Nothing justifies the latter above-quoted claim, not even remotely.

nothing that says its not justified, either..,works both ways

to me, its equivocal to stating that not every rape suspect actually raped someone during a discussion on race,,,


it is a true fact, but it also appears in context to try to distract from or interject doubt and questioning of the topic of rape,,,

Iran/Contra?
You sure you have the right President?

Actually, you have to prove the alleged justification.

President Obama is innocent of what you accuse him of until proven guilty.

I didn't mention presidents names, Im pointing out a double standard of how some presidents have been similar to this one, but not received the similar disdain in response,,

Bad premises make for bad conclusions.

But this seems to be standard operating procedure for the Odumboite crowd, anything not their way is racist.

So that leaves the question, which part is racist, the half that is white, the quarter that is Arabic or the quarter that is black?

and that means what?

that there are NO people against Obama due to his race

because those are the types of conclusions that have pretty bad premise,,,,,

yeah, someone slacking in intelligence would think 'anything not their way' is racist

however, no one here stated that

there isn't a 'part' racist, someone is racist or they are not,,,

Really, and from what halls of eternal wisdom would we expect to relate this spewing of dribble?

But why would you want to?

I have no expectations of anyone here who hasn't experienced racism,,,

except they continue telling themselves that others experiences are just all made up 'dribble' until they can 'prove' to the reader that they aren't,,,

really





life will go on,,,,

Your level of intellectual dishonesty is incredible. Carter was disdained by many for being a fool, but not dishonest.

Nixon was disdained by many for being dishonest, but generally recognized as one of the more competent presidents.

Clinton was disdained for being dishonest and an outright liar, but his domestic policies ran pretty well. He also worked across the aisle.

Bush pushed a "donut hole" bill for drug coverage on Medicare without any way to pay for it. It was good for the elderly and bad for the debt. The troops respected him. He didn't tax to pay for the war either. He is generally considered honest.

You are making up the "double standard" as an excuse for the lack of performance of Obama in any arena. He is the worst in every category by a very large margin. He is setting records in the unconstitutional arena.

nope, you are proving my point with all the 'buts' to justify the SAME types of behaviors in other presidents

like I said, its a double standard due to the differing level of DISDAIN for the action,,, considering WHO it is tied to,,,

Reagan had alzheimers, headed office during Iran Contra, tripled the debt,, is he considered 'honest' or 'competent' IN SPITE of those things though? Isnt he REVERED by some of the same folks who 'HATE' this president?

And all so preordained. Romney wasn't meant to win, just to make the sheeple think they had a choice. The same could have been said for McCain, another diversion from the truth.

And if you want to look at matters on the other side, it was a balancing act between a female and a black candidate, well the black candidate had less baggage.

And if you want to go deeper, the female candidate should have committed political suicide. Not going to happen, still in reserve to deliver the death blow to freedom in 2016.

The only thing Romney actually got right was that little faux pas about the 46%.

So, is this your way of saying you were raised in a racist environment and that is what contributes to your current views.

It would certainly explain how Odumbo can do no wrong in your eyes even after being proved to be the biggest liar ever to occupy the white house.

Im raised in a historically racist COUNTRY,, lets get that out the way

we all were

whether we ignore it or not wont make it less true,,,,

one of the long term affects of that RACIST history is racial division, socioeconomic, judicial , educational, and health disparities,,,


reality is contributing to my views, reading and listening to others is contributing to my views, and my experiences play a part of my views as should anyones with a brain of course

This president is no more or less flawed than any other, 'in my eyes'
he has 'lied' no more or less

he has been able to accomplish fewer of his stated goals though,, for certain, than others with a more cooperative congress to work with

but NONE OF THIS is relevant to whether the stated paraphrase in the op that the president BLAMES anyone for anything is accurately reflecting what the president actually SAID in the interview,,, or whether its true that SOME people will like or dislike him based upon his race,,,

and some people will hold him to a double standard based upon his race

just like a woman doing the same things as a man may get her labeled a female dog, but him labeled a strong man,,,,in people who may otherwise not consider themselves sexist and no doubt love people who are both male and female and have supported both males and females in some way in their lives

the same is true in how people hold different races of people accountable by different standards,,,even though they don't consider themselves 'racist',and no doubt are capable of loving or showing support for individuals in different races throughout their lives

Dang, and just how many ways can you use to justify a blind faith based on pure racism, yes racism.

The man is an idiot in his actions and a liar with his words. He is one of histories largest mass murders and wants to add more to his tally.

He has put the people of these united States in jeopardy with Odumbocare that has nothing to do with health, just a massive control mechanism to control and limit peoples lives.

He has robbed from the people many generations into the future, but still the people of blind faith want more. But even more importantly, they just cannot understand why those not blindly following object, so it must be racist.

And truthfully, it is, but you have your premises backwards. Remember, there can be no conflicts, check your premises, they are wrong.