100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: The Problem With Evolution? | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
I'm wondering how long peeps sling chit before "evolving" to slinging something less smelly, like swamp mud for instance.... another example of the pot calling the kettle Is this where I evolve into saying I was just playin?  God said the same after The Great Flood And I say to each his own.....  then why are you complaining about slinging chit Because I can.... thats generally the reason why people sling it And opinions, what are they and is your better, more real than mine?..... no they are not ...but I'm not here complaining about opinions by calling them chit...that is something you are doing as if your opinions are better Not really Funches....It is just the way you chose to interpret... well when you place "sling chit" pertaining to the posts and opinions of others....it doesn't leave much room for it to be mis-interpeted next time do like Jesus and claim that you were speaking in parables...that way you get to hide behind the excuse of "Mis-Interpetation" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ok i'll just simply put,water is the creator.Know why i'll explain i have worked on abandon homes where the pool in a screen enclosure was basically a lake and you know what there was fish in it,algea and tiny shrimp in it.Also there are people who actually use shovels and found different skeletal remains of humans over the years that show how we evolved over time.As for natural selection thats a fact men and women today even have it. what also have to be included into Evolution is the quantum leap of change pertaining to Mutation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• "Debating Creationists on the topic of Evolution is rather like trying to play chess with a pigeon; it knocks the pieces over, craps on the board, and flies back to its flock to claim victory." - Scott D. Weitzenhoffer  
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm wondering how long peeps sling chit before "evolving" to slinging something less smelly, like swamp mud for instance.... another example of the pot calling the kettle Is this where I evolve into saying I was just playin? God said the same after The Great Flood And I say to each his own..... then why are you complaining about slinging chit Because I can.... thats generally the reason why people sling it And opinions, what are they and is your better, more real than mine?..... no they are not ...but I'm not here complaining about opinions by calling them chit...that is something you are doing as if your opinions are better Not really Funches....It is just the way you chose to interpret... well when you place "sling chit" pertaining to the posts and opinions of others....it doesn't leave much room for it to be mis-interpeted next time do like Jesus and claim that you were speaking in parables...that way you get to hide behind the excuse of "Mis-Interpetation" Sounds good on paper, but I do not feel a need to hide behind excuses or speak in parables.....what is really happening here is I called something what it was and you took offense....so much so that you refuse to move on....This is exactly what I was referring to.....Another stagnated thread.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm wondering how long peeps sling chit before "evolving" to slinging something less smelly, like swamp mud for instance.... another example of the pot calling the kettle Is this where I evolve into saying I was just playin? God said the same after The Great Flood And I say to each his own..... then why are you complaining about slinging chit Because I can.... thats generally the reason why people sling it And opinions, what are they and is your better, more real than mine?..... no they are not ...but I'm not here complaining about opinions by calling them chit...that is something you are doing as if your opinions are better Not really Funches....It is just the way you chose to interpret... well when you place "sling chit" pertaining to the posts and opinions of others....it doesn't leave much room for it to be mis-interpeted next time do like Jesus and claim that you were speaking in parables...that way you get to hide behind the excuse of "Mis-Interpetation" Sounds good on paper, but I do not feel a need to hide behind excuses or speak in parables.....what is really happening here is I called something what it was and you took offense....so much so that you refuse to move on....This is exactly what I was referring to.....Another stagnated thread.... when one comment that the posts of others are chit...their post at that point in time is slinging chit ... that is why I said the pot calling the kettle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• "Debating Creationists on the topic of Evolution is rather like trying to play chess with a pigeon; it knocks the pieces over, craps on the board, and flies back to its flock to claim victory." - Scott D. Weitzenhoffer This pigeon just put all you atheists into checkmate. Is that the part when the pigeon goes back to his flock to claim his (false) victory?? I think it would be a safe bet that you have never heard of the theory of punctuated equilibria. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm wondering how long peeps sling chit before "evolving" to slinging something less smelly, like swamp mud for instance.... another example of the pot calling the kettle Is this where I evolve into saying I was just playin? God said the same after The Great Flood And I say to each his own..... then why are you complaining about slinging chit Because I can.... thats generally the reason why people sling it And opinions, what are they and is your better, more real than mine?..... no they are not ...but I'm not here complaining about opinions by calling them chit...that is something you are doing as if your opinions are better Not really Funches....It is just the way you chose to interpret... well when you place "sling chit" pertaining to the posts and opinions of others....it doesn't leave much room for it to be mis-interpeted next time do like Jesus and claim that you were speaking in parables...that way you get to hide behind the excuse of "Mis-Interpetation" Sounds good on paper, but I do not feel a need to hide behind excuses or speak in parables.....what is really happening here is I called something what it was and you took offense....so much so that you refuse to move on....This is exactly what I was referring to.....Another stagnated thread.... when one comment that the posts of others are chit...their post at that point in time is slinging chit ... that is why I said the pot calling the kettle What is more obvious to me is the fact that you did not bother to comment on this... Science's tools will never prove or disprove God's existence. For me the fundamental answers about the meaning of life come not from science but from a consideration of the origins of our uniquely human sense of right and wrong... OR THIS.... The theory of natural selection explains life as we find it, with all its quirks and tragedies. We can prove mathematically that it is capable of producing adaptive life forms and track it in computer simulations, lab experiments and real ecosystems. It doesn't pretend to solve one mystery (the origin of complex life) by slipping in another (the origin of a complex designer). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What is more obvious to me is the fact that you did not bother to comment on this... what was obvious to me was you were still slinging chit and mixing it with a post....it's generally an attempt to get that one last stab in ..ou ou ouchhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh but anyway if you want me to comment then of course it will be my pleasure to do so Science's tools will never prove or disprove God's existence. you have to rely on the science of logic to do that a perfect God that creates that which is less perfect than itself creates imperfection and therefore never was perfect...or a God a perfect God that creates that which is more perfect than itself is no longer the God and no longer perfect, the creation becomes the God this is why a perfect God would not create "anything" and why any entity that claim that it did create is not a God..or at least not a perfect one For me the fundamental answers about the meaning of life come not from science but from a consideration of the origins of our uniquely human sense of right and wrong... right and wrong needs a common thread that would make it unique to all humans and/or life forms perhaps that would be aquiring and supplying the essentials of life with the least degree of harm to oneself or to others is probably the only Universial right and wrong ...it even apply to Aliens OR THIS.... The theory of natural selection explains life as we find it, with all its quirks and tragedies. We can prove mathematically that it is capable of producing adaptive life forms and track it in computer simulations, lab experiments and real ecosystems. It doesn't pretend to solve one mystery (the origin of complex life) by slipping in another (the origin of a complex designer). because once God is placed into the equation it diverts to another realm of science..... psychology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What is more obvious to me is the fact that you did not bother to comment on this... what was obvious to me was you were still slinging chit and mixing it with a post....it's generally an attempt to get that one last stab in ..ou ou ouchhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh but anyway if you want me to comment then of course it will be my pleasure to do so Science's tools will never prove or disprove God's existence. you have to rely on the science of logic to do that a perfect God that creates that which is less perfect than itself creates imperfection and therefore never was perfect...or a God a perfect God that creates that which is more perfect than itself is no longer the God and no longer perfect, the creation becomes the God this is why a perfect God would not create "anything" and why any entity that claim that it did create is not a God..or at least not a perfect one For me the fundamental answers about the meaning of life come not from science but from a consideration of the origins of our uniquely human sense of right and wrong... right and wrong needs a common thread that would make it unique to all humans and/or life forms perhaps that would be aquiring and supplying the essentials of life with the least degree of harm to oneself or to others is probably the only Universial right and wrong ...it even apply to Aliens OR THIS.... The theory of natural selection explains life as we find it, with all its quirks and tragedies. We can prove mathematically that it is capable of producing adaptive life forms and track it in computer simulations, lab experiments and real ecosystems. It doesn't pretend to solve one mystery (the origin of complex life) by slipping in another (the origin of a complex designer). because once God is placed into the equation it diverts to another realm of science..... psychology you have to rely on the science of logic to do that a perfect God that creates that which is less perfect than itself creates imperfection and therefore never was perfect...or a God a perfect God that creates that which is more perfect than itself is no longer the God and no longer perfect, the creation becomes the God this is why a perfect God would not create "anything" and why any entity that claim that it did create is not a God..or at least not a perfect one What God created/creates is/was perfect. We choose to be imperfect through our faith and actions. But when in fact we are created, we are created perfect. Children are loving, innocent, trusting, honest, ect. They do not start to lie, fight, steal, or whatever may be the case until later in life. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What God created/creates is/was perfect. We choose to be imperfect through our faith and actions. But when in fact we are created, we are created perfect. Children are loving, innocent, trusting, honest, ect. They do not start to lie, fight, steal, or whatever may be the case until later in life. if God created Adam perfect then Adam would not have to eat food...if God created the garden perfect then it wouldn't need Adam to tend it.... in the bible you can not find anything in creation that was created perfect...which means that God is only capable of creating imperfection...and this is why God is himself imperfect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A perfect god would be able to create anything she chose while dictating the outcome for eternity....logic.... Psychologically speaking, in what realm of science do you place spirituality......  As to you comment about getting one last stab in......I see why you used the "pot calling the kettle"...now it is my turn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What God created/creates is/was perfect. We choose to be imperfect through our faith and actions. But when in fact we are created, we are created perfect. Children are loving, innocent, trusting, honest, ect. They do not start to lie, fight, steal, or whatever may be the case until later in life. if God created Adam perfect then Adam would not have to eat food...if God created the garden perfect then it wouldn't need Adam to tend it.... in the bible you can not find anything in creation that was created perfect...which means that God is only capable of creating imperfection...and this is why God is himself imperfect Why would Adam not need food if he was perfect? What does being perfect and the need for food have anything to do with one another? Adam wasn't there to tend the Garden, he was there to live in the paradise. God created a home for man, then created man. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A perfect god would be able to create anything she chose while dictating the outcome for eternity....logic.... sounds like a wedding planner Psychologically speaking, in what realm of science do you place spirituality...... the same realm as religion As to you comment about getting one last stab in......I see why you used the "pot calling the kettle"...now it is my turn women |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What God created/creates is/was perfect. We choose to be imperfect through our faith and actions. But when in fact we are created, we are created perfect. Children are loving, innocent, trusting, honest, ect. They do not start to lie, fight, steal, or whatever may be the case until later in life. if God created Adam perfect then Adam would not have to eat food...if God created the garden perfect then it wouldn't need Adam to tend it.... in the bible you can not find anything in creation that was created perfect...which means that God is only capable of creating imperfection...and this is why God is himself imperfect Why would Adam not need food if he was perfect? What does being perfect and the need for food have anything to do with one another? Adam wasn't there to tend the Garden, he was there to live in the paradise. God created a home for man, then created man. a perfect entity would need for naught...if Adam had to eat and God had to create is why neither are perfect ..you would think a God had better things to do than to play with toys |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A perfect god would be able to create anything she chose while dictating the outcome for eternity....logic.... sounds like a wedding planner Psychologically speaking, in what realm of science do you place spirituality...... the same realm as religion As to you comment about getting one last stab in......I see why you used the "pot calling the kettle"...now it is my turn women So complicated, so mysterious, so captivating??...That is what you mean isn't it?..... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What God created/creates is/was perfect. We choose to be imperfect through our faith and actions. But when in fact we are created, we are created perfect. Children are loving, innocent, trusting, honest, ect. They do not start to lie, fight, steal, or whatever may be the case until later in life. if God created Adam perfect then Adam would not have to eat food...if God created the garden perfect then it wouldn't need Adam to tend it.... in the bible you can not find anything in creation that was created perfect...which means that God is only capable of creating imperfection...and this is why God is himself imperfect Why would Adam not need food if he was perfect? What does being perfect and the need for food have anything to do with one another? Adam wasn't there to tend the Garden, he was there to live in the paradise. God created a home for man, then created man. a perfect entity would need for naught...if Adam had to eat and God had to create is why neither are perfect ..you would think a God had better things to do than to play with toys Who ever said God "needed" to create anything? And again, what does eating and being perfect have anything to do with one another? And who's speaking of toys? Wow, you're really out in left field today Funches. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A perfect god would be able to create anything she chose while dictating the outcome for eternity....logic.... sounds like a wedding planner Psychologically speaking, in what realm of science do you place spirituality...... the same realm as religion As to you comment about getting one last stab in......I see why you used the "pot calling the kettle"...now it is my turn women So complicated, so mysterious, so captivating??...That is what you mean isn't it?..... perhaps more in the realm of...so passive agressive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Who ever said God "needed" to create anything? you wouldn't be here if he didn't have a need ..didn't I already have that birds and the bees talk with you And again, what does eating and being perfect have anything to do with one another? try not eating for a year and it will become self explanatory And who's speaking of toys? Wow, you're really out in left field today Funches. didn't you claim that you would carry God's baby if he asked ...that makes you his boy toy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A perfect god would be able to create anything she chose while dictating the outcome for eternity....logic.... sounds like a wedding planner Psychologically speaking, in what realm of science do you place spirituality...... the same realm as religion As to you comment about getting one last stab in......I see why you used the "pot calling the kettle"...now it is my turn women So complicated, so mysterious, so captivating??...That is what you mean isn't it?..... perhaps more in the realm of...so passive agressive Close, but no banana.....Only life experience.....with eyes wide open.... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A perfect god would be able to create anything she chose while dictating the outcome for eternity....logic.... sounds like a wedding planner Psychologically speaking, in what realm of science do you place spirituality...... the same realm as religion As to you comment about getting one last stab in......I see why you used the "pot calling the kettle"...now it is my turn women So complicated, so mysterious, so captivating??...That is what you mean isn't it?..... perhaps more in the realm of...so passive agressive Close, but no banana.....Only life experience.....with eyes wide open.... she quoted while removing the dagger from his patootie |
|
|
|
|
