100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: A Desperate Agenda | |
|---|---|
|
|
 When is the last time a Democrat said anything about an idea to solve any of the problems our country is facing? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The dems are getting dirtier, and dirtier. Bet they toss her aside like an old rag once this is finished 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is Trump a Dem?
lol. all those resources he was born into and didn't even get beyond third grade vocabulary. Pretty unbelievable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is Trump a Dem? lol. all those resources he was born into and didn't even get beyond third grade vocabulary. Pretty unbelievable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. I noticed it is why we hardly SEE Trump anymore, maybe because the reality of how incompetent he is is harder to hide. So we hear only in snippets and internet claims how much he is doing, but by the same people who keep pretending that avoiding a DEPRESSION was not doing much of anything at all.
So I wouldn't exactly trust the judgment there. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. I noticed it is why we hardly SEE Trump anymore, maybe because the reality of how incompetent he is is harder to hide. So we hear only in snippets and internet claims how much he is doing, but by the same people who keep pretending that avoiding a DEPRESSION was not doing much of anything at all.
So I wouldn't exactly trust the judgment there. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wasn't it just last week he gave a long speech about trade and of course questions about k? He said plenty of time to reporters. I don't see him shying away from media.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Charles1962150
on
Sun 09/30/18 12:39 PM
|
|
Nominee's attack on Democrats poses risk to Supreme Court
"WASHINGTON (AP) — Brett Kavanaugh's angry denunciation of Senate Democrats at his confirmation hearing could reinforce views of the Supreme Court as a political institution at a time of stark partisan division and when the court already is sharply split between liberals and conservatives". http://apnews.com/8ef877d649a3448f9d270e975932ee81 Let's blame the Democrats for everything. Take no fault for anything. Blame the Democrats for his alleged attack on a woman. It's the Democrats fault that he allegedly held a woman down, covered her mouth and tried to rip her clothes off. The Democrats made him do it. You know this wanting to blame Democrats for everything real and imagined, (mostly imagined or made up) is getting old. Republicans never seem to want to take the blame for anything they do. Trump has proven that. Now here is another one. Take no blame. Just attack and deny. Which really does nothing but make him look even more guilty. If you can't prove what you say without an angry outburst, you make yourself look even more guilty. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the excessive thirst and delicate temper can be signs of alcoholism(or recovering alcoholism) ... j/s
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is Trump a Dem? lol. all those resources he was born into and didn't even get beyond third grade vocabulary. Pretty unbelievable. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the excessive thirst and delicate temper can be signs of alcoholism(or recovering alcoholism) ... j/s Thirsty could also be caused by nerves. I'll give him that much. But all the outburst, that's a classic sign of alcohol withdrawal. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Groupthink is third grade. Grown ups think for themselves without need to just regurgitate slogans and cliches.
Trump, whatever perception one has about him, makes TRUMP look like TRUMP. period. People speak volumes about THEMSELF through actions and words, not much about anyone else. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is Trump a Dem? lol. all those resources he was born into and didn't even get beyond third grade vocabulary. Pretty unbelievable. He graduated with honors from the Whorton School which is one of the most prestigious business schools in the country. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's people who are following the same thinking as the media who are sheep.
K is completely normal for being upset that a scammer has ruined his reputation and put his family through hell. I would say he was very controlled considering the circumstances. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am not sure that having those types of nerves under questioning is a good trait for a SCOTUS nominee.
I am also not aware of any source that claims Trump graduated from anywhere 'with honors', just that he managed to graduate, which could mean anything from a C average to above. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am not sure that having those types of nerves under questioning is a good trait for a SCOTUS nominee.
I am also not aware of any source that claims Trump graduated from anywhere 'with honors', just that he managed to graduate, which could mean anything from a C average to above. http://www.thedp.com/article/2017/02/trump-academics-at-wharton 1968 Wharton graduate Jon Hillsberg added that there was no indication on the 1968 Commencement Program that Trump graduated with any honors. A copy of the program acquired from the Penn Archives lists 20 Wharton award and prize recipients, 15 *** laude recipients, four magna *** laude recipients and two summa *** laude recipients for the Class of 1968. Trump’s name appears nowhere on those lists. “If he had done well, his name would have shown up,” Foxman said. Given that there are 366 listed 1968 Wharton graduates on QuakerNet, Penn’s alumni database, the Dean’s List of 56 students represents approximately the top 15 percent of the class. The omission of Trump’s name suggests that his academic record at Penn was not as outstanding as he has claimed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am not sure that having those types of nerves under questioning is a good trait for a SCOTUS nominee. I am also not aware of any source that claims Trump graduated from anywhere 'with honors', just that he managed to graduate, which could mean anything from a C average to above. http://www.thedp.com/article/2017/02/trump-academics-at-wharton 1968 Wharton graduate Jon Hillsberg added that there was no indication on the 1968 Commencement Program that Trump graduated with any honors. A copy of the program acquired from the Penn Archives lists 20 Wharton award and prize recipients, 15 *** laude recipients, four magna *** laude recipients and two summa *** laude recipients for the Class of 1968. Trump’s name appears nowhere on those lists. “If he had done well, his name would have shown up,” Foxman said. Given that there are 366 listed 1968 Wharton graduates on QuakerNet, Penn’s alumni database, the Dean’s List of 56 students represents approximately the top 15 percent of the class. The omission of Trump’s name suggests that his academic record at Penn was not as outstanding as he has claimed. Do you think he has done well for himself? You are trying to paint him as an underachiever and failing. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think the hoops are well called for, for the mere fact of the GAIN to be had, having authority that is SUPREME over the lives of others, and a pay of a quarter mill a year FOR LIFE> Im glad we have a SCOTUS in our judicial branch of the government. I am not sure we can call anything 'embarassing' anymore with a straight face. There is just to much juvenile, bullying and insensitive speech becoming our 'norm', that the line of 'embarassing' has become at best a very jagged and hard to define one. I seriously doubt that any of the last few candidates were in it for the money. They were all very well established. I feel that going forward many very qualified people will decline as opposed to their reputation being dragged thru the mud. And for the strain it puts on their family. I really Don't think $250,000 is alot of money to these people. They most likely make that or more already. The Dems created this Fiasco. And it is a major embarrassment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. TRump has done very well for himself financially. Sometimes Charletons do that.
He has not failed at all as a con/sales man. as to the SCOTUS. Not many have a quarter mill GUARANTEED FOR A LIFETIME AND a supreme authority over the interpretation of others right. THey should get the most upright of the upright, and they should have those that are the most beyond reproach, not perfect, but definitely those the MOST beyond should be there above those with scandal regarding rights of others. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here's the way it is, Nothing has been proven or disproven. If they go ahead and confirm him now without concrete evidence proving him innocent, They will once again be screwing themselves. The way most people will look at it, they are railroading him in. Right now there is a big black cloud of doubt hanging over this guy. Confirming now is the same thing as saying it's OK. A justice is supposed to be beyond reproach. But without a full investigation, no one will ever really know. If they confirm him now without all the evidence in, It will be seen as a Republican-led coverup. “Evidence proving him innocent” I thought in this country we were innocent until proven guilty? |
|
|
|
|
