100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Community > Posts By > LittleLeftofRight
|
Edited by
LittleLeftofRight
on
Fri 03/18/16 05:07 PM
|
|
Avery was the guy just recently released from prison after DNA proved his innocence of a murder. He was set up again by the Sheriff on another murder recently and was arrested again. Sassy should remember this guy. Its BIG as in HUGE business! Its so HUGE you can even trade it on the new york stock exchange! Hey more prisoners more more return on the investments! Type: Public, Traded as NYSE: CXW Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) is a company that owns and manages private prisons and detention centers and operates others on a concession basis. Co-founded by Thomas W. Beasley, a leader in the Republican Party, Doctor Robert Crants, and T. Don Hutto in 1983, it received initial investments from Hospital Corporation of America's founder Jack C. Massey, the Tennessee Valley Authority, and Vanderbilt University.[2] As of 2015, the company is the largest private corrections company in the United States. It manages more than 65 correctional and detention facilities with a capacity of more than 90,000 beds in 19 states and the District of Columbia.[3] The company’s revenue in 2012 exceeded more than $1.7 billion.[4] Controversies related to the company include: treatment of inmates and disclosure of oversight, lobbying efforts to conceal details of operations, a lawsuit about gang influence in Idaho prison and substantial falsification of records, co-operation with local law enforcement in a school drug sweep, and the deadly 2012 riot in a Mississippi facility.[5] The One Thing About Steven Avery's Case You Shouldn't Forget Given the attention Making A Murderer has received, it's no wonder that Steven Avery's case is mesmerizing the masses. How could a man be charged of a crime, be convicted, and have DNA exonerate him, just to be charged and convicted for a totally different crime just over two years later? Given that Friday is the 9-year anniversary of his conviction, the one thing you shouldn't forget about Steven Avery's case is how common what happened to him during this first case actually is. According to the National Registry of Exonerations, last year, 149 people were exonerated in the United States, which is more than ever before — 58 (also a record) were exonerated of homicide specifically. http://www.bustle.com/articles/147961-the-one-thing-about-steven-averys-case-you-shouldnt-forget If that isnt bad enough here you have a guy with an iq of 75 writing his own appeal. He has the right cause but the wrong evidence in support of the cause, hence they will hand him his *** once again and he will be denied the ability to refile. http://www.thewrap.com/making-a-murderer-steven-avery-files-new-appeal/ finally he hired a new attorney Avery hired Kathleen Zellner as his attorney at the beginning of January Steven Avery’s new attorney, Kathleen Zellner, plans to use “advanced luminol testing to exonerate Avery.” The official Twitter page for Netflix’s “Making a Murderer,” which chronicles the trial and conviction of Avery in the murder of Teresa Halbach, disclosed the plans for the advanced testing. According to the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, luminol testing is used to detect blood in large areas that can’t be seen during the visual examination. “Scientists can take advantage of the luminol reaction to locate potential blood evidence that would be undetectable through visual examination. The light, or luminescence, emitted in the luminol reaction is thought to result when an oxidizing agent, such as blood, catalyzes the oxidation of luminol by hydrogen peroxide in a basic solution.” Also Read: 'Making a Murderer': Who Is Steven Avery's New Lawyer Kathleen Zellner? Avery hired Zellner in January, who says there’s “new evidence” to present, and that she’s “confident” that Avery’s murder conviction will be overturned. In a statement provided to TheWrap, Illinois-based attorney Zellner said, “We are continuing to examine every aspect of Mr. Avery’s case and all of his legal options. We are confident Mr. Avery’s conviction will be vacated when we present the new evidence and results of our work to the appropriate court.” Wisconsin resident Avery is currently in prison for the murder of photographer Halbach. He continues to maintain his innocence, and the case has gained worldwide attention since the December premiere of the Netflix documentary series “Making a Murderer.” Also Read: 'Making a Murderer' Prosecutor to Write Tell-All Book Attorney Dean Strang, who represented Avery during his murder trial, told TheWrap in January that a “mass” of potential new evidence has emerged since the “Making a Murderer” premiere. Strang cited “leads, ideas [and] possibilities that have arrived in a mass from emails and calls since the film came out.” Zellner’s firm specializes in reversing wrongful convictions. Her clients have included Joseph H. Burrows, who was sentenced to death for the murder of Illinois farmer William E. Dulin before being exonerated. Zellner and the former prosecutor in Avery’s case, Ken Kratz, have not yet responded to TheWrap’s request for comment. and that is only the beginning, it does not end with avery! They also trapped brendan dassey a retarded 16 year old and sentenced him to life for a murder he did not commit. This goes on at all levels of gubmint and mostly kept hush hush in the media about the gubmints involvement. Whats the solution when they can pick people who go against them off one by one as they are doing and they can do the same to you! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
LittleLeftofRight
on
Fri 03/18/16 04:39 PM
|
|
There’s evidence to suggest that Teresa Halbach’s bones might not have been hers after all  This just in: There’s been a surprising new twist in the Steven Avery trial. There’s a chance the charred bones found in Avery’s yard—the ones that allegedly belonged to Teresa Halbach—might not actually be hers. DNA expert Sherry Culhane testified on the matter during Avery’s trial, saying that the partial profile of the bones matched Teresa’s standard. Now, Lynne Blanchard of Stop Wrongful Convictions is calling out the evidence as questionable, and thinks there might be more to the story. Since Culhane only had a partial profile, it cannot be conclusive that the DNA is a perfect match to Teresa’s. The bone fragments were allegedly found in Avery’s burn pit. Blanchard points out that nobody photographed the collection process—they were just put into boxes and taken away to a crime lab. Technically, the discovery was never documented. In addition, the descriptions of the bones have varied from testimony to testimony. “Since the scene wasn’t documented, there is no proof that any bones were ever on the Avery property,” Blanchard writes. “As well, the Manitowoc County coroner was forbidden from entering the scene and none of the forensic experts were summoned until after the bones had been removed. We are to simply accept the word of the state witnesses who claimed to see the bones.” We still don’t know what really happened—sadly, we may never know—but it definitely makes an already poorly-handled case even more fishy. Why wasn’t protocol followed? Where were the forensic anthropologist and the photographer when the evidence was discovered? Many believe that Manitowoc County officials were trying to frame Avery, and this kind of evidence doesn’t help matters. “The DNA evidence should have been reported more generally as ‘Teresa Halbach can not be excluded as source,’” Blanchard continued. “How is it even possible for tissue to survive a fire that disintegrated 60% of the bone mass? The teeth which are commonly used to identify a body because they outlast bone didn’t even survive the fire. Something’s wrong and it becomes difficult to accept this evidence as presented.” America has the government (or lack of it) that it deserves. Despite there are many cases like this that prove the point, I refrain from posting here for the most because of the juvenile cognitive dissonant approach and outright denial to government high crimes and conspiracy. Since this one is PROVEN beyond juvenile political denial from those who simply cannot accept the negative side of the world around them I'll be happy to elaborate on only a few of literally volumes of points to add to the one you listed above. Anytime investigations, like avery, attorney general fine, murrah, waco, 911, tonkin, our latest depression/financial debacle, and so forth, are wrought with more negligence than fact where nothing adds up the gubmint is square in the middle of it. Despite the fact that had anyone bothered to read a statute 1 that the states duty is to protect the state, a piece of paper, (which they do very well), 'the people', just because the name has been illegitimately used in the various constitutions, have the misguided perception it is the states duty to protect them. Well its not. (see the Deshaney case case and others) The state has the duty to protect itself not you EXCEPT where its convenient to state agenda. For the avery case; first he was setup and wrongfully convicted of rape he did not commit, forced to serve 18years before being exonerated. Manitowoc was on the hook for a 34 million settlement to avery that would have caused a national shake down of the judicial/legal industry. Halbach was allegedly murdered immediately after lenk and colburn depositions were taken. [we dont even know for sure she is really dead] Halbachs rav4 was conveniently parked on the farthest seldom used side of the lot where someone could drive the field unnoticed then covered up so averys wouldnt notice it. (bone yards customarily put vehicles where people have been mashed so bad they cannot be removed in the back of the yards due to the smell) Nonetheless the rav 4 was covered up and no one would have been capable of seeing it driven in from the house. We are to believe that despite the averys had a car crusher and could destroy the car so it was completely unrecognizable that instead they would park it on the far end of the lot out of site from the house. We are to believe according to the state that avery would burn the body not only in his back yard but also in barrels and also transported it to a gravel pit a mile away from the house and burn some of it there, despite they had an incinerator. We are to believe that the only dna found on the key was averys despite no dna was found from halbach on the key. We are to believe that the sample of blood taken from avery and held by the state despite being tampered with and having a torn seal and needle puncture hole in it was not the blood found smeared on the rav4. The prosecution used dramatized exaggerated inflammatory language to the press and news media to publicly convict him. Manitowok was not allowed to be involved in the investigation due to conflict of interest, but they were anyway. The fbi presented a false implication edta. Averys gf called and talked with him for 10+ minutes during the time he allegedly did this murder. There was no evidence what so ever of halbract being in averys trailer despite the prosecution trumpeted over the media that he shackled her anc cut her throat and stabbed her on the bed. They claim a .22 cal 'slug' went all the way through her head and landed under the compressor in the garage based on 'casings' laying around the garage that tested to be fired through that gun. Dna on the slug was tested so it cannot be retested and was contaminated by in the lab which should have been thrown out but it was used anyway. a couple seen avery in town at the same time he was claimed to have murdered this gal. The appelate court simply dodged the appeal. (Prison industry is HUGE money) Finally a juror was quoted to say not only did they have a couple ringers but that they were in fear of their lives...."If they can do that to him they can do that to me" Yes conspiracies happen all the time in America and those who would scream tin foil theorist without hard evidence proving the contrary are complicit in its promotion. There is no end to the problems with this case. Same MO as jfk, okc, waco, 911, etc etc etc...... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
LittleLeftofRight
on
Fri 03/18/16 01:43 PM
|
|
The above proves nothing more than welfare for the scientific community which provides us with more of the same politicized science we have been getting for the last 100 years.
They proved they can measure 'something' but there is no evidence it was gravity. I keep this 17000 volt transformer that I picked up when I was a kid for show (off) and tell for a science project (jacobs ladder) when I was in the 5th grade. I still have it because I get the biggest charge out of giving people the wire and letting them play with the arc to try to see the longest arc they can produce. I do this to prove a point. Like the movie the entity where you can see something invisible impressing upon the womans skin this works the same way. Everyone bar none have dropped the wire when they thought they got a shock when in fact they did not. Breaking the arc often times produces an invisible force that can be physically felt as an instantaneous pressure upon their hand. Like someone throwing a cup of water at it. Now this force can be felt several inches away. (Very strange feeling btw) That said I can buy that they proved that the 'ether' or 'aether' exists, (which einstein renamed to 'fabric' while denying ether exists) but not a gravity wave of all the ridiculous theories. Its all about wordsmithing games and endlessly milking the taxpayers.  speed of light is not constant http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7T0d7o8X2-E http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/2322/teslas-theory-of-gravity How is science suppressed even today? From a physics site: Tesla's theory of gravity [closed] I was reading up on Tesla's Wikipedia page last night, and I came across this: When he was 81, Tesla stated he had completed a "dynamic theory of gravity". He stated that it was "worked out in all details" and that he hoped to soon give it to the world. [75] The theory was never published. closed as off-topic by Norbert Schuch, Qmechanic♦ Feb 27 at 0:51 "We deal with mainstream physics here. Questions about the general correctness of unpublished personal theories are off topic, although specific questions evaluating new theories in the context of established science are usually allowed. For more information, see Is non mainstream physics appropriate for this site?." – Norbert Schuch, Qmechanic Aether concept It is important to undertand that Tesla's Aether concept is not analogous to classical aether theories. Tesla's aether was in fact a medium, or 'perfect fluid' that wets everything in which we are immersed, acting as an 'independent carrier'. It behaves as a solid to light (high frequency) and is transparent to matter, while it's effects, according to Tesla, can be felt through inertia. "The primary substance, thrown into infinitesimal whirls of prodigious velocity, becomes gross matter; the force subsiding, the motion ceases and matter disappears, reverting to the primary substance". Nikola Tesla - New York American - July 6, 1930 "According to an adopted theory, every ponderable atom is differentiated from a tenuous (fragile, vague) fluid, filling all space merely by spinning motion, as a whirl of water in a calm lake. By being set in movement this fluid, the ether, becomes gross matter. Its movement arrested (halted), the primary substance reverts to its normal state. It appears, then, possible for man through harnessed energy of the medium and suitable agencies for starting and stopping ether whirls to cause matter to form and disappear. At his command, almost without effort on his part, old worlds would vanish and new ones would spring into being. He could alter the size of this planet, control its seasons, adjust its distance from the sun, guide it on its eternal journey along any path he might choose, through the depths of the universe. He could make planets collide and produce his suns and stars, his heat and light; he could originate life in all its infinite forms. To cause at will the birth and death of matter would be man's grandest deed, which would give him the mastery of physical creation, make him fulfill his ultimate destiny." Nikola Tesla - New York Times - April 21, 1908 http://www.metaresearch.org/cosmology/speed_of_gravity.asp Photons that travel in free space slower than the speed of light http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.3987 The make/break of only a few watts of arc can cause you to be physically pushed, what evidence did ligo provide to prove that the most probable conclusion is not the case here? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the purpose of setting a game like this up and giving it to kids is the same as its always been, it gets them familiar with the idea, then its easy to shove it on to them before they figure out what hit them, only to be shock when they are 70 and realize that the banksters were extorting and transporting 10 trillion bucks on a 1 gig zippy stick and wish one of their parents would have been smart enough to warn them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
LittleLeftofRight
on
Sat 02/20/16 11:52 AM
|
|
yep,YouTube,wonderful Source!   Each to their own, but not everyone uses youtube to watch people smell their farts in a jug. M.I.T.-Walter Lewin- Non-Conservative Fields https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqjl-qRy71w |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed. But that doesn't solve the problem. The point is you cannot rescind your social security number,and even if you could it'd only give them more control. Truth is this,people are either too lazy dumb or incapable of looking after themselves after years of indoctrination by governments schools and media that if they could be free most people don't have the skills knowledge or confidence to exist outside of a sterilised environment. When all sides are the same side,and when all other avenues of thought lead only back to money control and power then it's inevitable people catch onto the charade they are living and stop working for these big corporations and buying their crap to begin with. Only when we are all free of money and it's burden will we be free. All empires collapse,the current one is going down the tubes,fast,social economics will become fighting your neighbour ( you know,the guy you've lived opposite from for 7 years but never said hello to?,that guy) over whose gonna eat the last piece of cat somebody trapped! Or tryna catch a drink of water that hasn't been contaminated by fracking or pesticides. Of course,that'll just be the beginning. New diseases,fake vaccines,hunger and starvation,no jobs,unable to grow food,it'll be mad Max times. Only a matter of time and pressure. Yep, then they will pull the terrorism or some other related card and claim the right to execute you without a trial and the mindless knee jerk american herd of cows will stand by looking on dumfounded while waiving their flag saying "that'll teach em" and then plant another martyr of freedom. I would add that its not free of money in and of itself, but free of 'rented money' and its associated structure. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But you are aware that wether liberal democrat republicans are all controlled bought n paid for anyway tho moe? Important fact of contract law,you cannot be forced into a contract. A contract,which is what Social Security is,even though they won't admit that officially,I have tried to hand back their corporate fictional entity to them in the social security offices but they have no clue,they are just barely comprehensible automatons who don't rock the boat and are too scared of being on the unemployment lines themselves they do anything they can to forget the fact they have a heart and soul. I have questioned my local MP,member of parliament,as to this exact issue and he sat there like an unplugged toaster unable to answer a single question coherently,when you confront these automatons it's fascinating how quickly they crumble when faced with simple questions like " if I'm born equal,and have an equitable share of my country's bounty and you government chaps are looking after it for me,where's my frickn cheque from all the lumber,oil,minerals,water,energy and foodstuffs that get bought and sold each day and how in the devil's elbows did you manage to get my country in debt when money,doesn't exist in actuality and holds no value except the sweat equity that those blinkered by their " work ethic" seem to attach to these pieces of metal and notes of cloth. You're not free whilst your owners are trading misery in your name daily. So,Social Security,Social,security? Social Insecurity. Unless you grow your own food,Monsanto owns you. You want to be free,but freedom doesn't exist,it's a word invented to keep your nose to the grindstone. What contract with the people have the US or britain or any government ever kept? They break them before the ink is dry. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
According to THIS: https://www.ssa.gov/history/InternetMyths.html Your opening post is a complete fabrication. Sorry OP, you've been suckered by political propaganda. there are people (not many mind you) that are alive today who remember sitting tight to the radio listening to the sales campaign and ss was sold as an 'insurance' policy. It is anything but, the gov can legally terminate the program at any time and not pay anyone a dime. People never read the actual legislation, days many people barely knew how to read much less understand gov legalese. People who never had birth certificates magically had them produced. (not hand written, in type of course) These bait and switch routines by gov have been going on since the beginning of time. Now today they wave the legalese in front of us, NOT the sales pitches, and the old timers leave this world betrayed. "to soon old, to late smart" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well..........
Unfortunately thats only the tip of the iceberg. I already got one good snoot full of "Facts are Facts", and putting this it into perspective academically is a much larger scope that requires far more research and background than the previous quaint little discussion on Germany. So after a moments reflection on the matter I think it best for me to pass the baton to this guy who splainz it quite succinctly: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsL6mKxtOlQ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yw
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
LittleLeftofRight
on
Fri 02/19/16 08:26 PM
|
|
Its the part of the 'HISTORY LESSON' that you left out !
 I like to be thorough! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
LittleLeftofRight
on
Fri 02/19/16 08:16 PM
|
|
and whispers are a deafening scream!
Statutory Instrument 1997 No. 1778 The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 © Crown Copyright 1997 Statutory Instruments printed from this website are printed under the superintendence and authority of the Controller of HMSO being the Queen’s Printer of Acts of Parliament. The legislation contained on this web site is subject to Crown Copyright protection. It may be reproduced free of charge provided that it is reproduced accurately and that the source and copyright status of the material is made evident to users. 1997 No. 1778 SOCIAL SECURITY The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 Made 22nd July 1997 Coming into force 1st September 1997 At the Court at Buckingham Palace, the 22nd day of July 1997 Present, The Queen’s Most Excellent Majesty in Council Whereas at London on the 13th February 1984 an Agreement on social security between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the United States of America (hereinafter referred to as “the Agreement”) and an Administrative Agreement for the implementation of the Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “the Administrative Agreement”)[1] were signed on behalf of those Governments and effect was given to the Agreement by the Social Security (United States of America) Order 1984 (hereinafter referred to as “the Principal Order”)[2]: And Whereas at London on 6th June 1996 a Supplementary Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the United States of America (which Supplementary Agreement is set out in Schedule 1 to this Order and is hereinafter referred to as “the Supplementary Agreement”) amending the Agreement and a Supplementary Administrative Agreement amending the Administrative Agreement (which Supplementary Administrative Agreement is set out in Schedule 2 to this Order and is hereinafter referred to as “the Supplementary Administrative Agreement”)[3] were signed on behalf of those Governments: And Whereas by Article 3 of the Supplementary Agreement it is provided that the Supplementary Agreement shall enter into force on the first day of the third month following the month in which each Government has received from the other Government written notification that all statutory and constitutional requirements have been complied with for entry into force of the Supplementary Agreement: And Whereas by Article 2 of the Supplementary Administrative Agreement it is provided that the Supplementary Administrative Agreement shall enter into force on the date of entry into force of the Supplementary Agreement: And Whereas written notification in accordance with Article 3 of the Supplementary Agreement was received by each Government on 20th June 1997 and accordingly the Supplementary Agreement and the Supplementary Administrative Agreement enter into force on the 1st September 1997: And Whereas by section 179(1)(a) and (2) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992[4] it is provided that Her Majesty may by Order in Council make provision for modifying or adapting that Act and the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992[5] in their application to cases affected by agreements with other Governments providing for reciprocity in matters specified in the said section: Now, therefore, Her Majesty, in pursuance of section 179(1)(a) and (2) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 and of all other powers enabling Her in that behalf, is pleased, by and with the advice of Her Privy Council, to order, and it is hereby ordered, as follows: - Citation and commencement 1. This Order may be cited as the Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 and shall come into force on 1st September 1997. Modification of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 and the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 and amendment of the Principal Order 2. The Social Security Administration Act 1992 and the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992 shall be modified and the Principal Order shall be amended so as to give effect to the Agreement as modified by the Supplementary Agreement set out in Schedule 1 to this Order and to the Administrative Agreement as modified by the Supplementary Administrative Agreement set out in Schedule 2 to this Order, so far as the same relate to England, Wales and Scotland. Amendment of Order 3. The reference to the Social Security (United States of America) Order 1984 shall be omitted in the Schedule to the Social Security (Reciprocal Agreements) Order 1988[6] and in Schedules 2 and 3 to the Social Security (Reciprocal Agreements) Order 1995[7]. N.H. Nicholls Clerk of the Privy Council SCHEDULE 1 Article 2 SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT AMENDING THE AGREEMENT ON SOCIAL SECURITY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the United States of America; Having considered the Agreement on Social Security which was signed on their behalf at London on 13th February 1984 (hereinafter referred to as “the Agreement”); Having recognised the need to revise certain provisions of the Agreement; Have agreed as follows: http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/11/statutory-instrument-1997-no-1778-the-social-security-united-states-of-america-order-1997-2820412.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Statutory_Instruments_of_the_United_Kingdom,_1997 Now I included the wiki link, you can go on there and it will take you right on to the parliamentary records if you think I am jerkin your chain. That said is it really much of a stretch that 'just maybe' world war 2 isnt quite the way you were led to believe?   |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with that ALL drugs should be legal, the state was never granted the authority to prevent anyone from taking whatever the hell the please. Well except by themselves since they have their little closed door monopoly going (in the case of opiates)thank you mi6 and cia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
LittleLeftofRight
on
Fri 02/19/16 07:08 PM
|
|
Let's look at the terrorist organizations, Cuomo wants Americans to support financially. Afghanistan, is a major opium producing country. Taliban/Al Qaeda. Monies can, and are funneled between groups worldwide, in support of terrorism. China, not a military or political ally of the U.S., is also a major producer of opium. Yay! Im sorry man but all that made me laugh. Aint nobody gonna mess with the cia's cash cow. Drug War? American Troops Are Protecting Afghan Opium. U.S. Occupation Leads to All-Time High Heroin Production By Washington's Blog Global Research, June 10, 2014 Washington's Blog and Global Research 13 November 2013 Region: Asia Theme: Global Economy, US NATO War Agenda In-depth Report: AFGHANISTAN It is well-documented that the U.S. government has – at least at some times in some parts of the world – protected drug operations. (Big American banks also launder money for drug cartels. See this, this, this and this. Indeed, drug dealers kept the banking system afloat during the depths of the 2008 financial crisis. And the U.S. drug money laundering is continuing to this day.) The U.S. military has openly said that it is protecting Afghani poppy fields: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgKmJESBFsw#t=98 As Wikipedia notes: Opium production in Afghanistan has been on the rise since U.S. occupation started in 2001. Indeed, a brand new report from the United Nations finds that opium production is at an all-time high. Common Dreams notes: The cultivation of opium poppy in Afghanistan—a nation under the military control of US and NATO forces for more than twelve years—has risen to an all-time high, according to the 2013 Afghanistan Opium Survey released Wednesday by the United Nations. According to the report, cultivation of poppy across the war-torn nation rose 36 per cent in 2013 and total opium production amounted to 5,500 tons, up by almost a half since 2012. “This has never been witnessed before in the history of Afghanistan,” said Jean-Luc Lemahieu, the outgoing leader of the Afghanistan office of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, which produced the report. *** The U.S. military has allowed poppy cultivation to continue in order to appease farmers and government officials involved with the drug trade who might otherwise turn against the Afghan Karzai government in Kabul. Fueling both sides, in fact, the opium and heroin industry is both a product of the war and an essential source for continued conflict. Public Intelligence has published a series of photographs showing American – and U.S.-trained Afghan – troops patrolling poppy fields in Afghanistan. Public Intelligence informs us that all of the photos are in the public domain, and not subject to copyright, and they assured me that I have every right to reproduce them. We produce these photos and the accompanying descriptions from Public Intelligence without further comment.  http://www.globalresearch.ca/drug-war-american-troops-are-protecting-afghan-opium-u-s-occupation-leads-to-all-time-high-heroin-production/5358053 Seems you have your terrorists reversed! LOL Taliban destroy poppy fields in surprise clampdown on Afghan opium growers Action by Taliban welcomed by government and clerics but insurgent says destruction was for religious reasons Afghan poppy cultivation An Afghan man extracts some of the weaker poppy plants on his farm, 10 miles east of Jalalabad. Photograph: Robert Nickelsberg/Getty Images Emma Graham-Harrison in Kabul Sunday 20 May 2012 14.58 EDT Last modified on Tuesday 26 January 2016 13.11 EST Taliban fighters have destroyed fields of opium poppies in eastern Afghanistan this spring, the first time since 2001 the hardline Islamist group is known to have clamped down on the cultivation of a drug that provides a big part of its funding. While the insurgents appear to have dug up a relatively small area of poppies in a remote area near the border with Pakistan, the move was so unusual it won a chorus of praise from the Afghan government and international organisations, whom the Taliban consider their enemy, as well as senior clerics. "They just did what the constitution ordered," said Wasifullah Wasifi, a spokesman for the provincial governor in Kunar, where the eradication took place. "The provincial governor really appreciates what the insurgents did. From the perspective of Islam it is forbidden and a crime to grow drugs," Wasifi said, adding that nearly a hectare had been destroyed by the Taliban in the province's Manawara district, in addition to a far larger amount eradicated by the government. An Afghan opium addict shows the opium he consumed in a day An Afghan opium addict show the amount he consumed in a day The country representative of the UN Office on Drugs and Crime in Afghanistan, Jean-Luc Lemahieu, confirmed that the Taliban had uprooted poppy fields in Kunar, and said he hoped the "rare event" might presage a stronger approach to controlling drug production. "We welcome this new approach and would hope that this is not a one-time exception but that the Taliban, and others alike, would take a principled stance against the narcotics business," he said. Advertisement Afghanistan has for years produced the vast majority of the world's opium, with only a brief break in 2001 when the Taliban government, which had previously relied on the crop to bolster its coffers, unexpectedly dug up most of the country's poppy fields. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/may/20/taliban-destroy-poppy-afghan-opium where you guys dig up so much bogus information beats me. We went in to protect the poppy fields that were being destroyed by the taliban! Watch the youtube if you want to hear the commanding officer say it! LOL This is why the made the movie the matrix. BLUE PILL / RED PILL "You take the blue pill, the story ends. You wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill, you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
LittleLeftofRight
on
Thu 02/18/16 01:11 PM
|
|
Looks to me like they are planning for a full scale invasion. That is how its done. Military buildup. Certainly looks like a standing army to me. A standing army does not need to have a US Army emblem sewn on the uniform to be one.
WND EXCLUSIVE U.S. suddenly alarmed over militarization of cops 'Andy Griffith and Barney Fife could be using grenade launchers and a tank' Published: 08/19/2014 at 8:25 PM At least one Bill of Rights watchdog who has been warning of the “militarization” of local law enforcement, particularly through the federal government’s surplus equipment program, believes the citywide lockdown after the Boston Marathon bombing and the armored vehicles and high-tech weaponry used to calm the violence in Ferguson, Missouri, shows the U.S. already has become a police state. John Whitehead of the Rutherford Institute, who has sued police departments for SWAT tactics, writes “these are no longer warning signs of a steadily encroaching police state.” “The police state has arrived,” he said. “For those like myself who have studied emerging police states, the sight of a city placed under martial law – its citizens under house arrest (officials used the Orwellian phrase ‘shelter in place’ to describe the mandatory lock-down), military-style helicopters equipped with thermal imaging devices buzzing the skies, tanks and armored vehicles on the streets, and snipers perched on rooftops, while thousands of black-garbed police swarm the streets and SWAT teams carry out house-to-house searches – leaves us in a growing state of unease,” he wrote.  WND reports on the militarization local police date to within months of the news site’s launch in 1997, when founder and CEO Joseph Farah wrote about a training session for armed federal officers for the Environmental Protec Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/08/u-s-suddenly-alarmed-over-militarization-of-cops/#hzCqCk3azHqHyRbD.99 Looks to me like they took a giant crapola in their own beds by creating a standing army and brutalizing so many people in the 'line of duty' and now they get sleep in it. That was often said at Nuremberg if I remember correctly? When they can afford all the law suits and to militarize our local police it seems someone or something is getting way to much money ya'll think |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
LittleLeftofRight
on
Thu 02/18/16 10:47 AM
|
|
What if everyone woke up one day and found out that the majority of everything you believed as truth was nothing more than a pack of lies? Ever think of that?
It would be most desirable for there to be a reporting requirement — or no need whatsoever for any database of those killed by the very people tasked with protecting them from harm. Government has NO duty to protect you. Ironically most everything people 'think' they know or 'believe in' is mostly BS and and the fruits of well organized false advertising. Just review cases like Deshaney, gonzales, warren and so forth http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3172&context=dlj Police Have No Duty To Protect Individuals by Peter Kasler Self-Reliance For Self-Defense -- Police Protection Isn't Enough! All our lives, especially during our younger years, we hear that the police are there to protect us. From the very first kindergarten- class visit of "Officer Friendly" to the very last time we saw a police car - most of which have "To Protect and Serve" emblazoned on their doors - we're encouraged to give ourselves over to police protection. But it hasn't always been that way. Before the mid-1800s, American and British citizens - even in large cities - were expected to protect themselves and each other. Indeed, they were legally required to pursue and attempt to apprehend criminals. The notion of a police force in those days was abhorrent in England and America, where liberals viewed it as a form of the dreaded "standing army." [because it IS a standing army!] (Emphasis mine) England's first police force, in London, was not instituted until 1827. The first such forces in America followed in New York, Boston, and Philadelphia during the period between 1835 and 1845. They were established only to augment citizen self-protection. It was never intended that they act affirmatively, prior to or during criminal activity or violence against individual citizens. Their duty was to protect society as a whole by deterrence; i.e., by systematically patrolling, detecting and apprehending criminals after the occurrence of crimes. There was no thought of police displacing the citizens' right of self-protection. Nor could they, even if it were intended. Professor Don B. Kates, Jr., eminent civil rights lawyer and criminologist, states: Even if all 500,000 American police officers were assigned to patrol, they could not protect 240 million citizens from upwards of 10 million criminals who enjoy the luxury of deciding when and where to strike. But we have nothing like 500,000 patrol officers; to determine how many police are actually available for any one shift, we must divide the 500,000 by four (three shifts per day, plus officers who have days off, are on sick leave, etc.). The resulting number must be cut in half to account for officers assigned to investigations, juvenile, records, laboratory, traffic, etc., rather than patrol. [1] [snip] It is, therefore, a fact of law and of practical necessity that individuals are responsible for their own personal safety, and that of their loved ones. Police protection must be recognized for what it is: only an auxiliary general deterrent. https://www.firearmsandliberty.com/kasler-protection.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
LittleLeftofRight
on
Thu 02/18/16 08:32 AM
|
|
48 suspicious banking deaths August 22, 2014 Our advice is if JP Morgan offers you a job: politley decline. The list of top level bankers dying under suspicious circumstances has been growing rapidly in recent months. Whether these are genuine deaths or something more sinister one thing is for certain, banking is becoming one of the most dangerous industries to be involved in right now with an extremely high death per employee ratio. The causes of death given for some of the bankers seems quite odd to say the least including one banker shooting himself 8 times with a nail gun and another being crushed to death by their own SUV. http://www.hangthebankers.com/48-suspicious-banking-deaths/ THIS ^^^^^ I made a thread on this last year (& how many allegedly left the country and/or retired), no one cared.  Welcome to collapse well then on this topic you are one step ahead of the crowd. they pissed off a lot of people, to the extent the IMF had to pump gold back into the market to stabilize it along and in conjunction with multitudes of suicides of course. Not surprising it went unheeded because people simply know little to nothing about how thing are done in the big leagues much less the top level leagues. Hopefully you were one of the lucky ones who escaped the 'conspiracy theorist' and 'antisemite' pejorative slurring and name calling from the peanut gallery who do not know the difference between valid evidence in the case of CT, or zionist v Judaism in the case of antisemitism. Meantime our wallets have been raped in support of the criminals, and the whole country put into deeper 'bond' slavery which is what it was called before they abolished the appropriate use of the 'label'. That said I dont see a total 'collapse', nasty depression yea, which I would estimate is a bit over 50% past. One of the biggest downsides of these suicides is that nothing ever gets onto court records hence no preventative laws will ever be made. Suffice to say these guys know exactly what they are doing and have a nearly impenetrable strategy. With that much power off'ing someone judges kennedys popes makes no difference, its childs play, and there is nothing government can do about it if they wish to live long enough to have gray hair. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
goodbye, 4th amendment...
Edited by
LittleLeftofRight
on
Thu 02/18/16 08:02 AM
|
|
Thats not the problem, someone 'else' most often calls them. The problem is the actions of the cops once called. They are taught to escalate everything, NOT de-escalate as SOP. Though they always lie in court [and judges simply overlook their commission of perjury as they do for most attorneys] that they tried to de-escalate a matter and were only doing their job. The proper procedure would have been to call for a warrant to legitimize the change in venue to a search. However the overlord courts simply rule against our rights any time it is possible when its statist v individual. judges also mix and match, first through synthesis the eliminate over the years the privacy of ones car, and they reason [through said synthesis] that since one has no privacy in the car neither do they in their home and as long as they do not cite anything that is not so far over the top insane that anyone with an iq over 20 can figure out, they claim its 'reasonable' as the core of their decision [despite its unconstitutional]. If a cop enters a home under one pretext that does not give them the authority (with certain narrow exceptions) to deviate from that pretext. [legitimately]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
LittleLeftofRight
on
Thu 02/18/16 07:17 AM
|
|
Again, it's not "Democratic operatives" who have called ALL the details on how his death has been handled, including no autopsy, and acceptance of the findings of the first officers on the scene. It has been HIS OWN FAMILY AND ASSOCIATES. So if you want to keep playing either paranoia games with yourself, OR you want to continue to pretend that this is all a plot to help the Democrats trip off an imaginary liberal majority court ... ....YOU HAVE TO EXPLAIN FIRST, HOW ALL OF HIS FAMILY AND HIS DOCTOR AND ALL THE POLICE ON THE SCENE AND THE REMOTE M.E. ARE ALL IN ON IT, AND ALL are FLAMING LIBERAL DEMOCRATS. Puh-lease. If there are THAT many of "THEM," then we have no shot at winning election for a conservative ANYTHING. Might as well leave the country now, and move to either Iran, or Russia. Simple, couple guys pull a few key family members off to the side and inform them that expediency is in the states best interest ending the statement with 'you know what I mean'.....you wanted to know what it takes thats all it takes if even that much. Dont kid yourself, Russia's constitution pales ours, you would get to knock heads with snowden and really get an earful. Of course the Russians dont follow their constitution any better than we follow ours. Chances are you would know more details about this and many other incidents that you would ever find out here from the corporate mobocracy. The real problem is that there are rogue groups operating under the veil of law and these groups can bring down ANYONE, president, even God if you run contrary and become a target of their interests. Laughing yet? 48 suspicious banking deaths August 22, 2014 Our advice is if JP Morgan offers you a job: politley decline. The list of top level bankers dying under suspicious circumstances has been growing rapidly in recent months. Whether these are genuine deaths or something more sinister one thing is for certain, banking is becoming one of the most dangerous industries to be involved in right now with an extremely high death per employee ratio. The causes of death given for some of the bankers seems quite odd to say the least including one banker shooting himself 8 times with a nail gun and another being crushed to death by their own SUV. http://www.hangthebankers.com/48-suspicious-banking-deaths/ Thats where it starts, which leads to: CEO Of Liechtenstein Bank Frick Murdered In Broad Daylight Tyler Durden's picture Submitted by Tyler Durden on 04/07/2014 10:05 -0400 Over the weekend the world was gripped by the drama surrounding the mysterious murder-homicide of the former CEO of Dutch bank ABN Amro and members of his family, and whether there is more foul play than meets the eye. However, that is nothing compared to what just happened in the tiny, and all too quiet Principality of Lichtenstein, where moments ago the CEO of local financial institution Bank Frick & Co. AG, Juergen Frick, was shot dead in the underground garage of the bank located in the city of Balzers. Of course when you are dealing with a supreme court judge it better appear convincingly to the greater MSM following majority of american people like death by natural causes so its NOT looked into. The progression starts with appearing like suicide natural whatever and evolves into outright open view assassination when nothing can be done about it, either from fear of retaliation at the higher levels or no opportunity to make a change at the lower levels short of war against the rogue elements who happen to be elements operating under the veil and cover of government, now that the rogue elements have merged under the immunity of government if you dissent and go against their interests you will lose because big brother listens very closely to dissenters whispers in the dark. "NSA the only part of government who truly listens." Its the same MO anytime the government is involved. Its not as if we have a bad government its that it was infiltrated from its inception and our laws skewed just enough by rogue elements (operating under government 'outside' the process to achieve their PRIVATE interests) so at best we the people can do nothing about it but be spectators, short of going to war against the rogue elements who just happen to....oops work for the government good luck with that, good luck rooting them out.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTbgsoHDc24 That said, sure it really could be natural causes, however when shortcuts are taken, evidence is tampered with, everyday investigative procedures are botched, and a controversial stench follows, the odds quickly tip in the direction of foul play. That said as far as I am aware it only takes one family member, which would be the executor of his will to stop the whole show. The propaganda that it takes thousands of people to pull these operations off is groundless. It only takes intimate knowledge of the system and often times only takes one or a small few people with authority to control the 'direction' of _______ whatever, the rest simply follow along. Of course there are all sorts of variants to that however that 'is' the process. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
goodbye, 4th amendment...
Edited by
LittleLeftofRight
on
Wed 02/17/16 09:20 PM
|
|
Actually, it is common for a judge to rule on the pleadings. Most of the appellate cases which are brought by criminal defendants are ruled on in this fashion. Determination of the facts of the case is an issue for the trial courts to address and therefore the appellate courts almost never address determining new issues of fact. Secondly, in general rules of appellate procedure do not provide a right to oral argument, unlike in the trial courts, and this has been longstanding tradition in criminal law, and really is nothing new. well the T v Ohio case if I remember correctly was a lame version of police insuring their safety, however, securing themselves from danger that rises to the level of 'imminent danger' is reasonable, but thats not the situation here, This case takes it to a whole new level, (of unconstitutional thank you US supreme court) The test used is 'community caretaker’!1 http://www.aele.org/law/2011all01/2011-01MLJ101.pdf What the courts are doing is protecting the officers under the guise that because the search resulted in producing guilty verdict for some crime they are justified in making rulings that violate the constitution and people simply accept it mostly because they do not see beyond their noses the blank check being given the gov for corruption. case in point; If you look at the steven avery case people give government a free pass for far more heinous crimes mean while hanging each other. Its not a bit surprising that scalia just happened to die with all these constitutional abominations on the books. |
|
|
|
|
Previous
