100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Internet debating techniques | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Gish Gallop
Sometimes being foundationally and fractally wrong can help you in a "debate". "Dr." Duane "Blabberbot" Gish, the quick-tongued creatard looncase, invented a way to weaponize stupidity. His debate tactic (that used to be called "vomiting up brain-dead verbal diarrhea") is now called "The Gish Gallop.". Ever since, it became the go-to drama generating technique for Creationists, conspiracy nuts and whackaloons everywhere. By inventing the Gish Gallop method, Gishbot finally achieved the immortality his religion failed to give him. The Gish Gallop is an underhanded punch to the beanbag, and is used almost exclusively by delusional douchenozzles. Strangely enough, it manages to merge several other "Internet Winning Debate Techniques" into one huge colon-blocking brick. It's a dozen Inane flames folded together. It's the verbal equivalent of the 50 Hitler Post and tl;dr Verbal DDOS Attack. In some ways it is also several nested copies of the Your argument is invalid gambit....turned inside-out and worn at a jaunty hat. Contents 1 How to Perform the Gish Gallop 1.1 Main Steps 1.2 Outcome #1: Optimum WIN 1.3 Outcome #2: Self-Inflicted AssPwnage 2 What the Gish Gallop Looks Like in Action 3 People Who Use the Gish Gallop 4 Other Internet-winning debate techniques How to Perform the Gish Gallop Zero to Dickbag in under a paragraph. The Gish Gallop, although simple enough for even the most simple-minded to deploy, does require a bit of prep-work. Here's a step-by-step guide. Main Steps 1. Be passionately wrong about a subject you do not understand. 2. Challenge someone who holds a different opinion to a "formal" debate. 3. Write Down a List of 5 legitimate rebuttals to the opposing point of view. 4. Take the list from Step 3 and wipe your dirty arse with it. As a moron who uses the Gish Gallop, you will never have any use for it. 5. Write Down a List of 20 utterly stupid, fallacy-laden lies, ad-hominem insults and strawmen arguments that you could kinda, sorta pin on your opponents position. 6. Write Down 5 more utter non-sequitur "rebuttals" that are so deliberately broken, ****tarded and nonsensical that it would make the listener seriously wonder if you are actually speaking English. 7. Combine all 25 lies into a dense paragraph of nonsense. 8. Repeat steps 4-7 at least 4 more times. 9. When it comes time to offer your first point -- instead of making one single cogent point and then backing it up with common-sense evidence and argumentation (the way you should in a formal debate) -- blurt out one of your tangled, over-complicated hell-paragraphs of deranged horseshit, preferably in one sudden, breathless burst. 10. Then angrily insist that if your opponent can't debunk every single point (even the most clearly stupid ones) then the opponent has shown that your opponents position is wrong and yours is (somehow) right by default, and that anyone shows that you are wrong are liars from the butthole of Karl Marx. at this point one of two things will happen... Outcome #1: Optimum WIN 11a. Your opponent will be flustered, flabbergasted and stunned...unable to know where to start the time-consuming process of unsnarling your mass of self-contradicting balderdash. He will use all of his time on disproving the worst lies, and can not manage to defeat all of them. 12a. Declare Victory! or Outcome #2: Self-Inflicted AssPwnage 11b. Your opponent will see the few key traits that all your points have in common. Then he will handily disprove every single point by destroying the flimsy "foundation" these fallacies are heaped upon. Irretrievable pwnage occurs. The entire audience now sees you for the brain-damaged sham you are, and laughs and points. Then they throw rotten fruit at you and hoot like howler monkeys on Ecstasy. 12b. Pompously Declare Victory Anyway! It does not matter that your opponent is right; the mere fact that he is your opponent makes him a commie nazi pedo, so screw him and his "facts"! The super-retarded non-sequiturs from Step 6 are the secret evil heart of the Gish Gallop. Anyone who hears these will feel compelled to unpack and parse these lies first, but won't be able to. If done right, those lies will be too confusing, mystifying and complicated to debunk in the time allowed. This leaves the other 20 lies hanging in the air uncontested. This tricks the gullible or biased in the audience into thinking that those points were plausible after all. How to turn Thoughtful Debate into Brain-Hemorrhage Inducing Chaos “ "While you are tied down by pesky annoyances like Intellectual Integrity, Honesty and the Need to fully research and reference your claims, the Creationist is free to utilize their army of BS claims and logical fallacies...while you dash around trying to clean it all up." -- ThetaOmega, explaining why the Gish Gallop is so painful to deal with. "The Modus Operandi of the Creationist is to memorize a bunch of copypasta and find somebody to regurgitate it to." -- TruePooka on where the Gallop starts. What the Gish Gallop Looks Like in Action Moderator: Hi everyone. This is a debate between Prima and Secunda. The topic of the debate will be: "Does Capitalism Lead to Tooth Decay?" Prima will be Defending the Position that Capitalism does not lead to tooth decay, while Secunda will back up his assertion that it does cause tooth decay. Participants have requested the following format: Each will make one point in support of their contention, and have 3 minutes to defend why the contention is true. Then the opponent will have 3 minutes for rebuttal. So it will be Prima Point, Secunda Rebuttal....Secunda Point, Prima Rebuttal...Prima Point, Secunda Rebuttal...and so on. There will be six rounds in all and at the end each will have a 5 minute closing statement followed by questions from the audience. Participants have also requested that both parties stay on topic, and that both not deny the arguments of the opposition before the arguments are heard. We do of course expect the participants to obey the forum rules, so try to keep it clean and professional. Prima: Don't Worry. I will. Secunda: Let's get this going... Moderator: Good luck to both! Prima: Okay, first of all due to a more robust, decentralized economy more people have easier access to high quality dentistry and cheap teeth cleaning impliments (....and so on....after which Prima shows numerous peer-reviewed papers, statistics and testimonials by well-informed and trusted authorities.) Secunda: Capitalism is wrong because Jesus said it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to get into heaven! Tooth Decay is God's punishment for a sinful world! My Opponent merely wants to defy god by drinking soda pop and eating too much bad food, and that's why he supports Capitalism! If it were truly our place to choose our own economic system, we'd have perfect teeth instead of rotten sinful ones! You know who else had bad teeth? HITLER, That's who. That's why you never saw him smile, because you'd see his sinful teeth and he knew he should've been ashamed of them. And Hitler fought against Stalin, who fought against Capitalism....do you know WHY? Because Stalin KNEW that Communism cures Tooth Decay! You never see Buddhist Monks with bad teeth, that's because their religion demands that they never touch gold! And if you don't touch gold you can't engage in Capitalism! Jesus also had perfect teeth....and you might say that's because he's the perfect human who was actually God in disguise...but it was really because he threw the money-changers out of the temple! Tooth Decay is worse in people who eat alot of candy, and only someone who lives in a decadent Capitalist culture can (or wants to) overindulge in sweets! And let's not forget Gingivitus...which actually means "Money Filth Lust" in an ancient Mesopotamian Language that only smart people have ever heard of or understand! AND THAT my fellow Sinners is Why Capitalism Causes Tooth Decay! And if MY OPPONENT can't disprove every single point I've just made, then he is as Guilty for Apartheid as P.W. Botha was! I Defy you to Prove Me Wrong! (Secunda wheezes as he runs out of breath. Long moment of stunned silence, while Prima stands, mouth agape.) Prima: .... Moderator: Wait....Whut!? People Who Use the Gish Gallop Creationists Libertarians VenomFangX Conservatives Glenn Beck Liberals NephilimFree Liars Douchebags Kent Hovind Other Internet-winning debate techniques 50 Hitler Post What's the matter? Too DEEP for you? cool story bro GTFO Inane flame Occupatio tl;dr Your mom Your argument is invalid https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Gish_Gallop |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
ridewytepony
on
Mon 12/29/14 09:01 PM
|
|
Oh now I'm starting to understand were you are comming from..lol this could be fun...I see the light I'll be the strait guy "set up guy"
and you pick it and employ these tactics Your move punk..lol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't debate online.
Only face to face. That way, the tried and true method can be used. The "knock'em the **** out" method. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh since your are not going to start it I guess I will have to address the obvious.
What is really going on here. Its about ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gish Gallop Sometimes being foundationally and fractally wrong can help you in a "debate". "Dr." Duane "Blabberbot" Gish, the quick-tongued creatard looncase, invented a way to weaponize stupidity. His debate tactic (that used to be called "vomiting up brain-dead verbal diarrhea") is now called "The Gish Gallop.". Ever since, it became the go-to drama generating technique for Creationists, conspiracy nuts and whackaloons everywhere. By inventing the Gish Gallop method, Gishbot finally achieved the immortality his religion failed to give him. The Gish Gallop is an underhanded punch to the beanbag, and is used almost exclusively by delusional douchenozzles. Strangely enough, it manages to merge several other "Internet Winning Debate Techniques" into one huge colon-blocking brick. It's a dozen Inane flames folded together. It's the verbal equivalent of the 50 Hitler Post and tl;dr Verbal DDOS Attack. In some ways it is also several nested copies of the Your argument is invalid gambit....turned inside-out and worn at a jaunty hat. Contents 1 How to Perform the Gish Gallop 1.1 Main Steps 1.2 Outcome #1: Optimum WIN 1.3 Outcome #2: Self-Inflicted AssPwnage 2 What the Gish Gallop Looks Like in Action 3 People Who Use the Gish Gallop 4 Other Internet-winning debate techniques How to Perform the Gish Gallop Zero to Dickbag in under a paragraph. The Gish Gallop, although simple enough for even the most simple-minded to deploy, does require a bit of prep-work. Here's a step-by-step guide. Main Steps 1. Be passionately wrong about a subject you do not understand. 2. Challenge someone who holds a different opinion to a "formal" debate. 3. Write Down a List of 5 legitimate rebuttals to the opposing point of view. 4. Take the list from Step 3 and wipe your dirty arse with it. As a moron who uses the Gish Gallop, you will never have any use for it. 5. Write Down a List of 20 utterly stupid, fallacy-laden lies, ad-hominem insults and strawmen arguments that you could kinda, sorta pin on your opponents position. 6. Write Down 5 more utter non-sequitur "rebuttals" that are so deliberately broken, ****tarded and nonsensical that it would make the listener seriously wonder if you are actually speaking English. 7. Combine all 25 lies into a dense paragraph of nonsense. 8. Repeat steps 4-7 at least 4 more times. 9. When it comes time to offer your first point -- instead of making one single cogent point and then backing it up with common-sense evidence and argumentation (the way you should in a formal debate) -- blurt out one of your tangled, over-complicated hell-paragraphs of deranged horseshit, preferably in one sudden, breathless burst. 10. Then angrily insist that if your opponent can't debunk every single point (even the most clearly stupid ones) then the opponent has shown that your opponents position is wrong and yours is (somehow) right by default, and that anyone shows that you are wrong are liars from the butthole of Karl Marx. at this point one of two things will happen... Outcome #1: Optimum WIN 11a. Your opponent will be flustered, flabbergasted and stunned...unable to know where to start the time-consuming process of unsnarling your mass of self-contradicting balderdash. He will use all of his time on disproving the worst lies, and can not manage to defeat all of them. 12a. Declare Victory! or Outcome #2: Self-Inflicted AssPwnage 11b. Your opponent will see the few key traits that all your points have in common. Then he will handily disprove every single point by destroying the flimsy "foundation" these fallacies are heaped upon. Irretrievable pwnage occurs. The entire audience now sees you for the brain-damaged sham you are, and laughs and points. Then they throw rotten fruit at you and hoot like howler monkeys on Ecstasy. 12b. Pompously Declare Victory Anyway! It does not matter that your opponent is right; the mere fact that he is your opponent makes him a commie nazi pedo, so screw him and his "facts"! The super-retarded non-sequiturs from Step 6 are the secret evil heart of the Gish Gallop. Anyone who hears these will feel compelled to unpack and parse these lies first, but won't be able to. If done right, those lies will be too confusing, mystifying and complicated to debunk in the time allowed. This leaves the other 20 lies hanging in the air uncontested. This tricks the gullible or biased in the audience into thinking that those points were plausible after all. How to turn Thoughtful Debate into Brain-Hemorrhage Inducing Chaos “ "While you are tied down by pesky annoyances like Intellectual Integrity, Honesty and the Need to fully research and reference your claims, the Creationist is free to utilize their army of BS claims and logical fallacies...while you dash around trying to clean it all up." -- ThetaOmega, explaining why the Gish Gallop is so painful to deal with. "The Modus Operandi of the Creationist is to memorize a bunch of copypasta and find somebody to regurgitate it to." -- TruePooka on where the Gallop starts. What the Gish Gallop Looks Like in Action Moderator: Hi everyone. This is a debate between Prima and Secunda. The topic of the debate will be: "Does Capitalism Lead to Tooth Decay?" Prima will be Defending the Position that Capitalism does not lead to tooth decay, while Secunda will back up his assertion that it does cause tooth decay. Participants have requested the following format: Each will make one point in support of their contention, and have 3 minutes to defend why the contention is true. Then the opponent will have 3 minutes for rebuttal. So it will be Prima Point, Secunda Rebuttal....Secunda Point, Prima Rebuttal...Prima Point, Secunda Rebuttal...and so on. There will be six rounds in all and at the end each will have a 5 minute closing statement followed by questions from the audience. Participants have also requested that both parties stay on topic, and that both not deny the arguments of the opposition before the arguments are heard. We do of course expect the participants to obey the forum rules, so try to keep it clean and professional. Prima: Don't Worry. I will. Secunda: Let's get this going... Moderator: Good luck to both! Prima: Okay, first of all due to a more robust, decentralized economy more people have easier access to high quality dentistry and cheap teeth cleaning impliments (....and so on....after which Prima shows numerous peer-reviewed papers, statistics and testimonials by well-informed and trusted authorities.) Secunda: Capitalism is wrong because Jesus said it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to get into heaven! Tooth Decay is God's punishment for a sinful world! My Opponent merely wants to defy god by drinking soda pop and eating too much bad food, and that's why he supports Capitalism! If it were truly our place to choose our own economic system, we'd have perfect teeth instead of rotten sinful ones! You know who else had bad teeth? HITLER, That's who. That's why you never saw him smile, because you'd see his sinful teeth and he knew he should've been ashamed of them. And Hitler fought against Stalin, who fought against Capitalism....do you know WHY? Because Stalin KNEW that Communism cures Tooth Decay! You never see Buddhist Monks with bad teeth, that's because their religion demands that they never touch gold! And if you don't touch gold you can't engage in Capitalism! Jesus also had perfect teeth....and you might say that's because he's the perfect human who was actually God in disguise...but it was really because he threw the money-changers out of the temple! Tooth Decay is worse in people who eat alot of candy, and only someone who lives in a decadent Capitalist culture can (or wants to) overindulge in sweets! And let's not forget Gingivitus...which actually means "Money Filth Lust" in an ancient Mesopotamian Language that only smart people have ever heard of or understand! AND THAT my fellow Sinners is Why Capitalism Causes Tooth Decay! And if MY OPPONENT can't disprove every single point I've just made, then he is as Guilty for Apartheid as P.W. Botha was! I Defy you to Prove Me Wrong! (Secunda wheezes as he runs out of breath. Long moment of stunned silence, while Prima stands, mouth agape.) Prima: .... Moderator: Wait....Whut!? People Who Use the Gish Gallop Creationists Libertarians VenomFangX Conservatives Glenn Beck Liberals NephilimFree Liars Douchebags Kent Hovind Other Internet-winning debate techniques 50 Hitler Post What's the matter? Too DEEP for you? cool story bro GTFO Inane flame Occupatio tl;dr Your mom Your argument is invalid https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Gish_Gallop Can someone please translate/summarize this for me? I'm too lazy to read it all.... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
ridewytepony
on
Mon 12/29/14 11:23 PM
|
|
Weaponizing stupidity.
Like take a ridiculous losing side to debate and complicate it with about 25 lies frusterating you opponent . Basically baffle 'em with BS Burying them with so much crap they will be forced to only argue about 3-4 of the worst statments and them been so far away from cornering you so its like a win or declare victory because they're frustrated and give up. Its funny I want to try...too funny. It could make a awesome game I would like to try with TS Mindfreak |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
damn, cool post!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tantalizingly baffling. Lmfoa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So jibber jabber about jibber jabber |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The op needs to take it
to the game sec and give it a home Who will be the king/queen of confusion. It truley reminds me of "When relationships go bad" but it would be a nice spin to do it for laughter and reverse rolls. I think most people do it naturally in relationships it seems. like trying to discuss a current disagreement and people are throwing the past in from 6 years ago.. FN frustrating. But to stage it would be funny ..just to see what ridiculous thing would be brought forth. Especially if there was 2 of 3 going on at the same time.Im sure some would fall into the tar pit trap and get frustrated? I'm in 100%,I think I know a good thing when I see it? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can I have some popcorn while I'm trying to decipher the OP?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can I have some popcorn while I'm trying to decipher the OP? I can't even figure out the replies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can I have some popcorn while I'm trying to decipher the OP? I can't even figure out the replies.  ...I feel so much better now! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 "De bait! De bait!" 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can I have some popcorn while I'm trying to decipher the OP? I can't even figure out the replies. Too funny:~] Don't waist your time boggling down your pretty little head as to what would come naturally to your gender. Thats right, Dr Gush is a fraud!(Not to mention Monty Python) He stole these methods from his Girlfriends... or my girlfriends..anyways whomever stole who's girlfriend payed the price 10 fold.:~) The argument clinic ~Monty Python m.youtube.com/watch?v=kQFKtI6gn9Y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Republicans have been doing it for years!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Republicans have been doing it for years! yep..at least it feels good when you partner f* you
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gish Gallop Sometimes being foundationally and fractally wrong can help you in a "debate". "Dr." Duane "Blabberbot" Gish, the quick-tongued creatard looncase, invented a way to weaponize stupidity. His debate tactic (that used to be called "vomiting up brain-dead verbal diarrhea") is now called "The Gish Gallop.". Ever since, it became the go-to drama generating technique for Creationists, conspiracy nuts and whackaloons everywhere. By inventing the Gish Gallop method, Gishbot finally achieved the immortality his religion failed to give him. The Gish Gallop is an underhanded punch to the beanbag, and is used almost exclusively by delusional douchenozzles. Strangely enough, it manages to merge several other "Internet Winning Debate Techniques" into one huge colon-blocking brick. It's a dozen Inane flames folded together. It's the verbal equivalent of the 50 Hitler Post and tl;dr Verbal DDOS Attack. In some ways it is also several nested copies of the Your argument is invalid gambit....turned inside-out and worn at a jaunty hat. Contents 1 How to Perform the Gish Gallop 1.1 Main Steps 1.2 Outcome #1: Optimum WIN 1.3 Outcome #2: Self-Inflicted AssPwnage 2 What the Gish Gallop Looks Like in Action 3 People Who Use the Gish Gallop 4 Other Internet-winning debate techniques How to Perform the Gish Gallop Zero to Dickbag in under a paragraph. The Gish Gallop, although simple enough for even the most simple-minded to deploy, does require a bit of prep-work. Here's a step-by-step guide. Main Steps 1. Be passionately wrong about a subject you do not understand. 2. Challenge someone who holds a different opinion to a "formal" debate. 3. Write Down a List of 5 legitimate rebuttals to the opposing point of view. 4. Take the list from Step 3 and wipe your dirty arse with it. As a moron who uses the Gish Gallop, you will never have any use for it. 5. Write Down a List of 20 utterly stupid, fallacy-laden lies, ad-hominem insults and strawmen arguments that you could kinda, sorta pin on your opponents position. 6. Write Down 5 more utter non-sequitur "rebuttals" that are so deliberately broken, ****tarded and nonsensical that it would make the listener seriously wonder if you are actually speaking English. 7. Combine all 25 lies into a dense paragraph of nonsense. 8. Repeat steps 4-7 at least 4 more times. 9. When it comes time to offer your first point -- instead of making one single cogent point and then backing it up with common-sense evidence and argumentation (the way you should in a formal debate) -- blurt out one of your tangled, over-complicated hell-paragraphs of deranged horseshit, preferably in one sudden, breathless burst. 10. Then angrily insist that if your opponent can't debunk every single point (even the most clearly stupid ones) then the opponent has shown that your opponents position is wrong and yours is (somehow) right by default, and that anyone shows that you are wrong are liars from the butthole of Karl Marx. at this point one of two things will happen... Outcome #1: Optimum WIN 11a. Your opponent will be flustered, flabbergasted and stunned...unable to know where to start the time-consuming process of unsnarling your mass of self-contradicting balderdash. He will use all of his time on disproving the worst lies, and can not manage to defeat all of them. 12a. Declare Victory! or Outcome #2: Self-Inflicted AssPwnage 11b. Your opponent will see the few key traits that all your points have in common. Then he will handily disprove every single point by destroying the flimsy "foundation" these fallacies are heaped upon. Irretrievable pwnage occurs. The entire audience now sees you for the brain-damaged sham you are, and laughs and points. Then they throw rotten fruit at you and hoot like howler monkeys on Ecstasy. 12b. Pompously Declare Victory Anyway! It does not matter that your opponent is right; the mere fact that he is your opponent makes him a commie nazi pedo, so screw him and his "facts"! The super-retarded non-sequiturs from Step 6 are the secret evil heart of the Gish Gallop. Anyone who hears these will feel compelled to unpack and parse these lies first, but won't be able to. If done right, those lies will be too confusing, mystifying and complicated to debunk in the time allowed. This leaves the other 20 lies hanging in the air uncontested. This tricks the gullible or biased in the audience into thinking that those points were plausible after all. How to turn Thoughtful Debate into Brain-Hemorrhage Inducing Chaos “ "While you are tied down by pesky annoyances like Intellectual Integrity, Honesty and the Need to fully research and reference your claims, the Creationist is free to utilize their army of BS claims and logical fallacies...while you dash around trying to clean it all up." -- ThetaOmega, explaining why the Gish Gallop is so painful to deal with. "The Modus Operandi of the Creationist is to memorize a bunch of copypasta and find somebody to regurgitate it to." -- TruePooka on where the Gallop starts. What the Gish Gallop Looks Like in Action Moderator: Hi everyone. This is a debate between Prima and Secunda. The topic of the debate will be: "Does Capitalism Lead to Tooth Decay?" Prima will be Defending the Position that Capitalism does not lead to tooth decay, while Secunda will back up his assertion that it does cause tooth decay. Participants have requested the following format: Each will make one point in support of their contention, and have 3 minutes to defend why the contention is true. Then the opponent will have 3 minutes for rebuttal. So it will be Prima Point, Secunda Rebuttal....Secunda Point, Prima Rebuttal...Prima Point, Secunda Rebuttal...and so on. There will be six rounds in all and at the end each will have a 5 minute closing statement followed by questions from the audience. Participants have also requested that both parties stay on topic, and that both not deny the arguments of the opposition before the arguments are heard. We do of course expect the participants to obey the forum rules, so try to keep it clean and professional. Prima: Don't Worry. I will. Secunda: Let's get this going... Moderator: Good luck to both! Prima: Okay, first of all due to a more robust, decentralized economy more people have easier access to high quality dentistry and cheap teeth cleaning impliments (....and so on....after which Prima shows numerous peer-reviewed papers, statistics and testimonials by well-informed and trusted authorities.) Secunda: Capitalism is wrong because Jesus said it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to get into heaven! Tooth Decay is God's punishment for a sinful world! My Opponent merely wants to defy god by drinking soda pop and eating too much bad food, and that's why he supports Capitalism! If it were truly our place to choose our own economic system, we'd have perfect teeth instead of rotten sinful ones! You know who else had bad teeth? HITLER, That's who. That's why you never saw him smile, because you'd see his sinful teeth and he knew he should've been ashamed of them. And Hitler fought against Stalin, who fought against Capitalism....do you know WHY? Because Stalin KNEW that Communism cures Tooth Decay! You never see Buddhist Monks with bad teeth, that's because their religion demands that they never touch gold! And if you don't touch gold you can't engage in Capitalism! Jesus also had perfect teeth....and you might say that's because he's the perfect human who was actually God in disguise...but it was really because he threw the money-changers out of the temple! Tooth Decay is worse in people who eat alot of candy, and only someone who lives in a decadent Capitalist culture can (or wants to) overindulge in sweets! And let's not forget Gingivitus...which actually means "Money Filth Lust" in an ancient Mesopotamian Language that only smart people have ever heard of or understand! AND THAT my fellow Sinners is Why Capitalism Causes Tooth Decay! And if MY OPPONENT can't disprove every single point I've just made, then he is as Guilty for Apartheid as P.W. Botha was! I Defy you to Prove Me Wrong! (Secunda wheezes as he runs out of breath. Long moment of stunned silence, while Prima stands, mouth agape.) Prima: .... Moderator: Wait....Whut!? People Who Use the Gish Gallop Creationists Libertarians VenomFangX Conservatives Glenn Beck Liberals NephilimFree Liars Douchebags Kent Hovind Other Internet-winning debate techniques 50 Hitler Post What's the matter? Too DEEP for you? cool story bro GTFO Inane flame Occupatio tl;dr Your mom Your argument is invalid https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Gish_Gallop Can someone please translate/summarize this for me? I'm too lazy to read it all.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why is every post from the OP so long? I can't be arsed to read a post that long? Chill out and shorten them and maybe people will read them properly?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why is every post from the OP so long? I can't be arsed to read a post that long? Chill out and shorten them and maybe people will read them properly? ^^^ this .. I can't be arsed either I did however read a dig directed at my gender. We are not amused, Mr Pony!!   (giggles)
|
|
|
|
|
