Community > Posts By > iamgeorgiagirl

 
iamgeorgiagirl's photo
Tue 05/12/09 11:06 AM
Creation Science Issues
Death Before the Fall of Man
By Greg Neyman
© Answers in Creation
First Published 28 January 2003
(This article can be freely copied and distributed, as long as it is unaltered and a link back to the original article appears on the page)


Young earth creation science advocates have long argued against the occurrence of death before the fall of man. There are actually two issues that we must deal with here. The primary issue is that there was or was not death before sin. The second issue is...did Adam and Eve's sin bring the punishment of physical death.



First, we will deal with the issue of animal death prior to sin. This mistaken doctrine stems from two verses in the Bible. The first is Genesis 1:29-30, which states,

"And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. 30And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, where-in there is life, I have given every green herb for meat; and it was so."

Yes, the Bible says that God gave the green plants to all animals to eat. This is a completely true statement. Adam and the animals could eat the plants for food. However, nowhere does the Bible say that animals "cannot" eat meat. There was no general prohibition against meat. However, it's not that simple a matter. One must also consider the location where God spoke these words.

God was addressing Adam within the Garden of Eden, which was a unique, special place. Eden was paradise, where there was no death, and where animals got along with each other. It is clear from Scripture that God created this Garden to be different from the rest of the world.

Some young earth creationists have argued that the entire world was originally created perfect and free from death. However, if this was true, then why did God plant a Garden, and place man in it? The Scriptures are clear that the Garden was separate and distinct from the rest of the world. We have no reason to suspect that there was no death outside of the Garden.

Also, nowhere does the Bible claim that there was no animal death before sin…it is inferred from the Genesis text and this verse, Romans 5:12, which states,

"Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned."

When Adam sinned, he did indeed introduce physical death (through his expulsion from paradise) for humanity. However, this verse has nothing to do with animal death prior to sin. There are several other good reasons for the existence of animal death prior to man's sin.



Genesis 2:17 is God's direct instructions to Adam. God told Adam...

But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it; for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.

Using a common, literal interpretation, when Adam ate the fruit, he should have died physically that day. Did Adam die the same day he ate the fruit? No, he did not. There are three possibilities. First, God lied to Adam. We know that God cannot lie, so this cannot be the case.

There are two other possible alternatives from which you must choose. The first is that God did not mean physical death at all, but spiritual. When Adam ate the fruit, he sinned, which caused separation between him and God, or spiritual death. The other alternative is that although the sin did not bring about instant death, it did bring about gradual death, making man susceptible to death. Adam and Eve, by their expulsion from the Garden of Eden, became vulnerable to death. Another viable alternative is that Adam did die that day. A day to God is different than a day for us. The six creation days were millions of years long. After the creation, God entered His rest...the seventh day, and we are still in that day. Thus, Adam and Eve died on the seventh day.



Ecosystem


Apparently, young earth creation science experts are a little weak when it comes to understanding the ecosystem and the food chain. God designed nature to be self-renewing. As creatures die, their remains decompose, and nourish the plants. As the plants grow, they are eaten by the animals. The animals are killed by predators, and what is not eaten is left to decompose to nourish the insects and plants, and the cycle starts all over. This IS the way God designed nature. There is no reason to believe this process was different prior to sin. The creation was made to "perfectly" renew itself through this process.



Another reason to consider is animal design. If God never intended carnivores to eat meat, then He would have designed them differently. For example, lions with molar teeth for chewing plants. A lion, with sharp teeth for killing, is not an efficient creation for the processing of plant matter. Therefore, God’s design is flawed, because He intended the lion to eat plants, but equipped it for killing. If you believe in young earth creation science, then you MUST believe in a flawed creation!



With that said, let's examine a few creatures of God's creation that proves there was death before Adam's Fall.



Spiders, Snakes, and Venom


Spiders are wondrous creatures. They spin their silk webs in order to ensnare their victims before consuming them. How would they have survived in a pre-death world? Would their webs have been used to catch falling leaves? No, they could just simply go into a tree, or to the ground, to feast on the leaves. Spiders were created with only one diet in mind...a dead insect.

Also, why were some spiders created as venomous? What is the purpose of this venom? They didn't need this venom to subdue the leaves, or whatever else they were supposed to eat in the Garden. And, it could not have been for self-defense, since there were no predators in the Garden? In fact, the same thing goes for venomous snakes. Venom only has one purpose...to kill. Even venoms that incapacitate are for the same thing in the end, for once the creature is incapacitated, it is consumed.

The only logical conclusion is that God created venomous creatures to kill their prey. Venom serves no purpose in a calm, friendly Garden with no death. If God did create venom, according to the young earth model, then His creation was not perfect, as the venom served no purpose.



Venus Fly Trap


I'm sure everyone has seen one of these carnivorous plants. Before the fall of man, did it catch falling leaves? It certainly could not have evolved this trait after the Garden.

Other plants that eat insects are the Sundew and the Pitcher Plant. These plants live in wet places, where there is poor nitrogen content in the soil. The plants get the nitrogen they need from the insects.



Bats


Bats feed off of flying insects. Before the Fall, did they use their natural radar to catch falling leaves and eat them?

The previous three examples list insect-eating organisms. Many young earth creationist organizations now teach that insects do not fall in the category of "nephesh creatures." Their current teaching is that death before sin only applied to these nephesh creations.1 This term is generally applied to land-dwelling creations, which Adam named in Genesis 2:19. By picking and choosing the type of creatures this "no death before sin" rule applies to, young earth creationists avoid problems such as insect and micro-organism death. The "nephesh rule" of interpretation allows them to ignore clear evidence that insects died before the Fall.



Sea Lions, Seals, and Walrus (and Penguins)


All of these marine mammals feed on fish. To get around this argument, young earth creationists could again claim that fish are not "nephesh creatures," since they were not named by Adam.



This list could go on for many pages. But, I'm sure you get the point already. There was clearly death before sin. Young earth creationists resort to the "nephesh" rule in order to avoid any problems, picking and choosing which creatures are truly "nephesh" and which ones are not. Naturally, if the evidence for an organism's death contradicts the young earth view, the organism is said to be non-nephesh.



Conclusion


According to the young earth creation science, there is no death before sin. However, why did God create creatures designed specifically for killing? God is perfect, and his creatures in the Garden would have been created perfectly to fit into the ecosystem. Venom has no purpose but to kill. According to the young-earth model, the "perfect" animal created by God would not need venom. Yet venom exists. Young earth creationism cannot explain this.

This is not so much an issue of old earth / young earth, as it is about biblical interpretation. This debate stems from their inaccurate assumptions that "death before sin" equates to animal physical death as well as human physical death.



1 answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/bad_things.asp



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



If you are not a Christian, and you have been holding out on making a decision for Christ because the Church always preached a message that was contrary to what you saw in the scientific world, then rest assured that the Bible is the inerrant Word of God, and you can believe in Christ and receive salvation, while still believing in an old earth. Click here for more.



Are you a Christian who believes in young earth creationism? Now that we have shown the many difficulties of the young earth creation science model in this and many other articles, how does this impact your Christian life? If you are a young earth creationism believer, click here.


iamgeorgiagirl's photo
Tue 05/12/09 10:59 AM
I've seen so many people get angry at God because he punishes evil souls who have no remorse...it makes no sense to me. I feel he is justified.

iamgeorgiagirl's photo
Tue 05/12/09 09:29 AM
my scent


tehe

iamgeorgiagirl's photo
Tue 05/12/09 09:19 AM


Eljay...

The issue comes in the fallacy of attempting to quantify evil. The question centers on defining evil. Evil - like darkness, is unquantifyable - for it is often viewed as the antithesis of good - when in reality, it is the falling short of it. Not the opposite - but the lack of. As with Darkness - which is not the opposite of light, but the absense of it. Therefore - Epicurous falls short in his analysis of God's dealing with evil - as he indicates a lack of understanding of what evil is - or rather, he premises that it is a mesurable entity which stands on it's own. We ony understand evil in the light of knowing what the good is that it has fallen short of.

That is the logical analysis of your question. It centers around accepting a false premise introduced by Epicurous. Though his argument may seem to make sense - it only makes sense if one presumes that evil is something that can be defined independent of the good it falls short of.



Does this deny the existence of evil?


I have to say that this is indeed a Rembrant of deception.

Especially in view of the fact that it totally ignores the fact that this would demand that nature herself falls short of goodness.

Creation itself falls short of goodness.

But this flies in the face of the fact that the Biblical God said of his creation: "God saw that it was good".

ohwell

This is just an empty loophole, and as far as I'm concerned it doesn't address the concerns of Epicuras at all. Like CreativeSoul suggests, it just attempts to deny evil whilst simultaneously pretending to perserve it in a very poetic but totally false way.


I believe the scriptures say in the begining it was good. Adam & Eve were in Eden. No storms, disasters, earthquakes, etc. Naked and not ashamed. They had each other and all they needed. The weather and struggles for mankind are part of the punishment for sin it suggests after Satan tempted Eve and she broke God's only request of her and caused Adam to do the same. Damn you Satan!

Maybe this is not what you are referring to.

iamgeorgiagirl's photo
Mon 05/11/09 09:49 PM

No matter what faith you subscribe to, if you believe in one all mighty power that be, answer me this:

Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able, and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him god?

- Epicurus.

I'm sure some of you have seen this quote before, and I'm not posting it to be a smart alec or rub you up the wrong way or anything of such nature.

I am having a lapse in what was once a strong personal belief in god, for personal reasons I would rather not go into. However, this quote really struck something in me, and has made me question faith in general (not just my own), as I really cannot find an answer to the questions posed in this verse.

Anyone willing to clarify how it can be disproven using logic are welcome to reply. I would welcome anyone to try and help out, because I'm pretty much lost for an answer...

Your parents love you and try to teach you right from wrong. What you decide to do with this knowledge is up to you.
God has promised to do away with all evil and he will. :wink:


iamgeorgiagirl's photo
Mon 05/11/09 09:09 PM
yawn

iamgeorgiagirl's photo
Mon 05/11/09 08:37 PM
My ex is with a dominatrix now...to me he is a big wuss...as well as whipped...laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh

iamgeorgiagirl's photo
Mon 05/11/09 06:22 AM


:tongue: Is being whipped such a bad thing?:tongue:
laugh
laugh laugh laugh


(((((((((Mirror))))))))))

iamgeorgiagirl's photo
Mon 05/11/09 05:47 AM
Aaw! People can be judgmental and self righteous about things they don't like, believe in or understand. Life can be tough at times for everyone... but this too shall pass. Hang in there...sounds like your dad doesn't know any better. You look young so I assume he hasn't known about your sexuality very long, maybe he just needs some time to process some things.
Maybe you should read the letter to him and talk?
I wish you the best.

flowerforyou

:heart:

iamgeorgiagirl's photo
Fri 05/08/09 05:53 AM



I think he would love neither one and is just enjoying the ride. When you love someone, there can be no others.


I agree with Audie!


that's bc Audie is right

But the question reads not can he be in love with both....but can he be in love and have feelings for another...



iamgeorgiagirl's photo
Fri 05/08/09 05:51 AM

I want serious answers!!!!

Can a man be truely in love with a woman yet have feelings for another woman at the same time?

Can a woman Truely love a man and a woman without loving one more than the other?

Can a Triad relationship work?

Clerification....one man and two women living togeather in harmony! A compleate love triangle not a third wheel!

Yes, ?, ?

huh

iamgeorgiagirl's photo
Fri 05/08/09 05:50 AM



Define Bit!@. A woman who is strong and takes up for herself? A woman who is unafraid to go after what she wants? A woman who will not allow herself to be devalued, disrespected or degraded? A woman who defends herself and all she loves with her words and her actions. A woman who will gaze into your eyes when you call her a Bit!@ and then wink at you.


Ok, I'm a Bit!@.:wink:



That's not how I define it...I actually respect those characteristics. I was thinking more along the lines of someone who kicks and crys on the ground when they don't get their way...


For the sake of this discussion, the book defines "b**ch" as follows:

"A b**ch is not a woman who speaks in a harsh tone of voice. It is not a woman who is abrasive or rude. She is polite but cler. She communitcates directly with a man, in much the same way men communicae with one another. In this way, it is easier for a man to deal with her than with a woman who appears too emotional, because the emotional sensative type of woman confuses him. The b*ch knows what she likes and has an easier time expressing it directly. "

I prefer biatch myself...

iamgeorgiagirl's photo
Fri 05/08/09 05:29 AM

i am a libertarian so i believe anything you do thats not hurting any one should be legal.

just because its legal doesn't mean we all have to partake just allow others if they chose to.

Yea, what he said! Like I said we are adults and are able to make up our own minds.


Peace

:heart:

iamgeorgiagirl's photo
Fri 05/08/09 05:24 AM



Every Generation of Every Religion that has a "doomsday prophecy" believes the end will come during their lifetime. They have been wrong up to this point, and I see no reason why that trend won't continue.


True indeed. We'll just have to see what happens. In the meantime Floridians, learn how to swim if you dont know how.scared
:tongue:

laugh laugh laugh

iamgeorgiagirl's photo
Sun 05/03/09 11:23 PM
You can get high on this but not that. People are going to do what they want whenever it is possible...legal or not. I think we should concentrate on reducing more severe and traumatic crimes instead of wasting jail space on a pot smoker.

iamgeorgiagirl's photo
Sun 05/03/09 11:15 PM






People who smoke it and like it will do it regardless of the legalities. I think adults should be able to decide for themselves what they will or will not do in the privacy of their own homes...

In the "free world" it ought to be adults being able to have a choice. Having a choice for themselves (if they want to partake of it or not)is what it's all about for me. True freedom does not really exist for us, nor really does the proverbial free world. We are always restricted to do what the government dictates.

I feel like pot is the least of this worlds problems. I can believe someone might OD on concentrated THC but not from smoking pot. I know too many smokers that are extremists at times with the best of weed. No way can you OD smoking it. No way. noway
I don't care who wrote the article. I will never believe it.

If someone died smoking it it was probably from choking on a bud they sucked in the wrong way.....laugh laugh laugh



glasses smokin smokin smokin smokin smokin smokin smokin smokin smokin glasses bigsmile scared shocked whoa noway










good take on it --- i think i can say youre kind of saying this --- if cigarettes are legal at "18" then so should weed --- thats a good point....am i right for assuming that? or maybe i should have stayed in my shell
That is pretty much what I am saying. People make way too much over it. We should have laws to avoid harming others but not telling us what to do or not do in our own homes... If people want to smoke weed why should I care? It hurts me none. If they are in fact harming themselves they have to suffer not me. They will do it either way. Jail & fines shouldn't always be imposed if they aren't harming others.

What gives them the power to dictate our lives in this way? It's BS



well i'll be...congrats to you...first time i've ever felt one way about something and actually discussed it and somebody elses opinion changed mine. good job...but i now agree with you

surprised
Way cool! But yes I get tired of the government telling me when and how I can use the water I pay for, etc.
It is BS this land of the free. My ancestors were American Indians, I am an adult yet I am told what to do all the time. It pisses me off.


forget the government - i hate when people try and tell me what i can do and say when half of what they do and say is just as "controversial" but just on different demographics....that really bugs the living hell out of me.....i can deal with the government almost....considering there really isn't anything we do about them
I know me too. You can have alcohol inside but not outside, you can smoke here but not there, etc. It is so maddening. Some states still try and regulate sex between consenting adults too. It is all BS

iamgeorgiagirl's photo
Sun 05/03/09 11:04 PM




People who smoke it and like it will do it regardless of the legalities. I think adults should be able to decide for themselves what they will or will not do in the privacy of their own homes...

In the "free world" it ought to be adults being able to have a choice. Having a choice for themselves (if they want to partake of it or not)is what it's all about for me. True freedom does not really exist for us, nor really does the proverbial free world. We are always restricted to do what the government dictates.

I feel like pot is the least of this worlds problems. I can believe someone might OD on concentrated THC but not from smoking pot. I know too many smokers that are extremists at times with the best of weed. No way can you OD smoking it. No way. noway
I don't care who wrote the article. I will never believe it.

If someone died smoking it it was probably from choking on a bud they sucked in the wrong way.....laugh laugh laugh



glasses smokin smokin smokin smokin smokin smokin smokin smokin smokin glasses bigsmile scared shocked whoa noway










good take on it --- i think i can say youre kind of saying this --- if cigarettes are legal at "18" then so should weed --- thats a good point....am i right for assuming that? or maybe i should have stayed in my shell
That is pretty much what I am saying. People make way too much over it. We should have laws to avoid harming others but not telling us what to do or not do in our own homes... If people want to smoke weed why should I care? It hurts me none. If they are in fact harming themselves they have to suffer not me. They will do it either way. Jail & fines shouldn't always be imposed if they aren't harming others.

What gives them the power to dictate our lives in this way? It's BS



well i'll be...congrats to you...first time i've ever felt one way about something and actually discussed it and somebody elses opinion changed mine. good job...but i now agree with you

surprised
Way cool! But yes I get tired of the government telling me when and how I can use the water I pay for, etc.
It is BS this land of the free. My ancestors were American Indians, I am an adult yet I am told what to do all the time. It pisses me off.

iamgeorgiagirl's photo
Sun 05/03/09 10:39 PM


People who smoke it and like it will do it regardless of the legalities. I think adults should be able to decide for themselves what they will or will not do in the privacy of their own homes...

In the "free world" it ought to be adults being able to have a choice. Having a choice for themselves (if they want to partake of it or not)is what it's all about for me. True freedom does not really exist for us, nor really does the proverbial free world. We are always restricted to do what the government dictates.

I feel like pot is the least of this worlds problems. I can believe someone might OD on concentrated THC but not from smoking pot. I know too many smokers that are extremists at times with the best of weed. No way can you OD smoking it. No way. noway
I don't care who wrote the article. I will never believe it.

If someone died smoking it it was probably from choking on a bud they sucked in the wrong way.....laugh laugh laugh



glasses smokin smokin smokin smokin smokin smokin smokin smokin smokin glasses bigsmile scared shocked whoa noway








good take on it --- i think i can say youre kind of saying this --- if cigarettes are legal at "18" then so should weed --- thats a good point....am i right for assuming that? or maybe i should have stayed in my shell
That is pretty much what I am saying. People make way too much over it. We should have laws to avoid harming others but not telling us what to do or not do in our own homes... If people want to smoke weed why should I care? It hurts me none. If they are in fact harming themselves they have to suffer not me. They will do it either way. Jail & fines shouldn't always be imposed if they aren't harming others.

What gives them the power to dictate our lives in this way? It's BS

iamgeorgiagirl's photo
Sun 05/03/09 05:35 PM

I just had a stew meat and bean burrito smothered in brown gravy and cheese with rellenos smothered in green sauce and cheese

mmm mmm mmm


Mmmm! Hope your woman had some too!


I predict the fart factor will be high tonight!


blushing


:wink:



laugh


glasses

iamgeorgiagirl's photo
Sun 05/03/09 05:32 PM



My Bro in law cooked us some authentic enchiladas, beans & rice...YUM!


I love it when a man cooks...



Yea...my sister's husband is HOT, too! laugh

Uh oh...


laugh



Married....



It figures...


tears

1 2 3 5 7 8 9 24 25