100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: The Problem With Evolution? | |
|---|---|
|
|
 A perfect god would be able to create anything she chose while dictating the outcome for eternity....logic....sounds like a wedding planner Psychologically speaking, in what realm of science do you place spirituality......  the same realm as religion As to you comment about getting one last stab in......I see why you used the "pot calling the kettle"...now it is my turn women So complicated, so mysterious, so captivating??...That is what you mean isn't it?.....  perhaps more in the realm of...so passive agressive Close, but no banana.....Only life experience.....with eyes wide open....  she quoted while removing the dagger from his patootie You get this...  And this...  And of course this...  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Who ever said God "needed" to create anything? you wouldn't be here if he didn't have a need ..didn't I already have that birds and the bees talk with you And again, what does eating and being perfect have anything to do with one another? try not eating for a year and it will become self explanatory And who's speaking of toys? Wow, you're really out in left field today Funches. didn't you claim that you would carry God's baby if he asked ...that makes you his boy toy try not eating for a year and it will become self explanatory Not eating for a year would be perfectly stupid lol. But what in the world does the two have ANYTHING to do with one another? What does being a perfect creation and not eating have anything to do with one another? We were made to need food, therefore needing food goes perfectly with being made perfectly. Not saying I myself in my actions and what not are perfect, but the creation of me and everyone else is perfect. Being made and our actions along with the outcome of our actions have absolutely nothing to do with one another. God doesn't control you unless you wish to obey his will. But forcibly God does not control anyone. Therefore it is the own persons fault for not being perfect. God has absolutely nothing to do with your actions or the lacking thereof. It's called free will. You choose what you do or don't do. Not God. didn't you claim that you would carry God's baby if he asked ...that makes you his boy toy Wow, that's a bit weird. Why you even think of stuff as such? Me being willing to carry God's baby if it ever presented itself is merely a display of obedience. God never would ask me to carry his child, when I said this it was purely hypothetical, but again God never would ask of such a thing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ didn't you claim that you would carry God's baby if he asked ...that makes you his boy toy No, you are wrong Funches....It would not make Cowboy God's boy toy, it would make the child an immaculate conception.... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not eating for a year would be perfectly stupid lol. But what in the world does the two have ANYTHING to do with one another? would your God also be stupid if he went a year without eating? ....... by answering that question you will understand how God created Adam imperfect Wow, that's a bit weird. Why you even think of stuff as such? Me being willing to carry God's baby if it ever presented itself is merely a display of obedience. God never would ask me to carry his child, when I said this it was purely hypothetical, but again God never would ask of such a thing. if you claim that God would never ask you to have his baby...then your statement that you would carry his child was fake I wonder if Mary also thought that God wouldn't ask her to carry The Holy Ghost's Baby....she probably coined the term "OMG" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A perfect god would be able to create anything she chose while dictating the outcome for eternity....logic.... sounds like a wedding planner Psychologically speaking, in what realm of science do you place spirituality...... the same realm as religion As to you comment about getting one last stab in......I see why you used the "pot calling the kettle"...now it is my turn women So complicated, so mysterious, so captivating??...That is what you mean isn't it?..... perhaps more in the realm of...so passive agressive Close, but no banana.....Only life experience.....with eyes wide open.... she quoted while removing the dagger from his patootie You get this... And this... And of course this... ahhh a bouquet of hemlock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A perfect god would be able to create anything she chose while dictating the outcome for eternity....logic.... sounds like a wedding planner Psychologically speaking, in what realm of science do you place spirituality...... the same realm as religion As to you comment about getting one last stab in......I see why you used the "pot calling the kettle"...now it is my turn women So complicated, so mysterious, so captivating??...That is what you mean isn't it?..... perhaps more in the realm of...so passive agressive Close, but no banana.....Only life experience.....with eyes wide open.... she quoted while removing the dagger from his patootie You get this... And this... And of course this... ahhh a bouquet of hemlock Yes, but as long as you do not eat my bouquet it is perfectly safe and quite pretty....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ didn't you claim that you would carry God's baby if he asked ...that makes you his boy toy No, you are wrong Funches....It would not make Cowboy God's boy toy, it would make the child an immaculate conception.... it's impossible for human reproduction to take place without some form of sex being involved.. even for immaculate conception to take place you still have to knock boots with someone ..or perhaps something ("no pun intended") which means that to carry God's child cowboy would have to be God's boy toy....remember...Christians are supposed to show their Faith in works |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ didn't you claim that you would carry God's baby if he asked ...that makes you his boy toy No, you are wrong Funches....It would not make Cowboy God's boy toy, it would make the child an immaculate conception.... it's impossible for human reproduction to take place without some form of sex being involved.. even for immaculate conception to take place you still have to knock boots with someone ..or perhaps something ("no pun intended") which means that to carry God's child cowboy would have to be God's boy toy....remember...Christians are supposed to show their Faith in works I was speaking from Cowboy's point of view which, to me, is just as valid as yours or mine darling... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A perfect god would be able to create anything she chose while dictating the outcome for eternity....logic.... sounds like a wedding planner Psychologically speaking, in what realm of science do you place spirituality...... the same realm as religion As to you comment about getting one last stab in......I see why you used the "pot calling the kettle"...now it is my turn women So complicated, so mysterious, so captivating??...That is what you mean isn't it?..... perhaps more in the realm of...so passive agressive Close, but no banana.....Only life experience.....with eyes wide open.... she quoted while removing the dagger from his patootie You get this... And this... And of course this... ahhh a bouquet of hemlock Yes, but as long as you do not eat my bouquet it is perfectly safe and quite pretty.... and serves as a reminder to the receiver that it also comes in tea bags |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ didn't you claim that you would carry God's baby if he asked ...that makes you his boy toy No, you are wrong Funches....It would not make Cowboy God's boy toy, it would make the child an immaculate conception.... it's impossible for human reproduction to take place without some form of sex being involved.. even for immaculate conception to take place you still have to knock boots with someone ..or perhaps something ("no pun intended") which means that to carry God's child cowboy would have to be God's boy toy....remember...Christians are supposed to show their Faith in works I was speaking from Cowboy's point of view which, to me, is just as valid as yours or mine darling... Cowboy's point of view is that God won't ask him to carry his child,....he either can read God's mind or probably praying to God that he don't ask |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A perfect god would be able to create anything she chose while dictating the outcome for eternity....logic.... sounds like a wedding planner Psychologically speaking, in what realm of science do you place spirituality...... the same realm as religion As to you comment about getting one last stab in......I see why you used the "pot calling the kettle"...now it is my turn women So complicated, so mysterious, so captivating??...That is what you mean isn't it?..... perhaps more in the realm of...so passive agressive Close, but no banana.....Only life experience.....with eyes wide open.... she quoted while removing the dagger from his patootie You get this... And this... And of course this... ahhh a bouquet of hemlock Yes, but as long as you do not eat my bouquet it is perfectly safe and quite pretty.... and serves as a reminder to the receiver that it also comes in tea bags Only by special request... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ didn't you claim that you would carry God's baby if he asked ...that makes you his boy toy No, you are wrong Funches....It would not make Cowboy God's boy toy, it would make the child an immaculate conception.... it's impossible for human reproduction to take place without some form of sex being involved.. even for immaculate conception to take place you still have to knock boots with someone ..or perhaps something ("no pun intended") which means that to carry God's child cowboy would have to be God's boy toy....remember...Christians are supposed to show their Faith in works I was speaking from Cowboy's point of view which, to me, is just as valid as yours or mine darling... Cowboy's point of view is that God won't ask him to carry his child,....he either can read God's mind or probably praying to God that he don't ask If it works for him, who are we to question? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A perfect god would be able to create anything she chose while dictating the outcome for eternity....logic.... sounds like a wedding planner Psychologically speaking, in what realm of science do you place spirituality...... the same realm as religion As to you comment about getting one last stab in......I see why you used the "pot calling the kettle"...now it is my turn women So complicated, so mysterious, so captivating??...That is what you mean isn't it?..... perhaps more in the realm of...so passive agressive Close, but no banana.....Only life experience.....with eyes wide open.... she quoted while removing the dagger from his patootie You get this... And this... And of course this... ahhh a bouquet of hemlock Yes, but as long as you do not eat my bouquet it is perfectly safe and quite pretty.... and serves as a reminder to the receiver that it also comes in tea bags Only by special request... by the giver or the receiver |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ didn't you claim that you would carry God's baby if he asked ...that makes you his boy toy No, you are wrong Funches....It would not make Cowboy God's boy toy, it would make the child an immaculate conception.... it's impossible for human reproduction to take place without some form of sex being involved.. even for immaculate conception to take place you still have to knock boots with someone ..or perhaps something ("no pun intended") which means that to carry God's child cowboy would have to be God's boy toy....remember...Christians are supposed to show their Faith in works I was speaking from Cowboy's point of view which, to me, is just as valid as yours or mine darling... Cowboy's point of view is that God won't ask him to carry his child,....he either can read God's mind or probably praying to God that he don't ask If it works for him, who are we to question? because asking questions is generally what takes place in a debate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A perfect god would be able to create anything she chose while dictating the outcome for eternity....logic.... sounds like a wedding planner Psychologically speaking, in what realm of science do you place spirituality...... the same realm as religion As to you comment about getting one last stab in......I see why you used the "pot calling the kettle"...now it is my turn women So complicated, so mysterious, so captivating??...That is what you mean isn't it?..... perhaps more in the realm of...so passive agressive Close, but no banana.....Only life experience.....with eyes wide open.... she quoted while removing the dagger from his patootie You get this... And this... And of course this... ahhh a bouquet of hemlock Yes, but as long as you do not eat my bouquet it is perfectly safe and quite pretty.... and serves as a reminder to the receiver that it also comes in tea bags Only by special request... by the giver or the receiver Receiver.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ didn't you claim that you would carry God's baby if he asked ...that makes you his boy toy No, you are wrong Funches....It would not make Cowboy God's boy toy, it would make the child an immaculate conception.... it's impossible for human reproduction to take place without some form of sex being involved.. even for immaculate conception to take place you still have to knock boots with someone ..or perhaps something ("no pun intended") which means that to carry God's child cowboy would have to be God's boy toy....remember...Christians are supposed to show their Faith in works I was speaking from Cowboy's point of view which, to me, is just as valid as yours or mine darling... Cowboy's point of view is that God won't ask him to carry his child,....he either can read God's mind or probably praying to God that he don't ask If it works for him, who are we to question? because asking questions is generally what takes place in a debate Questions are only a small part of debate (and cowboy has made his position clear)...Debate also includes logic, presentation of factual information or evidence, opinion, consistency, emotional appeal, ability to play from both sides of topic, argument, research, critical thinking, ethics... just to name a few... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why is it that so many theists have a problem with the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection as proposed by Darwin? Why is it so hard for them to accept that after a few thousand years of development mankind began to use the brainpower granted them [by God?] to observe the natural world and develop an explanation of the origin and evolution of biological beings using reason, logic and evidence - rather than the guesswork and superstison of primitive desert-dwellers who knew far less than their descendants would? Why should a 7000(?) year old theory be held accountable to a 150 year old theory? It was forgivable of primitive Man to believe in Geocentricism, since from our perspective is does indeed appear that the heavens revolve around a static Earth. Now we know the truth about our planet's position in the cosmos - but we do not grant the theory of Geoncentricism the same respect that we do of Creationism, yet we now have far better explanations for the origins of life than those hypothesised by ancient Hebrews. So why is it that modern-day theists easily accept that our planet orbits around a star yet find it so difficult to acknowledge that humans are just another species of animal? Why believe in gravity but not evolution? Even Darwin had trouble with the Platypus. It seems that there is always that one exception to the rules. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A perfect god would be able to create anything she chose while dictating the outcome for eternity....logic.... sounds like a wedding planner Psychologically speaking, in what realm of science do you place spirituality...... the same realm as religion As to you comment about getting one last stab in......I see why you used the "pot calling the kettle"...now it is my turn women So complicated, so mysterious, so captivating??...That is what you mean isn't it?..... perhaps more in the realm of...so passive agressive Close, but no banana.....Only life experience.....with eyes wide open.... she quoted while removing the dagger from his patootie You get this... And this... And of course this... ahhh a bouquet of hemlock Yes, but as long as you do not eat my bouquet it is perfectly safe and quite pretty.... and serves as a reminder to the receiver that it also comes in tea bags Only by special request... by the giver or the receiver Receiver.... written request or ESP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Questions are only a small part of debate (and cowboy has made his position clear)...Debate also includes logic, presentation of factual information or evidence, opinion, consistency, emotional appeal, ability to play from both sides of topic, argument, research, critical thinking, ethics... just to name a few... I'm not sure if anything on your list apply to Cowboy ...but anyway Cowboy will never admit that his position is clear because that would means that he is here preaching......and if you know Cowboy then you know that he has preach-o-phobia ...he will even tell you that he is not here to preach...but only to discuss which implies that his position is not clear |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not eating for a year would be perfectly stupid lol. But what in the world does the two have ANYTHING to do with one another? would your God also be stupid if he went a year without eating? ....... by answering that question you will understand how God created Adam imperfect Wow, that's a bit weird. Why you even think of stuff as such? Me being willing to carry God's baby if it ever presented itself is merely a display of obedience. God never would ask me to carry his child, when I said this it was purely hypothetical, but again God never would ask of such a thing. if you claim that God would never ask you to have his baby...then your statement that you would carry his child was fake I wonder if Mary also thought that God wouldn't ask her to carry The Holy Ghost's Baby....she probably coined the term "OMG" would your God also be stupid if he went a year without eating? ....... by answering that question you will understand how God created Adam imperfect God doesn't eat. He doesn't have to. God is not of flesh and blood as we, God's creation is. Adam needed food, not because he was imperfect, but because he was made of flesh and blood. |
|
|
|
|
