Previous 1
Topic: So What's the Deal With Lady Gaga
no photo
Thu 09/16/10 10:04 PM
I mean, why do people listen to her? I don't get it, it's the same crap I've heard churned out by the pop industry over and over again over the past few years, and now because some crazy ***** with a *ahem* different fashion sense sings it (I use the term "sing" losely) we're all just supposed to buy into to the fact that she's the next big thing?

She is no more talented or different musically than Britney Spears, Aguillera, Ashley Simpson...the list goes on. It's the same stuff! And don't get me started on why people even listen to Ke$ha. I mean am I missing something big here, or am I just getting old. 26 is too young to be old :(

metalwing's photo
Thu 09/16/10 10:09 PM
The Bad Romance video on Youtube shows a lot of artistic talent.

MelodyGirl's photo
Thu 09/16/10 10:12 PM
Music is subjective.

If you don't "get it" that's fine; you don't have to.

I think she is more talented than Spears and Simpson. Those two can't play instruments, and GaGa is more visually entertaining. Aguilera is more talented vocally but, as I said, GaGa can also play instruments as well.

I listen to hard core rock more than anything: Mushroomhead, Slip Knot, Sevendust, Manson, etc, but I also like to go clubbing. Pop, house and trance is also attractive to me.

I love GaGa. smitten

AndyBgood's photo
Thu 09/16/10 10:33 PM
David Bowie did the same thing in the 1970s. He would put on OUTRAGEOUS stage shows. She just tries to take image to a whole different high. She isn't my personal cup of tea but I do not have a dislike of her like Brittany Spears. Lady gaga isn't running amok and acting all stupid and all ya know! She reminds me of David Bowie meets a Las Vegas choreographer!

MelodyGirl's photo
Thu 09/16/10 10:41 PM

David Bowie did the same thing in the 1970s. He would put on OUTRAGEOUS stage shows. She just tries to take image to a whole different high. She isn't my personal cup of tea but I do not have a dislike of her like Brittany Spears. Lady gaga isn't running amok and acting all stupid and all ya know! She reminds me of David Bowie meets a Las Vegas choreographer!


That's a great comparison. Even Manson, Liberace, Elton John and Madonna have followed similar visual paths. She isn't doing anything new but she has her own "level" as you said. :thumbsup:

nicetallguy38's photo
Thu 09/16/10 10:43 PM
Edited by nicetallguy38 on Thu 09/16/10 10:44 PM

David Bowie did the same thing in the 1970s. He would put on OUTRAGEOUS stage shows. She just tries to take image to a whole different high. She isn't my personal cup of tea but I do not have a dislike of her like Brittany Spears. Lady gaga isn't running amok and acting all stupid and all ya know! She reminds me of David Bowie meets a Las Vegas choreographer!


Lady Gaga isnt acting all stupid?? Sooo getting naked in the Yankee clubhouse is acting smart?? HAHA Im not a fan of either but yes Gaga gets the nod for being a real musician .. apparently she was quite the piano bar player type person back in the day!

Just to clarify not a Britany or Gaga fan HUGE Bowie fan tho

AndyBgood's photo
Thu 09/16/10 10:57 PM


David Bowie did the same thing in the 1970s. He would put on OUTRAGEOUS stage shows. She just tries to take image to a whole different high. She isn't my personal cup of tea but I do not have a dislike of her like Brittany Spears. Lady gaga isn't running amok and acting all stupid and all ya know! She reminds me of David Bowie meets a Las Vegas choreographer!


Lady Gaga isnt acting all stupid?? Sooo getting naked in the Yankee clubhouse is acting smart?? HAHA Im not a fan of either but yes Gaga gets the nod for being a real musician .. apparently she was quite the piano bar player type person back in the day!

Just to clarify not a Britany or Gaga fan HUGE Bowie fan tho


Lady Godiva...

Should I say more???


Besides, baseball gets her all hot and sticky!

Suzanne20's photo
Thu 09/16/10 11:06 PM
I would make this post about Kesha...IMO she sounds drunk when trying to sing.

But to each their own.

Go GAGA!drinker

msharmony's photo
Thu 09/16/10 11:08 PM

I mean, why do people listen to her? I don't get it, it's the same crap I've heard churned out by the pop industry over and over again over the past few years, and now because some crazy ***** with a *ahem* different fashion sense sings it (I use the term "sing" losely) we're all just supposed to buy into to the fact that she's the next big thing?

She is no more talented or different musically than Britney Spears, Aguillera, Ashley Simpson...the list goes on. It's the same stuff! And don't get me started on why people even listen to Ke$ha. I mean am I missing something big here, or am I just getting old. 26 is too young to be old :(


on Kesha, I can agree,, Britney is a talented performer, aguilerra is talented singer, gaga is actually both,,,not to mention songwriting and business skill,,,

no photo
Thu 09/16/10 11:22 PM

I would make this post about Kesha...IMO she sounds drunk when trying to sing.

But to each their own.

Go GAGA!drinker



Well it makes sense that she sounds drunk when she's trying to sing, because all she does is sing about drinking!

She also looks like John Travolta, which is really unsettling to me.

southern_bee's photo
Thu 09/16/10 11:38 PM
aside from her drug use that helps her come up with her crazy ideas.she does have talent shes different..shes my guilty pleasure..and shes a helluva lot less annoying that that Kesha girl with the always auto tuned voice! oh and gaga hasnt flashed her vajayjay that i know of.

if you dont like her music its ok you dont have to listen..!flowers

no photo
Sat 09/18/10 11:15 PM
Did you know that she got here name from the Queen song "Radio GaGa"? That makes me imagine Freddy Mercury turning in his grave. And as far as her "talent" goes... I think if she looked like a regular person, she would never have a song on the radio. She just goes for the "wow" factor.

msharmony's photo
Sun 09/19/10 02:43 AM

Did you know that she got here name from the Queen song "Radio GaGa"? That makes me imagine Freddy Mercury turning in his grave. And as far as her "talent" goes... I think if she looked like a regular person, she would never have a song on the radio. She just goes for the "wow" factor.



thats unfortunate, music has become about image. few REGULAR looking females get airplay anymore, but she is a talented girl

composing, songwriting, musician, and vocalist,,she has alot more on her musical resume than most of the top artists right now,,

Gossipmpm's photo
Sun 09/19/10 06:22 AM
Edited by Gossipmpm on Sun 09/19/10 06:27 AM
read your post......


ya kinda answered your own question



also: we are not "supposed" to buy her music....I do cause I like it--like her---enjoy her fashion---enjoy her sexuality


and you do not.....


and the world will continue to revolve....even without Lady G

even without us......

And you can bet your bottom dollar shes an ordinary girl at home with her family

Every performer has their "schtick"....and hers happens to rake in boku bucks.....

so more power to the girl...I couldnt spend hours in those shoes

but for millions of dollars..........point me the way baby!!!!

(and I can sing!):heart:

no photo
Sun 09/19/10 12:02 PM
I guess my problem is that American music used to mean something, and now, thanks to acts like her or American Idol, it's kind of a joke to the rest of the world. It reminds me of how shitty music was after Elvis stopped making rock and roll and before the Beatles became popular. I long for the grunge days where looks didn't matter, but now they mean everything. The music sounds the same, has no substance. I've looked through Gaga's lyrics...nothing of substance. The whole mind-set is "if it has a good beat and I can dance to it..."

But I agree that the world keeps moving on, and I don't have to listen so why *****? But why not *****? People ***** about way more trivial matters on here right?

msharmony's photo
Sun 09/19/10 05:06 PM
I actually think that 90 percent of the talent that competes on American Idol is more talented than the top 25 percent of artists who get continuous airplay.

msmyka's photo
Sun 09/19/10 05:12 PM
I don't listen to either Lady GaGa or ke$ha ... not so into Pop in general. It's all just personal preference.

no photo
Mon 09/20/10 12:12 AM

I actually think that 90 percent of the talent that competes on American Idol is more talented than the top 25 percent of artists who get continuous airplay.


But that's my point! It's not about the talent...of course it's a part of it, but it's about the soul of the music. Bob Dylan sucked as a singer, but was one of the most influential artists of all time. Kurt Cobain wasn't the best singer or guitarist, and yet he changed music forever. American Idol makes it seem like as long as you hit all the right notes, you're a musician, when really, you're an "entertainer." Look at the winners, most of them didn't do anything after they won. Daughtry is horrible, Kelly Clarkson can't even write her own music...Carrie Underwood is actually the only contestant that I think has a lasting musical talent.

fifijones's photo
Mon 09/20/10 12:24 AM

Did you know that she got here name from the Queen song "Radio GaGa"? That makes me imagine Freddy Mercury turning in his grave. And as far as her "talent" goes... I think if she looked like a regular person, she would never have a song on the radio. She just goes for the "wow" factor.


She might not have gone to the London College of Music to study opera, but I bet dead Fred would like her. When I went to his concerts in the early '80s, he was pretty flamboyant! I love the Gaga.

Gossipmpm's photo
Mon 09/20/10 04:52 AM
....and I was like the #1 Bowie fan back in the 70's!!! Cut my hair short--died it red like Ziggy!!!!(ohhh those were the days!!!):heart:



Previous 1