Community > Posts By > alleoops

 
no photo
Mon 09/25/17 01:33 PM
Why have them stand for the BANNER? Because they are paid to.
If they didn't want to, don't sign the contract.
Fans pay a lot to go see a football game, not someones protest.


no photo
Mon 09/25/17 12:28 PM
Edited by alleoops on Mon 09/25/17 12:31 PM

Colin Kaepernick is unemployed... I'm good with that smokin


Perhaps the sponsors should pay more attention to whom they sponsor? whoa


Me too. smokin

The way I see it, the players are paid to play football not to protest.
People pay to see them play football not protest. Sponsors pay to show their products not to sponsor protest.
If players want to protest, take it some where else or the fans and eventually the sponsor will too.


no photo
Sun 09/24/17 08:22 PM
Sponsors edging away from NFL

Major dollars are on the line, but companies are so unhappy with a rash of domestic violence cases involving National Football League players that they are likely to drop sponsorships, said Robert Tuchman, president of sports and entertainment marketing firm Goviva.

"They are really holding on until the last minute until public outcry is so much that they can't be associated with this," said Tuchman. "That's when you're going to find them pulling out."

Football is the nation's most popular sport and has always been an advertising vehicle of choice for major consumer brands. Companies have committed millions of dollars to NFL sponsorships and millions more in related programs to leverage those sponsorships, said Tuchman. He added, "No one wants to pull away from the NFL."

But companies are now distancing themselves from the league following a series of shocking incidents involving pro football players and what's seen as a weak response from the NFL.

In the latest fallout from the domestic violence case involving former Baltimore Raven Ray Rice and other arrests of NFL players, Procter & Gamble (PG) has withdrawn from a promotional initiative with the NFL for Breast Cancer Awareness Month, according to CBS Sports, citing sources with knowledge of the matter.

The consumer products giant had worked with the NFL on a project in which players from every NFL franchise would have worn pink mouthguards and participated in social media to raise money and draw attention to the fight against breast cancer.

But P&G canceled the campaign on Thursday amid the furor over the league's response to Rice and other incidents involving the Minnesota Vikings' Adrian Peterson and the Arizona Cardinals' Jonathan Dwyer. P&G will still donate any money raised in the campaign to cancer charities, CBS Sports reported.

Spokespersons for P&G and the NFL did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
A growing number of sponsors have expressed concern about the recent domestic violence issues involving NFL players. Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) this week criticized the league's handling of what the beer seller were behaviors that "go against our own company culture and moral code." PepsiCo (PEP) also has questioned the NFL's handling of domestic violence and child abuse, while Radisson Hotels has suspended its sponsorship of the Vikings.
Companies have also cut ties with Rice, who was captured on video striking his then-fiancee Janay Palmer in a casino elevator. Sponsors who dropped Rice include Nike (NKE) and exercise equipment maker Vertimax.

Tuchman said he hopes the NFL will not only adopt a zero-tolerance policy, but also use its power to change attitudes about domestic violence -- not just in football, but across the country. "Because they are at the top of the top in terms of marketing and brand, they really have an opportunity here" to change both perceptions and behavior, he said.

So far the NFL seems to be squandering that opportunity with missteps. Commissioner Roger Goodell apologized Friday for mishandling the Rice affair. He also admitted the league needs clearer policies and announced new initiatives with the National Domestic Violence Hotline and the National Sexual Violence Resource Center.

Tuchman thought such efforts wouldn't be enough to fully address sponsors' concerns. He thinks the NFL needs to take a tougher stance on players shown to have abused women or children.

no photo
Sun 09/24/17 03:59 PM
Clearly, he was high smokin

no photo
Sun 09/24/17 07:45 AM
Edited by alleoops on Sun 09/24/17 07:50 AM

Justin Timberlake, son of Boxcar Willie ?.laugh


no photo
Sat 09/23/17 02:02 PM

WOW! The complexity of it today. We have some real geniuses out there.whoa


laugh :thumbsup:

no photo
Thu 09/21/17 06:42 PM

Lets knock them off the map.:tongue:


I could not knock them off my map so I just put some duct tape over
it. Should last for a while.

no photo
Wed 09/20/17 06:39 PM
anti semantics are those that are opposed to that study.happy

no photo
Wed 09/20/17 06:33 PM
Baaa, Baaa!

no photo
Wed 09/20/17 01:04 PM
No honey, Obama is next to her.

no photo
Wed 09/20/17 09:42 AM
Russian coercion, what happened to collusion?laugh
Still hanging on to a fantasy?laugh
Hilary lost because of what she is.

no photo
Wed 09/20/17 08:01 AM
Most agree with you. She would have been a disaster as president. She blames her loss on everything except herself.



I love this pic!

no photo
Wed 09/20/17 07:37 AM





She lost,he won,end of story!


Exactly. Please stop dogging the man. He is your President, whether you like it or not, whether you choose to accept it or not. Those complaining about him, just like the corrupt, biased media, need to get off his d*c* already.

For the sake of unity and land and country, let's just accept Trump. He was elected fair and square. I wish the liberals would quit their bitter rants already and face the music and respect themselves, their President, their country and their fellow countrymen.


Just because someone becomes President doesn't give them carte blanche to not be called on their crap.

They still can make bad choices and do wrong things,just like anyone else, difference being because they are POTUS the bad calls, behaviors, and mistakes they make have a deeper impact on "our country and follow countrymen'. than anyone elses'


I agree with your point. Do you understand mine now? Or is your point the only one that matters? What is your solution then? Impeachment? Presidential behavior modification? None of that will be happening. Unless you come up with some bona fide solution, nothing will change. Does that mean you are continuously and bitterly going to attack your President on every little thing or find reasons to make mountains out of mole hills to justify your own dislike of him?



no. I dont understand your point.

no. my point is not the only one that matters.

My solution is a better informed and educated public that actually understands how government works and holds candidates to some standard of moral character. Not perfection, but basic professionalism, courtesy, and knowledge.

Impeachment only if he meets the criteria.

Behavior modification happens constantly when they are trying to please their constituents and win over supporters.

No. Im not and do not constantly attack him. But I do participate in the threads OTHER people begin when they begin them and when I visit mingle2.

I rarely make mountains out of molehills, which is why I steer clear of 'blaming' Presidents for things and why I post a counter to those who constantly giving 'credit' for things. I give credit where it is due, and do the same with criticism.


offtopic

no photo
Tue 09/19/17 06:36 PM
I get mine at the Feed Store. Usually 25lb.bag last me a while.
It's a bit crunchy but hey, it's organic and the price is right.happy

no photo
Tue 09/19/17 06:23 PM
Edited by alleoops on Tue 09/19/17 06:24 PM
Ah, the Sportatorium in Big "D" Saturday night, I was there.

and on Sunday we had Studio Wrestling on TV.

no photo
Tue 09/19/17 06:13 PM
Didn't watch, no barf bag.ohwell

no photo
Tue 09/19/17 06:12 PM
laugh It's a New York thing.

no photo
Tue 09/19/17 02:22 PM


Who said any thing about radiation?spock

How else would you "blow them off the map "
Any other way would take to long!


We probably have a few neutron bombs still laying around.

no photo
Tue 09/19/17 01:08 PM
Who said any thing about radiation?spock

no photo
Tue 09/19/17 11:01 AM
Japan and SK will nuke up too. I think China is looking at NK as a new province. Looks bad for the little fat dude.laugh