i have tried it several times here.
still kind of hoping that the right one emails me.

when i got seperated/divorced,i lost my daughter for almost a year.
i very nearly fell completely apart.
every word in this song is heartfelt indeed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCCKkK_dBDw

thats one of the best replies ive seen in a long time.

its gotta be something in the water Tess...i dunno...but hey i agree with you.

i also wondered what ever happened to the op..really hopin shes okay.

lol..isnt that the truth..esp in the political forum...

btw,Fifi.you married a caveman??

i went out in the back last weekend,to get some parts off one of the trucks back there.
checked carefully..no poison ivy..cool.

slid under the truck,felt a scrape? across my butt..no big deal.
figured it was dirt/stones..

crawled out about 10 mins later,my azz was on FIRE....
went into the house,found out i had laid in stinging nettles..
even managed to get hit right under my eye too..

two days of swollen face and azz...yay me

best comment so far.
and..

those arent lawbreaking illegals...they are simply innocent people who stumbled across the border and fell into the Welfare system.
they didnt know any better..they couldnt read the signs....

i started with Unreal tournament on the Dreamcast.
what a game..teamwork,never before needed,suddenly very important.

now,its halo..and btw,

Halo Reach <-- Launches Today.
just toss in your ODST campaign disc.
scroll down,and hit ---> play the Beta.
cheers

lol,boy,does this post look familiar!
wait,ive seen it somewheres...
hrmm,could it possibly be on the Other thread thats the same thing?

why is there two threads about the same topic?
im just curious..no offense intended.

Origin
The origin of irregardless is not known for certain, but the speculation among references is that it may be a blend, or portmanteau word, of irrespective and regardless, both of which are commonly accepted standard English words. By blending these words, an illogical word is created. Another possibility is that when people say "irregardless" they are following the pattern of words like "irrelevant", "irrational" and "irregular". "Since the prefix ir- means 'not' (as it does with irrespective), and the suffix -less means 'without,' irregardless is a double negative."[1] According to the Oxford English Dictionary, Irregardless was first acknowledged in 1912 by the Wentworth American Dialect Dictionary as originating from western Indiana. Barely a decade later, the usage dispute over irregardless was such that, in 1923, Literary Digest published an article titled "Is There Such a Word as Irregardless in the English Language?

im totally crushed by your mighty wisdom,o keeper of the grammar.

if this is what you feel the need to do,posting stupid little zingers like this,then perhaps you need a refresher course in courtesy and class.

btw,if i were to be half as anal as you were,i would merely point out that you forgot an a in your sentence structure.

thanks for the waste of space.
o,and also for showing me what you are all about.

have a nice day.......

so?
i still stand by this statement.

im kinda baffled..English IS the common Known language of the usa

and whether or not its been voted on?

again..so?

since the day we came here and stole this country from the indians,english has been the common known language...Correct?

so that means it IS our primary language..irregardless of vote.

i have actually seen this happen..not any death,but the guy clearly had no clue what he was doing.
drove right thru a flashing red light,and t boned another car.
couldnt speak a word of english.
and he had a license..how did he pass the test??

btw,Great reply and well said

im kinda baffled..English IS the common Known language of the usa.

now i see people insisting theres no common language?
huh?

im not sure where they are coming from,but if you want to live in the usa,you should Know Read and Speak english.

want to speak in another language,great! cool!
have at it.

just dont expect the usa to bend over backwards because you cannot or will not learn english.
thats lucridious.

and if you just came here,and dont know how,then im Quite sure you would Find another countryman to help teach you.

in fact,one of the chatrooms i go to,i see lots of people from all over the world,learning to speak english,because they want to come here to the usa..where the Common language is...drum roll please..English!!

just my opinion.

ps,i still wish this site had a chatroom..even just one room,would be sufficient.

are you a banker?
do you know any politicians?

no?
then im guessing no parachutes for you....or me..or any of the rest of us regular americans.

ty MsHarmony.
im a bit confused..they apparently Have proof of the conspiracies.
so,again,if they lose the civil,they are found guilty right?

i dont care for this whole "settlement " thingy either.
they stole x amount of dollars,Make them Pay x amount of dollars back?
its not like they dont have the money.

how then,can it not be construed as a criminal act,considering they basically Stole the money,defrauded the investors and tried to cover their ***-ets?

isnt that a Crime?