100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Community > Posts By > Serchin4MyRedWine
|
Topic:
Cortez/Crowley
|
|
The most disturbing thing about her election and what it says about the Dems and the left-wing media is that she is a racist and called on people not to vote for Joe Crowley because he is WHITE.
I can't even Imagine what the outcry would be if a Republican candidate told people not to vote for their opponent because of the color of their skin. So many double standards on the left. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Cortez/Crowley
|
|
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a 28-year-old Latina running her first campaign, ousted 10-term incumbent Rep. Joe Crowley in New York's 14th congressional district.
This is a huge shocker for the Democrats. Rep. Joe Crowley was the #4 person of power in the Democrat House. This should scare Democrats on two fronts, She is a very far left-wing socialist and probably the most disturbing thing for Dems is that only 28,000 people showed up to vote! Where is the Blue wave? LMAO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Any man has the capacity to rape .. how many non immigrant rapes occur .. should we look at statistics ??? THOUSANDS of American CITIZENS are victims of horrendous crimes by ILLEGAL immigrants EVERY year. Rapes, Murders and maimed by DUI's and other crimes. The point is not how many Citizens commit these crimes,the point is we have enough crime by our own citizens, why add all these extra crimes on our citizens by illegals? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Weird question ..
Edited by
Serchin4MyRedWine
on
Tue 06/12/18 08:04 AM
|
|
Its been a very long time but yes I have tasted colostrum.
Just to clarify there is a big difference between colostrum and normal breast milk. Colostrum occurs during pregnancy and lasts just a few days after birth, it is thicker then the breast milk that is produced after the first few days after an infant is born. I have tried both 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genuine 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Cheating men
|
|
. I have a hard time understanding why happily married men can cheat and feel no guilt. Not only should they feel guilty about cheating on their wives and lying but they should also feel guilty about lying to the new women and leading her on, making her believe that he is available. I the end he will just break her heart. Shameful! I'm not sure a "happily" married man would cheat. Unhappy and discontented yes but also goes for women and wives too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
should the president be allowed to pardon himself? ____________________________________________________________________ If he burped, belched, sneezed or passed wind... certainly he has that right...and he should. Its the polite thing to do, especially if he is in a big meeting or a elevator. imagine the headlines if he didn't pardon himself?.. especially with the last infraction. Thats probably all he is guilty of 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The whole question is really irrelevant, its just another bone Trump trows out to drive the left wing media bonkers. The Constitution gives the president the right to pardon anyone, period. Some scholars might disagree that it may not mean he can pardon himself but the real argument about this is just an exercise in futility because the Constitution also makes it clear that the President can NOT be indicted criminally as President so there is no need for a self pardon. The ONLY recourse against a sitting president is Impeachment and there is no pardon for that. Mueller has no power to indict or charge the President with any crime, period! kind of “Judgment in cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office … but the party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to law.” — Article I, section 9, U.S. Constitution the IMPEACHMENT process can only remove the POTUS, but the POTUS is THEN still liable to the proper authorities according to the law. so a POTUS can't be criminally charged while POTUS, but the removal from office allows for them to THEN be criminally charged. Impeachment is the process by the House to charge a government official(is not specific only to the president) with a crime like in the case of Clinton who was charged with perjury and obstruction. Then must go to the Senate to convict such official to remove them from office. This takes 2/3 majority vote and is typically presided over by the Senate President(the Vice President) or the Chief Justice. As in Clinton's case, he was in impeached but remained in office because as in most cases the Senate RARELY convicts. So even if the best wishes of the far left Dems came true and the very slim possiblity Trump was ever "impeached" he would never be"convicted"and removed from office by the Senate and thereby would never face criminal charges,Period! But,RARELY [NEVER!!!} have we EVER had a president actively collude with a foriegn government to interfere with out sacred election process,and turn our government into the circus that THIS ONE has,without evident qualm,regret,or hesitation!!! we have had them obstruct justice before,but trump has taken it to such levels that even his own party hates him,and all of the things that he has done to embarrass both our government,AND their party!!! i think that when it gets to the point that the impeachment vote goes to the senate,after robert mueller makes public the evidence that he has against trump,and ESPECIALLY after the midterm elections,then 'rarely' might not be quite so impossible to think of as you are hoping! and,THEN,like harmony said,and backed up with chapter and verse out of the constitution,i think that it will go to the indictment phase,and proceeed from there,or else it will be an even BIGGER stain on our government,AND the republican party,who has nurtured this viper to its bosom!! if trump is smart[and lucky enough to be given the option!],he will resign like nixon did,but i REALLY hope that they dont give him that option,cuz what he has done to our government,and our country is inexcusable,and i feel that he MUST be made an example of!!! [but,since when has trump ever done the 'smart' thing??] so,keep on telling yourself whatever you have to tell yourself to make it through the day!! Yeah keep watching CNN if it makes you feel informed. You have six top democrat prosecutors investigating this for over a year a not a single piece of evidence of colluding with a foreign government! Keep smoking what ever it is that makes you live in a fantasy land. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Serchin4MyRedWine
on
Wed 06/06/18 01:27 PM
|
|
The whole question is really irrelevant, its just another bone Trump trows out to drive the left wing media bonkers. The Constitution gives the president the right to pardon anyone, period. Some scholars might disagree that it may not mean he can pardon himself but the real argument about this is just an exercise in futility because the Constitution also makes it clear that the President can NOT be indicted criminally as President so there is no need for a self pardon. The ONLY recourse against a sitting president is Impeachment and there is no pardon for that. Mueller has no power to indict or charge the President with any crime, period! kind of “Judgment in cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office … but the party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to law.” — Article I, section 9, U.S. Constitution the IMPEACHMENT process can only remove the POTUS, but the POTUS is THEN still liable to the proper authorities according to the law. so a POTUS can't be criminally charged while POTUS, but the removal from office allows for them to THEN be criminally charged. Impeachment is the process by the House to charge a government official(is not specific only to the president) with a crime like in the case of Clinton who was charged with perjury and obstruction. Then must go to the Senate to convict such official to remove them from office. This takes 2/3 majority vote and is typically presided over by the Senate President(the Vice President) or the Chief Justice. As in Clinton's case, he was in impeached but remained in office because as in most cases the Senate RARELY convicts. So even if the best wishes of the far left Dems came true and the very slim possiblity Trump was ever "impeached" he would never be"convicted"and removed from office by the Senate and thereby would never face criminal charges,Period! slim is not none. This isnt a semen stain on a dress, this is potential ACTUAL CORRUPTION, colluding with foreign government to obstruct the federal elections. probably as likely as them finding any EVIDENCE that Hilary did anything illegal, but both sides still have their hopes ... History sets the example that no president gets removed, but it also set the example that no president has NO political or military experience, so in the new normal, anything is possible. There has and probably never will be any evidence of Collusion, which by the way is NOT a crime anyway. Also there has been no evidence of CORRUPTION either. As long as this hoax investigation has been going on and how many leaks there have been, if there was ANY evidence of ANY crime it would have been leaked by now. The only Crimes that have been committed during the campaign have been by the FBI and DOJ. The IG (a democrat inspector general) has referred the deputy director of the FBI for criminal charges. Comey is next for as the IG report says "insubordination". This IG report of 500 pages will expose just how CORRUPT Obama's administration really was. All Mueller has gotten are crimes committed almost 20 years ago by Manafort(which were investigated in 2005 and cleared of), a simple perjury charge against Flynn which by the way the FBI testified they didn't think he lied. This whole thing run by Six Democrats all linked to Hillary smells so bad its impossible to tell how much damage it has done to the rule of law in our country. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The whole question is really irrelevant, its just another bone Trump trows out to drive the left wing media bonkers. The Constitution gives the president the right to pardon anyone, period. Some scholars might disagree that it may not mean he can pardon himself but the real argument about this is just an exercise in futility because the Constitution also makes it clear that the President can NOT be indicted criminally as President so there is no need for a self pardon. The ONLY recourse against a sitting president is Impeachment and there is no pardon for that. Mueller has no power to indict or charge the President with any crime, period! kind of “Judgment in cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office … but the party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to law.” — Article I, section 9, U.S. Constitution the IMPEACHMENT process can only remove the POTUS, but the POTUS is THEN still liable to the proper authorities according to the law. so a POTUS can't be criminally charged while POTUS, but the removal from office allows for them to THEN be criminally charged. Impeachment is the process by the House to charge a government official(is not specific only to the president) with a crime like in the case of Clinton who was charged with perjury and obstruction. Then must go to the Senate to convict such official to remove them from office. This takes 2/3 majority vote and is typically presided over by the Senate President(the Vice President) or the Chief Justice. As in Clinton's case, he was in impeached but remained in office because as in most cases the Senate RARELY convicts. So even if the best wishes of the far left Dems came true and the very slim possiblity Trump was ever "impeached" he would never be"convicted"and removed from office by the Senate and thereby would never face criminal charges,Period! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The whole question is really irrelevant, its just another bone Trump trows out to drive the left wing media bonkers.
The Constitution gives the president the right to pardon anyone, period. Some scholars might disagree that it may not mean he can pardon himself but the real argument about this is just an exercise in futility because the Constitution also makes it clear that the President can NOT be indicted criminally as President so there is no need for a self pardon. The ONLY recourse against a sitting president is Impeachment and there is no pardon for that. Mueller has no power to indict or charge the President with any crime, period! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Science
|
|
Is science coming close to the point where it can replace religion in the near future? Science will never replace religion but it certainly can change it. Only a few hundred years ago it was blasphemy to most religions and societies to say the earth was not the center of the universe. This is just one small example. Science has proven a lot of what is said in the bible as false. Every "religion" has evolved over time, their laws or rules change by societal influence(like gay marriage)or scientific findings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
fears from marriage
|
|
Don't know about the laws where you are from but here in the U.S. there is no need or logical reason to marry unless you plan to have children.
As a married couple you pay more in taxes then if you remain single. And of course it can be quite expense to divorce if it doesn't work out. Move in together and enjoy the relationship as long as it lasts, if you two get pregnant then you may decide its worth getting hitched. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Need some advice
|
|
You will love Florida! I moved here about 30 years ago and have no regrets. Not particularly fond of the Miami area but there are some really nice places just north or south of there.
You may find that you will get into things like salt water fishing, jet skiing, boating, scuba etc etc that you really can't do in Nevada(spent some time there too). We also have casinos if your into that LOL. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
First Real Cruise
|
|
In my experience all cruises include food but alcohol usually is the biggest expense, so it's good you got that included in your plan.
Most ships also have casinos so if you like to try your luck then plan for some extra money for that. Once on land, it depends on what you might want to buy as souvenirs in remembrance of your experience. Whether on the ship or on land you can use your credit card but depending on your destinations, sometimes using US cash can bargain down prices in certain situations Have Fun..cruises are great!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
The real thing 😍
|
|
Ok this has got me curious now but i dont want to pry. I just hope something good came out of your experience sir. Would you say you had the real thing back then? Sceptical  First, you never have to worry about "prying", I'm an open book and will always try to answer questions asked of me Second, I want to say something about you calling me "sir". This has to do with the great experience I have had with people from your country and it's culture. I have traveled extensively most of my adult life and I must say that the Filipino people are the friendliest, warmest, genuine and civil people I have ever met! After the long flight to Manila I was exhausted but still needed to get to the island of Mindanao, the southern most island. I was excited yet had some trepidation because the terror group abu sayyaf was still fairly active on that island. Anyway, once I finally got to my destination, a small town or barrio as they call them there, it was beautiful! Lush rain forest and simple homes. It was like going back in time. As many had electricity and the ones who had money also had modern things like T.V and laptops etc but a lot of them still bathed and washed clothes in the crystal clear streams and if you didn't have internet a walk to town had internet cafe's. But what really stands out is the beauty of the people. They have a deep human connection that a lot of western countries have lost because of high tech, materialism and immediate gratification expectations. Their morals, manners,honesty, integrity and civility toward each other and strong bonds of family was incredibly refreshing in a world that has left a lot of those values behind. In Short, I fell in love with the country and it's people! So to answer your question, a lot of great things came out of my experience(as stated above) and yes, I had the real thing back then, but then again there are things that can make being together very difficult. I wanted to message you and give you some tips and options about different visa processes etc but your filters don't allow that so I hope This helps you and anyone contemplating traveling or dating someone in the Philippines. I am glad to hear about your experience here in the Philippines and your impression of us quite true and flattering  hopefully someday you can visit again and see the changes that has happened but with the people basically the same  long distance is really hard huh. Thanks for sharing your experience sir After re-reading what I wrote, I guess I did give the impression to some that All of the country was as described. I just want to point out to the readers that there are MANY modern cities like Manila, Cebu and Davao just to name a very few that have all the amenities of modern large cities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
The real thing 😍
|
|
Ok this has got me curious now but i dont want to pry. I just hope something good came out of your experience sir. Would you say you had the real thing back then? Sceptical First, you never have to worry about "prying", I'm an open book and will always try to answer questions asked of me Second, I want to say something about you calling me "sir". This has to do with the great experience I have had with people from your country and it's culture. I have traveled extensively most of my adult life and I must say that the Filipino people are the friendliest, warmest, genuine and civil people I have ever met! After the long flight to Manila I was exhausted but still needed to get to the island of Mindanao, the southern most island. I was excited yet had some trepidation because the terror group abu sayyaf was still fairly active on that island. Anyway, once I finally got to my destination, a small town or barrio as they call them there, it was beautiful! Lush rain forest and simple homes. It was like going back in time. As many had electricity and the ones who had money also had modern things like T.V and laptops etc but a lot of them still bathed and washed clothes in the crystal clear streams and if you didn't have internet a walk to town had internet cafe's. But what really stands out is the beauty of the people. They have a deep human connection that a lot of western countries have lost because of high tech, materialism and immediate gratification expectations. Their morals, manners,honesty, integrity and civility toward each other and strong bonds of family was incredibly refreshing in a world that has left a lot of those values behind. In Short, I fell in love with the country and it's people! So to answer your question, a lot of great things came out of my experience(as stated above) and yes, I had the real thing back then, but then again there are things that can make being together very difficult. I wanted to message you and give you some tips and options about different visa processes etc but your filters don't allow that so I hope This helps you and anyone contemplating traveling or dating someone in the Philippines. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do have any family? Brothers or sisters that you can stay with or they can stay with you for a few days to try to determine what the hell is going on in your life?
Your parents or family would be the right people to help you instead of we strangers who know nothing about your history and could be suggesting things that make your problems or paranoia worse! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
LDS
|
|
I don't think any Christian who believes in God and Christ or any serious religion or faith for that matter, should place some kind of mandate, time table or pressure of any kind on anyone to join their faith.
If they truly believe in God and Christ then they know it will be in HIS hands at His Time and will, not some arbitrary time set by an "elder". JMO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wonder he has ever seen a "Queen"bee?
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
