100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
|
|
|
Sex between two consenting adults and that includes man/woman man/man woman/woman is a matter for them alone. If it doesn't harm , cause grief or cost anyone else then that is OK . Religion has caused more grief and harm than sex has.
Sex is good Sex is healthy, I am using as a means to keep fit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
..those who oppose sodomy are somehow afraid of something,,, never quite figured that term out myself,,, both are accurate gay butt sex is more accurate than both.... anal sex doesn't imply gay, and neither does sodomy... since this thread is about gays, then gay butt sex is appropriate... No, this thread ISN'T about gays. It's about marriage equality for the human race. How you get off by throwing around the term butt sex is beyond me. Maybe you've tried it and like it?? no, it's about gays wanting to be gay... there is no such thing as marriage inequality... any man, gay or not, can marry any woman he wants... gays want extra rights, and to cram their lifestyle down everyone else's throat... sure...why wouldn't they? a world full of homos, great for the future... i think it all should be suppressed, not welcomed... 8 billion people can't live the way they want to live... if they could, there would be no laws... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
..those who oppose sodomy are somehow afraid of something,,, never quite figured that term out myself,,, both are accurate gay butt sex is more accurate than both.... anal sex doesn't imply gay, and neither does sodomy... since this thread is about gays, then gay butt sex is appropriate... No, this thread ISN'T about gays. It's about marriage equality for the human race. How you get off by throwing around the term butt sex is beyond me. Maybe you've tried it and like it?? no, it's about gays wanting to be gay... there is no such thing as marriage inequality... any man, gay or not, can marry any woman he wants... gays want extra rights, and to cram their lifestyle down everyone else's throat... sure...why wouldn't they? a world full of homos, great for the future... i think it all should be suppressed, not welcomed... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
..those who oppose sodomy are somehow afraid of something,,, never quite figured that term out myself,,, both are accurate gay butt sex is more accurate than both.... anal sex doesn't imply gay, and neither does sodomy... since this thread is about gays, then gay butt sex is appropriate... No, this thread ISN'T about gays. It's about marriage equality for the human race. How you get off by throwing around the term butt sex is beyond me. Maybe you've tried it and like it?? no, it's about gays wanting to be gay... there is no such thing as marriage inequality... any man, gay or not, can marry any woman he wants... gays want extra rights, and to cram their lifestyle down everyone else's throat... man marry woman, woman marry man, seems pretty basic and inclusive of everyone,,, Are you saying that there are no gay men and no Lesbian Women |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
HappyBun
on
Sun 05/12/13 02:30 PM
|
|
..those who oppose sodomy are somehow afraid of something,,, never quite figured that term out myself,,, both are accurate gay butt sex is more accurate than both.... anal sex doesn't imply gay, and neither does sodomy... since this thread is about gays, then gay butt sex is appropriate... No, this thread ISN'T about gays. It's about marriage equality for the human race. How you get off by throwing around the term butt sex is beyond me. Maybe you've tried it and like it?? no, it's about gays wanting to be gay... there is no such thing as marriage inequality... any man, gay or not, can marry any woman he wants... gays want extra rights, and to cram their lifestyle down everyone else's throat... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
..those who oppose sodomy are somehow afraid of something,,, never quite figured that term out myself,,, both are accurate gay butt sex is more accurate than both.... anal sex doesn't imply gay, and neither does sodomy... since this thread is about gays, then gay butt sex is appropriate... No, this thread ISN'T about gays. It's about marriage equality for the human race. How you get off by throwing around the term butt sex is beyond me. Maybe you've tried it and like it?? no, it's about gays wanting to be gay... there is no such thing as marriage inequality... any man, gay or not, can marry any woman he wants... gays want extra rights, and to cram their lifestyle down everyone else's throat... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
HappyBun
on
Sun 05/12/13 12:50 PM
|
|
..those who oppose sodomy are somehow afraid of something,,, never quite figured that term out myself,,, both are accurate gay butt sex is more accurate than both.... anal sex doesn't imply gay, and neither does sodomy... since this thread is about gays, then gay butt sex is appropriate... No, this thread ISN'T about gays. It's about marriage equality for the human race. How you get off by throwing around the term butt sex is beyond me. Maybe you've tried it and like it?? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Corporations are part of the problems in most of these countries. American Corporations are the Real Power in America. Corporate greed is bringing the US down. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
..those who oppose sodomy are somehow afraid of something,,, never quite figured that term out myself,,, both are accurate gay butt sex is more accurate than both.... anal sex doesn't imply gay, and noeither does sodomy... since this thread is about gays, then gay butt sex is appropriate... maybe you should read it again... do you just make stuff up, or is there something that i wrote that says anal sex is ok? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
..those who oppose sodomy are somehow afraid of something,,, never quite figured that term out myself,,, both are accurate gay butt sex is more accurate than both.... anal sex doesn't imply gay, and noeither does sodomy... since this thread is about gays, then gay butt sex is appropriate... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
..those who oppose sodomy are somehow afraid of something,,, never quite figured that term out myself,,, both are accurate gay butt sex is more accurate than both.... anal sex doesn't imply gay, and noeither does sodomy... since this thread is about gays, then gay butt sex is appropriate... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
..those who oppose sodomy are somehow afraid of something,,, never quite figured that term out myself,,, both are accurate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
..those who oppose sodomy are somehow afraid of something,,, never quite figured that term out myself,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
please use the proper terminology,,,, sodomy it was addressed to anyone discussing sodomy,,,in this thread We should take careful note. What reasons are there for suggesting that the admonitions in all of these scriptures apply only to homosexual acts of anal intercourse, and not heterosexual acts too? Arguably, in none of these scriptures refering to sodomy does the Bible specify that it's referring to homosexual sex specifically. Indeed, to presume that these references apply to only homosexual men would be reading into scripture. Consequently, we should presume that the prohibition of anal sex in the Bible applies equally to heterosexual married couples. I don't normally like copy and paste but this is what I was getting at. Anal sex is not confined to gay men. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
please use the proper terminology,,,, sodomy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P
The day they legalize gay sex in Wisconsin is the day its hunters turn in their rifles for a glass of cranberry juice. What a ridiculous thing to say. Gay sex does not have to be "legalized." As far as I know there are no laws against it, at least laws that can be enforced. If Wisconsin still has any laws against what people can do in private con-sensually, they need to come into this century. And what does gay marriage have to do with cranberry juice? I'm confused. Everything you've said is ridiculous. Now, I can talk about my great state....what we need and don't need. You don't have any right. I don't have any right to do what? Talk about Wisconsin? I'm not really talking about Wisconsin in particular. Any state that still has any laws against what two consenting adults can do in private needs to come into this century. You are the one who brought Wisconsin into the subject of this thread. This thread is not about who you should be able to have sex with, its about SAME SEX MARRIAGE. You are so territorial.  You aren't very good at fallacies--strange since you use a list of them quite frequently. The topic is clearly about the goal of having every state cave in to others' views from different states. That is what is ridiculous. I vote in my state. You do not vote in my state. Get that through your head. Now, when you use words like "should" and "need", it leaves no room for any type of conceptualization whatsoever and everyone knows that's insane. So, instead of *****-footing around like a little girl, why don't you just go ahead and proclaim that you're just as biased and bigoted as anyone. You want people to think one thing, to see one thing, to end all thought and submit. That's never going to happen no matter what laws there are. Sorry, but that's just pure fantasy. If you haven't noticed, take a look at the crime rate for my great state, then go ahead and make with that sarcastic laugh emoticon thingy. You're the one who doesn't even want gay people having sex, but you're calling someone else a bigot? When in the world did I ever say that? I didn't call her anything, she did. All I'm tearing at is.... mind your own state. Do I go barking at the people of Maryland demanding this and that? No. Why would it bother you so much if gay people were allowed to marry in your state? How is that affecting your life? and why do care what the people in Wisconsin do? you should worry about your own state, and then the gay's there can have all the butt sex they want... maybe people in Wisconsin don't feel the same way you do about gay butt sex... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I say, let the homosexuals get married as long as one wears a wedding dress and that they serve cranberry juice cocktails at the reception.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like we may have a case to test International Law very soon. John Kerry has revived to Arab League Peace Initiative but already Netanyahu has sent delegates to pressure the US from ratifying it. Interesting times.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
America were to the forefront in Framing International Law within the UN but wars of Agression seem to have pushed respect for International Law to the sidelines. Has Israel put America in a bad light with its recent Airstrikes on Syria. Surely America and Russia are the major powers that should deal with world problems. Is Assads murdering of his own people a violation of international law? Is the transfer of weapons to a known and designated international terrorist group a violation of international law? The US and Russia should tell the world to fix their own problems and if they did people like you would have nothing to complain about. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
America needs to stay the hell out of other countries problems unless they are an ally like Japan, Israel among others. Our military should be FORBIDDEN from going to foreign countries on behalf of corporations. Its not our place to police the world. |
|
|
|
|
Previous
