100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Obama Blames His Race for Low Poll Numbers | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
cause it seems I have seen plenty of posts where people just posted the ANYTHING they could dig up that supports their perceptions without bothering to check its veracity,,, And your point is? That you have no counter? Or that you just counter with nothing because you are unwilling to find data that will support your view? two words READING COMPREHENSION try reading what the post was in response to,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
...some people perceive him as having poor character or job performance... Some? How far in the past are you living? |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Wed 01/22/14 02:07 PM
|
|
FACT: the name of the thread is,,, Obama Blames his RACE for low poll numbers FACT: this thread was not begun by msharmony I CHOSE to post my opinion, like everyone posting here has there is no 'cross' just a choice to participate that is somehow singled out as my 'cross' I rather not go into the ways I suffer from racism, as I highly doubt from past experience that anyone posting here will have a CLUE or an inkling to do anything but dismiss my experience or my perception I am a BALANCED individual who deals with reality reality has both good and bad in it I can see both good and bad things around me I don't choose to obsess on the bad, but that doesn't mean I cant have an opinion about them when others CHOOSE to bring them up we have far more GOOD things in this country than bad, but that doesn't mean the bad things cant get better racism figure into a lot of things when one is a minority,, but that's neither here nor there the title of this thread was misleading in claiming , based upon the limited information given, that the president was 'blaming' anyone or speaking of anything 'out of the blue' its quite possible, probable, and MOST LIKELY that his answer was in response to a QUESTION about race,, which made it neither an issue of blaming or being 'out of the blue' So you can't actually answer the question because it doesn't affect you directly, it's more what you heard on the news...... Sad, because I have never met anyone I would consider more racist, and I would have liked to know the reason for it. no, I CHOOSE not to answer, because no answer would be sufficient for the current audience of participants,,, So you wish to scream wolf but have no basis for it? We have one of those in the WH already. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
what are the 'qualifications' , prey tell? there is budget approvals,,, so should a POTUS be an accountant? there is signing of laws... so should the POTUS be a lawyer? there is international relations... so should the POTUS have geography and international relations degrees? there is overseeing the military,,,so should the POTUS be a veteran? which jobs would make someone 'qualified' to fit the position of a POTUS,,,,exactly? should they have held all the above 'professional' positions, and if so,, exactly how WELL should they have done in those positions? Pickin nits. He has 0, as in zero, nil. , nada, not a lick of political time in or any management skills. It's in his political history that racial voters refused to read. The US may even have been better off making a manikin from a pile of pig s h I t and sat it in the oval office. actually he has 12 years as an elected official, which is more REAL TIME in POLITICS than most of his predecessors,,, The US got what the electoral chose, as they have in every election I have participated in,,,, could you break down his Offices,so all of us could part-take in the Revelation,and pulease,don't mention his Community-Organizing as Job-Experience! all he had was a bit experience when he impersonated a US Senator! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
...some people perceive him as having poor character or job performance... Some? How far in the past are you living? is there some information one can share that either NONE perceive this or EVERYONE perceives this or MOST perceive this? if not,, Im sure 'SOME' is the accurate qualifier |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
whites and corporations are the majority of the wealth in this county if it involves money, Im sure some whites and corporations had a part in it ,, just like any other election, their money also contributed a lot I never believed he was a 'negro hero', but definitely a wonderful role model for 'negros' (as well as anyone else) I see no Uncle Tom, at least not by what I believe an Uncle Tom to be,,,, Money from his Uncle George Soros? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Wed 01/22/14 02:10 PM
|
|
...some people perceive him as having poor character or job performance... Some? How far in the past are you living? is there some information one can share that either NONE perceive this or EVERYONE perceives this or MOST perceive this? if not,, Im sure 'SOME' is the accurate qualifier Silly me!  Here I thought a 39% approval rating had something to do with opinion...... so 61% of the nation is racist? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
what are the 'qualifications' , prey tell? there is budget approvals,,, so should a POTUS be an accountant? there is signing of laws... so should the POTUS be a lawyer? there is international relations... so should the POTUS have geography and international relations degrees? there is overseeing the military,,,so should the POTUS be a veteran? which jobs would make someone 'qualified' to fit the position of a POTUS,,,,exactly? should they have held all the above 'professional' positions, and if so,, exactly how WELL should they have done in those positions? Pickin nits. He has 0, as in zero, nil. , nada, not a lick of political time in or any management skills. It's in his political history that racial voters refused to read. The US may even have been better off making a manikin from a pile of pig s h I t and sat it in the oval office. actually he has 12 years as an elected official, which is more REAL TIME in POLITICS than most of his predecessors,,, The US got what the electoral chose, as they have in every election I have participated in,,,, could you break down his Offices,so all of us could part-take in the Revelation,and pulease,don't mention his Community-Organizing as Job-Experience! all he had was a bit experience when he impersonated a US Senator! like I said, this crowd would find no answer sufficient,, unless it supports their personal opinions,,,,, 96-04 Illinois state 04-08 US senate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
whites and corporations are the majority of the wealth in this county if it involves money, Im sure some whites and corporations had a part in it ,, just like any other election, their money also contributed a lot I never believed he was a 'negro hero', but definitely a wonderful role model for 'negros' (as well as anyone else) I see no Uncle Tom, at least not by what I believe an Uncle Tom to be,,,, Uncle Tom because he owes his soul to the cor por ate store. Thanks, Mr. Tennessee Ernie Ford for the idea. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Wed 01/22/14 02:17 PM
|
|
what are the 'qualifications' , prey tell? there is budget approvals,,, so should a POTUS be an accountant? there is signing of laws... so should the POTUS be a lawyer? there is international relations... so should the POTUS have geography and international relations degrees? there is overseeing the military,,,so should the POTUS be a veteran? which jobs would make someone 'qualified' to fit the position of a POTUS,,,,exactly? should they have held all the above 'professional' positions, and if so,, exactly how WELL should they have done in those positions? Pickin nits. He has 0, as in zero, nil. , nada, not a lick of political time in or any management skills. It's in his political history that racial voters refused to read. The US may even have been better off making a manikin from a pile of pig s h I t and sat it in the oval office. actually he has 12 years as an elected official, which is more REAL TIME in POLITICS than most of his predecessors,,, The US got what the electoral chose, as they have in every election I have participated in,,,, could you break down his Offices,so all of us could part-take in the Revelation,and pulease,don't mention his Community-Organizing as Job-Experience! all he had was a bit experience when he impersonated a US Senator! like I said, this crowd would find no answer sufficient,, unless it supports their personal opinions,,,,, 96-04 Illinois state 04-08 US senate In which he only "backed" legislation. Like his tenure as a professor of Constitutional Law and the president of the Law Review Journal in which he never posted a review? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
...some people perceive him as having poor character or job performance... Some? How far in the past are you living? is there some information one can share that either NONE perceive this or EVERYONE perceives this or MOST perceive this? if not,, Im sure 'SOME' is the accurate qualifier Silly me! Here I thought a 39% approval rating had something to do with opinion...... so 61% of the nation is racist? lol approval of WHAT? there are people who think he is of good character but does a poor job there isn't an indicator for WHY they think his performance is poor so , he has a majority right now not approving of his JOB PERFORMANCE,, we don't know why they don't approve and we have no clue what that means about their opinion of his 'character' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Wed 01/22/14 02:21 PM
|
|
...some people perceive him as having poor character or job performance... Some? How far in the past are you living? is there some information one can share that either NONE perceive this or EVERYONE perceives this or MOST perceive this? if not,, Im sure 'SOME' is the accurate qualifier Silly me! Here I thought a 39% approval rating had something to do with opinion...... so 61% of the nation is racist? lol approval of WHAT? there are people who think he is of good character but does a poor job there isn't an indicator for WHY they think his performance is poor so , he has a majority right now not approving of his JOB PERFORMANCE,, we don't know why they don't approve and we have no clue what that means about their opinion of his 'character' So it must be racism? Even tho every day on the news people are stating other reasons it's really racism? And the scandals are simply entertainment? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
what are the 'qualifications' , prey tell? there is budget approvals,,, so should a POTUS be an accountant? there is signing of laws... so should the POTUS be a lawyer? there is international relations... so should the POTUS have geography and international relations degrees? there is overseeing the military,,,so should the POTUS be a veteran? which jobs would make someone 'qualified' to fit the position of a POTUS,,,,exactly? should they have held all the above 'professional' positions, and if so,, exactly how WELL should they have done in those positions? Pickin nits. He has 0, as in zero, nil. , nada, not a lick of political time in or any management skills. It's in his political history that racial voters refused to read. The US may even have been better off making a manikin from a pile of pig s h I t and sat it in the oval office. actually he has 12 years as an elected official, which is more REAL TIME in POLITICS than most of his predecessors,,, The US got what the electoral chose, as they have in every election I have participated in,,,, could you break down his Offices,so all of us could part-take in the Revelation,and pulease,don't mention his Community-Organizing as Job-Experience! all he had was a bit experience when he impersonated a US Senator! like I said, this crowd would find no answer sufficient,, unless it supports their personal opinions,,,,, 96-04 Illinois state 04-08 US senate In which he only "backed" legislation. Like his tenure as a professor of Constitutional Law and the president of the Law Review Journal in which he never posted a review? oh goodness, he sponsored and backed legislation during his career but believe what yall want,, all the baseless accusations and headpatting of each other is tiring me out already,,, lol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cause it seems I have seen plenty of posts where people just posted the ANYTHING they could dig up that supports their perceptions without bothering to check its veracity,,, And your point is? That you have no counter? Or that you just counter with nothing because you are unwilling to find data that will support your view? two words READING COMPREHENSION try reading what the post was in response to,,,, Yes, reading comprehension does seem to be a major flaw with your posts. You refuse to read and can't comprehend the error of your ways. But then that just seems to be the opinion of most posting to this topic. Shouldn't really count should it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
...some people perceive him as having poor character or job performance... Some? How far in the past are you living? is there some information one can share that either NONE perceive this or EVERYONE perceives this or MOST perceive this? if not,, Im sure 'SOME' is the accurate qualifier Silly me! Here I thought a 39% approval rating had something to do with opinion...... so 61% of the nation is racist? lol approval of WHAT? there are people who think he is of good character but does a poor job there isn't an indicator for WHY they think his performance is poor so , he has a majority right now not approving of his JOB PERFORMANCE,, we don't know why they don't approve and we have no clue what that means about their opinion of his 'character' So it must be racism? Even tho every day on the news people are stating other reasons it's really racism? who said it must be racism? WHO SAID THAT?,,,,,,seriously?! what I posted and believe is that SOME PEOPLE ARE RACIST AND WILL OBJECT TO HIM OR THE THINGS HE DOES BECAUSE THEY ARE RACIST SOME PEOPLE ARE RACIST AND SUPPORT HIM OR THE THINGS HE DOES BECAUSE THEY ARE RACIST exactly as he stated in the OP,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Wed 01/22/14 02:24 PM
|
|
what are the 'qualifications' , prey tell? there is budget approvals,,, so should a POTUS be an accountant? there is signing of laws... so should the POTUS be a lawyer? there is international relations... so should the POTUS have geography and international relations degrees? there is overseeing the military,,,so should the POTUS be a veteran? which jobs would make someone 'qualified' to fit the position of a POTUS,,,,exactly? should they have held all the above 'professional' positions, and if so,, exactly how WELL should they have done in those positions? Pickin nits. He has 0, as in zero, nil. , nada, not a lick of political time in or any management skills. It's in his political history that racial voters refused to read. The US may even have been better off making a manikin from a pile of pig s h I t and sat it in the oval office. actually he has 12 years as an elected official, which is more REAL TIME in POLITICS than most of his predecessors,,, The US got what the electoral chose, as they have in every election I have participated in,,,, could you break down his Offices,so all of us could part-take in the Revelation,and pulease,don't mention his Community-Organizing as Job-Experience! all he had was a bit experience when he impersonated a US Senator! like I said, this crowd would find no answer sufficient,, unless it supports their personal opinions,,,,, 96-04 Illinois state 04-08 US senate In which he only "backed" legislation. Like his tenure as a professor of Constitutional Law and the president of the Law Review Journal in which he never posted a review? oh goodness, he sponsored and backed legislation during his career but believe what yall want,, all the baseless accusations and headpatting of each other is tiring me out already,,, lol One excuse is as good as another I guess. Racism, lack of proof, no basis for argument. Funny how a race card has trouble standing against truth. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Wed 01/22/14 02:25 PM
|
|
cause it seems I have seen plenty of posts where people just posted the ANYTHING they could dig up that supports their perceptions without bothering to check its veracity,,, And your point is? That you have no counter? Or that you just counter with nothing because you are unwilling to find data that will support your view? two words READING COMPREHENSION try reading what the post was in response to,,,, Yes, reading comprehension does seem to be a major flaw with your posts. You refuse to read and can't comprehend the error of your ways. But then that just seems to be the opinion of most posting to this topic. Shouldn't really count should it. about as much as the majority opinion about a black child in a KKK meeting should matter or an opinion about women at a pimp convention,,,lol people have their prejudices and others with those prejudices often piggyback on their posts when they find them,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 RACE is the issue INTRODUCD BY THE OP take it up with them why THEY use the 'race card' I don't know how much feigned ignorance I can endure ..... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wth?
there is a certain class of DOCTORS That don't want people to be healthy because as long as there are unhealthy people they have an 'easy' way of making quite a lucrative living,,,and a way to make themselves ESTEEMED amongst the public there is a certain class of soldiers who don't want wars to end because as long as there are wars they have an 'easy'way of making a living and making themselves esteemed in the public there is a certain class o policemen and firemen who don't want crimes to end or fires not to cause danger, because as long as there is crime and dangerous fire they have an 'easy' way of makinga livng nd making themselves esteemed in the public,,, and on and on an don so, yeah, every occupation has those with little character/compassion,,,,whatever the relevance of that to whether making a statement about racism is the same as 'blaming' race is highly questionable though |
|
|
|
|
