Topic: Only 39 Percent Would Vote to Re-Elect Obama in 2012
Goofball73's photo
Wed 10/06/10 08:33 PM
Vote for Pedro! :thumbsup:

AndyBgood's photo
Wed 10/06/10 10:42 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFNQBTOVF4o


One more time!



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKosxf914ps

OH MY! Typical White Person!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySM63ES8t4U

A little more with his reverend spewing his hatred...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H64yKJhB528

Such a Bull S artist!

d24's photo
Wed 10/06/10 11:06 PM
God Damn America! Wright Is going to Hell In A Hand Basket! I would also love to Lance that Easy Button on the side of Obamas Nose.

ethan1100's photo
Wed 10/06/10 11:40 PM
Can't we all just get along...haha

msharmony's photo
Thu 10/07/10 12:13 AM

Anybody that votes for Obama needs their heads examined!



my head is fine, I havent been presented with what I feel is a better alternative,,,

msharmony's photo
Thu 10/07/10 12:15 AM

:thumbsup: I mean Is there any Question at all?


apparently, 41 percent strongly disapprove by todays ras poll which leaves a potential 59 percent which will re elect,,,

and again, all this is still only a snapshost and not absolutely indicative of what feelings will be 24 more months from now,,,,

willing2's photo
Thu 10/07/10 07:30 AM
Edited by willing2 on Thu 10/07/10 07:41 AM
100% of me didn't vote for H the first time. 100% of me wouldn't vote for him again.

The real, experienced alternatives weren't given equal time.




Rachel78745's photo
Thu 10/07/10 07:33 AM

100% of me didn't vote for H the first time. 100% of me wouldn't vote for him again.

The real, experienced alternatives weren't given equal time.

Democrats seem to be stuck-on-stupid.


Yep :thumbsup:

That's another phrase we use here in Texas LOL

Giocamo's photo
Thu 10/07/10 08:19 AM
he inherited it ?...last time I looked...he was a Senator for 4 years...so his he was a part of the problem...well...he was elected to fix it and he's made everything worse...

msharmony's photo
Thu 10/07/10 10:24 AM
Edited by msharmony on Thu 10/07/10 10:30 AM

he inherited it ?...last time I looked...he was a Senator for 4 years...so his he was a part of the problem...well...he was elected to fix it and he's made everything worse...


come on now,, with that kind of logic, there could be no more bipartisan arguments about which party is 'better',,, as it takes a government of democrats and republicans to accomplish anything


with THAT type of logic, both parties are responsible,,,,we cant have that now can we?

at this point I am voting OBama unless I see what I think is a better candidate

Lpdon's photo
Thu 10/07/10 11:06 AM

Vote for Pedro! :thumbsup:


I'm voting for Trump!

Lpdon's photo
Thu 10/07/10 11:09 AM

he inherited it ?...last time I looked...he was a Senator for 4 years...so his he was a part of the problem...well...he was elected to fix it and he's made everything worse...


He was a Senator for two years then campaigner for the rest of his term. He missed more votes and hearings then ANY other Senator.

msharmony's photo
Thu 10/07/10 11:39 AM
Edited by msharmony on Thu 10/07/10 11:40 AM
illinois senate 1996
us senate 2004

he has several years experience as a senator, just not a US senator

KerryO's photo
Thu 10/07/10 02:00 PM







And if an indictment for murder was even remotely similar to being elected President of the United States by a landslide, that statement might mean something.


-Kerry O.

In the context it was used in it did go perfectly. Sorry it went over your head.


'Fraid not, mon cherie. It was an obvious attempt to 'poison the well', a common debating tactic amongst the loud and less adept at making a case based on merits. But that's Birthers for you-- anyone who doesn't see things their way is an idiot.

Which is why Birther-in-Chief Orly Taitz was cited for contempt of court. You know, if you really feel this strongly about it and aren't just blowing smoke, why don't you exercise your Constitutional right to seek redress in the courts? Take him to court. Or write your Republican Congressperson and DEMAND they impeach Obama when they win a majority in the House this fall. I mean really, you already have half the posters in the Current Events forum on Mingle^2 convinced, right? :) What could go wrong?


-Kerry O.


LOL rofl

Nice try, but you still missed the point. I have grown weary of arguing people who are incapable of offering a legitimate argument. Personal attacks and opinions are useless on me. I am above that type of petty arguing.


Obviously not. Most of your answers include posturing and veiled insults. Like this one.

Newsflash: The Internet is lousy with snarky posters who say they are soooooo weary--but nobody gives a crap about that sort of posturing. They only care about what you write, not how smart you contend you are or pretend to be. Or your history at getting people to see your point of view on loud rhetoric as opposed to through persuasion based on verifiable facts.

And history has shown me that the Birther movement is one big loud Fail. Not a single court has rendered a verdict in the Birthers' favor.


-Kerry O.

-Kerry O.

KerryO's photo
Thu 10/07/10 02:02 PM


he inherited it ?...last time I looked...he was a Senator for 4 years...so his he was a part of the problem...well...he was elected to fix it and he's made everything worse...


He was a Senator for two years then campaigner for the rest of his term. He missed more votes and hearings then ANY other Senator.


Quick. Tell us how many days Bush spent on vacation away from Washington D.C.

He displaced Reagan as 'The Vacation President'.


-Kerry O.

Rachel78745's photo
Thu 10/07/10 02:35 PM








And if an indictment for murder was even remotely similar to being elected President of the United States by a landslide, that statement might mean something.


-Kerry O.

In the context it was used in it did go perfectly. Sorry it went over your head.


'Fraid not, mon cherie. It was an obvious attempt to 'poison the well', a common debating tactic amongst the loud and less adept at making a case based on merits. But that's Birthers for you-- anyone who doesn't see things their way is an idiot.

Which is why Birther-in-Chief Orly Taitz was cited for contempt of court. You know, if you really feel this strongly about it and aren't just blowing smoke, why don't you exercise your Constitutional right to seek redress in the courts? Take him to court. Or write your Republican Congressperson and DEMAND they impeach Obama when they win a majority in the House this fall. I mean really, you already have half the posters in the Current Events forum on Mingle^2 convinced, right? :) What could go wrong?


-Kerry O.


LOL rofl

Nice try, but you still missed the point. I have grown weary of arguing people who are incapable of offering a legitimate argument. Personal attacks and opinions are useless on me. I am above that type of petty arguing.


Obviously not. Most of your answers include posturing and veiled insults. Like this one.

Newsflash: The Internet is lousy with snarky posters who say they are soooooo weary--but nobody gives a crap about that sort of posturing. They only care about what you write, not how smart you contend you are or pretend to be. Or your history at getting people to see your point of view on loud rhetoric as opposed to through persuasion based on verifiable facts.

And history has shown me that the Birther movement is one big loud Fail. Not a single court has rendered a verdict in the Birthers' favor.


-Kerry O.

-Kerry O.


LOL I am the only one who posted facts. Is your tactic to try insulting me and distract from the truth that you have no valid point other than not liking me?
I tried to tell you that the personal attacks won't bother me. It only shows me how desperate and angry you truly are. That may work with other people from here but not me.

Rachel78745's photo
Thu 10/07/10 02:40 PM



he inherited it ?...last time I looked...he was a Senator for 4 years...so his he was a part of the problem...well...he was elected to fix it and he's made everything worse...


He was a Senator for two years then campaigner for the rest of his term. He missed more votes and hearings then ANY other Senator.


Quick. Tell us how many days Bush spent on vacation away from Washington D.C.

He displaced Reagan as 'The Vacation President'.


-Kerry O.



Nice there you go again! Avoid the point and try to distract instead of facing the actual comment. indifferent

Thats not how you debate, where are your facts? Disproving what the point of that quote meant. This sounds familiar.....Thats how my 5 year old daughter debates. I say you were wrong for hitting, savanah say's "but he was mean to me yesterday". Thats when I explain to her that OTHER people's actions do NOT excuse our own, nor does it make them any less wrong.

d24's photo
Thu 10/07/10 02:41 PM









And if an indictment for murder was even remotely similar to being elected President of the United States by a landslide, that statement might mean something.


-Kerry O.

In the context it was used in it did go perfectly. Sorry it went over your head.


'Fraid not, mon cherie. It was an obvious attempt to 'poison the well', a common debating tactic amongst the loud and less adept at making a case based on merits. But that's Birthers for you-- anyone who doesn't see things their way is an idiot.

Which is why Birther-in-Chief Orly Taitz was cited for contempt of court. You know, if you really feel this strongly about it and aren't just blowing smoke, why don't you exercise your Constitutional right to seek redress in the courts? Take him to court. Or write your Republican Congressperson and DEMAND they impeach Obama when they win a majority in the House this fall. I mean really, you already have half the posters in the Current Events forum on Mingle^2 convinced, right? :) What could go wrong?


-Kerry O.


LOL rofl

Nice try, but you still missed the point. I have grown weary of arguing people who are incapable of offering a legitimate argument. Personal attacks and opinions are useless on me. I am above that type of petty arguing.


Obviously not. Most of your answers include posturing and veiled insults. Like this one.

Newsflash: The Internet is lousy with snarky posters who say they are soooooo weary--but nobody gives a crap about that sort of posturing. They only care about what you write, not how smart you contend you are or pretend to be. Or your history at getting people to see your point of view on loud rhetoric as opposed to through persuasion based on verifiable facts.

And history has shown me that the Birther movement is one big loud Fail. Not a single court has rendered a verdict in the Birthers' favor.


-Kerry O.

-Kerry O.


LOL I am the only one who posted facts. Is your tactic to try insulting me and distract from the truth that you have no valid point other than not liking me?
I tried to tell you that the personal attacks won't bother me. It only shows me how desperate and angry you truly are. That may work with other people from here but not me.
:thumbsup: Some love to beat around the bush.

Lpdon's photo
Thu 10/07/10 08:24 PM









And if an indictment for murder was even remotely similar to being elected President of the United States by a landslide, that statement might mean something.


-Kerry O.

In the context it was used in it did go perfectly. Sorry it went over your head.


'Fraid not, mon cherie. It was an obvious attempt to 'poison the well', a common debating tactic amongst the loud and less adept at making a case based on merits. But that's Birthers for you-- anyone who doesn't see things their way is an idiot.

Which is why Birther-in-Chief Orly Taitz was cited for contempt of court. You know, if you really feel this strongly about it and aren't just blowing smoke, why don't you exercise your Constitutional right to seek redress in the courts? Take him to court. Or write your Republican Congressperson and DEMAND they impeach Obama when they win a majority in the House this fall. I mean really, you already have half the posters in the Current Events forum on Mingle^2 convinced, right? :) What could go wrong?


-Kerry O.


LOL rofl

Nice try, but you still missed the point. I have grown weary of arguing people who are incapable of offering a legitimate argument. Personal attacks and opinions are useless on me. I am above that type of petty arguing.


Obviously not. Most of your answers include posturing and veiled insults. Like this one.

Newsflash: The Internet is lousy with snarky posters who say they are soooooo weary--but nobody gives a crap about that sort of posturing. They only care about what you write, not how smart you contend you are or pretend to be. Or your history at getting people to see your point of view on loud rhetoric as opposed to through persuasion based on verifiable facts.

And history has shown me that the Birther movement is one big loud Fail. Not a single court has rendered a verdict in the Birthers' favor.


-Kerry O.

-Kerry O.


LOL I am the only one who posted facts. Is your tactic to try insulting me and distract from the truth that you have no valid point other than not liking me?
I tried to tell you that the personal attacks won't bother me. It only shows me how desperate and angry you truly are. That may work with other people from here but not me.


Actually there are a few of us here who post facts. Me, d24, KingsKnight, Willing, Moe, Dodo and a coupple others.......

Even Kim has her moments! bigsmile

Lpdon's photo
Thu 10/07/10 08:25 PM










And if an indictment for murder was even remotely similar to being elected President of the United States by a landslide, that statement might mean something.


-Kerry O.

In the context it was used in it did go perfectly. Sorry it went over your head.


'Fraid not, mon cherie. It was an obvious attempt to 'poison the well', a common debating tactic amongst the loud and less adept at making a case based on merits. But that's Birthers for you-- anyone who doesn't see things their way is an idiot.

Which is why Birther-in-Chief Orly Taitz was cited for contempt of court. You know, if you really feel this strongly about it and aren't just blowing smoke, why don't you exercise your Constitutional right to seek redress in the courts? Take him to court. Or write your Republican Congressperson and DEMAND they impeach Obama when they win a majority in the House this fall. I mean really, you already have half the posters in the Current Events forum on Mingle^2 convinced, right? :) What could go wrong?


-Kerry O.


LOL rofl

Nice try, but you still missed the point. I have grown weary of arguing people who are incapable of offering a legitimate argument. Personal attacks and opinions are useless on me. I am above that type of petty arguing.


Obviously not. Most of your answers include posturing and veiled insults. Like this one.

Newsflash: The Internet is lousy with snarky posters who say they are soooooo weary--but nobody gives a crap about that sort of posturing. They only care about what you write, not how smart you contend you are or pretend to be. Or your history at getting people to see your point of view on loud rhetoric as opposed to through persuasion based on verifiable facts.

And history has shown me that the Birther movement is one big loud Fail. Not a single court has rendered a verdict in the Birthers' favor.


-Kerry O.

-Kerry O.


LOL I am the only one who posted facts. Is your tactic to try insulting me and distract from the truth that you have no valid point other than not liking me?
I tried to tell you that the personal attacks won't bother me. It only shows me how desperate and angry you truly are. That may work with other people from here but not me.
:thumbsup: Some love to beat around the bush.


Or some just make stuff up, thrive on conspiracy theroys and just filled with hate.