Does it bother you when someone who is ONLINE on an ONLINE DATING SITE tells you they don't like email or IM & wants to move to phone almost immediately?

I always wonder whyyyyyyyyy they bother being on line at all. I meet guys in person too, but I use a computer for a reason .. I'm at it a lot in my work & play, so why not use it as a medium to meet people. And I like chatting on mine as well. If someone doesn't well, it's one less thing we have in common

I just don't get it .. if they hate using the computer to meet people then WHYYYY do they do it?



On that note .. I love what I just read from Dan, on another thread .. I think he nailed it ..


On the first email it is a bit too forward {to ask for a date] On top of that, it is highly unlikely to return a positive result. If you cant be bothered to spend time online emailing people, then an online dating site where emailing is the main communication tool, is probably not for you.




YAAAAA Dan!!! You nailed it

Pictures are ok, ski pic is cool, but try at least one picture with no sunglasses and look into the camera one can tell a lot about a person thru their eyes ..

Have fun & rock on

Hi.I live in penn hills area. I've been so busy with work and business. I've not been on a date for over 5 months and I would like to go out today and have a drink with someone. so if you are a nice lady with good attitude and feel like you could use a good companionship today and want to hang out. hit me up.

Normally I'd advise the same thing, except more forcefully and abrasively than MG.

However, this time I think it's a moot question. The two guys on your picture are equally handsome, and as far as humans are concerned with looks, and looks alone, looks don't count for individuality, they count for goodness. You must have individuality in your character and personality, since those make or break compatibility in relationships. But I don't think that I'd choose a black woman over a Chinese woman or the other way around if they were the same except for the looks, which was also the same in their degrees of goodness.

What I mean if I met a Chines doctor and a Black doctor and they had exactly the same amount of money, and they both loved me equally, and they both were a hit with my dad and they were both hated by my Momma instantly, but one was a "9" and the other, a "7", I'd marry the "9", regardless which it was. But if the circumstances were kept constant, while changing the scenario to both being an "8" (individually, not collectively) then I'd not know which to marry.(*)

Similarly, on your pic, both guys are a 9-and-a-half, so don't worry, I wouldn't, who is you and who is not. Let the women decide it for themselves.

Let me give you another instance of examples. A woman puts an ad in, she is a slim blonde.

You meet her on a first date.

Scenario 1: In reality she's a fat blonde.
Scenario 2: In reality she's a slim brunette.

In Sc. 1. you'll get upset, rightly so.
In Sc. 2., if you are really a man, you won't even notice the hair color.

This proves that it's not the looks, but the degree of good looks, that makes peole like another for their looks alone or not.

If it were looks, really, a type of looks, that made peole look, then in Sc. 2. you ought to have got upset just as much as under Sc. 1.

Q.E.D.

* In retrospect, I should have married both. Oh, well.