Community > Posts By > oldkid46

 
oldkid46's photo
Wed 12/04/19 08:37 PM


I think most people will support stronger penalties for the illegal use or possession of a firearm. I think they would also support some level of required knowledge and emotional stability to purchase. What they will not support is the government or some other organization knowing who has a firearm and what that firearm is.


How else do we track if someone is supposed to have that weapon?
You put everyone through the same test of allowed to own/purchase. Those that are approved get it noted on their government issued ID. With that approved ID, they are allowed to purchase and possess. Even those who have no interest in owning or purchasing a weapon still go through the background test. The goal is to make sure someone purchasing or owning a weapon is a safe, law-abiding individual not how many and type of firearm they may own!!

oldkid46's photo
Wed 12/04/19 08:20 PM
Interesting topic! Looking forward to the comments from the female gender. Sorry guys, but your opinion does not answer the OP's question!!!!

oldkid46's photo
Wed 12/04/19 10:37 AM
Gender bias!! A woman can just ask, a man can only wish!!

oldkid46's photo
Wed 12/04/19 10:31 AM
I think most people will support stronger penalties for the illegal use or possession of a firearm. I think they would also support some level of required knowledge and emotional stability to purchase. What they will not support is the government or some other organization knowing who has a firearm and what that firearm is.

oldkid46's photo
Wed 12/04/19 10:20 AM

IT is like any relationship. Inadequate performance can be the percpetion of either party (employer and empoyee). A relation works when BOTH parties consider the NEEDS of the other, and not just themselves. When there is not greed, that is more likely to happen.
We have seen many examples of excessive greed on both sides. Unions that have wanted more than an employer could provide and the company goes bankrupt. We have seen businesses get to greedy and either competition ate them up or their employees move to better jobs. End result, they go out of business. There has to be a balance where the company prospers and all share those benefits. Without that, there is only business failures and jobs lost.

oldkid46's photo
Wed 12/04/19 08:31 AM




Funny stuff. Just what has Norway contributed to the world? Nada. And tell me how many people do those 2% employ? How much taxes are collected as the result of those employed? Bottom line is capitalism works for those that WANT TO WORK. It doesn't work for people just wanting a hand out or malcontents that just want to run their mouths.
employing other people is not a work, its investment in a firm and interest. That's no work and enjoy life on others labor.

Those 2% have employed only 1/6th population of the world. The rest are dying and barely makes end meet by sniffing trash buns. Under socialism, every man and woman is put to work and employment is guaranteed by state because every work contributes to society and every work has a value to it. Class does not exist in this society since its irrelevant.

If you want to give credit and worship those 2% for giving employment to 1/6th of total population after looting them then you've no hope.

Bottom line-
Capitalism works for people who DO NOT WANT TO WORK and those who live off labor of 98% of people and keep these majority of people oppressed. Capitalism is for lazy people who have dreams of being millionaires oppressing people under them. Funny thing is these people buy this **** they actually believe everyone can be a millionaire and own business. Then reality strikes them even if 60% people own businesses, then who will work under them? Makes me laugh




ROFLMAO. If you run your numbers about 5 billion people " are dying and barely makes end meet by sniffing trash buns " Sorry friend you are pulling numbers/facts out of your posterior. No point in addressing the rest of your crap. Your system has failed every time it's been tried. Ever heard of Venezuela? The Soviet Union> Maos' China? Have a nice life comrade,
USSR, China , Cuba are socialist, not communist, comrade.
All 3 countries have introduced capitalistic policies into their economies as pure socialism was failing. The truth is that when the government provides a job for everyone, the performance of the people doing those jobs is sub-par and the results inadequate. When there are no consequences to inadequate performance, that will be the level of competency you will receive.














oldkid46's photo
Wed 12/04/19 08:20 AM
quote]
Another term for our great, President Trump.
Enjoy the ride.
:thumbsup: [

oldkid46's photo
Wed 12/04/19 08:16 AM
To men, sex is more physical while to women, it is more emotional. Yes, both partners have a responsibility to make it good for their partner. If you can't express what you enjoy to your partner, how can they give you a satisfying experience? Likewise if you have sexual hangups and are unwilling to give your partner what they desire, how can you expect them to have a positive experience? Unfortunately, many people still have many issues and are sexually repressed. One other key, you can only change your own knowledge and performance not your partners. They are either willing to learn and adapt or not!! IMO, if it isn't a danger to your health, give it a try!!!

oldkid46's photo
Tue 12/03/19 11:25 PM
IF I had the money, I certainly would have a sugar baby!!! At least it is an upfront business transaction that satisfies both parties!!

oldkid46's photo
Mon 12/02/19 09:39 AM

Newsflash: According to research among men most of them want a committed relationship.

I want a relationship too. A committed, interdependent relationship.

While you may be right on men wanting a committed relationship, I suspect the details of what that relationship is are very different. The devil is in the details!!

oldkid46's photo
Sun 12/01/19 08:07 PM
So simple: most men marry for sex and most women marry for the relationship. The 2 will never be compatible!

oldkid46's photo
Sun 12/01/19 08:31 AM
Most economies are a combination of capitalism and socialism. In most of the western world, capitalism is the dominate economic force with a small amount of socialism. Where that line falls varies between countries with the US being more capitalistic and the EU less.

In all ways, capitalism is the best economic system for those willing to put out the effort to succeed in life. It also provides a reasonable level of support for those who are physically or mentally unable to provide for themselves. What it does not provide is a reasonable standard of living for those who should be capable of a successful life but are unwilling to put forth the effort. Those are the people capitalism throws away and allows to die. Not much loss there.

True socialism provides for all members of society at the same level but a lower level than capitalism would. For those who would otherwise be failures, this is an improvement in the standard of living they would have under capitalism. For those who would otherwise be successful in life, it is a reduction in their standard of living. Eventually, they will put out less effort and the socialist economy will suffer. Most countries, even the communist ones, have figured out that some level of capitalism is required to have a successful economy. When you destroy the incentive to work, people will no longer put out the effort.

oldkid46's photo
Sat 11/30/19 06:38 PM
one day after you DIE!!

oldkid46's photo
Sat 11/30/19 06:37 PM


Is wrong you can do that only if your wife doesn’t satisfy your sexual desire


slaphead noway
LOL

oldkid46's photo
Sat 11/30/19 08:08 AM
Forever is impossible with the constraints on relationships today. We all change as the years go by yet we expect the relationship will stay the same. We are unwilling to accept that our partner has changed and they require something new of us or acceptance of the new situation to maintain the relationship.

People mature differently over time and the partner you knew 20 years ago is not the partner you have today. You have also matured in some way and unless you both matured in the same way at the same rate, there will be conflict. The challenge is to find a mutually acceptable resolution to that conflict if the relationship is to survive and be healthy for both.

oldkid46's photo
Sat 11/30/19 07:57 AM
Using just the chronological age is inadequate especially as we get older. There comes a point when we look at different people in the same age group and see very different people and the lifestyle they enjoy. Some act truly old in their lifestyle and let their problems control what they will and won't do. Some act much younger than their actual years and try to overcome any restraints in their lives. They live a much younger lifestyle. It is finding those compatible lifestyles that is the ultimate goal. One only has to look at a number of profiles in a given age range and see the difference in they enjoy doing to understand where they are in lifestyle years.

oldkid46's photo
Fri 11/29/19 04:37 PM

Only if he gets his wifes permission.
:thumbsup: This is probably the right choice you should be making. Share the fun!!

oldkid46's photo
Sun 11/24/19 08:29 PM

Sex isn't a need.
You are correct, there are very few actual needs such as food, water, and some level of shelter from the elements. Human contact is not a need either and sexual satisfaction can be self administered. I think most of us want a little more in life than basic survival and then human companionship and sex becomes an important element of that improved lifestyle.

oldkid46's photo
Wed 11/20/19 08:46 PM
The simple basics: sex, companionship, and the freedom to do the things they enjoy! Not difficult but almost impossible to find in an older woman.

oldkid46's photo
Tue 11/19/19 05:47 PM
103 and in the nursing home!!