Topic: There is no God?
no photo
Wed 09/30/15 08:59 PM



lol, thats my point, there is no point to any of it... someone says "this is what god/allah/buddha/whoever wants", i'm just supposed to say "oh, ok, i'll do whatever you want"... why would god talk with anyone else? if a god wanted me to believe, then a god needs to see me in person, not send a "representative"... so that being said, no one can convince me with words, other than a god itself...


So the issue is more because you dont see reason to believe in what people have to say about God.
You want him to be the one who would actually talk to you about himself.

no photo
Wed 09/30/15 09:05 PM
Edited by Pansytilly on Wed 09/30/15 09:06 PM

I personally do believe in a God.

The reason I believe is because of the existence of love.

love is counter-intuitive to our very survival as a species, it makes zero sense for love to exist.


If our whole purpose is survival what would be wrong with rape? our survival and the continuation of our species should be the our goal then...so logically speaking rape would be good for our survival...

But most of us would agree rape is very bad, it's not 'right' why do we know things like this even if they are never taught to us?

In even very remote tribes their is systems that 'respect elders' why? again if our only purpose is survival it would make sense to weed out the elderly(weak), but we don't do this. Instead we form bonds between parents, children, spouses, friends, etc....what is the purpose of those?


I personally believe a God exists, because the evidence exists that we have a purpose other than survival, and personally i'm curious to figure out exactly what that purpose is.


Yes. That is also why i ask the question.
We kill off each other because of survival. The eternal rat race. We want to come out on top and be able to assert ourselves, financially, sexually, reputation, power...etc...
I dont see the point of denying God's existence while at the same time blaming him for the atrocities human nature is capable of for the sake of survival...

isaac_dede's photo
Wed 09/30/15 09:38 PM


I personally do believe in a God.

The reason I believe is because of the existence of love.

love is counter-intuitive to our very survival as a species, it makes zero sense for love to exist.


If our whole purpose is survival what would be wrong with rape? our survival and the continuation of our species should be the our goal then...so logically speaking rape would be good for our survival...

But most of us would agree rape is very bad, it's not 'right' why do we know things like this even if they are never taught to us?

In even very remote tribes their is systems that 'respect elders' why? again if our only purpose is survival it would make sense to weed out the elderly(weak), but we don't do this. Instead we form bonds between parents, children, spouses, friends, etc....what is the purpose of those?


I personally believe a God exists, because the evidence exists that we have a purpose other than survival, and personally i'm curious to figure out exactly what that purpose is.


Yes. That is also why i ask the question.
We kill off each other because of survival. The eternal rat race. We want to come out on top and be able to assert ourselves, financially, sexually, reputation, power...etc...
I dont see the point of denying God's existence while at the same time blaming him for the atrocities human nature is capable of for the sake of survival...


Personally I don't believe it's purely for survival, we have choices. Also in order for us to recognize what love is, evil has to exist.

I know many people always say that if their is a God then why do bad things happen...i've heard it so much from so many...and have asked the same question myself many many times. But I realized, he has too, because he gave us a choice.

Consider the following the example.

A mother really really wants her daughter to be healthy, she removes any unhealthy food from the house, she homeschool's her daughter so she is can't choose bad food at school. The mother get's an online job so she can't be tempted by bad food...etc...basically sure ensures that wherever her daughter is, for the rest of her life, that their is only healthy food available, and the amount is regulated by an always present nutritionist.

So now here is the question, does the daughter understand the benefits of healthy eating? does she understand the consequences of unhealthy eating? Would she even know what 'unhealthy' meant?

Personally I'd say no.

But on the other hand, if you have a mother who keeps both unhealthy and healthy food in the house, explains the differences to her daughter, and teaches her about each then let's her choose, i'm sure the mother is proud when her daughter makes the right decision, but in order for that moment to possible, one must have the choice to make the wrong decision...and unfortunately that decision can hurt someone else. Yes it sucks, but it has to be able to happen for choice to truly exist.

no photo
Wed 09/30/15 09:43 PM

I personally believe a God exists, because the evidence exists that we have a purpose other than survival, and personally i'm curious to figure out exactly what that purpose is.




From what I read in the Bible, I believe we have the potential to become "sons of God" probably to populate the universe. Christ was the first to be resurrected and there will be two more resurrections.

Romans 8:29

For those God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brothers and sisters.

Colossians 1:18

And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

no photo
Wed 09/30/15 09:47 PM



I personally do believe in a God.

The reason I believe is because of the existence of love.

love is counter-intuitive to our very survival as a species, it makes zero sense for love to exist.


If our whole purpose is survival what would be wrong with rape? our survival and the continuation of our species should be the our goal then...so logically speaking rape would be good for our survival...

But most of us would agree rape is very bad, it's not 'right' why do we know things like this even if they are never taught to us?

In even very remote tribes their is systems that 'respect elders' why? again if our only purpose is survival it would make sense to weed out the elderly(weak), but we don't do this. Instead we form bonds between parents, children, spouses, friends, etc....what is the purpose of those?


I personally believe a God exists, because the evidence exists that we have a purpose other than survival, and personally i'm curious to figure out exactly what that purpose is.


Yes. That is also why i ask the question.
We kill off each other because of survival. The eternal rat race. We want to come out on top and be able to assert ourselves, financially, sexually, reputation, power...etc...
I dont see the point of denying God's existence while at the same time blaming him for the atrocities human nature is capable of for the sake of survival...


Personally I don't believe it's purely for survival, we have choices. Also in order for us to recognize what love is, evil has to exist.

I know many people always say that if their is a God then why do bad things happen...i've heard it so much from so many...and have asked the same question myself many many times. But I realized, he has too, because he gave us a choice.

Consider the following the example.

A mother really really wants her daughter to be healthy, she removes any unhealthy food from the house, she homeschool's her daughter so she is can't choose bad food at school. The mother get's an online job so she can't be tempted by bad food...etc...basically sure ensures that wherever her daughter is, for the rest of her life, that their is only healthy food available, and the amount is regulated by an always present nutritionist.

So now here is the question, does the daughter understand the benefits of healthy eating? does she understand the consequences of unhealthy eating? Would she even know what 'unhealthy' meant?

Personally I'd say no.

But on the other hand, if you have a mother who keeps both unhealthy and healthy food in the house, explains the differences to her daughter, and teaches her about each then let's her choose, i'm sure the mother is proud when her daughter makes the right decision, but in order for that moment to possible, one must have the choice to make the wrong decision...and unfortunately that decision can hurt someone else. Yes it sucks, but it has to be able to happen for choice to truly exist.


I agree.
Free will is a gift from God.
What we choose to do with it in light of the situation we find ourselves in, partially defines the quality of a relationship with him.

LUNG1954's photo
Wed 09/30/15 11:37 PM


I only want to find out and understand why some people choose to believe that there is no such thing as God.

I just know that god is not a thing ( Material),but I believe strongly that it does exist.
I know the different reasons too for what different people believes that it doesn't exist....and I always prefer to leave it to their own intellect.

I personally believe God exists. Believers will lose nothing and they get His love and assistants. Disbelievers will get nothing and lose His love, getting harsh punishment instead.

Quran 31; But if any reject the Faith, let not his rejection grieve you: for to Us they shall return, and We shall tell them the truth about their deeds: for God knows well all that is in the human hearts -- (23) We shall let them enjoy themselves for a little while, but then We shall drive them to a harsh punishment. (24)
Quran 10: Say, Those who invent falsehoods about God shall not prosper. (69) Their portion is short-lived enjoyment in this world; but to Us they shall return. Then We shall make them taste a severe punishment, because of their denial of truth. (70)
Bible;Revelation 21:8
But as for the cowardly, the faithless, the detestable, as for murderers, the sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars, their portion will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur, which is the second death.

rug212001's photo
Thu 10/01/15 02:08 AM
Edited by rug212001 on Thu 10/01/15 02:10 AM



I only want to find out and understand why some people choose to believe that there is no such thing as God.


I can only comment on my own point of view and how I got to being an atheist.

First off, I do not discount the possibility of god. However, I have not seen any reason to believe in one.

I have studied religious text most of my life and I find constrictions, immoral behavior, and many just plain absurdities from god in all that I have studied. Therefore, I cannot believe in it.


Absurd, how so?
Even people, governments, societies have absurdities, constrictions, immoral behavior...doesnt make any of it untrue, or unreal or unbelievable...? Doesnt even make it unacceptable, i think..

My statement here was on based on the accounts of the gods I have read about in many religious text over the years and about the god character in these text. For example, the bible says god is the highest good then he kills almost everyone on the planet. That is a combination of an absurdity, an immoral behavior, and a contradiction of himself. I would think that a book that is even inspired by god would be free of these contradictions.



I have researched all the known historical evidence of how the religious text I have studied came into being and how the came into use. I have not found evidence for any divine intervention with this research. Therefore, I cannot believe in it.


What kind of evidence are you looking for?

I'm looking for anything that could not be explained by someone just writing a story.



I look at history and see all the horrible things that have been done in the name of god. I look at current events and see all the horrible things that are currently being done in the name of god. Therefore, I cannot believe in it.


I think God is mostly just used as a scapegoat for both ends...
If someone were to do something as evil in the name of a god they believe in, but in reality only wanted to advance themselves...How is it different from someone who does something good in the name of a god, but in reality, suffers for it?
Is the existence of God dependent on what other people do?

I agree that god is used as an scapegoat. Of course the existence of god doesn't depend on what people do. However, when the people that are telling me god exist are the same people that treat others terribly it hurts the credibility of their claims.



I look at every "scientific proof" of god's existence and find it to be deeply flawed to the point I cannot justify calling it science.

This is true if your concept of God is one that hinges solely on science.

Science is the only thing that has been proven time and time again to produce an accurate picture of reality. This is because of the self correcting nature of science. It would also stand to reason that any god that answers prayers would be messerable. Prayer could be shown to work statistically better than chance. However, when these studies have been done. Prayer does no better than chance.



I talk to religious people and see that most of their beliefs come from one of two things.
1 - It's how they was raised and taught from a very young age.
2 - Personal revelation.
I have also found it is mainly a combination of both. While I was raised to believe in god, it fell apart when I studied.


I agree, it is a mix of both.
Some who were raised without learning any measure of faith in God, can eventually find him after all, God-willing.

Most of the time that doesn't happen when they have been raised to question and examine everything.



As for the personal revelation I think Matt Dillahunty summed it up much better than I ever could.

if there is a god, that god should know exactly what it would take to change my mind...and that god should be capable of doing whatever it would take. The fact that this hasn't happened can only mean one of two things:
1. No such god exists.
2. Whatever god exists doesn't care to convince me, at this time.


Since all other evidence has fallen short, I go with option 1.


His assumption actually removes personal accountability. Seems selfish and childish to be one sided and to put all the blame on God for something Matt chose on his own.
Kinda like how kids sometimes tell their parents " if i am important to you, then you should do ____ to convince me, otherwise you are just full of it and there is no reason for me to believe you anymore "
Same reasoning with some toxic relationships..." If you love me, you'd do ___ to prove it "

So no matter what he does, if you dont want to believe or acknowledge it, nothing he does will ever convince you anyways...?

If god exist and wants to have a relationship with you. Wouldn't it make sense for him to first establish the fact that he exist?

Neither of your analogies are the same as what Mr. Dillahunty said. The child's parents have already been proven to exist as far as the child is concerned. Same goes for the toxic relationships analogy.

A closer analogy is like being in school and the boy that has never had a girlfriend says he has a girlfriend, but you wouldn't know her because she goes to another school. Then provides no other credible evidence. While it could be true, is anyone likely to believe him?

prashant01's photo
Thu 10/01/15 06:46 AM


if there is a god, that god should know exactly what it would take to change my mind...and that god should be capable of doing whatever it would take. The fact that this hasn't happened can only mean one of two things:
1. No such god exists.
2. Whatever god exists doesn't care to convince me, at this time.


Since all other evidence has fallen short, I go with option 1.


Why shall god change your mind......
...Just to prove his capability?

Is your mind an unique & universally acceptable entity?

....some certifying agency??

Why shall he care to convince everyone for accepting his existence...particularly when he himself has created differently minded living beings..??

Whatever our thoughts are....those are originated from the soul...no one has yet proved the existence of soul too....that invisible driving power too is god's gift to you & god is making you think that he doesn't exist.




rug212001's photo
Thu 10/01/15 10:15 AM



if there is a god, that god should know exactly what it would take to change my mind...and that god should be capable of doing whatever it would take. The fact that this hasn't happened can only mean one of two things:
1. No such god exists.
2. Whatever god exists doesn't care to convince me, at this time.


Since all other evidence has fallen short, I go with option 1.


Why shall god change your mind......
...Just to prove his capability?

I can't tell you how many times I have been told that if I try god will reveal himself.


Is your mind an unique & universally acceptable entity?

Unique - Possibly
Universally acceptable entity - Nope


....some certifying agency??

Nope


Why shall he care to convince everyone for accepting his existence...particularly when he himself has created differently minded living beings..??

I have no idea. I'm not the one that thinks he exist, nor am I the one that thinks he has/will reveal himself, nor am I the one that thinks he wants to have a relationship with me.


Whatever our thoughts are....those are originated from the soul...no one has yet proved the existence of soul too....that invisible driving power too is god's gift to you & god is making you think that he doesn't exist.

Going with that logic, it would be god's will I don't believe in him. If that is the case then he should tell his followers to stop trying to convert me.

Rizun's photo
Thu 10/01/15 02:07 PM


I don't believe in god BECAUSE I don't feel it and it makes no logical sense to me. Religion to me has always been a part of society in some way, it's like the teddy bear I got when I was young. I can't imagine parting with it, but sooner or later I gotta grow up and give it up or pass it along, but I'll never stop loving it and I'm going to make damn sure the next owner will love it like I did. Like it's how we deal with emotionally difficult or wonderful things like death or birth. Religion has kind of become tradition.
I don't think most people care or believe what's going on when it's Christmas... or Easter... why would they.

Mostly though I think we do it out of fear, because it's so basic a feeling and therefore so powerful. Fear of the unknown.
Personally I have never felt so relieved when I figured out that there is nothing to fear.

Then again what god are we referring to
The christian god, or Odin, Allah, the Greek gods, a volcano, the sun or..



You are equating religion with God?


A castle is built around a king as is a religion around a god.
Learn about the castle, learn about the god.
May not tell you about the god specifically, but again... which god are we talking about.. old testament god.. greek gods.. which one.

mightymoe's photo
Thu 10/01/15 02:16 PM



if there is a god, that god should know exactly what it would take to change my mind...and that god should be capable of doing whatever it would take. The fact that this hasn't happened can only mean one of two things:
1. No such god exists.
2. Whatever god exists doesn't care to convince me, at this time.


Since all other evidence has fallen short, I go with option 1.


Why shall god change your mind......
...Just to prove his capability?

Is your mind an unique & universally acceptable entity?

....some certifying agency??

Why shall he care to convince everyone for accepting his existence...particularly when he himself has created differently minded living beings..??

Whatever our thoughts are....those are originated from the soul...no one has yet proved the existence of soul too....that invisible driving power too is god's gift to you & god is making you think that he doesn't exist.





what are you talking about? invisible power? whats the point of god making anyone think it doesn't exist when everything you've been taught about god says otherwise? it's this kind of made up philosophies that make my decisions easy....

no1phD's photo
Thu 10/01/15 02:56 PM
There is no God.. glad you finally came to that conclusion.. now maybe we can move on to more important things... like getting rid of the government..lol... and if there's any FBI agents reading this I'm only kidding I really really like the government:angel: :angel: :angel:

sybariticguy's photo
Thu 10/01/15 09:33 PM


Just to put my own side of this in:

I did not CHOOSE to believe that there is no God. Had I been able to CHOOSE, I would have chosen to believe.

I DISCOVERED that I did not "see" a god in any of what I experienced here.

And as a long time student and researcher of human behavior, I suggest that you recognize that when asked for explanations, it is very common for people to say what they think they should say, rather than what is actually true.

They aren't lying most of the time, per se, it's more that they are reacting to the various challenges they think they see in the asking of the question, and or trying to get something more from the situation than they have. i thought god was love....

Thus some self-proclaimed atheists might say they actively rejected God, as in frustration with the way His people behave, while others might claim atheism in hopes that God will notice and step in to reassure them or "buy them back." Still others will be worried about all the eager people who want to run everyone else's lives as God's self-appointed representatives, and will claim atheism as a defense against oppression.


I see your point.
Human disappointment and great expectations.
Kinda like why some people choose not to believe in love anymore.

Frankk1950's photo
Thu 10/01/15 11:46 PM

I have always wondered why god is so unwilling to make himself known to humanity .. To prove his existence .. And I believe it is because he is unable to do so bigsmile bigsmile

Why must belief in him be based on faith

Most would not believe in the Loch Ness monster or other mythical creatures based on faith .. Proof would be required .. Yet religious followers are willing to believe in god ... When there is no proof of his existence .


Because God has a sense of humour.If we knew for certain He existed then there would be nothing left to argue about.:smile:

no photo
Fri 10/02/15 03:01 AM

My statement here was on based on the accounts of the gods I have read about in many religious text over the years and about the god character in these text. For example, the bible says god is the highest good then he kills almost everyone on the planet. That is a combination of an absurdity, an immoral behavior, and a contradiction of himself. I would think that a book that is even inspired by god would be free of these contradictions.


are we talking about Noah and the flood, here?



I'm looking for anything that could not be explained by someone just writing a story.



you want to prove God as a scientifically reproducible concept?

i dunno...sometimes i think...if we want to prove anything as a scientifically reproducible concept...then that means we can induce it....

so to prove God as the same, you are saying that we can induce God?

so take for example the concepts of justice, love, integrity...etc...and their antitheses......to prove the existence of all of these, it should be explained by something that is not on the grounds of someone just writing a story about these things....that we would have to be able to show that these are reproducible and inducible, to say that they actually exist...otherwise, they really don't exist but are just figments of our overactive imagination...




I agree that god is used as an scapegoat. Of course the existence of god doesn't depend on what people do. However, when the people that are telling me god exist are the same people that treat others terribly it hurts the credibility of their claims.



well yes. because people are terribly terribly flawed.

say for example, if someone were to tell you and explain to you what virtue is, but live their life in vice, then does that mean that what they claim virtue to be is not credible?
same as with the opposite...if someone were to tell you how it is to be bad, but live their lives above par...does that mean their entire explanation of vice is not acceptable?

i dunno...it doesn't seem right, nor fair to judge God based on the credibility of people...people will always fall short, not just because of being flawed, but also because the person looking also has their own expectation of people.



Science is the only thing that has been proven time and time again to produce an accurate picture of reality. This is because of the self correcting nature of science. It would also stand to reason that any god that answers prayers would be messerable. Prayer could be shown to work statistically better than chance. However, when these studies have been done. Prayer does no better than chance.



i don't see it.
yes, science produce an accurate picture of the physical world we live in. all of it are governed by laws, and we did not know it first. it was set upon as such before we even knew of it.

hence, it becomes the question of what came first, the chicken or the egg.

you are saying that science came first, and we created the concept of God because of a lack of understanding in science...and the more we discover scientifically, the less is the power of God...

whereas the flipside is, God created it all, set with order and balance and such is what we discovered to be science...and the discoveries will be unending because we can only come to discover what has already been there since the beginning of time.

do you believe that it is possible for us to discover ALL that there is to be discovered in science to prove beyond doubt that God does not exist?


Most of the time that doesn't happen when they have been raised to question and examine everything.



i think, those who were raised to question and examine everything are probably more likely to find God...
whereas those who think that they have found all the answers they need, are the ones who won't bother too much to examine who God really is...


If god exist and wants to have a relationship with you. Wouldn't it make sense for him to first establish the fact that he exist?

Neither of your analogies are the same as what Mr. Dillahunty said. The child's parents have already been proven to exist as far as the child is concerned. Same goes for the toxic relationships analogy.

A closer analogy is like being in school and the boy that has never had a girlfriend says he has a girlfriend, but you wouldn't know her because she goes to another school. Then provides no other credible evidence. While it could be true, is anyone likely to believe him?


but you are already assuming that he doesn't have a girlfriend...lol...

i think he has been establishing that for sometime. but some people don't want to acknowledge it for what it is, and gives different meaning to it.

like say a guy who loves a girl and does what he can accordingly... she could ignore it completely, acknowledge that it is there but reject it, wait and see if she develops feelings, try to take advantage of him, learn to trust and love him as well....or whatever else she chooses to do in between.

its a two way street...recognition is part of it.

no photo
Fri 10/02/15 03:06 AM



I don't believe in god BECAUSE I don't feel it and it makes no logical sense to me. Religion to me has always been a part of society in some way, it's like the teddy bear I got when I was young. I can't imagine parting with it, but sooner or later I gotta grow up and give it up or pass it along, but I'll never stop loving it and I'm going to make damn sure the next owner will love it like I did. Like it's how we deal with emotionally difficult or wonderful things like death or birth. Religion has kind of become tradition.
I don't think most people care or believe what's going on when it's Christmas... or Easter... why would they.

Mostly though I think we do it out of fear, because it's so basic a feeling and therefore so powerful. Fear of the unknown.
Personally I have never felt so relieved when I figured out that there is nothing to fear.

Then again what god are we referring to
The christian god, or Odin, Allah, the Greek gods, a volcano, the sun or..



You are equating religion with God?


A castle is built around a king as is a religion around a god.
Learn about the castle, learn about the god.
May not tell you about the god specifically, but again... which god are we talking about.. old testament god.. greek gods.. which one.


:laughing:

well...just one God for me...lol...
i try to learn about him not basing on religion, but i do use the bible as reference

no photo
Fri 10/02/15 03:08 AM

I have always wondered why god is so unwilling to make himself known to humanity .. To prove his existence .. And I believe it is because he is unable to do so bigsmile bigsmile

Why must belief in him be based on faith

Most would not believe in the Loch Ness monster or other mythical creatures based on faith .. Proof would be required .. Yet religious followers are willing to believe in god ... When there is no proof of his existence .



what proof are you looking for?

rug212001's photo
Fri 10/02/15 12:22 PM


My statement here was on based on the accounts of the gods I have read about in many religious text over the years and about the god character in these text. For example, the bible says god is the highest good then he kills almost everyone on the planet. That is a combination of an absurdity, an immoral behavior, and a contradiction of himself. I would think that a book that is even inspired by god would be free of these contradictions.

are we talking about Noah and the flood, here?

Yes, that was the reference. Though it is by no means the only one I could point to.


I'm looking for anything that could not be explained by someone just writing a story.

you want to prove God as a scientifically reproducible concept?

Anything that exist can be proven to exist.

i dunno...sometimes i think...if we want to prove anything as a scientifically reproducible concept...then that means we can induce it....

Observation is a huge part of science. Much like studying apes in the wild you don't have to interact or induce anything. Just watch and see what happens. In fact, you are doing science wrong if you are inducing the outcome.

so to prove God as the same, you are saying that we can induce God?

No, I'm saying if prayer worked then it would do statistically better than chance. Which it has failed over and over.

so take for example the concepts of justice, love, integrity...etc...and their antitheses......to prove the existence of all of these, it should be explained by something that is not on the grounds of someone just writing a story about these things....that we would have to be able to show that these are reproducible and inducible, to say that they actually exist...otherwise, they really don't exist but are just figments of our overactive imagination...

Are you saying god is just a concept? If so, then it doesn't matter if I believe it or not as it was made up to begin with. Just like every other concept out there.


I agree that god is used as an scapegoat. Of course the existence of god doesn't depend on what people do. However, when the people that are telling me god exist are the same people that treat others terribly it hurts the credibility of their claims.

well yes. because people are terribly terribly flawed.

say for example, if someone were to tell you and explain to you what virtue is, but live their life in vice, then does that mean that what they claim virtue to be is not credible?
same as with the opposite...if someone were to tell you how it is to be bad, but live their lives above par...does that mean their entire explanation of vice is not acceptable?

i dunno...it doesn't seem right, nor fair to judge God based on the credibility of people...people will always fall short, not just because of being flawed, but also because the person looking also has their own expectation of people.

So you are telling me that I should believe a claim made by person that has a history of lying without evidence? That would be completely illogical. Someone's character does not make their claim true or false. However, it can help or hurt their credibility. Even if it's the best person in the world, god existing would be an extraordinary claim. Like Carl Sagan said. "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence"


Science is the only thing that has been proven time and time again to produce an accurate picture of reality. This is because of the self correcting nature of science. It would also stand to reason that any god that answers prayers would be messerable. Prayer could be shown to work statistically better than chance. However, when these studies have been done. Prayer does no better than chance.

i don't see it.
yes, science produce an accurate picture of the physical world we live in. all of it are governed by laws, and we did not know it first. it was set upon as such before we even knew of it.

hence, it becomes the question of what came first, the chicken or the egg.

Science has answered that one. The Tyrannosaurus Rex wish is almost an exact genetic match with chickens.

you are saying that science came first, and we created the concept of God because of a lack of understanding in science...and the more we discover scientifically, the less is the power of God...

The fact of reality came first. We are just stumbling through time trying to figure out what the hell is going on. Religion came about as a way to explain things. However, some people realised saying god did it doesn't give you an real understanding of what is going on. Since humans are curious creatures we look for the answers. Science is nothing the than the proven method to get valid answers.

whereas the flipside is, God created it all, set with order and balance and such is what we discovered to be science...and the discoveries will be unending because we can only come to discover what has already been there since the beginning of time.

If that is the case, then there should be evidence of it somewhere. Maybe it's only a matter of time before we find it. Maybe we never will. Until we find some, then I'm not going to accept a claim without it.

do you believe that it is possible for us to discover ALL that there is to be discovered in science to prove beyond doubt that God does not exist?

Not in any foreseeable future. I would put that up there as a possibility on the same level as god existing. Though enough lack of evidence is a kind of evidence itself. Though, it is impossible to prove a negative.


Most of the time that doesn't happen when they have been raised to question and examine everything.

i think, those who were raised to question and examine everything are probably more likely to find God...
whereas those who think that they have found all the answers they need, are the ones who won't bother too much to examine who God really is...

I'm rather sure you have that backwards because of the lack of evidence for god's existence.


If god exist and wants to have a relationship with you. Wouldn't it make sense for him to first establish the fact that he exist?

Neither of your analogies are the same as what Mr. Dillahunty said. The child's parents have already been proven to exist as far as the child is concerned. Same goes for the toxic relationships analogy.

A closer analogy is like being in school and the boy that has never had a girlfriend says he has a girlfriend, but you wouldn't know her because she goes to another school. Then provides no other credible evidence. While it could be true, is anyone likely to believe him?


but you are already assuming that he doesn't have a girlfriend...lol...

i think he has been establishing that for sometime. but some people don't want to acknowledge it for what it is, and gives different meaning to it.

Do you have any evidence to back that claim up?

like say a guy who loves a girl and does what he can accordingly... she could ignore it completely, acknowledge that it is there but reject it, wait and see if she develops feelings, try to take advantage of him, learn to trust and love him as well....or whatever else she chooses to do in between.

But at least she would know he exist. When you love someone you tend to want them to know you exist.

its a two way street...recognition is part of it.

That is exactly what I have been attempting to do most of my life. Recognize reality for what it is. If that includes god. Fine, but I need evidence to make me believe it. Just like I didn't believe two objects of different sizes would fall to the ground and hit at the same time in a vacuum until it was shown to me.

One of my many goals in life is to rid myself of all false beliefs. That simply means I need evidence to believe anything. Since I have found none for god, I don't believe in god. Much like, I didn't find any evidence for the tooth fairy, so I don't believe in the tooth fairy.

mightymoe's photo
Fri 10/02/15 12:50 PM




lol, thats my point, there is no point to any of it... someone says "this is what god/allah/buddha/whoever wants", i'm just supposed to say "oh, ok, i'll do whatever you want"... why would god talk with anyone else? if a god wanted me to believe, then a god needs to see me in person, not send a "representative"... so that being said, no one can convince me with words, other than a god itself...


So the issue is more because you dont see reason to believe in what people have to say about God.
You want him to be the one who would actually talk to you about himself.


"people" have no better Idea about god than i do... if god is talking to them, then it has obviously has nothing to say to me... so what people say doesn't matter at all, especially when i hear the ridiculous babble some of the say...

yellowrose10's photo
Fri 10/02/15 12:58 PM
People believe what they believe and can't convice them otherwise....on any side