Community > Posts By > mightymoe

 
mightymoe's photo
Sat 09/08/18 04:06 PM



I understand what your saying, and agree somewhat....but(imo) if someone wants information, they need to look it up for themselves... None of the jobs/no jobs information is accurate...never has been, never will be...bush and Obama both lied and pushed the numbers in their favor, by only using one resource, or a combo of resources to make the numbers more favorable... Bush mainly used the unemployment claims to bolster his numbers, because when the money runs out, he presented it as people getting a job, saying unemployment claims we're down, but in actuality the benefits time was up and they still didn't have a job... Obama did the same thing, but he also had people count the total jobs by US companies, divided the number of jobs filled by the total number of people that can work in the US... Just some tricks they use to get they unemployment numbers in their favor...
What a great bunch of information....but its just you talking...provide SOME thing that demonstrates what youre saying, otherwise, the world is flat and the moon is made of cheese days are back.
do you own ****ing searches...if I wanna post a link, I will, if I don't, I won't... If you don't like or agree with what I say, then prove me wrong, don't whine to me about a stupid link...

mightymoe's photo
Sat 09/08/18 04:03 PM

The trend started by Obama, and the numbers as a trend was the same in 2015-2016.
Nothing to do with Trump himself.
Just a development continuing after a man that took over a totally destroyed world but was able to correct it, and get it back on track.

Taking the credit for the upswing made by another genious is just saad.
But isn't that a typical.... Lol.

where do y'all come up with this BS at?

mightymoe's photo
Sat 09/08/18 03:56 PM
Edited by mightymoe on Sat 09/08/18 03:59 PM



charts? what charts?

I saw interviews with CEO's...I think it was 20/20 or 48 hours where they had like 10 people comment on something in the news and in this case it was CEO's in the chairs commenting on what they would do. None of them would use the money for their employees for wages.

This isnt what I saw but it sure is compelling and it was before the bill went thru.
http://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/15/gary-cohn-looks-for-assurances-from-ceos-on-tax-plan-gets-crickets.html
well, I don't know enough about econmics to say Trump was right or wrong...till I know for sure either way, I'll give Trump the benefit of doubt that he's trying to help...

did you use the link? if not, it was Trump's chief economic adviser Gary Cohn at a at a gathering of CEO's hosted by the Wall Street Journal prior to the tax cut being voted on.
Prior.
If you look at Cohn's body language simply as the host asked the question, he is, to me, visibly uncomfortable, as if he already knows the answer the crowd of CEO's will give.
At any rate, the behavior planned by CEO's was available.

there's more to economics than just wages... If a company like Wal Mart goes under, how many Americans are out of work? Like I said, I don't know if he's right or wrong, when I know, I'll let you know... If Boeing goes down, the city of Seattle turns into Detroit after the auto manufacturers left...there's plenty of reasons to help the people without making their companies raise their wages...

mightymoe's photo
Sat 09/08/18 03:34 PM




Well I think I kind of explained why there was no link. My computer is down and I can not copy the link to my phone. I thought that was a valid reason. It's not?
But I do apologise for giving the wrong newspaper. It is actually the New York Post..front page .
And one of my points was that regardless of good news some will still find something wrong with it because they do not like the current chief therefor they can not accept anything positive that happens under his leadership

And I think this was proven in this thread.
I think that may be construed as arrogance rather than introducing productive discussion.
(someone disagreed with your payrate comments and someone even provided a link disputing its value. 'lol' doesnt quite cut it in defending a position.)
The hope of the political forum is that people can have mature, informative discussions. I dont think its purpose is to prove that some people will find something wrong with everything.
Does that even need to be explored?
Wouldnt it be more useful to defend your own point with actual information?
If you havent got access to a computer, maybe wait til you do, before trying to guide an honest, informative, mature discussion...

-OR-

respect the opinions of others when unable to research their stance yourself. Wait til you have time to research those points of view.

I for one, am grateful for your posts. I get a great deal of education from them just learning about other perspectives, and looking things up to see what I think about whatever the topic relates to.
Very cool.
Just not excited about the erosion of information this forum sometimes generates.

This will always be true:
Some of us will hold personal love for the incumbent.
Some of us will hold personal hate for the incumbent.
Some of us will sit and lurk and watch and take notes to fool those who are too far to either side.
Some of us will have no idear, and will burn up the internet search engines to try to figure it out.
Some of us will be 'yes-men' to certain other posters.
Most of us are in between all of that.

I understand what your saying, and agree somewhat....but(imo) if someone wants information, they need to look it up for themselves... None of the jobs/no jobs information is accurate...never has been, never will be...bush and Obama both lied and pushed the numbers in their favor, by only using one resource, or a combo of resources to make the numbers more favorable... Bush mainly used the unemployment claims to bolster his numbers, because when the money runs out, he presented it as people getting a job, saying unemployment claims we're down, but in actuality the benefits time was up and they still didn't have a job... Obama did the same thing, but he also had people count the total jobs by US companies, divided the number of jobs filled by the total number of people that can work in the US... Just some tricks they use to get they unemployment numbers in their favor...

mightymoe's photo
Sat 09/08/18 03:09 PM






So greedy ceo's and board members are Trump's fault... 9 tax reductions and it didn't make it to the employees...tell me again who's fault this is?
I thought Trump was well schooled in business. Isnt that what he was praised for? Are you saying Trump was duped by the CEO's....that he didnt know this is exactly what would happen? Isnt this exactly what people predicted would happen?
I don't know if he was duped or not..untill I know better, I'll give Trump credit for trying, he cannot control what the ceo's do or don't do... So who predicted this? You? Ido know this, there's a lot of people looking to make look bad, it's not out of the question he was lied to...
He can make predictions based on the past behavior, which is what I heard before it went into effect. Based on that information, yes, I predicted it. I doubt I had more information than Trump. You think he was lied to about what exactly?
wow, you're pretty smart to know about predictions from charts like that... But I guess it's not real hard to guess what greedy ceo's will do with money... But either way, Trump did his job, and y'all still whine...
charts? what charts?

I saw interviews with CEO's...I think it was 20/20 or 48 hours where they had like 10 people comment on something in the news and in this case it was CEO's in the chairs commenting on what they would do. None of them would use the money for their employees for wages.

This isnt what I saw but it sure is compelling and it was before the bill went thru.
http://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/15/gary-cohn-looks-for-assurances-from-ceos-on-tax-plan-gets-crickets.html
well, I don't know enough about econmics to say Trump was right or wrong...till I know for sure either way, I'll give Trump the benefit of doubt that he's trying to help...

mightymoe's photo
Sat 09/08/18 03:03 PM
Edited by mightymoe on Sat 09/08/18 03:50 PM

Oh, and as a postscript to my last posting:

If the last months of Obama's presidency showed that we were heading for recession, the resulting recession, even though it happened during Trump's presidency, could not be blamed on Trump. It is the way it goes.

For example, some Dems say that there were TWO Bush recessions, one the beginning of his term, one near the end. That is not a valid statement. The market was cooling after the dot-com bubble burst, and a lot of money was taken off the table, by many means. Mostly it was people who didn't understand the market, and who should not have been in the market, buying stocks they disn't research because of "Fear of missing out" Clinton's previous Laziez faire (somebody correct my spelling) approach to the market during the bulk of his term was not a correct approach at the end. Lots of things like e-trading were also new, so it was a bit of uncharted water.

In any case, W inherited a tough economy which was not his doing. The "second" recession of his 8 years was all his, however.
I have to disagree...when Clinton was in office, the economy was great gas was at 87 cents a gallon, there was no big deficit.... Things started to go bad after 9/11....but Clinton did do something somewhat suspicious - one of the last bills he signed was lowering the score for credit worthyness for people who can't afford homes to get a home...take a guess whos corporate names were on that bill.. Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae....
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2016/05/28/is_clinton_the_real_housing_crash_villain_130707.html




mightymoe's photo
Sat 09/08/18 12:40 PM




So greedy ceo's and board members are Trump's fault... 9 tax reductions and it didn't make it to the employees...tell me again who's fault this is?
I thought Trump was well schooled in business. Isnt that what he was praised for? Are you saying Trump was duped by the CEO's....that he didnt know this is exactly what would happen? Isnt this exactly what people predicted would happen?
I don't know if he was duped or not..untill I know better, I'll give Trump credit for trying, he cannot control what the ceo's do or don't do... So who predicted this? You? Ido know this, there's a lot of people looking to make look bad, it's not out of the question he was lied to...
He can make predictions based on the past behavior, which is what I heard before it went into effect. Based on that information, yes, I predicted it. I doubt I had more information than Trump. You think he was lied to about what exactly?
wow, you're pretty smart to know about predictions from charts like that... But I guess it's not real hard to guess what greedy ceo's will do with money... But either way, Trump did his job, and y'all still whine...

mightymoe's photo
Sat 09/08/18 09:25 AM


So greedy ceo's and board members are Trump's fault... 9 tax reductions and it didn't make it to the employees...tell me again who's fault this is?
I thought Trump was well schooled in business. Isnt that what he was praised for? Are you saying Trump was duped by the CEO's....that he didnt know this is exactly what would happen? Isnt this exactly what people predicted would happen?
I don't know if he was duped or not..untill I know better, I'll give Trump credit for trying, he cannot control what the ceo's do or don't do... So who predicted this? You? Ido know this, there's a lot of people looking to make look bad, it's not out of the question he was lied to...

mightymoe's photo
Sat 09/08/18 08:27 AM

From what Ive read, the lower income workers are a large part of that increase since the minimum wage increase was mandated. For the middle, not much going on there.

Growth is growth and Im hoping that even the little increases will make a difference without inflation snapping at our heels.

Hopefully, we will have more transparency in the healthcare industry so that competition will create a functional marketplace.
healthcare is out a control... They need to revamp the whole system, from the greedy doctors to the big pharma..

mightymoe's photo
Sat 09/08/18 08:21 AM

Not 4 years, but 8.
Hopefully this upward trend in job growth will eventually lead to increased wages, but so far, not so much.

In addition, it seems that not enough of us are qualified for the jobs that are becoming available. That leads me to wonder about how accessible education is for everyone, since IT is continuing to be important.




Obama actually did a good job, kinda with education...anyone could get a student loan, with grants that didn't need to be paid back...but it did bite back, the company that did the loans had to be bailed out,because lots weren't paying back the loans...

mightymoe's photo
Sat 09/08/18 08:09 AM

Excellent point "Bluegrass". And dont forget to mention the fact that trump is dismantling safety measures that protect workers
good, if someone gets hurt or dies, a new job just opened up..that's a win win no matter how you look at it...

mightymoe's photo
Sat 09/08/18 08:08 AM

Since its been trending in that direction since 2014 you shoul be saying THANKS OBAMA ! :thumbsup: explode
whoa don't drink the liberal Kool aid....

mightymoe's photo
Sat 09/08/18 06:52 AM

Stephen Hawking was an atheist, and believed that "the universe is governed by the laws of science". He stated: "There is a fundamental difference between religion, which is based on authority, [and] science, which is based on observation and reason. Science will win because it works." In an interview published in The Guardian, Hawking regarded "the brain as a computer which will stop working when its components fail", and the concept of an afterlife as a "fairy story for people afraid of the dark". Can anyone remember what life was like before they were born? I think not.
and that's your whole argument?...indifferent

mightymoe's photo
Sat 09/08/18 06:38 AM










So presenting FACTS is now "conservative bashing"? And showing the inherent bias of a cited piece is "bashing"?
no, it's called bashing when you can't read what the topic is about....hint - it's not about Trump....in any way


And if you will look REAL CLOSELY, I didn't mention Trump in my original reply, just stated that you are attempting in the OP to bash Obama with something that is normal for ALL ex-presidents to do.

See how YOUR biased media source is leading you around?


yea, because I started the topic...I didn't jump into your anti Trump thread and bash Obama, did I?


Oh, I didn't see in the rules of the forum that state you have private thread privileges.

You are welcome into any thread I start.... because you join anyway and spout your hate about a guy who is gone from office for almost 2 years now anyway.

I actually LIKE seeing your contributions. I really wish you would prepare your arguments based more on truth than knee-jerk party line, but then, people in Hell want ice water too, we all get what we get.

I am sorry that I ruined your Obama bash with facts.
you have no facts ... You're just trying to push people's buttons, nothing else...read the rules, anyone can post in any topic...but it has to be on topic, and not trying to bait others...


I stated a simple fact that it is NORMAL for ALL ex-presidents to earn money on the speaking circuit. This deflated your Obama bash to just another news flash similar to "the sun came up this morning", and you got butthurt.

Oh, and I KNOW anyone can post in any thread... but truly, I do enjoy when you reply to things. Please do not stop posting, I sincerely get a kick out of your logic.
this post wasn't intended to bash Obama, I really want to know the secret of the meetings, because I think he's up to something...but they do turn into Obama bashing, for some reason....my whole point is I didn't start this thread for anyone to whine about Trump, he has nothing to do with this thread...if you start your own post about Trump haters unite, then what would you say if I went in and bashed Obama?


Follow me on this. I know it is tough for you, but:

1) NOBODY bashed Trump on this original response.
2) Obama is not doing anything unique, even though your subject title implies it.
3) If I start a topic, you are encouraged to join it, that is what this forum is about. Like I say, I truly enjoy your "arguments".
4) I would expect you to bring up Obama or Hillary in any thread when you interjected, because you have demonstrated you can't argue on point.

Clear Skippy?


implied? I've outright said I think he's up to something...you should work on your reading comprehension skills...btw, I'm going to start reporting all your posts that are talking about me rather than the subject, you still haven't read the forums rules yet ...or is that the comprehension skills thing again?

mightymoe's photo
Sat 09/08/18 06:33 AM


Video- Johnny Cashless Sings, "Obama's Prison Blues"
Impeach Obama Campaign
https://youtu.be/8n8K5b3gFvI
haven't seen you in a while...how's our favorite socialist doing?

mightymoe's photo
Sat 09/08/18 06:13 AM

To mightymoe

Your quote: ....."it only exists because I can see it" thoughts...

You might agree with everything I've said, (or plaguerized, if you prefer - but I don't enjoy flattery!), if we bracketed the words "as far as I am concerned" after everything.

Excellent. It's the perfect solution. Existence is - AS FAR AS IT IS CONCERNED.

Your quote: "it existed long before humans we're ever around, we just didn't know about it..."

One can speculate endlessly, and extemporize infinitely, but there is no proof of anything without a prover.


the proof in in the pudding...the earth was here for at least 4.5 billion years before anyone was around to see it, so it didn't exist? So how are we living on something that doesn't exist?

mightymoe's photo
Sat 09/08/18 06:09 AM

Try this - "BIRGUY74"

Some day, you won't be around. You can speculate that there will be SOMEONE around, (or something); but one can't claim to PROVE this without oneself being around to do so.

Quote: My 'word-tool', (the ‘human grunt-offspring’), identifies the object.......

Unless something/one is around to identify the claimed-to-be-in-existence object, how can it BE?

Quote: ...in order for anything to 'happen' it must be identifiably perceivable: how else can 'happening' be happening?!

mightymoe's photo
Sat 09/08/18 06:06 AM

Big Bang????? Hmmmm is that how the universe was created? What caused that one tiny atom to exist in the first place???? How can something be created from nothing?????? Ultimately the answer God. Science refuses to acknowledge that but the two go hand in hand.
maybe to some...but science and make believe don't go hand in hand...

mightymoe's photo
Sat 09/08/18 06:03 AM

as an undercover alien i can tell you that the big bang is nothing but a theory . it's 2018 bru :neutral_face:
i'll just give you a little clue why there is males and females? if the big bang was real how did the first creatures on earth split into two different genders ?
weak correlation...what makes you think an animal split? Nature is really beyond our comprehension right now, the DNA and genes carry so much information we can't understand it all...one of the things we do understand is the need for a male and female to pass their genes and DNA to the next generation...some species can reproduce asexually, but the offspring are all perfect little clones of the female, meaning no genes or dna was blended to make the offspring a slight bit different than the parents...that's what evolution is, trying to make the offspring better than the parents...that's why nature needs pairing ..

mightymoe's photo
Fri 09/07/18 02:51 PM








So presenting FACTS is now "conservative bashing"? And showing the inherent bias of a cited piece is "bashing"?
no, it's called bashing when you can't read what the topic is about....hint - it's not about Trump....in any way


And if you will look REAL CLOSELY, I didn't mention Trump in my original reply, just stated that you are attempting in the OP to bash Obama with something that is normal for ALL ex-presidents to do.

See how YOUR biased media source is leading you around?


yea, because I started the topic...I didn't jump into your anti Trump thread and bash Obama, did I?


Oh, I didn't see in the rules of the forum that state you have private thread privileges.

You are welcome into any thread I start.... because you join anyway and spout your hate about a guy who is gone from office for almost 2 years now anyway.

I actually LIKE seeing your contributions. I really wish you would prepare your arguments based more on truth than knee-jerk party line, but then, people in Hell want ice water too, we all get what we get.

I am sorry that I ruined your Obama bash with facts.
you have no facts ... You're just trying to push people's buttons, nothing else...read the rules, anyone can post in any topic...but it has to be on topic, and not trying to bait others...


I stated a simple fact that it is NORMAL for ALL ex-presidents to earn money on the speaking circuit. This deflated your Obama bash to just another news flash similar to "the sun came up this morning", and you got butthurt.

Oh, and I KNOW anyone can post in any thread... but truly, I do enjoy when you reply to things. Please do not stop posting, I sincerely get a kick out of your logic.
this post wasn't intended to bash Obama, I really want to know the secret of the meetings, because I think he's up to something...but they do turn into Obama bashing, for some reason....my whole point is I didn't start this thread for anyone to whine about Trump, he has nothing to do with this thread...if you start your own post about Trump haters unite, then what would you say if I went in and bashed Obama?

1 2 4 6 7 8 9 24 25